Developing an ANP-driven value framework for sustainable preservation and revitalization as exemplified by Hakka enclosed houses in China
Source abstract
Abstract
Architectural heritage embodies the historical, architectural, and cultural evolution of societies, serving as a vital repository of historical, artistic, scientific, and social values. Amid rapid urbanization, heritage preservation faces growing challenges from competing interests and divergent value systems, necessitating more refined evaluation methodologies. This study proposes a weighted indicator allocation approach based on the Analytic Network Process (ANP) and expert ranking, applied to 102 Hakka enclosed houses in Shenzhen’s Pingshan District. By analyzing their origins, historical development, and spatial characteristics, a value-oriented assessment framework is established—integrating historical, current-use, and sustainability values. Developing a Multi-Level evaluation framework to guide the conservation of Hakka enclosed houses through field Surveys and case studies. The findings enhance the scientific rigor and objectivity of renewal efforts, offering innovative insights for balancing preservation and adaptive reuse in regional architectural heritage conservation and policymaking.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · Urban Planning and Valuation · Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. De la Torre, M. Assessing the Values of Cultural Heritage: Research Report. https://www.getty.edu/conservation/publications_resources/pdf_publications/values_cultural_heritage.html (2002).
2. De la Torre, M. Values and heritage conservation. Herit. Soc. 6, 155–166 (2013).10.1179/2159032X13Z.00000000011 ↗
3. Uzer, E. Exercising our rights to past: emergent heritage activism in istanbul. in Theorizing Heritage Through Non-Violent Resistance (eds Hammami, F. & Uzer, E.) 19–39 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77708-1_2.10.1007/978-3-030-77708-1_2 ↗
4. Waterton, E., Watson, S. & Silverman, H. An introduction to heritage in action. in Heritage in Action: Making the Past in the Present (eds Silverman, H., Waterton, E. & Watson, S.) 3–16 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42870-3_1.10.1007/978-3-319-42870-3_1 ↗
5. Araoz, G. F. Preserving heritage places under a new paradigm. J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 1, 55–60 (2011).10.1108/20441261111129933 ↗
6. Klamer, A. Chapter 21: The values of cultural heritage. in The Values of Cultural Heritage. In Handbook on the Economics of Cultural Heritage 421–437 (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013).10.4337/9780857931009.00035 ↗
7. Parkinson, A., Scott, M. & Redmond, D. Competing discourses of built heritage: lay values in Irish conservation planning. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 22, 261–273 (2015).10.1080/13527258.2015.1121404 ↗
8. Aigner, A. Heritage-making ‘from below’: the politics of exhibiting architectural heritage on the internet—a case study. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 22, 181–199 (2016).10.1080/13527258.2015.1107615 ↗
9. Wei, Q. Negotiation of social values in the world heritage listing process: a case study on the Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal, China. Archaeologies 14, 501–526 (2018).10.1007/s11759-018-9353-y ↗
10. Shim, H., Oh, K. T., O’Malley, C., Jun, J. Y. & Shi, C.-K. Heritage values, digital storytelling, and heritage communication: the exploration of cultural heritage sites in virtual environments. Digit. Creat. 35, 171–197 (2024).10.1080/14626268.2024.2313585 ↗
11. Del, M. S. T. T., Saleh Sedghpour, B. & Kamali Tabrizi, S. The semantic conservation of architectural heritage: the missing values. Herit. Sci. 8, 70 (2020).10.1186/s40494-020-00416-w ↗
12. Huang, C. & Xu, H. From indigenous villages to world heritage sites: structural violence in spatial transformation. Ann. Tour. Res. 110, 103880 (2025).10.1016/j.annals.2024.103880 ↗
13. Wang, S., Zhang, J., Wang, F. & Dong, Y. How to achieve a balance between functional improvement and heritage conservation? A case study on the renewal of old Beijing city. Sustain. Cities Soc. 98, 104790 (2023).10.1016/j.scs.2023.104790 ↗
14. Icomos, A. The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance 2013 (Australia ICOMOS Incorporated, 2013).
15. Kerr, J. S. Conservation Plan, the 7th Edition: A Guide to the Preparation of Cosignificancenservation Plans for Places of European Cultural https://australia.icomos.org/wp-content/uploads/The-Conservation-Plan-7th-Edition-reduced-file-size.pdf (2013).
16. Özçakır, Ö, Bilgin Altınöz, A. G. & Mignosa, A. A tool for identifying post-intervention value shifts in urban heritage places: the heritage value circle. J. Archit. Conserv. 28, 22–45 (2022).
