Hybrid heat-source solid-state additive manufacturing of 5A06 deposition with favorable mechanical and electrochemical performance
Source abstract
Abstract
The HHSAMed 5A06 deposition, produced through hybrid heat-source solid-state additive manufacturing (HHSAM), demonstrates a more uniform microstructure and enhanced microhardness, with a measured value of 89.9 HV0.5. Additionally, it exhibits superior mechanical properties, including increased yield strength (YS), ultimate tensile strength (UTS), and elongation (EL) in both the longitudinal direction (YS-238.3 MPa, UTS-358.1 MPa, EL-27.5%) and the building direction (YS-184.0 MPa, UTS-324.5 MPa, EL-25.7%).The heat-source enhances the material flow behavior and the interlayer bonding strength among the stacking layers, excluding the effects of grain refinement and precipitate strengthening. It demonstrates superior corrosion resistance relative to the AFSD deposition and 5A06 feedstock, attributed to the most stable passive film, a greater concentration of Al 6 (Fe,Mn) and the lack of Al 3 Mg 2 .
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · High Entropy Alloys Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Phillips, B. J. et al. Microstructure-deformation relationship of additive friction stir-deposition Al-Mg-Si. Mater 7, 100387 (2019).
2. Griffiths, R. et al. A perspective on solid-state additive manufacturing of aluminum matrix composites using MELD. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 28, 648–656 (2018).10.1007/s11665-018-3649-3 ↗
3. Robinson, T. W. et al. Microstructural and mechanical properties of a solid-state additive manufactured magnesium alloy. J. Manuf. Sci. 144, 061013 (2022).10.1115/1.4052968 ↗
4. Rivera, O. G. et al. Microstructures and mechanical behavior of Inconel 625 fabricated by solid-state additive manufacturing. Mate. Sci. Eng. A 694, 1–9 (2017).10.1016/j.msea.2017.03.105 ↗
5. Avery, D. Z. et al. Fatigue behavior of solid-state additive manufactured inconel 625. Jom 70, 2475–2484 (2018).10.1007/s11837-018-3114-7 ↗
6. Griffiths, R. J. et al. Solid-state additive manufacturing of aluminum and copper using additive friction stir deposition: Process-microstructure linkages. Materialia 15, 100967 (2021).10.1016/j.mtla.2020.100967 ↗
7. Yu, H. Z. et al. Non-beam-based metal additive manufacturing enabled by additive friction stir deposition. Scr. Mater. 153, 122–130 (2018).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.03.025 ↗
8. Khodabakhshi, F. & Gerlich, A. P. Potentials and strategies of solid-state additive friction-stir manufacturing technology: A critical review. J. Manuf. Process. 36, 77–92 (2018).10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.09.030 ↗
9. Du, J. et al. Effect on microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir welded 5A06 aluminum alloy joints by deep cryogenic treatment. Mater. Res. Express 11, 046514 (2024).10.1088/2053-1591/ad3d34 ↗
10. Wang, J. et al. Corrosion mechanism of 5083 aluminum alloy in seawater containing phosphate. J. Ocean U. China 20, 372–382 (2021).10.1007/s11802-021-4545-2 ↗
11. Li, S. M., Li, Y. D., Zhang, Y., Liu, J. H. & Yu, M. Effect of intermetallic phases on the anodic oxidation and corrosion of 5A06 aluminum alloy. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 22, 167–174 (2015).10.1007/s12613-015-1057-3 ↗
12. Ambrosio, D., Wagner, V., Dessein, G., Vivas, J. & Cahuc, O. Machine learning tools for flow-related defects detection in friction stir welding. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 15, 1–15 (2023).
13. Sun, Y. F., Shen, J. M., Morisada, Y. & Fujii, H. Spot friction stir welding of low carbon steel plates preheated by high frequency induction. Mater. Des. 54, 450–457 (2014).10.1016/j.matdes.2013.08.071 ↗
14. Gotawala, N. & Hang, Z. Y. Material flow path and extreme thermomechanical processing history during additive friction stir deposition. J. Manuf. Process. 101, 114–127 (2023).10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.05.095 ↗
15. Chen, S., Li, X., Jiang, X., Yuan, T. & Hu, Y. The effect of microstructure on the mechanical properties of friction stir welded 5A06 Al Alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 735, 382–393 (2018).10.1016/j.msea.2018.08.020 ↗
16. Li, H., Lin, J., Dean, T. A., Wen, S. W. & Bannister, A. C. Modelling mechanical property recovery of a linepipe steel in annealing process. Int. J. Plast. 25, 1049–1065 (2009).10.1016/j.ijplas.2008.09.001 ↗
17. Avery, D. Z. et al. Influence of grain refinement and microstructure on fatigue behavior for solid-state additively manufactured Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 51, 2778–2795 (2020).10.1007/s11661-020-05746-9 ↗
18. Sundar, A. S., Kar, A., Mugada, K. K. & Kumar, A. Enhancement of microstructure, microtexture, and mechanical properties of Al6061 friction stir welds using the developed static shoulder welding tool. Mater. Charact. 203, 113148 (2023).10.1016/j.matchar.2023.113148 ↗
19. Machado, D. C. et al. Influence of processing temperature on microhardness evolution, microstructure and superplastic behaviour in an AleMg alloy processed by high-pressure torsion. J. Mater. Res. Texhnol. 24, 2867 (2023).
20. Wang, B. et al. Effects of different friction stir welding processes on residual stress and deformation of Ti62A alloy joints. J. Mater. Process. Tech. 26, 6096–6107 (2023).
