Unveiling the factors influencing Sakya monastery distribution via interpretable machine learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Tibetan Buddhism has deeply influenced the political, cultural, and spatial fabric of the Tibetan Plateau. Among its various traditions, the Sakya school is notable for its early theocratic regime. However, the temporal and spatial evolution of its monasteries—as key vehicles for the school’s spread—and the quantitative mechanisms behind their distribution remain unclear. This study combines GIS-based spatial analysis with interpretable machine learning (LightGBM-SHAP) to identify the key natural and human factors shaping Sakya monastery distribution. Emphasis is placed on capturing nonlinear interactions among variables to uncover deeper spatial patterns. Results reveal that human factors—particularly historical population, settlement density, and the presence of other sects—exert a stronger influence than natural conditions. The findings underscore the complex socio-political dynamics embedded in monastic diffusion and highlight the potential of explainable machine learning for advancing research in historical GIS (HGIS) and religious geography.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Flood Risk Assessment and Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Yu, K. The World’s Three Major Religions and Their Sects (Hunan People’s Publishing House, 1988).
2. Harvey, P. An Introduction To Buddhism: Teachings, History and Practices. (Cambridge University Press, 2012).10.1017/CBO9781139050531 ↗
3. Zürcher, E. The Buddhist Conquest Of China: The Spread and Adaptation of Buddhism In Early Medieval China (Brill, 2007).
4. Wang, K. D. On the influence of geographical environment on Tibetan Buddhism. J. Guangzhou Inst. Socialism 8, 58–62 (2010).
5. Duojie, Cairang Historical overview, doctrinal characteristics, and far-reaching influence of the Sakya school of Tibetan Buddhism. Qinghai Social Sciences 5, 34–41 (2018).
6. Chao, Z., Zhao, Y. & Liu, G. Multi-scale spatial patterns of Gelugpa monasteries of Tibetan Buddhism in Tibetan inhabited regions, China. GeoJournal 87, 4289–4310 (2022).10.1007/s10708-021-10501-7 ↗
7. Chao, Z., Zhao, Y., Fang, S. & Chen, D. Spatial diffusion processes of Gelugpa monasteries of Tibetan Buddhism in Tibetan areas of China utilizing the multi-level diffusion model. Geo Spatial Inform. Sci. 27, 64–81 (2022).10.1080/10095020.2022.2108345 ↗
8. Xiaoting, W., Yang, L., Jiangxin, Z. & Jorden, L. Z. T. The game between shamanism and Sakya school: the cultural identity significance of “liangzhou alliance” to Han, Tibetan and Mongolian nationalities. J. Sociol. Ethnol. 3, 17–23 (2021).
9. Lamo, S. Sakya tradition in Tibet & Ladakh region. Tibet J. 44, 19–26 (2019).
10. Rinpoche, D. The Sakya School of Tibetan Buddhism (Simon and Schuster, 2016).
11. Wang, L. The spread of the Sakya school of Tibetan Buddhism in the Amdo region from the perspective of spatiotemporal distribution of monasteries. J. North Minzu University 4, 131–136 (2013).
12. Wang, K. D. A preliminary study on the spatial distribution and characteristics of Sakya monasteries in the Kham region during historical periods. Religious Studies 4, 178–183 (2011).
13. Dean, K. Historical GIS (Geographical Information Systems) and the Geography of Religion. Handbook of the Geographies of Religion, 1213-1231 (Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024).10.1007/978-3-031-64811-3_68 ↗
14. Fang, S., Zhao, Y., Chao, Z. & Kang, X. Spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of Tibetan Buddhist monasteries in Amdo Tibetan Inhabited Regions, China. J. Geovis. Spat. Anal. 6, 29 (2022).10.1007/s41651-022-00124-y ↗
15. Fang, S. B., Zhao, Y. L., Liu, X. X. & Yang, Y. Quantitative characteristics and influencing factors of Tibetan Buddhist religious space with monasteries as the carrier: a case study of U-Tsang. China. Herit. Sci. 12, 23 (2024).10.1186/s40494-024-01142-3 ↗
16. Chen, D., Zhao, Y., Chao, Z., Li, Y. & Fang, S. Constructing a digital system of historical geographic information from the perspective of digital humanities: a case study of the historical geographic information database of Tibetan Buddhist monasteries. Digit. Scholarship Humanit. 39, 43–60 (2024).10.1093/llc/fqad103 ↗
17. Alrasheedi, K. G., Lue, G. J., Baby, S. N. & Al-Ansari, N. GIS-based spatial accessibility to Islamic facilities for muslim community in the Melbourne metropolitan area. Earth Sci. Geotech. Eng. 10, 49–68 (2020).
