Urban planning genes of Fu prefecture in Ming Dynasty China based on HGIS
Source abstract
Abstract
For millennia, the Chinese ancient urban planning system has exhibited a clear hierarchy and strong continuity, particularly in urban morphology. Yet, the preservation and adaptive reuse of this urban heritage face significant challenges amid modern urbanization. Existing research has concentrated largely on capital cities, while systematic and quantitative studies of Fu Prefectures in the Ming dynasty remain scarce. This study proposes an innovative methodology grounded in planning genes, integrating textual analysis, data compilation, HGIS database construction, and mathematical modeling. Drawing on local gazetteers, historical maps, archeological reports, and remote sensing data, a comprehensive database was established. The research quantitatively examines 167 Ming Fu Prefectures, identifying seven core planning genes: terrain, city shape, city wall circumference, gate number, altar–temple location, government office location, and wall height and thickness. The findings reveal the internal logic and embedded wisdom of urban form, offering new perspectives for historic urban heritage conservation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · Urban Design and Spatial Analysis · Archaeological Research and Protection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (85)
Show source-provided references
1. Bandarin, F. & Van Oers, R. The historic urban landscape (Wiley, 2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119968115.10.1002/9781119968115 ↗
2. Smith, L. Uses of heritage (Routledge, 2006). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203602263.10.4324/9780203602263 ↗
3. Plevoets, B. & Cleempoe, K. V. Adaptive reuse as an emerging discipline: an historic survey (Libri Publishers, 2013).
4. Li, X., Hou, W., Liu, M. & Yu, Z. Traditional thoughts and modern development of the historical urban landscape in china: lessons learned from the example of pingyao historical city. Land 11, 247 (2022).10.3390/land11020247 ↗
5. Yu, Q. The present situation and countermeasures of the protection and inheritance of urban historical and cultural heritage in china. Commun. Humanit. Res. 16, 12–19 (2023).10.54254/2753-7064/16/20230053 ↗
6. Chen, L., Huang, W., Dong, J., Wang, H. & Wang, B. Protection of historical and cultural cities: shaping resident’s psychological needs and identity formation. J. Civ. Transp. Eng. 1, 45–52 (2024).10.62517/jcte.202406208 ↗
7. Mieroop, M. V. D. The ancient mesopotamian city (Oxford University, 1997). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198150626.001.0001.10.1093/oso/9780198150626.001.0001 ↗
8. Vitruvius Vitruvius: ‘ten books on architecture’ (Cambridge University Press, 1999). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511840951.10.1017/cbo9780511840951 ↗
9. Howard, E. Garden cities of to-morrow (Routledge, 2013). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203716779.10.4324/9780203716779 ↗
10. Zhang, G. On the concept of “urban” in the early days of china. Cult. Relics 36, 61–67 (1985).
11. Tu, W. Influences of pre-qin city tradition on the basic pattern of chinese cities. Jianghan Acad. 41, 92–102 (2022).
12. Song, Z. The social nature reflected by the “yizhi” urban system of shang dynasty. J. Chin. Historical Stud. 16, 57–65 (1994).
13. Zhang, N. & Zhou, Y. Discourse on the urban development during the qin and han dynasties. Historiogr. Res. Anhui 33, 6–12 (1989).
14. Wu, Q. Ancient chinese philosophy and ancient city planning. Architect. J. 42, 45–47 (1995).
15. Wang, G. Analysis on scale and grading system of cities built in ming dynasty. Hist. Architect. 46, 86–104 (2009).
16. Wang, L. & He, Y. Royalty-state power and the formation and change of ancient chinese cities. Jianghan Trib. 59, 120–127 (2016).
