Predicting the dissolution kinetics of silicate glasses by topology-informed machine learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Machine learning (ML) regression methods are promising tools to develop models predicting the properties of materials by learning from existing databases. However, although ML models are usually good at interpolating data, they often do not offer reliable extrapolations and can violate the laws of physics. Here, to address the limitations of traditional ML, we introduce a “topology-informed ML” paradigm—wherein some features of the network topology (rather than traditional descriptors) are used as fingerprint for ML models—and apply this method to predict the forward (stage I) dissolution rate of a series of silicate glasses. We demonstrate that relying on a topological description of the atomic network (i) increases the accuracy of the predictions, (ii) enhances the simplicity and interpretability of the predictive models, (iii) reduces the need for large training sets, and (iv) improves the ability of the models to extrapolate predictions far from their training sets. As such, topology-informed ML can overcome the limitations facing traditional ML (e.g., accuracy vs. simplicity tradeoff) and offers a promising route to predict the properties of materials in a robust fashion.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Theoretical and Computational Physics · Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Mauro, J. C., Tandia, A., Vargheese, K. D., Mauro, Y. Z. & Smedskjaer, M. M. Accelerating the design of functional glasses through modeling. Chem. Mater. 28, 4267–4277 (2016).10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01054 ↗
2. Brauer, D. S., Rüssel, C. & Kraft, J. Solubility of glasses in the system P2O5–CaO–MgO–Na2O–TiO2: experimental and modeling using artificial neural networks. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 353, 263–270 (2007).10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.12.005 ↗
3. Cassar, D. R., de Carvalho, A. C. P. L. F. & Zanotto, E. D. Predicting glass transition temperatures using neural networks. Acta Mater. 159, 249–256 (2018).10.1016/j.actamat.2018.08.022 ↗
4. Yang, K. et al. Prediction of silicate glasses’ stiffness by high-throughput molecular dynamics simulations and machine learning. arXiv:1901.09323 [cond-mat, physics:physics] (2019).10.1038/s41598-019-45344-3 ↗
5. Anoop Krishnan, N. M. et al. Predicting the dissolution kinetics of silicate glasses using machine learning. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 487, 37–45 (2018).10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.02.023 ↗
6. Onbaşlı, M. C., Tandia, A. & Mauro, J. C. Mechanical and Compositional Design of High-Strength Corning Gorilla® Glass. in Handbook of Materials Modeling: Applications: Current and Emerging Materials (eds Andreoni, W. & Yip, S.) 1–23 (Springer International Publishing, 2018).10.1007/978-3-319-50257-1_100-1 ↗
7. Cubuk, E. D. et al. Structure-property relationships from universal signatures of plasticity in disordered solids. Science 358, 1033–1037 (2017).10.1126/science.aai8830 ↗
8. Lookman, T., Alexander, F. & Rajan, K. Information science for materials discovery and design. (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015).10.1007/978-3-319-23871-5 ↗
