journal article·2023-09

Mechanism Analysis of Electrochemical Micro-machining Behavior Assisted by Magnetic Field with Local Magnetic Induction Lines Deformation

Guibing Pang, Xudong Cao, Jingang Zhang, Sifan Wang, Ben Lin, Mingying Li, Manfu Wang, Zhihua Zhang

JOM· Volume 75· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

Grade 404C stainless steel was prepared with high precision by electrochemical micro-machining with or without magnetic field assistance. The surface roughness distributions were detected and their micro-morphologies were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. Compared with traditional electrochemical micro-machining, the processing efficiency and final surface quality were improved by introducing an external magnet with the north pole directly under the machining gap. However, when dual magnets with the alignment of opposite north–north poles were employed, the variation of surface roughness with processing time was almost consistent with the magnetic field-free case. The mechanism of the effect of magnetic field on electrochemical micro-machining was elaborated. The advantage of magnetic field assistance was the generation of magnetohydrodynamic convection, which facilitated mass transport and accelerated anodic dissolution. Due to the magnetic induction lines in the machining gap being heavily deformed by the repulsion between the magnetic poles, the magnetohydrodynamic force was impaired and the gradient magnetic force was enhanced, which weakened the mass transfer and inhibited the anodic dissolution. In the process of magnetic field assistance electrochemical micro-machining, the magnetohydrodynamic force and the gradient magnetic force will affect the processing effect and enough attention should be paid to the deformation of the magnetic induction lines.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Advanced machining processes and optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. N. Holstein, W.G. Krauss, J.G. Konys, S. Heuer, and T. Weber, Fusion Eng. Des. 109, 956 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2016.01.045 (2016).10.1016/j.fusengdes.2016.01.045 ↗
2. R. Mahdavinejad, and M. Hatami, J. Mater. Process Tech. 202(1–3), 307 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.09.027 (2008).10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.09.027 ↗
3. A.A. Gomez-Gallegos, F. Mill, and A.R. Mount, J. Manuf. Process 23, 83 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.05.010 (2016).10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.05.010 ↗
4. J.R. Vinod Kumaar, and R. Thanigaivelan, Mater. Manuf. Process. 35(9), 969 https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2020.1750630 (2020).10.1080/10426914.2020.1750630 ↗
5. M.M. Lohrengel, K.P. Rataj, N. Schubert, M. Schneider, S. Höhn, A. Michaelis, M. Hackert-Oschätzchen, A. Martin, and A. Schubert, Powder Metall. 57(1), 21 https://doi.org/10.1179/1743290113Y.0000000062 (2014).10.1179/1743290113Y.0000000062 ↗
6. R. Thanigaivelan, and R.M. Arunachalam, Mater. Manuf. Process 25(10), 1181 https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2010.508806 (2010).10.1080/10426914.2010.508806 ↗
7. T. Sathish, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 8(5), 4354 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.07.046 (2019).10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.07.046 ↗
8. C.Y. Zhang, Y.J. Zhang, X.L. Chen, W. Li, and G.X. Liu, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 97(9–12), 3575 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2142-3 (2018).10.1007/s00170-018-2142-3 ↗
9. Y. Liu, and N.S. Qu, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 169, 105333 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105333 (2020).10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105333 ↗
10. W. Chen, F. Han, and J. Wang, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 96(1), 1367 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1594-9 (2018).10.1007/s00170-018-1594-9 ↗
11. J. Li, D. Wang, D. Zhu, and B. He, J. Mater. Process Tech. 275, 116323 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116323 (2020).10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116323 ↗
12. M. Hajian, M.R. Razfar, and S. Movahed, Precis. Eng. 45, 322 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.03.009 (2016).10.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.03.009 ↗
13. K.G. Zhai, L. Tang, J. Liu, X.Y. Zhang, Y.N. Yan, and X. Feng, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 115(4), 1227 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06930-w (2021).10.1007/s00170-021-06930-w ↗
14. L. Tang, and W.M. Gan, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 72(5–8), 685 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5701-2 (2014).10.1007/s00170-014-5701-2 ↗
15. Z.J. Fan, T.C. Wang, and L. Zhong, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 149(1–3), 409 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.12.025 (2004).10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.12.025 ↗
16. L. Li, J.M. Bao, P.Y. Cheng, K. Yun, and H.H. Gao, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 101(5), 1635 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-3072-9 (2019).10.1007/s00170-018-3072-9 ↗
17. S. Ayyappan, K. Sivakumar, and M. Kalaimathi, P I Mech. Eng. C-J Mech. 231(10), 1956 https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406215623310 (2017).10.1177/0954406215623310 ↗
18. L. Li, and J.M. Bao, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 94(1), 1177 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0983-9 (2018).10.1007/s00170-017-0983-9 ↗
19. P.S. Pa, ECS Trans. 14(1), 629 https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2956081 (2008).10.1149/1.2956081 ↗
20. C.F. Zhang, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 15(2), 1148 https://doi.org/10.20964/2020.02.10 (2020).10.20964/2020.02.10 ↗
21. Z.P. Lu, C.B. Huang, D. Huang, and Y. Wu, Corros. Sci. 48(10), 3049 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2005.11.014 (2006).10.1016/j.corsci.2005.11.014 ↗
22. L. Li, J.M. Bao, P.Y. Cheng, K. Yun, and P.L. Yin, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 102(1), 949 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-3185-1 (2019).10.1007/s00170-018-3185-1 ↗
23. P. Lazzeretti, J. Chem. Phys. 150(18), 184117 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5097578 (2019).10.1063/1.5097578 ↗
24. R. Shirsavar, M. Nasiri, A. Amjadi, A. Nejati, S.O. Sobhani, and M. Habibi, Rsc Adv. 6(113), 112641 https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra24346k (2016).10.1039/c6ra24346k ↗
25. X.P. Wang, J.J. Zhao, Y.P. Hu, L. Li, and C. Wang, Electrochim. Acta 117, 113 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2013.11.100 (2014).10.1016/j.electacta.2013.11.100 ↗
26. B.Y. Yuan, C. Wang, L. Li, and S.H. Chen, Corros. Sci. 58, 69 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2012.01.005 (2012).10.1016/j.corsci.2012.01.005 ↗
27. D. Barker, and F.C. Walsh, T I Met. Finish 69(4), 158 https://doi.org/10.1080/00202967.1991.11870915 (1991).10.1080/00202967.1991.11870915 ↗
28. C. Winkelmann, and W. Lang, Int. J. Mach. Tool Manuf. 72, 25 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2013.05.004 (2013).10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2013.05.004 ↗
29. L. Li, M.A. Baoji, R.F. Wang, and L.Q. Du, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 91, 2995 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-9983-z (2017).10.1007/s00170-017-9983-z ↗
30. S.R. Ragsdale, K.M. Grant, and H.S. White, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120(51), 13461 https://doi.org/10.1021/ja982540q (1998).10.1021/ja982540q ↗
31. R.A. Tacken, and L.J.J. Janssen, J. Appl. Electrochem. 25(1), 1 https://doi.org/10.1007/bf002512 (1995).10.1007/bf002512 ↗