18. Afnarius, S., Akbar, F. & Yuliani, F. Developing web-based and mobile-based GIS for places of worship information to support halal tourism: a case study in Bukittinggi, Indonesia. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 9, 52 (2020).10.3390/ijgi9010052 ↗
19. Cofrancesco, P., Capolupo, C. & Frisetti, A. Mapping medieval Christianity. CARE-GIS: reusing web digital data in a webGIS application. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 12, 1–12 (2019).10.1145/3336125 ↗
20. Vargha, M. Modelling Christianisation: A Geospatial Analysis of the Archaeological Data on the Rural Church Network of Hungary in the 11th-12th Centuries (Archaeopress Publishing, 2022).10.2307/j.ctv2vm3b7n ↗
21. Saha, K., Kalra, R. & Khare, R. A geospatial approach to enhance religious tourism in India—A case of Ujjain city, Madhya Pradesh. GeoJournal 87, 1793–1810 (2022).10.1007/s10708-020-10334-w ↗
22. Piarsa, N. & Adi Purnawan, K. Design and implementation of web-based geographic information systems on mapping hindu’s temple. Appl. Mech. Mater. 776, 437–442 (2015).10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.776.437 ↗
23. He, W., Shirowzhan, S. & Pettit, C. J. GIS and machine learning for analysing influencing factors of bushfires using 40-year spatio-temporal bushfire data. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 11, 336 (2022).10.3390/ijgi11060336 ↗
24. Huang, D., Su, L., Fan, H., Zhou, L. & Tian, Y. Identification of topographic factors for gully erosion susceptibility and their spatial modelling using machine learning in the black soil region of Northeast China. Ecol. Indic. 143, 109376 (2022).10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109376 ↗
25. Avand, M. & Moradi, H. Using machine learning models, remote sensing, and GIS to investigate the effects of changing climates and land uses on flood probability. J. Hydrol. 595, 125663 (2021).10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125663 ↗
26. Linardatos, P., Papastefanopoulos, V. & Kotsiantis, S. Explainable AI: a review of machine learning interpretability methods. Entropy 23, 18 (2020).10.3390/e23010018 ↗
27. Du, M., Liu, N. & Hu, X. Techniques for interpretable machine learning. Commun. ACM 63, 68–77 (2019).10.1145/3359786 ↗
28. Li, Z. Extracting spatial effects from machine learning model using local interpretation method: An example of SHAP and XGBoost. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 96, 101845 (2022).10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101845 ↗
29. Ke, E., Zhao, J. & Zhao, Y. Investigating the influence of nonlinear spatial heterogeneity in urban flooding factors using geographic explainable artificial intelligence. J. Hydrol. 648, 132398 (2025).10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132398 ↗
30. Zhang, J. et al. Insights into geospatial heterogeneity of landslide susceptibility based on the SHAP-XGBoost model. J. Environ. Manag. 332, 117357 (2023).10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117357 ↗
31. Peng, S. 1-km onthly Mean Temperature Dataset for China (1901-2022). (National Tibetan Plateau Data Center, 2019).
32. Peng, S. 1-km Monthly Precipitation Dataset For China (1901-2020) (National Tibetan Plateau Data Center, 2020).
33. Silverman, B. W. Density Estimation For Statistics And Data Analysis (Routledge, 2018).10.1201/9781315140919 ↗
34. Ebdon, D. Statistics in Geography (Blackwell, 1985).
35. Getis, A. Interaction modeling using second-order analysis. Environ. Plan. A 16, 173–183 (1984).10.1068/a160173 ↗
36. Ke, G. et al. Lightgbm: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst. 30, 3146–3154 (2017).
37. Wang, D.-n, Li, L. & Zhao, D. Corporate finance risk prediction based on LightGBM. Inf. Sci. 602, 259–268 (2022).10.1016/j.ins.2022.04.058 ↗
38. Qiu, Y. & Zhang, H. Prediction of Software User Interaction Data Based on the LightGBM Model. In Proceedings of the 2024 8th International Conference on Big Data and Internet of Things 226-230 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2024).10.1145/3697355.3697392 ↗
39. Pan, H. et al. The LightGBM-based classification algorithm for Chinese characters speech imagery BCI system. Cogn. Neurodyn. 17, 373–384 (2023).10.1007/s11571-022-09819-w ↗
40. Wang, S. et al. Interpretation of spatial and temporal changes and drivers of ecological source regions based on LightGBM-SHAP. AIP Adv 14, 065036 (2024).10.1063/5.0213347 ↗
41. Lundberg, S. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst. 30, 4768–4777 (2017).
42. Shapley, L. S. A value for n-person games. Contribution to the Theory of Games 307-317 (Princeton University Press, 1953).10.1515/9781400881970-018 ↗
43. Van den Broeck, G., Lykov, A., Schleich, M. & Suciu, D. On the tractability of SHAP explanations. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 74, 851–886 (2022).10.1613/jair.1.13283 ↗
44. Moreno, M. A. Derge: the heaven of the Tibetan book. PORTO ARTE: Revista de Artes Visuais 23, 137–141 (2018).
45. Gesang. The ancient Sakya monastery: the second Dunhuang. China Cult. Heritage 46, 40–45 (2009).
46. Davidson, R. M. Tibetan Renaissance: Tantric Buddhism in the Rebirth of Tibetan Culture (Columbia University Press, 2005).
47. Li, X., Gao, J. & Zhang, J. A topographic perspective on the distribution of degraded meadows and their changes on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, West China. Land Degrad. Dev. 29, 1574–1582 (2018).10.1002/ldr.2952 ↗
48. Yao, T. et al. A review of climatic controls on δ18O in precipitation over the Tibetan Plateau: observations and simulations. Rev. Geophys. 51, 525–548 (2013).10.1002/rog.20023 ↗
49. Gamble, R., Powers, J. & Hackett, P. Central Tibetan famines 1280-1400: when premodern climate change and bad governance starved Tibet. Bull. Sch. Orient. Afr. Stud. 85, 215–233 (2022).10.1017/S0041977X22000556 ↗