Vulnerability of World Cultural Heritage Sites in developing Asian countries
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract While World Cultural Heritage Sites in developing countries are fewer in number, they are over-represented in the List of World Heritage in Danger, and few scientific studies are conducted about them. This study investigates factors that threaten the World Cultural Heritage Sites in selected Asian countries, the intensity of these threats, and the management capacity to respond to them. Linked data from UNESCO Periodic Report (Cycle II), the World Heritage Site database, and the Köppen–Geiger climate classification is analysed using logit and ordered logit models. The results show that the perceived likelihood of a major threat is highest for the factors (i) sudden ecological or geological events (dy/dx = 0.18, p < 0.01), (ii) climate change and severe weather events (dy/dx = 0.1, p < 0.05), (iii) local conditions affecting physical fabric (dy/dx = 0.1, p < 0.05), and (iv) social–cultural use of heritage (dy/dx = 0.10, p < 0.05), while the likelihood of high management capacity is highest for the factors (i) illegal human activities (dy/dx = 0.27, p < 0.01) and (ii) invasive/alien or hyper-abundant species (dy/dx = 0.21, p < 0.01). In addition, sites in the Philippines and Afghanistan are most likely to report threats as major, but least likely to report high management capacity compared to other Asian countries. Further, the sites in this region do not have correspondingly high (or even adequate) management capacity for threats identified as major. The study, therefore, concludes that the studied sites are highly vulnerable to threats primarily from natural rather than socio-economic or human-induced causes. The study contributes novel insights into the risk and vulnerability of the World Cultural Heritage Sites in developing countries.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · Conservation Techniques and Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (72)
Show source-provided references
1. Lakhanpal, S. Contesting renewable energy in the global south: a case-study of local opposition to a wind power project in the Western Ghats of India. Environ. Dev. 30, 51–60 (2019).10.1016/j.envdev.2019.02.002 ↗
2. Nguyen, T. L., Asahi, C., Tran, T. A. & Le, N. H. Indicator-based approach for flood vulnerability assessment in ancient heritage city of Hoi An, Central Region of Vietnam. Nat. Hazards 114, 2357–2385 (2022).10.1007/s11069-022-05475-9 ↗
3. Karkee, M. B., Cuadra, C. & Sunuwar, L. The challenges of protecting heritage architecture in developing countries from earthquake disasters. Adv. Archit. Ser. 20, 407–419 (2005).
4. Bui, H. T., Le, T. A. & Nguyen, C. H. UNESCO world heritage designation: an opportunity or a threat to Hoi an ancient town (Vietnam)? (eds Baporikar N. et al.) In: Tourism and Opportunities for Economic Development in Asia 291–301 (IGI Global, 2017)10.4018/978-1-5225-2078-8.ch015 ↗
5. Caust, J. & Vecco, M. Is UNESCO World Heritage recognition a blessing or burden? Evidence from developing Asian countries. J. Cult. Herit. 27, 1–9 (2017).10.1016/j.culher.2017.02.004 ↗
6. Levin, N., Ali, S., Crandall, D. & Kark, S. World Heritage in danger: Big data and remote sensing can help protect sites in conflict zones. Glob. Environ. Change 55, 97–104 (2019).10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.02.001 ↗
7. Falk, M. & Hagsten, E. A management perspective on threats to cultural world heritage sites. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 29, 167–183 (2023).10.1080/13527258.2023.2176348 ↗
8. Falk, M. & Hagsten, E. Threat perception and adaptive capacity of natural world heritage site management. Environ. Manag. 71, 285–303 (2023).10.1007/s00267-022-01780-y ↗
9. Simpson, N. P. et al. Decolonizing climate change-heritage research comment. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 210–213 (2022).10.1038/s41558-022-01279-8 ↗
10. Orr, S. A., Richards, J. & Fatoric, S. Climate change and cultural heritage: a systematic literature review (2016–2020). Hist. Environ. Policy 12, 434–477 (2021).10.1080/17567505.2021.1957264 ↗
11. Crowley, K. et al. Cultural heritage and risk assessments: gaps, challenges, and future research directions for the inclusion of heritage within climate change adaptation and disaster management. Clim. Resil. Sustain 1, e45 (2022).
