Quantitative spatial connectivity of karst industrial heritage sites: a case study of five Guizhou sites
Source abstract
Abstract
Industrial heritage clusters, as integral components of cultural heritage, have received global attention. This study examines their spatial distribution and connectivity within karst regions using fractal dimension and complex network analysis, with five Guizhou industrial heritage clusters as case studies. Key findings are: Their spatial morphology exhibits pronounced topographic dependency, manifesting through building agglomeration, heterogeneous planar configurations, and diverse morphological patterns; The architectural relics network demonstrates weak overall connectivity, characterized by structural fragility, low stability, and balanced redundancy; Individual clusters display limited medium/high centrality nodes, dominated by low/medium competitiveness. Coordinator roles constitute the primary network functions, with location and transportation emerging as critical determinants. Based on these insights, the study proposes integrated conservation strategies for industrial heritage preservation and systematic restoration, alongside hierarchical classification frameworks. These outcomes provide methodological references for the sustainable management of industrial and cultural heritage sites worldwide.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · Religious Tourism and Spaces · Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhang, J., Sun, H., Xu, S. & Aoki, N. Analysis of the spatial and temporal distribution and reuse of urban industrial heritage: the case of Tianjin. Land 11, 2273 (2022).10.3390/land11122273 ↗
2. Xu, Y., Wu, J. A review of research on third-line construction in 2023. J. China Three Gorges University (Humanities and Social Sciences) 46, 15–20 (2024).
3. Zhang, J. et al. Construction of the Chinese route of industrial heritage based on spatial and temporal distribution analysis. Buildings 14, 1065 (2024).10.3390/buildings14041065 ↗
4. Li Hongru, A. Brief discussion on the experience of revitalization and utilization of industrial heritage in world cultural heritage in the world. Low.-Carbon Econ. 8, 17 (2019).
5. Xu, D., Huang, G. & Fei, X. Empirical study on the impact of authenticity evaluation in the adaptive reuse process of industrial heritage. 2024 3rd International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities and Arts (SSHA 2024). Atlantis Press, 843–863. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-259-0_88 (2024).10.2991/978-2-38476-259-0_88 ↗
6. Blagojević, M. R. & Tufegdžić, A. The new technology era requirements and a sustainable approach to industrial heritage renewal. Energy Build. 115, 148–153 (2016).10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.07.062 ↗
7. Jiang, Z. et al. External spatial morphology of creative industries parks in the industrial heritage category based on spatial syntax: Taking Tianjin as an example. Buildings 14, 559 (2024).10.3390/buildings14030559 ↗
8. Zhong, D., Huang, P., Xiong, G. & Li, H. Renewal strategies of industrial heritage based on placeness theory: The case of Guangzhou, China. Cities 155, 105407 (2024).10.1016/j.cities.2024.105407 ↗
9. Martinović, A. & Ifko, S. Industrial heritage as a catalyst for urban regeneration in post-conflict cities. Case study: Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Cities 74, 259–268 (2018).10.1016/j.cities.2017.12.013 ↗
10. Zhang, J. The protection and utilization model of industrial heritage in the era of creative economy. Constr. News Cult. 2, 91–94 (2020).
11. Mo, C., Wang, L. & Rao, F. Typology, preservation, and regeneration of the post-1949 industrial heritage in China: A case study of Shanghai. Land 11, 1527 (2022).10.3390/land11091527 ↗
12. Yang, L. Study on the development model of the combination of “Third-Tier” industrial heritage and rural tourism under the concept of urban image. Sci. Program. 2022, 2730532 (2022).
13. Scaffidi, F. Average social and territorial innovation impacts of industrial heritage regeneration. Cities 148, 104907 (2024).10.1016/j.cities.2024.104907 ↗
14. Yao, L., Gao, C. & Zhuang, Y. Exploring the spatiotemporal dynamics and simulating heritage corridors for sustainable development of industrial heritage in Foshan City, China. Sustainability 16, 5605 (2024).10.3390/su16135605 ↗
15. Zhang, J., Cenci, J. & Becue, V. A preliminary study on industrial landscape planning and spatial layout in Belgium. Heritage 4, 1375–1387 (2021).10.3390/heritage4030075 ↗
16. Çayır, C. Sanayi mirasının korunarak yeniden işlevlendirilmesi Eskişehir fabrikalar bölgesi çift kurt kiremit ve tuğla fabrikası örneği (Master’s thesis, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University (Turkey)) (2011).