9. Bishop, C. M. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. (Springer, New York, 2006).
10. Alpaydin, E. Introduction to Machine Learning. (MIT Press, 2014).
11. Gubernatis, J. E. & Lookman, T. Machine learning in materials design and discovery: examples from the present and suggestions for the future. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 120301 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.120301 ↗
12. Ramprasad, R., Batra, R., Pilania, G., Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, A. & Kim, C. Machine learning in materials informatics: recent applications and prospects. Npj Comput. Mater. 3, 54 (2017).10.1038/s41524-017-0056-5 ↗
13. Ghiringhelli, L. M., Vybiral, J., Levchenko, S. V., Draxl, C. & Scheffler, M. Big data of materials science: critical role of the descriptor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 105503 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.105503 ↗
14. Vienna, J. D., Ryan, J. V., Gin, S. & Inagaki, Y. Current understanding and remaining challenges in modeling long-term degradation of borosilicate nuclear waste glasses. Int. J. Appl. Glass Sci. 4, 283–294 (2013).10.1111/ijag.12050 ↗
15. Grambow, B. Nuclear waste glasses - how durable? Elements 2, 357–364 (2006).10.2113/gselements.2.6.357 ↗
16. Jantzen, C. M., Brown, K. G. & Pickett, J. B. Durable glass for thousands of years. Int. J. Appl. Glass Sci. 1, 38–62 (2010).10.1111/j.2041-1294.2010.00007.x ↗
17. Collin, M. et al. Structure of international simple glass and properties of passivating layer formed in circumneutral pH conditions. Npj Mater. Degrad. 2, 4 (2018).10.1038/s41529-017-0025-y ↗
18. Helgeson, H. C., Murphy, W. M. & Aagaard, P. Thermodynamic and kinetic constraints on reaction rates among minerals and aqueous solutions. II. Rate constants, effective surface area, and the hydrolysis of feldspar. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 48, 2405–2432 (1984).10.1016/0016-7037(84)90294-1 ↗
19. Doremus, R. H. Diffusion-controlled reaction of water with glass. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 55, 143–147 (1983).10.1016/0022-3093(83)90014-5 ↗
20. Christie, J. K., Ainsworth, R. I. & de Leeuw, N. H. Investigating structural features which control the dissolution of bioactive phosphate glasses: beyond the network connectivity. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 432, 321–34.10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.01.016 ↗
21. Bauchy, M. Deciphering the atomic genome of glasses by topological constraint theory and molecular dynamics: sa review. Comput. Mater. Sci. 159, 95–102 (2019).10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.12.004 ↗
22. Mauro, J. C. Decoding the glass genome. Curr. Opin. Solid St. Mater. Sci. 22, 58–64 (2018).10.1016/j.cossms.2017.09.001 ↗
23. Varshneya, A. K. Fundamentals of Inorganic Glasses (Academic Press Inc, 1993).10.1016/B978-0-08-057150-8.50025-2 ↗
24. Hamilton, J. P. & Pantano, C. G. Effects of glass structure on the corrosion behavior of sodium-aluminosilicate glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 222, 167–174 (1997).10.1016/S0022-3093(97)00395-5 ↗
25. Mysen, B. O. & Richet, P. Silicate Glasses and Melts: Properties and Structure (Elsevier, 2005).
26. Hamilton, J. P. Corrosion behavior of sodium aluminosilicate glasses and crystals (1999).
27. Hamilton, J. P., Pantano, C. G. & Brantley, S. L. Dissolution of albite glass and crystal. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 64, 2603–2615 (2000).10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00388-4 ↗
28. Hamilton, J. P., Brantley, S. L., Pantano, C. G., Criscenti, L. J. & Kubicki, J. D. Dissolution of nepheline, jadeite and albite glasses: toward better models for aluminosilicate dissolution. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 65, 3683–3702 (2001).10.1016/S0016-7037(01)00724-4 ↗
29. Li, M.-F., Tang, X.-P., Wu, W. & Liu, H.-B. General models for estimating daily global solar radiation for different solar radiation zones in mainland China. Energy Convers. Manage. 70, 139–148 (2013).10.1016/j.enconman.2013.03.004 ↗
30. Vienna, J. D., Neeway, J. J., Ryan, J. V. & Kerisit, S. N. Impacts of glass composition, pH, and temperature on glass forward dissolution rate. Npj Mater. Degrad. 2, 22 (2018).10.1038/s41529-018-0042-5 ↗
31. Pignatelli, I., Kumar, A., Bauchy, M. & Sant, G. Topological control on silicates’ dissolution kinetics. Langmuir 32, 4434–4439 (2016).10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b00359 ↗
32. Pierce, E. M., Rodriguez, E. A., Calligan, L. J., Shaw, W. J. & Pete McGrail, B. An experimental study of the dissolution rates of simulated aluminoborosilicate waste glasses as a function of pH and temperature under dilute conditions. Appl. Geochem. 23, 2559–2573 (2008).10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.05.006 ↗
33. Mascaraque, N. et al. Dissolution kinetics of hot compressed oxide glasses. J. Phys. Chem. B 121, 9063–9072 (2017).10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b04535 ↗
34. Aagaard, P. & Helgeson, H. C. Thermodynamic and kinetic constraints on reaction rates among minerals and aqueous solutions; I,theoretical considerations. Am. J. Sci. 282, 237–285 (1982).10.2475/ajs.282.3.237 ↗
35. Mauro, J. C. Topological constraint theory of glass. Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 90, 7 (2011).
