Evaluation of archaeological heritage comprehensive utilization potential in Henan section of the Yellow River Basin
Source abstract
Abstract
The evaluation of archeological heritage comprehensive utilization potential (CUP) is essential for heritage value recognition, conservation, and sustainable regional development. This study examines 125 archeological heritages in Henan section of the Yellow River basin and develops a CUP evaluation system across three dimensions: core value, existing conditions, and regional context. Spatial distribution of CUP is analyzed at watershed and administrative scales. Results show that: (1) overall CUP is generally low with significant differentiation, only 8% classified as high-potential; (2) driving mechanisms vary by potential type: high-potential heritages are primarily driven by core value, medium-potential heritages by existing conditions, and low-potential heritages benefit from regional context advantages; (3) CUP spatially clusters along watersheds and exhibits notable administrative gradient differences. The proposed multidimensional evaluation framework provides a scientific basis for differentiated heritage management and supports systematic integration and high-quality development of cultural heritage in the Henan section of the Yellow River basin.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · Archaeological Research and Protection · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Du, X., Quan, Y. & Kong, M. Research on empowering community development and rural revitalization through the conservation and utilization of large archaeological sites: Taking the archaeological ruins of Liangzhu City as an example. Agric. Archaeol. 01, 14–19 (2025).
2. Zhao, W. & Chu, T. Preliminary study on the cConservation and exhibition planning of large-scale archaeological sites. In Proc. 2012 Annual Conference of the Chinese Society of Landscape Architecture. 151–155 (China Architecture & Building Press, 2012).
3. State Administration of Cultural Heritage (ed.). Selected International Documents on Cultural Heritage Conservation. 162–165 (Cultural Relics Press, 2007).
4. Ginzarly, M., Houbart, C. & Teller, J. The Historic Urban Landscape approach to urban management: a systematic review. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 25, 999–1019 (2018).10.1080/13527258.2018.1552615 ↗
5. Yang, A., Wang, Y. & Liu, L. (Eds.). Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention. 1–16 (Cultural Relics Press, 2014).
6. Li, Y., Dong, W., Cheng, X., & Yu, H. Introduction to the Development System of Cultural Heritage Protection in China. 146 (Northwestern Polytechnical University Press, 2021).
7. Xu, Y., Rollo, J., Esteban, Y., Tong, H. & Yin, X. Developing a comprehensive assessment model of social value with respect to heritage value for sustainable heritage management. Sustainability 13, 13373 (2021).10.3390/su132313373 ↗
8. Wang, P. Research on the value evaluation, protection and utilization strategy of great ruins—taking the Zhongshan Royal Tombs in the Han Dynasty as an example. Study Nat. Cult. Herit. 3, 158–162 (2018).
9. Dai, J., Hou, X. & Feng, X. A Preliminary exploration on the evaluation system for the value of large scale relic sites. China Cult. Herit. Sci. Res. 3, 25–27 (2012).
10. Liu, W. & Guo, Y. The evolution and prospect of complex site’s value cognition system in China. West. Archaeol. 1, 309–318 (2019).
11. Li, H. Study on the evaluation in value and mode of protection and utilization about large site. 44-46 (Master’s Thesis, Northwest University, 2005).
12. Wang, Y. Value Evaluation System and Conservation and Utilization Mode of Great Sites: A Case Study of Conservation and Utilization Plan of Tanshishan Site. Southeast Cult. 6, 27–32 (2010).
13. Jiang, W. Research and practice on multilevel value assessment of historical and cultural heritage. Future City Des. Manag. 12, 68–73 (2023).
14. Zhang, S., Yang, Z. & Wang, C. Environmental risk assessment of earthen heritage sites in arid regions: a case study of the Great Wall in Xinjiang. npj Herit. Sci. 13, 1–14 (2025).
15. Kakiuchi, E. Cultural heritage protection system in Japan: current issues and prospects for the future. Gdań. Stud. Azji Wschodniej 10, 7–27 (2016).
