The scientometric analysis of Karst ecosystem structure and stability: insights for sustainable protection of World Heritage Sites
Source abstract
Abstract
Karst ecosystems, characterized by their fragility and sensitivity to disturbances, need structural stability to preserve biodiversity and geological integrity. Despite their ecological importance, systematic reviews on their stability and structure are scarce. This study fills this gap by analyzing 145 papers from Web of Science (WOS) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) through a systematic literature review. It identifies publication trends, keyword distributions, and regional research focuses, synthesizes key findings on ecosystem structure, disturbance types, and functional influences, and proposes three unresolved scientific questions: the structure-function relationship, a stability evaluation framework, and driving factors for stability optimization. The study provides a foundation for enhancing conservation and sustainable management of karst World Heritage Sites (WHSs), offering new insights into ecosystem stability and protection.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Marine and environmental studies · Karst Systems and Hydrogeology · Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (99)
Show source-provided references
1. Dong, Z. F., Bi, F. F. & Ji, Y. Q. Current status, problems, and suggestions of terrestrial ecosystems carbon sink in China. Sci. Technol. Rev. 40, 15–24 (2022).
2. Piao, S. L., He, Y., Wang, X. H. & Chen, F. H. Estimation of China’s terrestrial ecosystem carbon sink: methods, progress and prospects. Sci. China Earth Sci. 65, 641–651 (2022).10.1007/s11430-021-9892-6 ↗
3. Huang, B. R., Ouyang, Z. Y., Zheng, H., Wang, X. K. & Miao, H. Connotation of ecological integrity and its assessment methods: a review. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 17, 2196–2202 (2006).
4. Kong, H. M. et al. Assessment method of ecosystem health. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 13, 486–490 (2002).
5. Huang, C. J. et al. Effects of extreme climate on the structure and function of forest ecosystem in central and southeast China. Terr. Ecosyst. Conserv. 2, https://doi.org/10.12356/j.2096-8884.2022-0061 (2022).10.12356/j.2096-8884.2022-0061 ↗
6. Hao, T. X. et al. Practice and thinking of comprehensively improving the quality and stability of forest ecosystem in China. Terr. Ecosyst. Conserv. 2, https://doi.org/10.12356/j.2096-8884.2022-0081 (2022).10.12356/j.2096-8884.2022-0081 ↗
7. Bukvareva, E. N. et al. The current state of knowledge of ecosystems and ecosystem services in Russia: a status report. Ambio 44, 491–507 (2015).10.1007/s13280-015-0674-4 ↗
8. Niu, Z. E. et al. Spatiotemporal characteristic of terrestrial ecosystem services and their trade-offs and synergies in China from 2000 to 2018 based on a process model. Acta Ecol. Sin. 43, 496–509 (2023).
9. Chatanga, P. & Seleteng-Kose, L. Montane palustrine wetlands of Lesotho: Vegetation, ecosystem services, current status, threats and conservation. Wetlands 41, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-021-01470-1 (2021).10.1007/s13157-021-01470-1 ↗
10. Zhang, C. S. et al. Evaluation of water conservation of China’s ecosystems based on benchmark. Acta Ecol. Sin. 42, 9250–9260 (2022).
11. Ferraz, S., Brancalion, P. H. S., Guillemot, J. & Meli, P. On the need to differentiate the temporal trajectories of ecosystem structure and functions in restoration programs. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 13, https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082920910314 (2020).10.1177/1940082920910314 ↗
12. Chen, H. Y. Evaluation of the importance of nature reserve ecosystem services in Yunxian of Western Yunnan. Shaanxi For. Sci. Technol. 50, 3 (2022).
