A computational framework for evaluating an edge-integrated, multi-ramp construction model of the Great Pyramid of Giza
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Despite decades of study, a quantitative, integrated framework to evaluate minute-scale throughput, geometric control, and a zero external footprint for Khufu’s pyramid has been lacking. We test the Integrated Edge-Ramp (IER) model—a helical path formed by omitting and backfilling perimeter courses—using a unified, end-to-end pipeline coupling parametric geometry, discrete-event logistics, and staged finite-element analysis (FEA). An adaptive multi-ramp strategy can sustain 4–6-min dispatches and yields a median on-site duration of 13.8–20.6 years (95% CI); including quarrying, river transport, and seasonal pauses gives 20–27 years. FEA indicates that stresses and settlements remain within plausible limits for Old Kingdom limestone under self-weight. The model’s geometry is also consistent with internal voids identified by muon imaging (a hypothesis-generating result). The IER helps reconcile throughput, survey access, and zero-footprint closure, and produces falsifiable predictions (edge-fill signatures, corner wear). Our study provides a transferable, open-data/code framework for testing construction hypotheses for ancient megastructures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ancient Egypt and Archaeology · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Building materials and conservation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. Tallet, P. The Red Sea Papyri (Wadi el-Jarf): new texts and new research perspectives (in French). Bull. Inst. Fr. Arch.éol. Orient. 121, 403–424 (2021).
2. Ghoneim, E. et al. The ancient Ahramat Branch of the Nile and its potential role in the construction of the Egyptian pyramids. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 258, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01379-7 (2024).10.1038/s43247-024-01379-7 ↗
3. Sheisha, H. et al. Nile waterscapes facilitated the construction of the Giza pyramids during the 3rd millennium BCE. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2202530119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2202530119 (2022).10.1073/pnas.2202530119 ↗
4. Hölscher, U. The tomb of King Chephren (in German). Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs’sche Buchhandlung. https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.26793 (1912).10.11588/diglit.26793 ↗
5. Brichieri-Colombi, S. Engineering a feasible ramp for the Great Pyramid of Giza. PalArch’s. J. Archaeol. Egypt/Egyptol. 12, 1–15 (2015).
6. Arnold, D. Reflections on the problem of pyramid construction (in German).Mitteilungen Dtsch. Arch.äol. Inst. Abt. Kairo (MDAIK37, 15–28 (1981).
7. Lehner, M. The Complete Pyramids: Solving the Ancient Mysteries (Thames & Hudson, London, 2008).
8. Lehner, M, Hawass, Z. Giza and the Pyramids: The Definitive History (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2017).
9. Hawass, Z. & Lehner, M. Builders of the pyramids. Archaeology 50, 36–47 (1997).
10. Dunham, D. Building an Egyptian pyramid. Archaeology 9, 84–91 (1956).
11. Houdin, J. P. Khufu: The Secrets Behind the Building of the Great Pyramid (Farid Atiya Press, Cairo, 2006).
12. Morishima, K. et al. Discovery of a big void in Khufu’s Pyramid by observation of cosmic-ray muons. Nature 552, 386–390, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24647 (2017).10.1038/nature24647 ↗
13. Klemm, R., Klemm, D. D. The integral ramp as a construction element of large pyramids (in German). in Stationen. Beiträge zur Kulturgeschichte Ägyptens. Rainer Stadelmann gewidmet. (eds Guksch, H. et al.) p. 87–94 (Mainz am Rhein: Philipp von Zabern, 1998).
14. Müller-Römer, F. The construction of pyramids in the old kingdom. Hist. Res. 11, 22–30, https://doi.org/10.11648/j.history.20231101.14 (2023).10.11648/j.history.20231101.14 ↗
15. Müller, J. et al. Structural simulations and construction hypotheses for prehistoric monumental architecture using 3D modelling. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 44, 103483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2022.103483 (2022).10.1016/j.jasrep.2022.103483 ↗
16. Fernández-Palacios et al. Access to complex reality-based 3D models using virtual reality solutions. J. Cult. Herit. 23, 40–48, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2016.09.003 (2017).10.1016/j.culher.2016.09.003 ↗
17. Apollonio, F. I. et al. 3D modelling and data enrichment in digital reconstruction of architectural heritage. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. XL-5/W2, 43–48, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-5-W2-43-2013 (2013).10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-5-W2-43-2013 ↗
18. Landreau, X. et al. On the possible use of hydraulic force to assist with building the step pyramid of saqqara. PLoS One 19, e0306690, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306690 (2024).10.1371/journal.pone.0306690 ↗
19. Brichieri-Colombi, S. A feasible spiral ramp for the Great Pyramid of Giza: engineering and logistical considerations. PalArch’s. J. Archaeol. Egypt/Egyptol. 17, 1–19 (2020).