17. Lynch, K. The image of the city (MIT Press, 1960).
18. Lefebvre, H. The production of space (Blackwell, 1991).
19. Conzen, M. R. G. Alnwick, northumberland: a study in town-plan analysis. Transactions and Papers (institute of British Geographers). iii–122 (1960).10.2307/621094 ↗
20. Cataldai, G., Maffei, G. L. & Vaccaro, P. Saverio Muratori and the Italian school of planning typology. Urban Morphol. 6, 3–14 (2002).10.51347/jum.v6i1.3899 ↗
21. Cataldi, G. From Muratori to Caniggia: the origins and development of the italian school of design typology. Urban Morphol. 7, 19–34 (2003).10.51347/jum.v7i1.3904 ↗
22. Krier, L. The architecture of community (Island Press, 2011).
23. Rossi, A. A scientific autobiography (MIT Press, 2010).
24. Moudon, A. V. Urban morphology as an emerging interdisciplinary field. Urban Morphol. 1, 3–10 (1997).10.51347/jum.v1i1.4047 ↗
25. Gauthier, P. & Gilliland, J. Mapping urban morphology: a classification scheme for interpreting contributions to the study of urban form. Urban Morphol. 10, 41–50 (2005).10.51347/jum.v10i1.3926 ↗
26. Hitehand, J. British urban morphology: the conzenian tradition. Urban Morphol. 5, 103–109 (2001).10.51347/jum.v5i2.3896 ↗
27. Guo, L. The universal order and pattern of city state: a comparative studyof early chinese and western planning ideas in rites of zhou andaristotle’s politics. City Plan. Rev. 47, 32–38 (2023).
28. Li, X., Wang, S., Li, X. & Lin, L. Yinxungehua: a planning thought for adapting urban spatial patterns to inherit and foster new developments. City Plan. Rev. 48, 57–58 (2024).
29. Li, B. & Wu, H. The nationalism in the history of chinese early-modem urban planning. Urban Plan. Forum 54, 99–103 (2010).
30. Mohamed, S. A., Harun, N. Z. & Abdullah, A. Typo-morphology as an approach for the conservation of the early malay towns (tipo-morfologi sebagai satu pendekatan dalam aspek pemeliharaan bandar melayu awal). Asian J. Environ. 1, 143–154 (2018).
31. Chen, J., Yao, S. & Tian, Y. The theory and localization about typo-morphological approach. Urban Plan. Int. 32, 57–64 (2017).10.22217/upi.2014.109 ↗
32. Whitehand, J., Conzen, M. P. & Gu, K. Plan analysis of historical cities: a sino-european comparison. Urban Morphol. 20, 139–158 (2016).10.51347/jum.v20i2.4060 ↗
33. Wang, H. Cultural gene analysis of settlement morphology—a case of the qingyan town of guizhou province. Planners 24, 61–65 (2008).
34. Lin, Z. & Xu, J. Research on the spatiotemporal evolution of urban historical landscapes from the perspective of cultural genes: a case study of Changting, Fujian. J. Civ. Eng. Urban Plan. 6, 11–19 (2024).
35. Liu, P. The gene expression and the sight identification of the ancient villages’ cultural landscape. J. Hengyang Norm. Univ. 24, 1–8 (2003).
36. Wei, K., He, Y., Wang, M., Zhu, R. & Wang, Z. Identification, inheritance and restoration of traditional village landscape gene: a case study of Lidipo village in Tongchuan, Shaanxi Province. Npj Herit. Sci. 13, 18 (2025).10.1038/s40494-025-01559-4 ↗
37. Duan, J., Shao, R., Lan, W., Liu, J. & Jiang, Y. Space gene. City Plan. Rev. 43, 14–21 (2019).
38. Li, X., Li, P., Luo, D. & Chen, D. Hotspots evolution, status review and development of urban morphological gene research. Urban Dev. Stud. 26, 67–75 (2019).
39. Zhao, W., Liao, X. & Wang, H. Analysis of mountain morphological genes: cognition and practice of spatial map method of historical town protection. Planners 37, 50–57 (2021).
40. Ye, Y., Li, B. & Wu, T. Concepts of planning heritage and corresponding practices in the world. Urban Plan. Int. 37, 82–87 (2022).
41. Taylor, R., Cox, M. & Dickins, I. Britain’ s planning heritage (Croom Helm Ltd, 1975).
42. Freestone, R. Urban nation: australia’ s planning heritage (CSIRO Publishing, 2010). https://doi.org/10.1071/9780643100138.10.1071/9780643100138 ↗
43. Talen, E., Menozzi, S. & Schaefer, C. What is a “great neighborhood”? An analysis of Apa’s top-rated places. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 81, 121–141 (2015).10.1080/01944363.2015.1067573 ↗
44. Australian Heritage Commission. Australian historic themes : a framework for use in heritage assessment and management (Australian Heritage Commission, 2001). https://heritagensw.intersearch.com.au/heritagenswjspui/handle/1/2684.