13. Titlyanova, A. A. Stability of grass ecosystems. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 2, 119–123 (2009).10.1134/S1995425509020052 ↗
14. Qiao, X. N. et al. Temporal variation and spatial scale dependency of the trade-offs and synergies among multiple ecosystem services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China. Sci. Total Environ. 651, 218–219 (2019).10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.135 ↗
15. Murphy, E. J. et al. Understanding the structure and functioning of polar pelagic ecosystems to predict the impacts of change. Proc. R. Soc. B 283, 1844 (2016).10.1098/rspb.2016.1646 ↗
16. Wang, S. et al. How complementarity and selection affect the relationship between ecosystem functioning and stability. Ecology 102, e3347 (2021).10.1002/ecy.3347 ↗
17. Loch, J. M. H., Walters, L. J. & Cook, G. S. Recovering trophic structure through habitat restoration: a review. Food Webs 25, e00162 (2020).10.1016/j.fooweb.2020.e00162 ↗
18. Xu, F. et al. Grazing legacy mediates the diverse responses of grassland multidimensional stability to resource enrichment. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 378, 109313 (2025).10.1016/j.agee.2024.109313 ↗
19. Lap, Q. K. A Study on Comprehensive Evaluation of Mountain Landscape Ecology Based on GIS. China Univ. Geosci. (2014). (in Chinese)
20. Qin, T. L. et al. A 3S-based regional terrestrial carbon cycle model in Luanhe Basin, China. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 32, 3721–3737 (2023).10.15244/pjoes/163501 ↗
21. Zhe, J. & Qin, A. C. Evaluation of the spatial distribution of scenic resources based on 3S technology: a case study of the Yesanpo National Park. PLoS One 17, e0269841 (2022).10.1371/journal.pone.0269841 ↗
22. Abolmaali, S. M. R. et al. Impacts of spatio-temporal change of landscape patterns on habitat quality across Zayanderud Dam watershed in central Iran. Sci. Rep. 14, 1–13 (2024).10.1038/s41598-024-59407-7 ↗
23. Tscharntke, T. et al. Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes—eight hypotheses. Biol. Rev. 87, 661–685 (2012).10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00216.x ↗
24. Zhu, J. X. et al. Ecological space management and control zoning of Giant Panda National Park from the perspective of ecosystem services and land use. Sci. Rep. 14, 1–22 (2024).10.1038/s41598-023-50600-8 ↗
25. Albrecht, J. et al. Species richness is more important for ecosystem functioning than species turnover along an elevational gradient. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1582–1593 (2021).10.1038/s41559-021-01550-9 ↗
26. Pennekamp, F. et al. Biodiversity increases and decreases ecosystem stability. Nature 563, 109–112 (2018).10.1038/s41586-018-0627-8 ↗
27. Haddad, N. M. et al. Plant diversity and the stability of food webs. Ecol. Lett. 14, 42–46 (2011).10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01548.x ↗
28. Marini, L., Bartomeus, I., Rader, R. & Lami, F. Species–habitat networks: A tool to improve landscape management for conservation. J. Appl. Ecol. 56, 923–928 (2019).10.1111/1365-2664.13337 ↗
29. Teng, J. K. Evaluation on soil erosion control effect and soil conservation function based on landscape structure—a case study: Nianzhuang Gully Basin, Yan’an City. Southwest Univ. Sci. Technol. (2018).
30. Saint-Béat, B. et al. Trophic networks: How do theories link ecosystem structure and functioning to stability properties? A review. Ecol. Indic. 52, 458–471 (2015).10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.017 ↗
31. Camara, T., Leal, I. R., Bluethgen, N., Oliveira, F. M. P. & Arnan, X. Anthropogenic disturbance and rainfall variation threaten the stability of plant-ant interactions in the Brazilian Caatinga. Ecography42, 1960–1972 (2019).10.1111/ecog.04531 ↗
32. Zhang, S. H., Xiong, K. N., Qin, Y., Min, X. Y. & Xiao, J. Evolution and determinants of ecosystem services: Insights from South China karst. Ecol. Indic. 133, 108437 (2021).10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108437 ↗
33. Xiao, J. & Xiong, K. N. A review of agroforestry ecosystem services and its enlightenment on the ecosystem improvement of rocky desertification control. Sci. Total Environ. 852, 158538 (2022).10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158538 ↗
34. Grant, M. J. & Booth, A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr. J. 26, 91–108 (2009).10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x ↗
35. Shamseer, L. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 350, g7647 (2015).10.1136/bmj.g7647 ↗
36. Characteristics and distribution of tropical karst geological heritage in Guilin (Guangxi, PR China), the necessity and importance for its protection. Mem. Soc. Geol. Fr. 165, 185-189 (1994).
37. Bogunovic, M. Properties of some elementary soil areas in the mountain karst zone of Croatia. Poljopr. Znan. Smotra 59, 31–40 (1994).
38. Chung, K. F. et al. Phylogenetic analyses of Begonia sect. Coelocentrum and allied limestone species of China shed light on the evolution of Sino-Vietnamese karst flora. Bot. Stud. 55, 1–15 (2014).10.1186/1999-3110-55-1 ↗
39. Zhang, J. G., Chen, H. S., Su, Y. R., Zhang, W. & Kong, X. L. Spatial and temporal variability of surface soil moisture in the depression area of Karst hilly region. Acta Ecol. Sin. 28, 6334–6343 (2008).