12. Labadi, S. A review of the global strategy for a balanced, representative and credible World Heritage List 1994–2004. Conserv. Manag. Archaeol. Sites 7, 89–102 (2005).10.1179/135050305793137477 ↗
13. Yongqi, L., Ruixia, Y., Pu, W., Anlin, Y. & Guolong, C. A quantitative description of the spatial–temporal distribution and evolution pattern of world cultural heritage. Herit. Sci 9, 80 (2021).10.1186/s40494-021-00549-6 ↗
14. Ryan, J. & Silvanto, S. A brand for all the nations. Mark. Intell. Plan. 29, 305–318 (2011).10.1108/02634501111129266 ↗
15. Rössler, M. & Lin, R. C. H. Cultural landscape in world heritage conservation and cultural landscape conservation challenges in Asia. Built Herit. 2, 3–26 (2018).10.1186/BF03545707 ↗
16. Hosseini, K., Stefaniec, A. & Hosseini, S. P. World Heritage Sites in developing countries: assessing impacts and handling complexities toward sustainable tourism. J. Destin. Mark. Manag 20, 100616 (2021).
17. Nguyen, K. N. & Baker, S. Climate change impacts on UNESCO World Heritage-listed cultural properties in the Asia-Pacific region: a systematic review of state of conservation reports, 1979–2021. Sustainability (Switzerland) 15, 14141 (2023).10.3390/su151914141 ↗
18. Turner, B. L. et al. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8074–8079 (2003).10.1073/pnas.1231335100 ↗
19. Adger, W. N. Vulnerability. Glob. Environ. Chang. 16, 268–281 (2006).10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006 ↗
20. Gallopin, G. C. Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Glob. Environ. Chang. 16, 293–303 (2006).10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004 ↗
21. Smit, B. & Wandel, J. Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob. Environ. Chang. 16, 282–292 (2006).10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008 ↗
22. Kasthala, S., Parthasarathy, D., Narayanan, K. & Inamdar, A. B. Classification and evaluation of current climate vulnerability assessment methods. Soc. Indic. Res. 171, 605–639 (2024).10.1007/s11205-023-03271-x ↗
23. Field, C. B. & Barros, V. R. Climate Change 2014—Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Regional Aspects (Cambridge University Press, 2014).
24. Pörtner, H.-O. et al. IPPC 2022: Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Working Group II Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2022).
25. Ravan, M., Revez, M. J., Pinto, I. V., Brum, P. & Birkmann, J. A vulnerability assessment framework for cultural heritage sites: the case of the Roman ruins of Tróia. Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci. 14, 26–40 (2023).10.1007/s13753-023-00463-4 ↗
26. UNESCO. List of Factors Affecting the Properties https://whc.unesco.org/en/factors/ (2023).
27. Daly, P. et al. Rebuilding historic urban neighborhoods after disasters: balancing disaster risk reduction and heritage conservation after the 2015 earthquakes in Nepal. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 86, 103564 (2023).10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103564 ↗
28. Jia, M. Y. et al. Exploring the impact of climate change on flood risk at cultural heritage sites using a GIS-based SCS-CN method: a case study of Shanxi province, China. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct 96, 103968 (2023).10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103968 ↗
29. Kunte, P. D. et al. Multi-hazards coastal vulnerability assessment of Goa, India, using geospatial techniques. Ocean Coast Manag. 95, 264–281 (2014).10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.04.024 ↗
30. Wang, J. J. Flood risk maps to cultural heritage: Measures and process. J. Cult. Herit. 16, 210–220 (2015).10.1016/j.culher.2014.03.002 ↗