16. Petti, L., Trillo, C. & Makore, B. N. Cultural heritage and sustainable development targets: a possible harmonisation? Insights from the European Perspective. Sustainability 12, 926 (2020).10.3390/su12030926 ↗
17. Nocca, F. The role of cultural heritage in sustainable development: Multidimensional indicators as decision-making tool. Sustainability 9, 1882 (2017).10.3390/su9101882 ↗
18. Wright, W. C. & Eppink, F. V. Drivers of heritage value: a meta-analysis of monetary valuation studies of cultural heritage. Ecol. Econ. 130, 277–284 (2016).10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.001 ↗
19. Dümcke, C. & Gnedovsky, M. The social and economic value of cultural heritage: literature review. EENC Pap. 1, 101–114 (2013).
20. Zhang, S. et al. Construction of cultural heritage evaluation system and personalized cultural tourism path decision model: an international historical and cultural city. J. Urban Manag. 12, 96–111 (2023).10.1016/j.jum.2022.10.001 ↗
21. Wang, H., Liu, J. & Wei, B. Value evaluation and development suitability of heritage tourism in Hongshan Culture site. Environ. Sci. Manag. 41, 20–24 (2016).
22. Armbrecht, J. Use value of cultural experiences: a comparison of contingent valuation and travel cost. Tour. Manag. 42, 141–148 (2014).10.1016/j.tourman.2013.11.010 ↗
23. Martín-Ruiz, D., Castellanos-Verdugo, M. & de los Ángeles Oviedo-García, M. A visitors’ evaluation index for a visit to an archaeological site. Tour. Manag. 31, 590–596 (2010).10.1016/j.tourman.2009.06.010 ↗
24. Liu, Y. & Zhang, C. Market value assessment of cultural site tourism resources based on AHP: a case study of the Laosicheng Site. Cult. Ind. 15, 7–12 (2018).
25. Wang, X. & Liu, S. Value assessment methods of large-scale heritage sites and national archaeological site parks: a case study of the Tongwancheng site. Southeast Cult. 1, 13–23 (2013).
26. Qiao, S. Research on the value evaluation and utilization of cultural tourism resources of large-scale archaeological sites--a case study of Luoyang city site in Sui and Tang dynasties. 20-26 (Master’s Thesis, Henan University, 2023).
27. Jiang, M. Application of AHP in the evaluation analysis of complex site conservation. China Popul., Resour. Environ. 25, 571–574 (2015).
28. Koren-Lawrence, N., Collins-Kreiner, N. & Israeli, Y. H. The future of the past: sustainable management of archaeological tourist sites–The case study of Israel. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 35, 100700 (2020).
29. Ramirez-Guerrero, G., Garcia-Onetti, J., Arcila-Garrido, M. & Chica-Ruiz, J. A. A tourism potential index for cultural heritage management through the ecosystem services approach. Sustainability 13, 6415 (2021).10.3390/su13116415 ↗
30. Zeng, L. Evaluation of tourism development and high-quality development model of the Xixia mausoleum site based on AHP. Xixia Stud. 2, 314–327 (2023).
31. Rui, S. Utilization strategies for courtyard-style historic buildings in the Xishan Yongding River Cultural Belt based on potential evaluation. 109-140 (Master’s Thesis, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2023).
32. Huang, Y. & Huang, L. The development and underlying rationale of international regulations on the protection and utilization of global cultural heritage. J. Guizhou Minzu Univ. 3, 158–173 (2025).
33. Li, Z. Reflections on the holistic and systematic conservation and utilization of cultural heritage: a case study of the conservation and utilization of large sites. Southeast Cult. 2, 13–20 (2025).
34. Shao, Y., Hu, L. & Zhao, J. Research on the holistic conservation and utilization of historical and cultural resources from a regional perspective: a case study of Southern Anhui. Urban Plan. Forum 3, 98–105 (2016).