40. Jiang, Y. et al. Interspecific and intraspecific variation in functional traits of subtropical evergreen and deciduous broadleaved mixed forests in karst topography, Guilin, southwest China. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 9, https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082916680211 (2016).10.1177/1940082916680211 ↗
41. Tong, X. W. et al. Quantifying the effectiveness of ecological restoration projects on long-term vegetation dynamics in the karst regions of Southwest China. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 54, 105–113 (2017).
42. Li, C. Z., Lian, J. J., Chen, H. S., Feng, T. & Fu, Z. Y. Estimation of soil erosion and its response to land use change in karst regions at county scale. Sci. Soil Water Conserv. 15, 39–47 (2017).
43. Zhang, S. H., Xiong, K. N., Min, X. Y. & Zhang, S. Demographic shrinkage promotes ecosystem services supply capacity in the karst desertification control. Sci. Total Environ. 917, 170427 (2024).10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170427 ↗
44. Li, H. D., Wu, X. W. & Xiao, Z. S. Assembly, ecosystem functions, and stability in species interaction networks. Chin. J. Plant Ecol. 45, 1049–1063 (2021).10.17521/cjpe.2019.0159 ↗
45. Wang, Z. H. & Liu, L. L. Ecosystem structure and functioning: current knowledge and perspectives. Chin. J. Plant Ecol. 45, 1033–1035 (2021).10.17521/cjpe.2021.0370 ↗
46. Hou, W. J., Gao, J. B., Peng, T., Wu, S. H. & Dai, E. F. Review of ecosystem vulnerability studies in the karst region of Southwest China based on a structure-function-habitat framework. Prog. Geogr. 35, 320–330 (2016).10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.03.006 ↗
47. Wen, Z. H. A Study on the Ecological Processes of Southern China Karst and Its Value as a World Heritage Site. Guizhou Normal University (2015). (in Chinese).
48. Yu, J. F. On the composition and structure of forest ecosystems. Heilongjiang Sci. Technol. Inf. 26, 235 (2012).
49. Liu, Y. The Impact of Karst Soil Thickness on Plant Community Structure and Biomass. Southwest University. https://doi.org/10.27684/d.cnki.gxndx.2020.003774 (2020).10.27684/d.cnki.gxndx.2020.003774 ↗
50. Tian, L., An, M. T., Yu, J. H. & Wu, M. X. Species abundance distribution pattern of plant communities in different terrains in subtropical karst area. Guihaia 42, 983–995 (2022).
51. Lu, Z. X. et al. Plant community structure and diversity characteristics of different vegetation restoration modes in the karst region of northwest Guangxi, China. J. Cent. South Univ. For. Technol. 42, 115–126 (2022).
52. Ali, A. Linking forest ecosystem processes, functions and services under integrative social-ecological research agenda: Current knowledge and perspectives. Sci. Total Environ. 892, 164768 (2023).10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164768 ↗
53. Donohue, I. et al. On the dimensionality of ecological stability. Ecol. Lett. 16, 421–429 (2013).10.1111/ele.12086 ↗
54. Plieninger, T. et al. Exploring ecosystem-change and society through a landscape lens: Recent progress in European landscape research. Ecol. Soc. 20, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07443-200205 (2015).10.5751/ES-07443-200205 ↗
55. Hu, C. Y., Wu, W., Zhou, X. X. & Wang, Z. J. Spatiotemporal changes in landscape patterns in karst mountainous regions based on the optimal landscape scale: A case study of Guiyang City in Guizhou Province, China. Ecol. Indic. 150, 110211 (2023).10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110211 ↗
56. Lamy, T., Liss, K. N., Gonzalez, A. & Bennett, E. M. Landscape structure affects the provision of multiple ecosystem services. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/124017 (2016).10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/124017 ↗
57. Zhou, H. K., Tang, Y. H., Gu, S., Cui, X. Y. & Zhao, X. Q. Stability of alpine meadow ecosystem on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Chin. Sci. Bull. 51, 320–327 (2006).10.1007/s11434-006-0320-4 ↗
58. Zhang, M., Yin, P. H., Yang, S. G. & He, X. B. The ecological theories and evaluation methods of ecosystem stability. Adv. Geosci. 12, 1345–1351 (2022).10.12677/AG.2022.1211130 ↗
59. He, S. Y., et al. Research progress of grassland ecosystem structure and stability and inspiration for improving its service capacity in the karst desertification control. Plants 12, (2023).10.3390/plants12040770 ↗
60. Odum, E. P. Basic Ecology. Philadelphia: Saunders College. https://worldcat.org/title/879113713 (1983).
61. Huang, Z. et al. Quantifying the spatiotemporal characteristics of multi-dimensional karst ecosystem stability with Landsat time series in southwest China. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 104, 102575 (2021).
