Source of unearthed pottery from the Qujialing culture in the middle Yangtze River
Source abstract
Abstract
The Yangtze River Basin is a cradle of Chinese civilization. The production and distribution of pottery in this region during the Qujialing period is crucial for understanding how craft production, sociopolitical complexity, and technological advances are intricately linked and contributed to the formation and development of the Yangtze civilization. We report here a study of late Qujialing culture pottery from the Shangang, Gouwan, and Qujialing sites using chemical and mineralogical compositions and strontium isotope ratios. Principal component and cluster analyses suggest that each site mainly produced and consumed its own pottery. These results are consistent with strontium isotope analysis and trace (rare) element analysis, which revealed that the sources of the raw materials significantly differed among the 3 sites. The centralized mode of pottery production and distribution simply does not apply to study sites and their similar pottery styles.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis · Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Moreno Gil, A., Garrido García, C., Bonora Soriano, B., Gómez-Gras, D. & Risch, R. Bronze age frontiers and pottery circulation: Political and economic relations at the northern fringes of El Argar, southeast Iberia, ca. 2200-1550 BCE. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 32, 36 (2025).10.1007/s10816-025-09702-y ↗
2. Cucart-Mora, C., Gómez-Puche, M., Romano, V., de Pablo, J. F. L. & Lozano, S. Reconstructing Mesolithic social networks on the Iberian Peninsula using ornaments. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. 14, 174 (2022).10.1007/s12520-022-01641-z ↗
3. Pryce, T. O. et al. A late 2nd/early 1st millennium BC interaction arc between mainland southeast Asia and southwest China: Archaeometallurgical data from Hebosuo and Shangxihe, Yunnan. J. Archaeol. Sci. 143, 105612 (2022).10.1016/j.jas.2022.105612 ↗
4. Lu, Q. et al. Pottery manufacture and exchange at the Qixingdun site in Hunan province, China. npj Herit. Sci. 13, 308 (2025).10.1038/s40494-025-01863-z ↗
5. Xie, Z. et al. Changes and continuity in pottery production and use at Wujiafentou in the core zone of Youziling and Shijiahe cultures in central China. Herit. Sci. 12, 64 (2024).10.1186/s40494-024-01181-w ↗
6. Tsoupra, A. et al. A multi-analytical characterization of fourteenth to eighteenth century pottery from the Kongo kingdom, Central Africa. Sci. Rep. 12, 9943 (2022).10.1038/s41598-022-14089-x ↗
7. Pinto Monte, M., Madridi Fernández, M., Buxedai Garrigós, J. & Coll Conesa, J. The medieval and post-medieval ceramics from Manises (Valencia). A reassessment from the new excavations at Barri d’Obradors. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 39, 103135 (2021).
8. Oliveira, L. S. S. et al. Archeometric study of pottery shards from Conjunto Vilas and São João, Amazon. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 167, 108303 (2020).10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.04.053 ↗
9. Yao, S., He, L., Wang, F., Chen, M. & Zhao, Y. Composition analysis of pottery from the Jiangjiashan and Bianjiashan cemeteries in Liangzhu ancient city, China. npj Herit. Sci. 13, 231 (2025).10.1038/s40494-025-01808-6 ↗
10. Rice, P. M. et al. Evolution of specialized pottery production: a trial model. Curr. Anthropol. 22, 219–240 (1981).10.1086/202661 ↗
11. Zhao, X., Zhao, Y., Qin, X. & Wang, R. On Liangzhu culture tremolite-tempered pottery: social complexity, logistical networks and cross-craft interaction in Neolithic China. J. Archaeol. Sci. 167, 106000 (2024).10.1016/j.jas.2024.106000 ↗
12. Barani, H. et al. Archaeometric analysis of pottery sherds from Barveh Tepe: Insights into early Bronze age pottery-making techniques and firing temperatures. Archaeometry 67, 328–343 (2025).10.1111/arcm.13011 ↗
13. Hall, M. E. Pottery styles during the early Jomon period: Geochemical perspectives on the Moroiso and Ukishima pottery styles. Archaeometry 43, 59–75 (2001).10.1111/1475-4754.00005 ↗
14. Miki, T., Kuronuma, T., MacDonald, B. L., Glascock, M. D. & Kondo, Y. Petrographic and geochemical analyses of pottery from Wadi Tanuf, Oman: Approaching pottery production in south-eastern Arabia during the second and first millennia BCE. Archaeometry 66, 1236–1254 (2024).10.1111/arcm.12974 ↗
15. Papakosta, V., Lopez-Costas, O. & Isaksson, S. Multi-method (FTIR, XRD, PXRF) analysis of Ertebølle pottery ceramics from Scania, southern Sweden. Archaeometry 62, 677–693 (2020).10.1111/arcm.12554 ↗
16. Renson, V. et al. Lead and strontium isotopes as tracers for early formative pottery exchange in ancient Mexico. J. Archaeol. Sci. 126, 105307 (2021).10.1016/j.jas.2020.105307 ↗
17. Li, B. et al. ICP-MS trace element analysis of Song dynasty porcelains from Ding, Jiexiu and Guantai kilns, north China. J. Archaeol. Sci. 32, 251–259 (2005).10.1016/j.jas.2004.09.004 ↗
18. Pashkova, G. V. et al. A workflow for uncertainty assessment in elemental analysis of archaeological ceramics: a case study of Neolithic coarse pottery from eastern Siberia. Heritage 6, 4434–4450 (2023).10.3390/heritage6050234 ↗
19. Muşkara, Ü & Konak, A. Obsidian source identification at Gre Fılla, Turkey. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 38, 103003 (2021).