31. Li, M. Disaster risk management of cultural heritage: a global scale analysis of characteristics, multiple hazards, and issues based on historical disasters and current DRR measures in world heritage sites. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct 110, 104633 (2024).10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104633 ↗
32. Broomandi, P. et al. Impacts of ambient air pollution on UNESCO world cultural heritage sites in Eastern Asia: dose–response calculations for material corrosions. Urban Clim. 46, 101275 (2022).10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101275 ↗
33. al-Houdalieh, S. H. & Sauders, R. R. Building destruction: the consequences of rising urbanization on cultural heritage in the Ramallah Province. Int. J. Cult. Prop. 16, 1–23 (2009).10.1017/S0940739109090043 ↗
34. Fu, L., Zhang, Q. P., Tang, Y. Z., Pan, J. & Li, Q. Assessment of urbanization impact on cultural heritage based on a risk-based cumulative impact assessment method. Herit. Sci. 11, 15 (2023).10.1186/s40494-023-01024-0 ↗
35. Miura, K. A dilemma of World Heritage ideals and challenges in Southeast Asia. Int. J. Cult. Prop. 29, 433–457 (2022).10.1017/S094073912200025X ↗
36. Su, M. & Li, B. Resource management at world heritage sites in China. Procedia Environ. Sci. 12, 293–297 (2012).10.1016/j.proenv.2012.01.280 ↗
37. Yang, X. S., Mu, D. J., Hu, M. J., Xiao, S. Z. & Meng, J. N. Establishment of the management effectiveness assessment system of world natural heritage and empirical analysis—a case study of Fanjingshan. Herit. Sci 11, 124 (2023).10.1186/s40494-023-00971-y ↗
38. Selcuk, O., Karakas, H., Cizel, B. & Ipekci Cetin, E. How does tourism affect protected areas?: a multi-criteria decision making application in UNESCO natural heritage sites. Nat. Hazards 117, 1923–1944 (2023).10.1007/s11069-023-05934-x ↗
39. Renfrew, C. Looting and vandalism (cultural heritage management). In Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology (ed. Smith, C) 4552–4554 (Springer New York, New York, NY, 2014).10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1216 ↗
40. Ravankhah, M., Schmidt, M. & Will, T. An indicator-based risk assessment framework for World Heritage sites in seismic zones: the case of “Bam and its Cultural Landscape” in Iran. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 63, 102405 (2021)10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102405 ↗
41. Sabbioni, C., Brimblecombe, P. & Cassar, M. The Atlas of Climate Change Impact on European Cultural Heritage: Scientific Analysis and Management Strategies (Anthem Press, 2010).
42. Udeaja, C. et al. Urban heritage conservation and rapid urbanization: insights from Surat, India. Sustainability 12, 2172 (2020).10.3390/su12062172 ↗
43. Phillips, H. The capacity to adapt to climate change at heritage sites—the development of a conceptual framework. Environ. Sci. Policy 47, 118–125 (2015).10.1016/j.envsci.2014.11.003 ↗
44. Engle, N. L. Adaptive capacity and its assessment. Glob. Environ. Chang 21, 647–656 (2011).10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.019 ↗
45. Gupta, J. et al. The Adaptive Capacity Wheel: a method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environ. Sci. Policy 13, 459–471 (2010).10.1016/j.envsci.2010.05.006 ↗
46. Mortreux, C. & Barnett J. Adaptive capacity: exploring the research frontier. Wires Clim.Change 8, e467 (2017)10.1002/wcc.467 ↗
47. Unakul, M. Refining the adaptive capacity framework for world heritage management. Nakhara: J. Environ. Des. Plan. 17, 25–42 (2019).
48. Tuan, T. H., Seenprachawong, U. & Navrud, S. Comparing cultural heritage values in South East Asia—possibilities and difficulties in cross-country transfers of economic values. J. Cult. Herit. 10, 9–21 (2009).10.1016/j.culher.2008.09.003 ↗
49. Khoo, S. L. & Lim, Y. M. Dissecting George Town’s human capital challenges in built heritage. J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. 9, 376–393 (2019).