62. Lin, L., Xiong, K. N., Wang, Q., Zhao, R. & Zhou, J. Y. A review of village ecosystem structure and stability: Implications for the karst desertification control. Land. 12 https://doi.org/10.3390/land12061136 (2023).10.3390/land12061136 ↗
63. Xia, F. et al. High stability of autochthonous dissolved organic matter in karst aquatic ecosystems: evidence from fluorescence. Water Res. 220, 118723 (2022).10.1016/j.watres.2022.118723 ↗
64. Donohue, I. et al. Navigating the complexity of ecological stability. Ecol. Lett. 19, 1172–1185 (2016).10.1111/ele.12648 ↗
65. Kéfi, S. et al. Advancing our understanding of ecological stability. Ecol. Lett. 22, 1349–1356 (2019).10.1111/ele.13340 ↗
66. Yan, W. L., et al. A study on karst cave collapse based on improved Terzaghi theory and upper limit analysis. Appl. Sci. 14, https://doi.org/10.3390/app14188252 (2024).10.3390/app14188252 ↗
67. Jing, J. S. et al. Vegetation types affect responsive change in soil moisture to rainfall in under karst rocky desertification control areas. J. Irrig. Drain. 39, 100–109 (2020).
68. Song, S., Wang, S. H., Xu, D. W. & Gong, Y. Elemental evolution characteristics and influencing factors of green infrastructure network in karst mountain cities: A case study of Qianzhong urban agglomeration in Southwest China. Ecol. Process. 13, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-024-00530-8 (2024).10.1186/s13717-024-00530-8 ↗
69. Feng, M. D., Li, T. Y., Zeng, C., He, B. H. & Zhang, D. Y. Changes in soil water repellency and soil erosion resistance as affected by land uses in karst environments. J. Environ. Manage. 368, 122102 (2024).10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122102 ↗
70. Hussain, A., et al. Characterizing the local and global climatic factors associated with vegetation dynamics in the karst region of southwest China. J. Hydrol. 643, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132018 (2024).10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132018 ↗
71. Pan, S. et al. Agricultural drought-driven mechanism of coupled climate and human activities in the karst basin of southern China. Sci. Rep. 14, 12072 (2024).10.1038/s41598-024-62027-w ↗
72. Luo, W., Liu, M. X., Yao, Z. Y., Tu, X. J. & Lin, K. R. Uncovering the impact of climate and vegetation changes on runoff in karstic regions of southwest China. J. Environ. Manage. 370, 122617 (2024).10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122617 ↗
73. Li, Z. Y., Ye, X. Z. & Wang, S. P. Ecosystem stability and its relationship with biodiversity. Chin. J. Plant Ecol. 45, 1127–1139 (2021).10.17521/cjpe.2020.0116 ↗
74. Hui, G. Z. & Hu, Y. Research progress of structure-based forest management. For. Res. 31, 85–93 (2018).
75. Potterf, M. et al. Interpreting wind damage risk-how multifunctional forest management impacts standing timber at risk of wind felling. Eur. J. Forest Res 141, 347–361 (2022).10.1007/s10342-022-01442-y ↗
76. Duan, L. X., Wang, X. R. & Jin, Y. L. Study on interspecific relationships, community stability, and environmental factors of lithophytic moss at different elevations in karst cities. Ecol. Evol. 14, e70120 (2024).10.1002/ece3.70120 ↗
77. Jiang, L. & Pu, Z. C. Different effects of species diversity on temporal stability in single-trophic and multitrophic communities. Am. Nat. 174, 651–659 (2009).10.1086/605961 ↗