20. Hirlimann, C. Energy budget and block flow estimations for pyramid construction. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.00525 (pre-print) (2022).10.48550/arXiv.2201.00525 ↗
21. Fajardo, S. et al. Modelling and measuring complexity of traditional and ancient technologies using Petri nets. PLoS One 17, e0278310, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278310 (2022).10.1371/journal.pone.0278310 ↗
22. Manière, R. Least cost path analysis for archaeological logistics: applications to ancient Egyptian sites. J. Comput. Appl. Archaeol. 4, 100–113, https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.67 (2021).10.5334/jcaa.67 ↗
23. Smith, C. B. How the Great Pyramid was Built (Smithsonian Books, Washington (DC), 2018).
24. Brier, B., Houdin, J. P. The Secret of the Great Pyramid: How One Man’s Obsession Led to the Solution of Ancient Egypt’s Greatest Mystery (HarperCollins, New York, 2008).
25. Harrell, J. A. & Brown, V. M. The world’s oldest surviving artwork of hauling a monument on a sled. J. Am. Res. Cent. Egypt 31, 161–173, https://doi.org/10.2307/40001091 (1994).10.2307/40001091 ↗
26. Fall, A. et al. Sliding friction on wet and dry sand. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 175502. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.175502 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.175502 ↗
27. Stocks, D. A. Experiments in Egyptian Archaeology: Stoneworking Technology in Ancient Egypt (Routledge, London, 2003).
28. Hemeda, S. & Sonbol, A. Sustainability problems of the Giza pyramids. Herit. Sci. 8, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-020-0356-9 (2020).10.1186/s40494-020-0356-9 ↗
29. Weiss, H. et al. Pyramid building and collapse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2212483119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2212483119 (2022).10.1073/pnas.2212483119 ↗
30. McKenzie, D. The course thicknesses of the great Pyramid. Nexus Netw. J. 18, 347–372, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-016-0296-6 (2016).10.1007/s00004-016-0296-6 ↗
31. Pugacheva, P. et al. Investigation of the North Face Corridor in the Great Pyramid of Giza using electrical resistivity tomography. Sci. Rep. 15, 41187. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-29081-4 (2025).10.1038/s41598-025-29081-4 ↗
32. Howell, M., Prevenier, W. From Reliable Sources: An Introduction to Historical Methods (Cornell University Press, Ithaca (NY), 2001).
33. Brichieri-Colombi, S. The ramp at Hatnub quarry: no solution for pyramids. PalArch’s. J. Archaeol. Egypt/Egyptol. 16, 1–21 (2019).
34. Liefferink, R. W. et al. Sliding on wet sand. Granul. Matter 22, 57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-020-01022-0 (2020).10.1007/s10035-020-01022-0 ↗
35. Liefferink, R. W. et al. Ploughing friction on wet and dry sand. Phys. Rev. E. 98, 052903. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.98.052903 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevE.98.052903 ↗
36. West, J. et al. Building the next pyramid. arXiv preprint arXiv. 1502.07319. https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.07319 (pre-print) (2015)
37. Cooper, J. A. et al. Maximal sustained levels of energy expenditure in humans during exercise. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 43, 2359–2367 (2011).10.1249/MSS.0b013e31822430ed ↗
38. Klemm, D. D., & Klemm, R. Stone and Stone Quarries in Ancient Egypt (Oxbow Books for the British Museum, Oxford, 2008).
39. Lehner, M. The development of the Giza necropolis: the Khufu project. Mitteilungen Dtsch. Arch.äol. Inst., Abt. Kairo (MDAIK) 41, 109–143 (1985).
40. Clerc, L. The accurate construction of the right angles of the Great Pyramid’s ground plan. Herit. Sci. 8, 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-020-00412-4 (2020).10.1186/s40494-020-00412-4 ↗
41. Marriner, N. et al. The pyramid builders’ waterways: Reconstructing the ancient topography of Khufu’s Pharaonic Harbour at Giza, Egypt. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 53, 104303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2023.104303 (2024).10.1016/j.jasrep.2023.104303 ↗
42. Der Manuelian, P. Walking Among Pharaohs: George Reisner and the Dawn of Modern Egyptology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2022).10.1093/oso/9780197628935.001.0001 ↗
43. Daganzo, C. F. The cell transmission model, part II: network traffic. Transport. Res. Part B Methodol. 29, 79–93, https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(94)00022-R (1995).10.1016/0191-2615(94)00022-R ↗
44. Bloxam, E. & Storemyr, P. The quarries of Egypt’s Eastern Desert. Egypt. Archaeol. 44, 23–27 (2014).
45. Lehner, M. The pyramid-age settlement of the southern mount at Giza. J. Am. Res Cent. Egypt 39, 27–74, https://doi.org/10.2307/40001149 (2002).10.2307/40001149 ↗
46. Lehner, M. The name and nature of the Heit el-Ghurab Old Kingdom site: worker’s town, pyramid town, and the port hypothesis. in The Pyramids: Between Life and Death (eds Hein, I., Billing, N. & Meyer-Dietrich, E.) 99–160 (Uppsala University, 2016).