50. Imon, S. S., DiStefano, L. D. & Lee, H.-Y. UNESCO–ICCROM Asian Academy for Heritage Management initiative to establish interpretation and presentation standards at World Heritage Sites in Asia. J. Herit. Tour. 6, 245–254 (2011).10.1080/1743873X.2011.579616 ↗
51. Chechi, A. Non-state actors and the implementation of the World Heritage Convention in Asia: achievements, problems, and prospects. Asian J. Int. Law 8, 461–489 (2018).10.1017/S2044251318000012 ↗
52. Hinkel, J. “Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity”: towards a clarification of the science-policy interface. Glob. Environ. Chang. 21, 198–208 (2011).10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.08.002 ↗
53. Meskell, L. States of conservation: protection, politics, and pacting within UNESCO’s World Heritage Committee. Anthropol. Q. 87, 217–243 (2014).10.1353/anq.2014.0009 ↗
54. UNESCO. The Criteria for Selection (UNESCO, 2023).
55. Alberts, H. C. & Hazen, H. D. Maintaining authenticity and Integrity at Cultural World Heritage Sites. Geogr. Rev. 100, 56–73 (2010).10.1111/j.1931-0846.2010.00006.x ↗
56. Kotova, L., Jacob, D., Leissner, J., Mathis, M. & Mikolajewicz, U. (eds) Climate Information for the Preservation of Cultural Heritage: Needs and Challenges. Transdisciplinary Multispectral Modeling and Cooperation for the Preservation of Cultural Heritage (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019).10.1007/978-3-030-12957-6_25 ↗
57. Kotova, L. et al. Making use of climate information for sustainable preservation of cultural heritage: applications to the KERES project. Herit. Sci. 11, 18 (2023).10.1186/s40494-022-00853-9 ↗
58. Bertacchini, E. E. & Saccone, D. Toward a political economy of World Heritage. J. Cult. Econ. 36, 327–352 (2012).10.1007/s10824-012-9169-3 ↗
59. Wooldridge, J. M. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, 2010).
60. Rubel, F. & Kottek, M. Observed and projected climate shifts 1901–2100 depicted by world maps of the Köppen–Geiger climate classification. Meteorol. Z. 19, 135 (2010).10.1127/0941-2948/2010/0430 ↗
61. UNESCO. Periodic Reporting. https://whc.unesco.org/en/periodicreporting/ (2024)
62. International Monetary Fund. World Economic Outlook Groups and Aggregates Information 2022 (International Monetary Fund, accessed 19 February 2024); https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2022/01/weodata/groups.htm#da
63. Kawakami, K., Weise, K. & Dingwall, P. R. Understanding World Heritage in Asia and the Pacific–No. 35—The Second Cycle of Periodic Reporting 2010–2012 (UNESCO, 2012).
64. Khalaf, R. W. Periodic Reporting under the World Heritage Convention: Futures and Possible Responses to Loss. Hist. Environ.: Policy Pract. 13, 341–360 (2022).10.1080/17567505.2022.2079857 ↗
65. Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolf, B. & Rubel, F. World map of the Koppen–Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol. Z. 15, 259–263 (2006).10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130 ↗
66. Köppen–Geiger Observed and Predicted Climate Shifts—WGS 84. Esri (ArcGIS Storymaps) https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/Story::k%C3%B6ppen-geiger-observed-and-predicted-climate-shifts-wgs-84/about (2020).
67. Marzeion, B. & Levermann, A. Loss of cultural world heritage and currently inhabited places to sea-level rise. Environ. Res. Lett. 9 (2014).10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034001 ↗
68. Tapete, D. & Cigna, F. Appraisal of opportunities and perspectives for the systematic condition assessment of heritage sites with Copernicus Sentinel-2 high-resolution multispectral imagery. Remote Sensing 10, 034001 (2018).10.3390/rs10040561 ↗
69. Bosher, L., Kim, D., Okubo, T., Chmutina, K. & Jigyasu, R. Dealing with multiple hazards and threats on cultural heritage sites: an assessment of 80 case studies. Disaster Prev. Manag. 29, 109–128 (2019).10.1108/DPM-08-2018-0245 ↗
70. Global Heritage Fund. Saving our Vanishing Heritage: Safeguarding Endangered Cultural Heritage Sites in the Developing World (Global Heritage Fund, 2010).
71. Global Heritage Fund. Asia’s Heritage in Peril (Global Heritage Fund, 2012).
72. Morrison, T. H. et al. Political dynamics and governance of World Heritage ecosystems. Nat. Sustain. 3, 947–955 (2020).10.1038/s41893-020-0568-8 ↗