20. Luo, Y. et al. Interregional interaction between the Majiayao culture and the Zongri culture on the northeastern Tibetan Plateau: New evidence from the pottery production and exchange. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 65, 105199 (2025).
21. Chen, X., Lü, H., Liu, X. & Frachetti, M. D. Geospatial modelling of farmer-herder interactions maps cultural geography of Bronze and Iron age Tibet, 3600-2200 BP. Sci. Rep. 14, 2010 (2024).10.1038/s41598-023-50556-9 ↗
22. Hubei Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology, Jingmen City Museum & Qujialing Site Protection Center. 2018 Brief report on excavation of Qujialing Site in Jingmen, Hubei. Jianghan Archaeol. 5–32+2 (2021).
23. Institute of History, Zhengzhou University & Henan Provincial Cultural Relics Bureau Office for the Protection and Management of Cultural Relics under the South-to-North Water Diversion Project. Brief report on excavation of Qujialing cultural relics at Xichuan Shangang site, Henan. Culture Relics Central China 4–19 (2016).
24. Institute of History, Zhengzhou University & Henan Provincial Cultural Relics Bureau Office for the Protection and Management of Cultural Relics under the South-to-North Water Diversion Project. Brief report on excavation of Qujialing cultural relics at Xichuan Gouwan site, Henan. Archaeology 42–65+128–130+2 (2018).
25. Li, W. History of Pottery-making Technologies in Ancient China; Shanxi Jiaoyu Chubanshe, Taiyuan. 31-32 (2017).
26. Neral, N., Kudelić, A., Maričić, A. & Zelić, B. K. Physical and mechanical properties of ceramics: insights into raw material selection in prehistoric pottery production in Croatia. Appl. Clay Sci. 274, 107859 (2025).10.1016/j.clay.2025.107859 ↗
27. Arnold, D. E. Does the standardization of ceramic pastes really mean specialization?. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 7, 333–375 (2000).10.1023/A:1026570906712 ↗
28. Smith, A. L. Processing clay for pottery in northern Cameroon: social and technical requirements. Archaeometry 42, 21–42 (2000).10.1111/j.1475-4754.2000.tb00864.x ↗
29. Sun, Z., Peng, W. & Su, X. Cultural factors of pottery unearthed at the Panlongcheng site and their reflection of the production background. Cult. Relics South. China 03, 115–126 (2024).
30. Rivero, S. G. et al. From Andalusia to Atlantic during early globalization: multidisciplinary archaeometric approach to ceramic production from Jerez de la Frontera (Spain). Ceramics 8, 20 (2025).10.3390/ceramics8010020 ↗
31. Silachyov, I. & Akymbek, Y. Element content of the samples of medieval ceramics from Southern Kazakhstan: searching the way of preliminary differentiation. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 332, 3799–3811 (2023).10.1007/s10967-023-09073-2 ↗
32. Sarhadi-Dadian, H., Ramli, Z., Moradi, H. & Jozi, Z. Compositional analysis of the pottery shards from Kuh-I Khawja historical site, Sistan, east of Iran. J. Anc. Hist. Archaeol. 8, 127–133 (2021).
33. Salehı Nezamı, R., Fazeli Nashli, H. & Oudbashi, O. Chemical study of Bronze age and Iron age potteries of Sagzabad Tep. J. Archaeol. Stud. 12, 147–164 (2020).
34. Zhang, H. Application of chemical element analysis technology in the study of ancient ceramic production sites. Chin. Ceram. 4, 81–84 (2013).
35. Das, S. K., Ghosh, S., Gangopadhyay, K., Ghosh, S. & Hazra, M. Provenance study of ancient potteries from west Bengal and Tamil Nadu: application of major element oxides and trace element geochemistry. Man. Environ. 42, 11–20 (2017).