45. Zhang, Y. & He, Y. The nature, connotation, and characteristics of planning heritage. Urban Planning Forum, 35-42 (Taylor and Francis, 2022).
46. Wang, Z., Li, H. & Li, B. Planning heritage in world heritage: distributions, values, and classification. Urban Plan. Forum 69, 93–101 (2025).
47. Zou, H. Preliminary approach to the study and related issues of urban planning heritage. Study Nat. Cult. Herit. 4, 120–124 (2019).
48. Chen, F. One new framework of study: application of urban typo-morphology to china. Architect. J. 57, 85–90 (2010).
49. Bobkova, E., Berghauser Pont, M. & Marcus, L. Towards analytical typologies of plot systems: quantitative profile of five European cities. Environ. Plan. B Urban Analytics City Sci. 48, 604–620 (2021).10.1177/2399808319880902 ↗
50. Cheng, Y. A new exploration of the methods for researching into the formation of ancient cities in china. J. Shanghai Norm. Univ. 39, 43–51 (2010).
51. Huang, L., Liu, S. & Kang, Z. The protection of urban spatial structures in historic cities: a multi-actor perspective of the cultural space construction in Fuzhou, China. Sustainability 16, 385 (2023).10.3390/su16010385 ↗
52. Xu, Y. et al. Text mining-based analysis of ancient landscape and tourism behavior at Hangzhou’s West Lake. npj Herit. Sci. 13, 426 (2025).10.1038/s40494-025-01980-9 ↗
53. Wang, S. Planning techniques of chang’an city in sui and tang dynasty. City Planning Review. 33, 55-58 + 72 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1002-1329.2009.06.011.10.3321/j.issn:1002-1329.2009.06.011 ↗
54. Ren, Y. & Zhu, S. The anatomy about disproportion characteristic of the tang chang’an city form. J. Chin. Historical Geogr. 21, 48–56 (2005).
55. Zhao, C. Research on palace scale of the yuan and qin dynasties: base on analysis of the scale and symbolic significance of yuan capital(dadu) palace. City Plan. Rev. 44, 83–88 (2020).
56. Feng, S. Construction of Dadu and inheritance of culture reading “wind from the Yao’s rein and rain from Shun: planning thoughts of Dadu of Yuan dynasty and imperial china”. Architect. J. 69, 116–119 (2022).
57. Wang, N. Analysis on the central axis of the Ming and Qing dynasties Beijing axis planning and iconic architectural design composition ratio analysis. Beijing Plan. Rev. 33, 138–153 (2019).
58. Su, L. Research on the development and changes of cities in the Fujiang River Basin during historical periods. Lect. Notes Hist. 6, 103–115 (2024).
59. Ao, S. Ming prefecture city walls with a size of nine li. J. Chin. Architect. Hist. 7, 301–329 (2015).
60. Hu, C. Study on the local chronicles of Ming dynasty in Wumeng mountain area. J. Zhaotong Univ. 42, 21–26 (2020).
61. Luo, Y. The government of western Yunnan: the transition of military and political arrangement in the Yongchang area of Ming Dynasty (Social Sciences Academic Press, 2019).