78. Ma, F. Y. Research advances on ecosystem stability. J. Desert Res. 22, 4–7 (2002).
79. White, L., O’Connor, N. E., Yang, Q., Emmerson, M. C. & Donohue, I. Individual species provide multifaceted contributions to the stability of ecosystems. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1594–1601 (2020).10.1038/s41559-020-01315-w ↗
80. Wang, Y., Yang, Y. G., Li, A. M. & Wang, L. Stability of multi-layer ecosystems. J. R. Soc. Interface 20, 20220752 (2023).10.1098/rsif.2022.0752 ↗
81. Eschenbrenner, J. & Thebault, E. Diversity, food web structure and the temporal stability of total plant and animal biomasses. Oikos 2023, e08769 (2023).10.1111/oik.08769 ↗
82. Evans, L. C. et al. Bioclimatic context of species’ populations determines community stability. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 31, 1542–1555 (2022).10.1111/geb.13527 ↗
83. Kiers, E. T., Palmer, T. M., Ives, A. R., Bruno, J. F. & Bronstein, J. L. Mutualisms in a changing world: An evolutionary perspective. Ecol. Lett. 13, 1459–1474 (2010).10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01538.x ↗
84. Ozturk T., Ceber Z. P., Türkeş M., Kurnaz M. L. Projections of climate change in the Mediterranean Basin by using downscaled global climate model outputs. Int. J. Climatol. 2015, e4285. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4285.10.1002/joc.4285 ↗
85. Yang, Z. L. et al. Daytime warming lowers community temporal stability by reducing the abundance of dominant, stable species. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 154–163 (2017).10.1111/gcb.13391 ↗
86. Wang, Y. F., Jiang, L. L., Wang, Z. S., Song, M. H. & Wang, S. P. Phosphorus enrichment increased community stability by increasing asynchrony and dominant species stability in the alpine meadow of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 127, e2022JG006819 (2022).10.1029/2022JG006819 ↗
87. Liu, J. S. et al. Nitrogen addition reduced ecosystem stability regardless of its impacts on plant diversity. J. Ecol. 107, 2427–2435 (2019).10.1111/1365-2745.13187 ↗
88. Zhang, Y. H. et al. Nitrogen enrichment weakens ecosystem stability through decreased species asynchrony and population stability in a temperate grassland. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 1445–1455 (2016).10.1111/gcb.13140 ↗
89. Yuan, Y. S. et al. Nitrogen addition alters the relative importance of roots and mycorrhizal hyphae in regulating soil organic carbon accumulation in a karst forest. Soil Biol. Biochem. 195, 109471 (2024).10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109471 ↗
90. Yang, T. et al. Greater variation of soil organic carbon in limestone- than shale-based soil along soil depth in a subtropical coniferous forest within a karst faulted basin of China. Catena 246, 108389 (2024).10.1016/j.catena.2024.108389 ↗
91. Liu, R. L. Some soil features of karst ecosystem. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:132110609.
92. Lazaro, A. & Alomar, D. Landscape heterogeneity increases the spatial stability of pollination services to almond trees through the stability of pollinator visits. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 279, 149–155 (2019).10.1016/j.agee.2019.02.009 ↗
93. Zhao, Q., Zheng, G. Q. & Huang, Q. H. Characteristics of urban forest landscape pattern and optimization of urban forest spatial structure: a case study of Nanjing City. Acta Geogr. Sin. 62 (2007) (in Chinese).
94. Xiao, L. Evaluation of ecosystem service functions and optimization of ecological networks based on landscape patterns in Nanping City. Beijing Forestry University https://doi.org/10.26949/d.cnki.gblyu.2021.000706 (2021).10.26949/d.cnki.gblyu.2021.000706 ↗
95. Antiop, M. Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landsc. Urban Plan. 67, 9–26 (2004).10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00026-4 ↗
96. Dai, L. & Wang, Z. Construction and optimization strategy of ecological security pattern based on ecosystem services and landscape connectivity: A case study of Guizhou Province, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30, 45123–45139 (2023).10.1007/s11356-023-25417-7 ↗
97. Lin, S. et al. Multifactor relationships between the forest structure and water conservation function of Picea crassifolia Kom. plantations in Qinghai Province, China. Land Degrad. Dev. 33, 2596–2605 (2022).10.1002/ldr.4335 ↗
98. Zhao, J. D. et al. Studies on the stability of different communities in Nonggang karst region of Guangxi. Carsologica Sinica 31, 1–14 (in Chinese).
99. Deng, A. M. & Liao, X. Z. On development of ethnic minority community based on the empowerment theory. J. Wuhan Bus. Univ. 12, 80–81 (2015).