47. Tavares, A. Village, town and barracks: a fourth dynasty settlement at Heit el-Ghurab, Giza. in Old Kingdom, New Perspectives: Egyptian Art and Archaeology (ed Eyre, C.), 2750–2150 BC, p. 233–251 (Oxbow Books, Oxford, 2011).10.2307/j.ctvh1dm4r.25 ↗
48. Dormion, G. Architectural Analysis of the Chamber of Cheops (in French) (Fayard, Paris, 2004).
49. Schumacher, T. et al. Confirmation of the ScanPyramids North Face Corridor in the Great Pyramid of Giza using multi-modal image fusion from three non-destructive testing techniques. Sci. Rep. 15, 9275. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-91115-8 (2025).10.1038/s41598-025-91115-8 ↗
50. Procureur, S. et al. Precise characterization of a corridor-shaped structure in Khufu’s Pyramid by observation of cosmic-ray muons. Nat. Commun. 14, 1144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36351-0 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-36351-0 ↗
51. Elkarmoty, M. et al. Localization and shape determination of a hidden corridor in the Great Pyramid of Giza using non-destructive testing. NDT E Int. 139, 102809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2023.102809 (2023).10.1016/j.ndteint.2023.102809 ↗
52. Ivashov, S. et al. Discussion of the non-destructive testing possibilities for the study of the Great Pyramid of Giza. Heritage 6, 5867–5882, https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6080308 (2023).10.3390/heritage6080308 ↗
53. Sharafeldin, S. M. et al. Shallow geophysical techniques to investigate the groundwater table at the Great Pyramids of Giza, Egypt. Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst. 8, 29–43, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-8-29-2019 (2019).10.5194/gi-8-29-2019 ↗
54. Ayrinhac, S. Transportation of the Djehutihotep Statue revisited. Tribol. Online 11, 466–473, https://doi.org/10.2474/trol.11.466 (2016).10.2474/trol.11.466 ↗
55. Harris, B. Roll me a great stone: a brief historiography of megalithic construction and the genesis of the roller hypothesis. Oxf. J. Archaeol. 37, 267–281 (2018).10.1111/ojoa.12142 ↗
56. Abd El-Hady, M. et al. Geoenvironmental investigation of Sahure’s pyramid, Abusir archaeological site, Giza, Egypt. Herit. Sci. 9, 135. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-021-00575-2 (2021).10.1186/s40494-021-00575-2 ↗
57. Fahmy, A. et al. Geoenvironmental investigation of Sahure’s Pyramid, Abusir archaeological site, Giza, Egypt. Herit. Sci. 10, 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00699-1 (2022).10.1186/s40494-022-00699-1 ↗
58. Mahmoud, S. & Abdel-Hady, M. Petrography and deterioration processes of building stones of ancient Egyptian monuments. Geoarchaeology 35, 907–920, https://doi.org/10.1002/gea.21788 (2020).10.1002/gea.21788 ↗
59. El-Said, Y. et al. Non-destructive investigation of the subsurface condition of the first step of the Great Pyramid of Giza, Egypt.NRIAG J. Astron. Geophys. (now. Egypt. J. Astron. Geophys. 11, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1080/20909977.2021.2022784 (2022).10.1080/20909977.2021.2022784 ↗
60. El-khteeb, A. et al. Archeological exploration via integrated shallow geophysical methods: case study from Saqqara, Giza, Egypt. Herit. Sci. 13, 38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-025-01605-1 (2025).10.1038/s40494-025-01605-1 ↗
61. El-Aguizy, O. M., Gobashy, M. M., Metwally, A., Soliman, K. S. & El-Hassanin, N. The discovery of the tomb of the Great Army General Iwrhya: A quasi 3D Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT), Saqqara, Giza, Egypt. Contribut. Geophys. Geod. 50, 425–446, https://doi.org/10.31577/congeo.2020.50.4.3 (2020).10.31577/congeo.2020.50.4.3 ↗
62. Gamále, M. et al. The ScIDEP Muon radiography project at the Egyptian Pyramid of Khafre. J. Appl. Phys. 138, 044901. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0273135 (2025).10.1063/5.0273135 ↗
63. Ivashov, S. et al. A proposed radar method for non-destructive investigation of Egyptian pyramids. Insight – Non-Destruct. Test. Cond. Monit. 63, 12–19, https://doi.org/10.1784/insi.2021.63.1.12 (2021).10.1784/insi.2021.63.1.12 ↗
64. Scheuring, S. A. Construction of the Great Pyramid with pulley-like systems using counter-weights on sliding-ramps. npj Herit. Sci. 13, 473, https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-025-02018-w (2025).10.1038/s40494-025-02018-w ↗
65. Odler, M. et al. Arsenical copper tools of Old Kingdom Giza craftsmen: first data. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 36, 102997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.102997 (2021).10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.102997 ↗