62. Jia, W., Wang, L. & Chong, H. Resulting of pedigree and topology of centripetal spatial schema in chinese traditional cities. Front. Architect. Res. 12, 664–682 (2023).10.1016/j.foar.2023.04.002 ↗
63. Xue, Q., Jin, X., Cheng, Y., Yang, X. & Zhou, Y. The dataset of walled cities and urban extent in late imperial China in the 15th–19th centuries. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13, 5071–5085 (2021).10.5194/essd-13-5071-2021 ↗
64. Shi, J. et al. A scene-based spatiotemporal data model of immovable cultural relics. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 12, 671 (2025).10.1057/s41599-025-04934-5 ↗
65. Lin, H. et al. Historical sensing: the spatial pattern of soundscape occurrences recorded in poems between the tang and the qing dynasties amid urbanization. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 11, 730 (2024).10.1057/s41599-024-03251-7 ↗
66. Liu, B., Wu, C., Xu, W., Shen, Y. & Tang, F. Emerging trends in gis application on cultural heritage conservation: a review. Herit. Sci. 12, 139 (2024).10.1186/s40494-024-01265-7 ↗
67. Liu, S., Wu, L., Xiang, C. & Dai, W. Revitalizing rural landscapes: applying cultural landscape gene theory for sustainable spatial planning in Linpu village. Buildings 14, 2396 (2024).10.3390/buildings14082396 ↗
68. Sun, J. & Shao, L. Interpretation of historic urban landscape genes: a case study of harbin, china. Land 13, 1988 (2024).10.3390/land13121988 ↗
69. Gu, M., Wang, Y., Wu, Y., Dai, Y. & Fan, W. Formulating sustainable planning for Goulan Yao village based on the integration of cultural landscape gene theory and spatial analysis. Sci. Rep. 15, 29872 (2025).10.1038/s41598-025-15357-2 ↗
70. Wang, W., Shi, Q. & Wang, G. Exploration of the landscape gene characteristics of traditional villages along the Jinzhong section of the wanli tea road from the perspective of the village temple system. Land 13, 1602 (2024).10.3390/land13101602 ↗
71. Satoh, S. The morphological transformation of Japanese castle-town cities. Urban Morphol. 1, 11–18 (1996).10.51347/jum.v1i1.3862 ↗
72. Sorensen, A. The making of urban japan (Routledge, 2005). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203993927.10.4324/9780203993927 ↗
73. Carolina Sparavigna, A. An example of military engineering in 16th century: the star fort of turin. Int. J. Sci. 12, 62–67 (2015).
74. Paccoud, A. B. adiou haussmann and saint-simon: opening spaces for the state and planning between ‘post-politics’ and urban insurgencies. Plan. Theory 18, 339–358 (2019).10.1177/1473095218764224 ↗
75. Peterson, M. The city-state of boston: the rise and fall of an atlantic power, 1630–1865 (Princeton University Press, 2019). https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc77f69.10.2307/j.ctvc77f69 ↗
76. Bartolini, N. Critical urban heritage: from palimpsest to brecciation. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 20, 519–533 (2014).10.1080/13527258.2013.794855 ↗
77. Petruccioli, A. After amnesia. learning from the Islamic Mediterranean urban fabric (ICAR, 2007).
78. Giuliani, F., Gaglio, F., Martino, M. & De Falco, A. A hbim pipeline for the conservation of large-scale architectural heritage: the city walls of Pisa. npj Herit. Sci. 12, 35 (2024).10.1186/s40494-024-01141-4 ↗
79. Liu, Q. & Wang, Y. Research on space protection and renewal of historic city wall landscape belt in modern city. E3s Web Conf. 372, 01004 (2023).10.1051/e3sconf/202337201004 ↗
80. Fan, W., Song, X. & Huo, S. The inheritance of beijing royal gardens cultural heritage resources from the perspective of cultural gene. J. Resour. Ecol. 16, 253–264 (2025).
81. Ma, T., Lv, L., Tan, W., Chen, R. & Pan, H. Regeneration research on the rural landscape on the basis of cultural gene. Iop Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 310, 022076 (2019).10.1088/1755-1315/310/2/022076 ↗
82. Hu, Z., Strobl, J., Min, Q., Tan, M. & Chen, F. Visualizing the cultural landscape gene of traditional settlements in China: a semiotic perspective. Herit. Sci. 9, 115 (2021).10.1186/s40494-021-00589-y ↗
83. Turner, M. G. Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20, 171–197 (1989).10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.001131 ↗
84. Jiang, Y., Li, N. & Wang, Z. Parametric reconstruction of traditional village morphology based on the space gene perspective—the case study of Xiaoxi village in western Hunan, China. Sustainability 15, 2088 (2023).10.3390/su15032088 ↗
85. Chen, H. & Chen, L. Visualizing the spatial network of cultural heritage based on spatial genes. J. Glob. Trends Soc. Sci. 2, 1–14 (2025).10.70731/5vpygb27 ↗