17. Xu, L. & He, S. Protection and Planning of Three-line Construction Industrial Sites under the Guidance of Cultural Value.Urban Planning Society of China, Chengdu Municipal People’s Government. Spatial Governance for High-quality Development: Proceedings of the 2020 China Urban Planning Annual Conference (09 Urban Cultural Genetic Conservation). School of Construction and Planning, Huazhong University of Science and Technology: 11, https://doi.org/10.26914/c.cnkihy.2021.032317 (2021).10.26914/c.cnkihy.2021.032317 ↗
18. Claver, J., García-Domínguez, A. & Sebastián, M. A. Multicriteria decision tool for sustainable reuse of industrial heritage into its urban and social environment. Case Studies. Sustainability 12, 7430 (2020).10.3390/su12187430 ↗
19. Kerstetter, D., Confer, J. & Bricker, K. Industrial heritage attractions: Types and tourists. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 7, 91–104 (1998).10.1300/J073v07n02_05 ↗
20. Fangli, S. & Shihao, L. Research on intangible cultural heritage policy evaluation based on PMC Index Model. Inf. Sci. 41, 151–161 (2023).
21. Zhang, Y. et al. Study on the spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors in the reuse of national industrial heritage sites in China. Sustainability 15, 16685 (2023).10.3390/su152416685 ↗
22. Zhang, B., Fan, J. & Huang, Z. Research on spatial morphological characteristics and influencing factors of industrial heritage: a case study of nine industrial heritages in Guizhou Province. Land 13, 1785 (2024).10.3390/land13111785 ↗
23. Luo, Y. & Li, Y. Journal of Southwest University of Science and Technology (Philosophy and Social Science) 39, 11–17. (2022).
24. Hillier, W. R. G., Yang, T. & Turner, A. Advancing DepthMap to advance our understanding of cities: Comparing streets and cities and streets with cities. Proceedings: Eighth International Space Syntax Symposium. (2012).
25. Cooray, S. A qualitative enhancement to quantitative social network analysis. Inf. Soc. 37(4), 227–246 (2021).10.1080/01972243.2021.1926028 ↗
26. Gao, J. & Cao, Y. Research on the analysis and reconstruction strategy of industrial heritage from the perspective of cultural landscape. Archit. Cult. 10, 156–158 (2024). (in Chinese).
27. Liu, N., Huang, J. & Zhou, J. Discussion on the planning strategy of industrial heritage protection in the central area of the city: A case study of the old site of Huaxin Cement Plant in Huangshi City. Hubei Prov. Plan. 39, 117–124 (2023).
28. Luo, J., Xu, Z. & Guo, J. Analysis on the spatial layout and stylistic characteristics of Tusi Architecture in Guizhou. Shanxi Archit.47(2), 11–13 (2021).
29. Yuan X. Network relationship and spatial network characteristics of “ecological-living-living-living” traditional villages in Miaodong traditional villages in southeast Guizhou Province. Guizhou: Guizhou University,https://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10657-1022712575.htm 2022.
30. Zhang, B. et al. The Changsha historic urban area: a study on the evolution characteristics and influencing factors of the connectivity of construction land. Herit. Sci. 12, 287 (2024).10.1186/s40494-024-01401-3 ↗
31. Shi, Y. & Huang, Y. Exploration of the correlation between historic district morphology and social network structure. Planners 34, 101–105 (2018).
32. Song J., Chen J., Hu Y. Spatial Transformation Strategy of Industrial Heritage from the Perspective of Social Network Analysis: A Case Study of Sanlinqiao Community Center Project. Southern Architecture,2024,(03):32-41. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=14CuGbpFC1Cs08tKwNGnfMusg5kvaxU0TzWsq4VBO3KikXIMzKjDjbK36x4k71Q8k27QN9IgvVq4uvWYewB_Pxx5sIovaK14rtOWFrfHWaa2Gq5LVpwxp9QLZ3zm-z9QP86pgp6rHDqfexHBg-GQTxUoSHWwF9KXYJypMGwEh_W1MJTc2gC0ziF9vktr_eqE2UGCfZzVFc=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS.
33. Li, A. & Wahid, W. A. Conservation situation and social network analysis of industrial heritage in Tangshan City, China. Int. J. Art. Des. 7, 16–27 (2023).