36. Li, P. et al. Chemical variations of clays and pottery within a relatively small spatial extent: Initial insights from modern pottery-making in Central China. Archaeol. Res. Asia. 38, 100504 (2024).
37. Anders, E. & Grevesse, N. Abundances of the elements: meteoritic and solar. Geochim. Acta 53, 197–214 (1989).10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-X ↗
38. McDonough, W. F. & Sun, S. S. The composition of the earth. Chem. Geol. 120, 223–253 (1995).10.1016/0009-2541(94)00140-4 ↗
39. Shan, J. The theory and related research on the production provenance of ancient ceramics (PhD dissertation) 15-28 (University of Science and Technology of China, 2002).
40. Maritan, L. et al. Nile River clayey materials in Sudan: Chemical and isotope analysis as reference data for ancient pottery provenance studies. Quat. Int. 657, 50–66 (2023).10.1016/j.quaint.2021.05.009 ↗
41. Olszewski, J. et al. Osteological, multi‑isotope and proteomic analysis of poorly‑preserved human remains from a Dutch East India Company burial ground in South Africa. Sci. Rep. 13, 14666 (2023).10.1038/s41598-023-41503-9 ↗
42. Perry, M. A., Coleman, D. & Delhopital, N. Mobility and exile at 2nd century A.D. Khirbet edh-Dharih: Strontium isotope analysis of Human Migration in western Jordan. Geoarchaeology 23, 528–549 (2008).10.1002/gea.20230 ↗
43. Ohta, T., Sueyoshi, M., Shima, M., Ida, S. & Iizuka, T. Estimation of tributary–mainstem migration of freshwater fishes by Sr isotope analysis of otoliths. Ecol. Res. 40, 409–421 (2025).10.1111/1440-1703.12531 ↗
44. Wang, X. & Tang, Z. H. The first large-scale bioavailable Sr isotope map of China and its implication for provenance studies. Earth Sci. Rev. 210, 103353 (2020).10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103353 ↗
45. Carter, S. W. et al. Strontium isotopic evidence for prehistoric transport of gray-ware ceramic materials in the eastern Grand Canyon region. Usa. Geoarchaeol.26, 189–218 (2011).10.1002/gea.20348 ↗
46. Renson, V. et al. Pottery provenance in the eastern mediterranean using lead isotopes. Archaeometry 58, 54–67 (2016).10.1111/arcm.12217 ↗
47. De Bonis, A. et al. Sr-Nd isotopic fingerprinting as a tool for ceramic provenance: Its application on raw materials, ceramic replicas and ancient pottery. J. Archaeol. Sci. 94, 51–59 (2018).10.1016/j.jas.2018.04.002 ↗
48. Liu, L. New water-rock interaction evidence for groundwater in the Hebei plain: characteristics of Sr isotope tracer. Hydrogeol. Eng. Geol. 4, 41–43 (2007).
49. Yang, S. et al. Sr-Nd isotope composition of Yangtze River sediments and source tracing. Sci. Sin.37, 682–690 (2007).
50. Faure, G. et al. Strontium isotope geology. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, New York. 18–19 (1972).10.1007/978-3-642-65367-4 ↗
51. Badawy, W. M. et al. Formation of reference groups for archaeological pottery using neutron activation and multivariate statistical analyses. Archaeometry 64, 1377–1393 (2022).10.1111/arcm.12793 ↗
52. Li, Q., Chen, X., Kang, Y. & Li, T. Two pottery styles at one site: Chemical and mineralogical insights from the Liudun site in the Yangtze-Huaihe region of China. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 61, 104974 (2025).
53. He, X. et al. Exploring pottery origin by composition and technique comparison: a case study at the Daqu burial site, Beijing, China. Herit. Sci. 12, 126 (2024).10.1186/s40494-024-01245-x ↗
54. Luo, Y. et al. Beyond stylistic typology: Archaeometric reconstruction of diverse pottery traditions and intercommunity interactions at the Lajia site (2300-1900 BCE), Northwest China. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. 17, 160 (2025).10.1007/s12520-025-02267-7 ↗
55. Wu, J., Ao, X., Liu, F., Wang, X. & Li, T. Chemical insights into pottery production and use at Neolithic Zoumaling earthen-walled town in China. npj Herit. Sci. 13, 115 (2025).10.1038/s40494-025-01667-1 ↗
56. Ao, X., Wu, J., Xie, Z. & Li, T. Chemical insights into pottery production and use at Neolithic Fenghuangzui earthen-walled town in China. npj Herit. Sci. 13, 156 (2025).10.1038/s40494-025-01748-1 ↗
57. Xiao, Y., Luo, Y., Tao, Y., Zhang, D. & Cui, J. Technical examination of eggshell black pottery unearthed at the Qujialing site. Jianghan Archaeol. 179, 114–122 (2022).