Portable XRF for paintings and metals authentication: a critical guide to some practical limitations and multi-technique integrations
Source abstract
Abstract
In authentication studies, chemists, scientists, art historians, conservators, and law enforcement collaborate to identify forgeries. For paintings, pigment characterization (detecting anachronistic materials) is decisive. Portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (pXRF) is a dominant, versatile, non-destructive identification method, yet its misuse is documented and widespread. Literature and current results require contextualization by instrument and era, avoiding over-interpretation. This practical review examines pXRF’s strengths and constraints through case studies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis · X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis · Conservation Techniques and Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Galli, A. & Bonizzoni, L. True versus forged in the cultural heritage materials: the role of PXRF analysis. X-Ray Spectrom. 43, 22–28 (2014).10.1002/xrs.2461 ↗
2. Chiari, G. & Sarrazin, P. Portable non-invasive XRD/XRF instrument: a new way of looking at objects surface. in 9th International Conference ‘Art2008,’ Jerusalem 25-30 2008:Non-Destructive Investigations and Microanalysis for the Diagnostics and Conservation of Cultural and Environmental Heritage (ed Notea, A.) pp 1–6 (Israel National Commission for UNESCO, Jerusalem, 2008).
3. Silveira, P. & Falcade, T. Applications of energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence technique in metallic cultural heritage studies. J. Cult. Herit. 57, 243–255 (2022).10.1016/j.culher.2022.09.008 ↗
4. Rahman, M. S., Metselaar, H. S. C. & Bushroa, A. R. XRF data-based statistical clustering of ancient ceramic artifacts and analysing provenance with thermo-mineralogical analysis. Spectrochim. Acta Part B 224, 107090 (2025).10.1016/j.sab.2024.107090 ↗
5. Santos, H. C. et al. Identification of forgeries in historical enamels by combining the non-destructive scanning XRF imaging and alpha-PIXE portable techniques. Microchem. J. 124, 241–246 (2016).10.1016/j.microc.2015.08.025 ↗
6. Al-Bashaireh, K., Serogy, A. R. E., Hussein, E. & Shakhatreh, M. Genuine or forged? Assessing the authenticity of a confiscated manuscript using radiocarbon dating and archaeometric techniques. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. 9, 337–343 (2017).10.1007/s12520-015-0286-8 ↗
7. Chiari, G. Saving art in situ. Nature 453, 159 (2008).10.1038/453159a ↗
8. Monico, L. et al. Advanced X-ray techniques to study the alteration of pigments in paintings. Riv. Nuovo Cim. 48, 315–434 (2025).10.1007/s40766-025-00070-7 ↗
9. Moioli, P. & Seccaroni, C. Analysis of art objects using a portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer. X-Ray Spectrom. 29, 48–52 (2000).10.1002/(SICI)1097-4539(200001/02)29:1<48::AID-XRS404>3.0.CO;2-H ↗
10. Cavaleri, T. et al. Below the surface of the coffin lid of Neskhonsuennekhy in the Museo Egizio collection. X-Ray Spectrom. 50, 1–14 (2020).
11. Cesareo, R. et al. Applications of non-cryogenic portable EDXRF systems in archaeometry. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 380, 440–445 (1996).10.1016/S0168-9002(96)00320-8 ↗
12. Janssens, K. et al. Use of microscopic XRF for non-destructive analysis in art and archaeometry. X-Ray Spectrom. 29, 73–91 (2000).10.1002/(SICI)1097-4539(200001/02)29:1<73::AID-XRS416>3.0.CO;2-M ↗
13. Orsilli, J., Migliori, A., Padilla-Alvarez, R., Martini, M. & Galli, A. AR-XRF measurements and data treatment for the evaluation of gilding samples of cultural heritage. J. Anal. Spectrom. 38, 174–185 (2023).10.1039/D2JA00227B ↗
14. Harth, A. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) on painted heritage objects: a review using topic modeling. Herit. Sci. 12, 17 (2024).10.1186/s40494-024-01135-2 ↗
15. Potts, P. J. & Sargent, M. In situ measurements using hand-held XRF spectrometers: a tutorial review. J. Anal. Spectrom. 37, 1928–1947 (2022).10.1039/D2JA00171C ↗
16. Glocker, R. & Schreiber, H. Quantitative Röntgenspektralanalyse mit Kalterregung des Spektrums. Ann. Phys. 8, 1089–1102 (1928).10.1002/andp.19283900805 ↗
17. Seccaroni, C. & Moioli, P. Fluorescenza X—Prontuario per l’analisi XRF Portatile Applicata a Superfici Policrome. (Nardini, Firenze, 2002).