35. Darvill, T. Value systems and the archaeological resource. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 1, 52–64 (1994).10.1080/13527259408722130 ↗
36. Yuan, H. & Fan, J. Construction of integrated, contiguous conservation and utilization system for cultural relics protection unit in Qiandongnan based on quantitative analysis. npj Herit. Sci. 13, 1–23 (2025).10.1038/s40494-025-01790-z ↗
37. Ye, Q., Yang, Y. & Zhang, Y. Formation Models of the Yellow River Alluvial fan and the evolution of the downstream channels. Yellow River 4, 32–37 (1982).
38. Weng, J. L. Post-occupancy evaluation of historic districts based on AHP-CRITIC: a case study of Xinghua Fu Historic District in Putian City. J. Green. Sci. Technol. 26, 17–22 (2024).
39. Xiang, W. et al. Assessment of CO2 geological sequestration potential in the Northern Jiangsu-Southern Yellow Sea Basin via AHP-CRITIC methodology. Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Control 142, 104321 (2025).10.1016/j.ijggc.2025.104321 ↗
40. Silverman, B. W. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis, 1st edn. 130–134 (CRC Press LLC, 2018).10.1201/9781315140919-1 ↗
41. Lu, Y., Han, Q., Zhang, Z., Sun, Z. & Dai, J. Spatiotemporal distribution and evolution of global world cultural heritage, 1972–2024. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 14, 190 (2025).10.3390/ijgi14050190 ↗
42. Xia, J., Deng, M. & Zhu, L. Assessing the location potential for tourism development of traditional villages in Sichuan province. China Sci. Rep. 15, 28239 (2025).10.1038/s41598-025-13846-y ↗
43. Fan, X., Wang, Z. & Li, S. Value evaluation model (VEM) of ancient Chinese military settlement heritage: a case study of Liaoxi corridor in the Ming dynasty. Herit. Sci. 12, 97 (2024).10.1186/s40494-024-01210-8 ↗
44. Zhang, S., Song, H., Li, X. & Luo, S. Urban parks quality assessment using multi-dimension indicators in Chengdu, China. Land 13, 86 (2024).10.3390/land13010086 ↗
45. Xu, Y. & Jiang, H. An implementation evaluation system for conservation planning for historic and culturally significant towns and villages: a case study based on the Huangqiao famous historic and cultural town. South Archit. 10, 17–26 (2024).
46. Zhang, N. et al. Evaluation and conservation of the significance of historical and cultural spaces in China. J. Urban Region. Plan. 12, 1–17 (2020).
47. Chen, J. et al. Portraying heritage corridor dynamics and cultivating conservation strategies based on environment spatial model: an integration of multi-source data and image semantic segmentation. Herit. Sci. 12, 419 (2024).10.1186/s40494-024-01497-7 ↗
48. Sun, H. Reflections on the conservation of large-scale sites in China. China Cult. Herit. 6, 61–71 (2016).
49. Wang, M. Constructing the Chinese civilization identification system: a logical approach. Adm. Forum 32, 58–64 (2025).10.1484/J.FORUM.5.152175 ↗
50. Liu, W. H. Research on the theory and methodology of large site conservation in China. 69–80 (Science Press, 2020).
51. Wang, L. Conceptual methodology and revitalization path for the utilization of large-scale sites in the new era: oriented by the continuity of value. Pop. Archaeol. 12, 48––455 (2019).
52. Tao, H., Zhang, M. & Liu, J. Symbiosis and integration: coordinated development of human-land-industry in rural heritage sites: a case study of the Tingsong cultural community. Prog. Geogr. 41, 582–594 (2022).10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.04.004 ↗
53. Zhou, K. S. et al. On the Songshan cultural circle. Cult. Relics Cent. China 1, 1–97 (2025).
54. Liu, Y. F. & Song, G. D. Archaeological research on urban water management systems of the Three Dynasties in the Circum-Songshan Region 185–192 (China Social Sciences Press, 2022).
55. Huang, X. Y. & Zhang, G. Channel changes and depositional environment analysis of the Lower Yellow River since historical records. J. Hebei GEO Univ. 43, 39–45 (2020).
56. Chen, C. et al. Spatial distribution and regional cooperative conservation of heritage resources in the Yellow River Basin. Arid Land Geogr. 47, 1220–1230 (2024).