36. Phillips, J. C. Topology of covalent non-crystalline solids .1. Short-range order in chalcogenide alloys. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 34, 153–181 (1979).10.1016/0022-3093(79)90033-4 ↗
37. Phillips, J. C. Topology of covalent non-crystalline solids II: medium-range order in chalcogenide alloys and As-Si-Ge. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 43, 37–77 (1981).10.1016/0022-3093(81)90172-1 ↗
38. Smedskjaer, M. M., Mauro, J. C. & Yue, Y. Prediction of glass hardness using temperature-dependent constraint theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 115503 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.115503 ↗
39. Bauchy, M. et al. Fracture toughness anomalies: viewpoint of topological constraint theory. Acta Mater. 121, 234–239 (2016).10.1016/j.actamat.2016.09.004 ↗
40. Bauchy, M. et al. Topological control on the structural relaxation of atomic networks under stress. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 035502 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.035502 ↗
41. Gupta, P. K. & Mauro, J. C. Composition dependence of glass transition temperature and fragility. I. A topological model incorporating temperature-dependent constraints. J. Chem. Phys. 130, 094503-094503–094503-094508 (2009).10.1063/1.3077168 ↗
42. Mauro, J. C., Gupta, P. K. & Loucks, R. J. Composition dependence of glass transition temperature and fragility. II. A topological model of alkali borate liquids. J. Chem. Phys. 130, 234503-234503–234503-234508 (2009).10.1063/1.3152432 ↗
43. Yang, K. et al. Prediction of the Young’s modulus of silicate glasses by topological constraint theory. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 514, 15–19 (2019).10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.03.033 ↗
44. Pignatelli, I. et al. Direct experimental evidence for differing reactivity alterations of minerals following irradiation: the case of calcite and wquartz. Sci. Rep. 6, 20155 (2016).10.1038/srep20155 ↗
45. Oey, T. et al. Topological controls on the dissolution kinetics of glassy aluminosilicates. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 100, 5521–5527 (2017).10.1111/jace.15122 ↗
46. Oey, T. et al. Rate controls on silicate dissolution in cementitious environments. RILEM Tech. Lett. 2, 67–73 (2017).10.21809/rilemtechlett.2017.35 ↗
47. Oey, T. et al. The role of the network-modifier’s field-strength in the chemical durability of aluminoborate glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 505, 279–285 (2019).10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.11.019 ↗
48. Hsiao, Y.-H. et al. Effects of irradiation on Albite’s chemical durability. J. Phys. Chem. A 121, 7835–7845 (2017).10.1021/acs.jpca.7b05098 ↗
49. Mascaraque, N., Bauchy, M. & Smedskjaer, M. M. Correlating the network topology of oxide glasses with their chemical durability. J. Phys. Chem. B 121, 1139–1147 (2017).10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b11371 ↗
50. Hsiao, Y.-H. et al. Role of electrochemical surface potential and irradiation on garnet-type almandine’s dissolution kinetics. J. Phys. Chem. C. 122, 17268–17277 (2018).10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b04459 ↗
51. Aragones, E., Gilboa, I., Postlewaite, A. & Schmeidler, D. Accuracy vs. s implicity: sa complex trade-off. SSRN Electron. J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.332382 (2002).10.2139/ssrn.332382 ↗
52. Tibshirani, R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 58, 267–288 (1996).10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x ↗
53. Gardner, M. W. & Dorling, S. R. Artificial neural networks (the multilayer perceptron)—a review of applications in the atmospheric sciences. Atmos. Environ. 32, 2627–2636 (1998).10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00447-0 ↗
54. Rasmussen, C. E. & Williams, C. K. I. Gaussian processes for machine learning. (MIT Press, 2008).
55. Bauchy, M. Structural, vibrational, and elastic properties of a calcium aluminosilicate glass from molecular dynamics simulations: the role of the potential. J. Chem. Phys. 141, 024507 (2014).10.1063/1.4886421 ↗
56. Zheng, Q. J. et al. Structure of boroaluminosilicate glasses: Impact of [Al2 O3]/[SiO2] ratio on the structural role of sodium. Phys. Rev. B 86, 054203 (2012).