18. Bagliano, G. B., Cigna, A. A., Perini, A. & Nicola, G. Semiquantitative analysis of pigment samples. in Congresso Internazionale: Applicazione Dei Metodi Nucleari Nel Campo Delle Opere D’arte, pp 247–258 (Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Rome, 1976).
19. Cesareo, R. et al. Non-destructive analysis of chemical elements in paintings and enamels. Archaeometry 14, 65–78 (1972).10.1111/j.1475-4754.1972.tb00051.x ↗
20. Caneva, C. & Ferretti, M. XRF spectrometers for non-destructive investigations in art and archaeology: the cost of portability. in Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Non-Destructive Testing (AIPnD, Rome, 2000).
21. Ferretti, M., Guidi, G., Moioli, P., Scafe, R. & Seccaroni, C. The presence of antimony in some grey colours of three paintings by Correggio. Stud. Conserv. 36, 235–239 (1991).10.1179/sic.1991.36.4.235 ↗
22. Ferrero, J. L., Roldán, C., Ardid, M. & Navarro, E. X-ray fluorescence analysis of yellow pigments in altarpieces by Valencian artists of the XV and XVI centuries. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A. 422, 868–873 (1999).10.1016/S0168-9002(98)01125-5 ↗
23. Longoni, A. et al. A portable XRF spectrometer for non-destructive analyses in archaeometry. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 409, 407–409 (1998).10.1016/S0168-9002(98)00113-2 ↗
24. Migliori, A., Bonanni, P., Carraresi, L., Grassi, N. & Mandò, P. A. A novel portable XRF spectrometer with range of detection extended to low-Z elements. X-Ray Spectrom. 40, 107–112 (2011).10.1002/xrs.1316 ↗
25. Baensch, A. T. Field portable XRF for modern exploration programs. in AIG Exploration Technologies Conference, pp 9–11 (Olympus Innov-X, Perth, 2011).
26. Decreto Legislativo 31 luglio 2020, n. 101. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana 2–(2020).
27. Regio Decreto 1 Marzo 1928, n.842 - Art. 16. Gazzetta Ufficiale (1928).
28. Legge 11 Gennaio 2018, n. 3 - Art. 8. Gazzetta Ufficiale (2018).
29. Shoval, S., Panczer, G. & Boudeulle, M. Study of the occurrence of titanium in kaolinites by micro-Raman spectroscopy. Opt. Mater. 30, 1699–1705 (2008).10.1016/j.optmat.2007.11.012 ↗
30. Adlington, L. W., Gratuze, B. & Schibille, N. Comparison of pXRF and LA-ICP-MS analysis of lead-rich glass mosaic tesserae. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 34, 102603 (2020).
31. Franceschi, E., Nicola, M., Nicola, G. L., Chimienti, A. & Coluccia, S. Indagini non-invasive XRF, rilievi tridimensionali colorimetrici e restauro di sarcofagi egizi della XXVI dinastia: due casi a confronto. in VI Congresso Nazionale IGIIC—Lo Stato dell’Arte 579–592 (Nardini, Spoleto, 2008).