21. Chen, L. et al. Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of multilayer AA6061 alloy fabricated by additive friction stir deposition. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 16, 1–16 (2024).
22. Liu, D., Lai, X., Huang, Z., Yang, L. & Zhou, K. Study on hot deformation behavior and processing maps of cobalt-based superalloy GH5188. Adv. Eng. Mater. 26, 230167 (2024).
23. Gao, J. et al. Improving the weld formation and mechanical properties of the AA-5A06 friction pull plug welds by axial force control. Acta Metall. Sin. 33, 828–838 (2020).10.1007/s40195-020-01015-1 ↗
24. Gao, W. et al. Precipitation Behavior and Corrosion Properties of Stirred Zone in FSWed AA5083 Al-Mg Alloy after Sensitization. Metals 13, 1618 (2023).10.3390/met13091618 ↗
25. Huang, Y. & Humphreys, F. J. The effect of solutes on grain boundary mobility during recrystallization and grain growth in some single-phase aluminium alloys. Mater. Chem. Phys. 132, 166–174 (2012).10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.11.018 ↗
26. Chen, R. Y., Chu, H. Y., Lai, C. C. & Wu, C. T. Effects of annealing temperature on the mechanical properties and sensitization of 5083-H116 aluminum alloy. P. I. Mech. Eng. L, 229, 339–346 (2015).
27. Tian, N. et al. The formation of three phases containing Fe and Mn in 5182 aluminum alloy. Mater. Character 207, 113497 (2024).10.1016/j.matchar.2023.113497 ↗
28. Zhou, X., Zhao, Y., Tian, S., Liu, T. & Zhan, X. Investigation on laser-MIG hybrid-welded joint for 5A06 aluminum alloy: effect of the laser heat input on grain size and microhardness. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 36, 437–452 (2022).10.1080/01694243.2021.1924002 ↗
29. Gao, J. et al. Improving the weld formation and mechanical properties of the AA-5A06 friction pull plug welds by axial force control. Acta Metall. Sin.-Engl. 33, 828–838 (2020).10.1007/s40195-020-01015-1 ↗
30. Reilly, A., Shercliff, H., Chen, Y. & Prangnell, P. Modelling and visualisation of material flow in friction stir spot welding. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 225, 473–484 (2015).10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.06.021 ↗
31. Pan, J., Thierry, D. & Leygraf, C. Hydrogen peroxide toward enhanced oxide growth on titanium in PBS solution: blue coloration and clinical relevance. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 30, 393–402 (1996).10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199603)30:3<393::AID-JBM14>3.0.CO;2-L ↗
32. de Assis, S. L., Wolynec, S. & Costa, I. Corrosion characterization of titanium alloys by electrochemical techniques. Electrochim. Acta 51, 1815–1819 (2006).10.1016/j.electacta.2005.02.121 ↗
33. Orlikowski, J., Ryl, J., Jarzynka, M., Krakowiak, S. & Darowicki, K. Instantaneous impedance monitoring of aluminum alloy 7075 corrosion in borate buffer with admixed chloride ions. Corros 71, 828–838 (2015).10.5006/1546 ↗
34. da Silva, R. M. P. et al. The local electrochemical behavior of the AA2098-T351 and surface preparation effects investigated by scanning electrochemical microscopy. Surf. Interface Anal. 51, 982–992 (2019).10.1002/sia.6682 ↗
35. Jafarzadeh, K., Shahrabi, T. & Hosseini, M. G. EIS study on pitting corrosion of AA5083-H321 aluminum-magnesium alloy in stagnant 3.5% NaCl solution. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 24, 215–219 (2008).
36. Ji, Y., Hu, Q., Xia, D. H. & Luo, J. L. Corrosion susceptibility of passive films on 1060, 2024, and 5083 aluminum alloys: experimental study and first-principles calculations. J. Electrochem. Soc. 170, 041505 (2023).10.1149/1945-7111/accab8 ↗
37. Duan, T. et al. Long-term localized corrosion behaviors of 5A06 aluminum alloys exposed in the natural deep-sea environment of South China Sea. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 20, 4597–4607 (2022).10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.09.014 ↗
38. Wang, X. et al. Thermal stability of refined Al6 (Fe,Mn) phase formed in laser powder bed fusion process. J. Alloy. Compd. 17, 174593 (2024).10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.174593 ↗
39. Qiao, Q. et al. Hybrid heat-source solid-state additive manufacturing: A novel method to fabricate high performance AA6061 deposition. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 228, 107–124 (2025).10.1016/j.jmst.2024.11.079 ↗
40. Qiao, Q. et al. A comparative study of machine learning in predicting the mechanical properties of the deposited AA6061 alloys via additive friction stir deposition, MGEA 31, (2024).10.1002/mgea.31 ↗
41. Qiao, Q. et al. In-Situ monitoring of additive friction stir deposition of AA6061: Effect of layer thickness on the microstructure and mechanical properties. Addit. Manuf. 84, 104141 (2024).
42. ASTM. Standard Practice for Determining Average Grain Size Using Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD) in Fully Recrystallized Polycrystalline Materials; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 1–5 (2014).
43. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Strain-Controlled Fatigue Testing; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 1–16 (2017).
44. Filot´as, D. et al. Double barrel microelectrode assembly to prevent electrical field effects in potentiometric SECM imaging of galvanic corrosion processes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, C270 (2018).10.1149/2.0671805jes ↗
45. Polcari, D., Dauphin-Ducharme, P. & Mauzeroll, J. Scanning electrochemical microscopy: a comprehensive review of experimental parameters from 1989 to 2015. Chem. Rev. 116, 13234–13278 (2018).10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00067 ↗