32. Grindrod, J. Wood preservation. The use of arsenic compounds. Builder 178, 366 (1950).
33. Nicola, M., Mastrippolito, C. & Masic, A. Iron oxide-based pigments and their use in history. in Iron Oxides: From Nature to Applications (ed Faivre, D.) pp 545–565 (Wiley, Hoboken, 2016).10.1002/9783527691395.ch21 ↗
34. Cagnana, A., Roascio, S. & Zucchiatti, A. Stratigrafie degli intonaci e analisi archeometriche dei pigmenti degli affreschi altomedievali di Santa Maria di Castelseprio (VA). in Proceedings of V Congresso Nazionale di Archeologia Medievale, Foggia/Manfredonia, 30 September–3 2009 (eds Volpe, G. & Favia, P.) pp 111–115 (All’Insegna del Giglio, Firenze, 2009).
35. Nicola, M., Aceto, M., Gheroldi, V., Gobetto, R. & Chiari, G. Egyptian blue in the Castelseprio mural painting cycle. Imaging and evidence of a non-traditional manufacture. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 19, 465–475 (2018).
36. Nicola, M. et al. Real-time identification and visualization of Egyptian blue using modified night vision goggles. Rend. Lincei. Sci. Fis. Nat. 35, 495–512 (2024).10.1007/s12210-024-01245-w ↗
37. Anselmi, C. et al. Imaging the antique: unexpected Egyptian blue in Raphael’s Galatea by non-invasive mapping. Rend. Lincei 31, 913–917 (2020).10.1007/s12210-020-00960-4 ↗
38. Nicola, M., Marello, A., Radelet, T., Delieuvin, V. & Sgamellotti, A. Unexpected Egyptian blue in Renaissance paintings: identification in works by Perugino and “Lo Spagna” in the Louvre collection. Rend. Fis. Acc. Lincei 36, 1043–1051 (2025).10.1007/s12210-025-01366-w ↗
39. Janssen, R. Ancient Egyptian coffins: past present future. J. Inst. Conserv. 43, 189–191 (2020).10.1080/19455224.2020.1765594 ↗
40. Liritzis, I. & Zacharias, N. Portable XRF of archaeological artifacts: current research, potentials and limitations. in X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry (XRF) in Geoarchaeology (ed Shackley, M. S.) pp 109–142 (Springer, Berlin, 2011).10.1007/978-1-4419-6886-9_6 ↗
41. Craddock, P. T. Scientific Investigation of Copies, Fakes, and Forgeries. (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2009).10.4324/9780080939001 ↗
42. Eastaugh, N., Walsh, V., Chaplin, T. & Siddall, R. The Pigment Compendium A Dictionary of Historical Pigments. (Elsevier, Oxford, 2004).
43. Ward, G. W. R. The Grove Encyclopedia of Materials and Techniques in Art. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008).
44. Araújo, M. F., Alves, L. C. & Cabrai, J. M. P. Comparison of EDXRF and PIXE in the analysis of ancient gold coins. Nucl. Inst. Methods Phys. Res. B 75, 450–453 (1993).10.1016/0168-583X(93)95694-Z ↗
45. Fernandes, R., van Os, B. J. H. & Huisman, H. D. J. The use of Hand-Held XRF for investigating the composition and corrosion of Roman copper-alloyed artefacts. Herit. Sci. 1, 1–7 (2013).10.1186/2050-7445-1-30 ↗
46. Simon, S. & Röhrs, S. Between fakes, forgeries, and illicit artifacts—authenticity studies in a heritage science laboratory. Arts 7, 20 (2018).10.3390/arts7020020 ↗
47. Di Fazio, M., Felici, A. C., Catalli, F. & De Vito, C. Microstructure and chemical composition of Roman orichalcum coins emitted after the monetary reform of Augustus (23 B.C.). Sci. Rep. 9, 12668 (2019).10.1038/s41598-019-48941-4 ↗
48. Caponetti, E. et al. First discovery of orichalcum ingots from the remains of a 6th century BC shipwreck near Gela (Sicily) seabed. Mediterr. Archaeol. Archaeom. 17, 11–18 (2017).
49. Żmuda-Trzebiatowska, I., Del Hoyo-Meléndez, J. M. & Śliwiński, G. Material composition evaluation of historical Cu alloy aquamanilia by complementary XRF and LIBS measurements. Eur. Phys. J. 134, 269 (2019).