17. Liang, W., Ahmad, Y. & Mohidin, H. H. B. The development of the concept of architectural heritage conservation and its inspiration. Built Herit 7, 21 (2023).10.1186/s43238-023-00103-2 ↗
18. Gentry, K. & Smith, L. Critical heritage studies and the legacies of the late-twentieth century heritage canon. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 25, 1148–1168 (2019).10.1080/13527258.2019.1570964 ↗
19. Li, Y., Zhao, L., Huang, J. & Law, A. Research frameworks, methodologies, and assessment methods concerning the adaptive reuse of architectural heritage: a review. Built Herit. 5, 6 (2021).10.1186/s43238-021-00025-x ↗
20. Mısırlısoy, D. & Günçe, K. Adaptive reuse strategies for heritage buildings: a holistic approach. Sustain. Cities Soc. 26, 91–98 (2016).10.1016/j.scs.2016.05.017 ↗
21. Elsorady, D. A. Adaptive reuse decision making of a heritage building antoniadis palace, egypt. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 14, 658–677 (2020).10.1080/15583058.2018.1558313 ↗
22. Phillips, R. G. & Stein, J. M. An indicator framework for linking historic preservation and community economic development. Soc. Indic. Res. 113, 1–15 (2013).10.1007/s11205-011-9833-6 ↗
23. Yung, E. H. K., Chan, E. H. W. & Xu, Y. Assessing the social impact of revitalising historic buildings on urban renewal: the case of a local participatory mechanism. J. Des. Res. 13, 125–149 (2015).
24. Zhu, Y. & González Martínez, P. Heritage, values and gentrification: the redevelopment of historic areas in China. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 28, 476–494 (2022).10.1080/13527258.2021.2010791 ↗
25. Zhu, Y. Cultural effects of authenticity: contested heritage practices in China. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 21, 594–608 (2015).10.1080/13527258.2014.991935 ↗
26. Al-Habaibeh, A. et al. Enhancing the sustainability and energy conservation in heritage buildings: the case of Nottingham Playhouse. Front. Archit. Res. 11, 142–160 (2022).10.1016/j.foar.2021.09.001 ↗
27. Houghton, A. Health impact assessments a tool for designing climate change resilience into green building and planning projects. J. Green Build. 6, 66–87 (2011).10.3992/jgb.6.2.66 ↗
28. Chen, D. & Li, J. Process-led value elicitation within built heritage management: a systematic literature review between 2010 and 2020. J. Archit. Conserv. 27, 1–16 (2021).
29. Fredheim, L. H. & Khalaf, M. The significance of values: heritage value typologies re-examined. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 22, 466–481 (2016).10.1080/13527258.2016.1171247 ↗
30. Saaty, T. L. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process (RWS Publications, 1996).
31. Kheybari, S., Rezaie, F. M. & Farazmand, H. Analytic network process: an overview of applications. Appl. Math. Comput. 367, 124780 (2020).
32. Nazarian-Jashnabadi, J., Rahnamay Bonab, S., Haseli, G., Tomaskova, H. & Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M. A dynamic expert system to increase patient satisfaction with an integrated approach of system dynamics, ISM, and ANP methods. Expert Syst. Appl. 234, 121010 (2023).10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121010 ↗
33. Yüksel, İ & Dagˇdeviren, M. Using the analytic network process (ANP) in a SWOT analysis—a case study for a textile firm. Inf. Sci. 177, 3364–3382 (2007).10.1016/j.ins.2007.01.001 ↗
34. Jharkharia, S. & Shankar, R. Selection of logistics service provider: an analytic network process (ANP) approach. Omega 35, 274–289 (2007).10.1016/j.omega.2005.06.005 ↗
35. Chen, C. S., Chiu, Y. H., & Tsai, L. Evaluating the adaptive reuse of historic buildings through multicriteria decision-making. Habitat Int. 81, 12–23 (2018).10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.09.003 ↗
36. Lan, L. T. H., Hien, D. T. T., Thong, N. T., Smarandache, F. & Giang, N. L. An ANP-TOPSIS model for tourist destination choice problems under temporal neutrosophic environment. Appl. Soft Comput. 136, 110146 (2023).10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110146 ↗
37. Luo, X. L. An Introduction to Hakka Studies (Shanghai Literature and Art Publishing House, Shanghai, 1992).
38. Parga-Dans, E., González, P. A. & Enríquez, R. O. The social value of heritage: balancing the promotion-preservation relationship in the Altamira World Heritage Site, Spain. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 18, 100499 (2020).
39. Báez, A. & Herrero, L. C. Using contingent valuation and cost-benefit analysis to design a policy for restoring cultural heritage. J. Cult. Herit. 13, 235–245 (2012).10.1016/j.culher.2010.12.005 ↗
40. Darko, A. et al. Review of application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in construction. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 19, 436–452 (2019).
41. Saaty, T. L. & Vargas, L. G. Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012).10.1007/978-1-4614-3597-6 ↗
42. Meskell, L. UNESCO’s world heritage convention at 40: challenging the economic and political order of international heritage conservation. Curr. Anthropol. 54, 483–494 (2013).10.1086/671136 ↗
43. Bie, P. & Cleempoel, K. V. Adaptive reuse as a strategy towards conservation of cultural heritage: a literature review. WIT Trans. Built Environ. 118, 155–164 (2011).
44. Fouseki, K. Heritage Dynamics: Understanding and Adapting to Change in Diverse Heritage Contexts (UCL Press, 2022). https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787358331.10.14324/111.9781787358331 ↗
45. Milošević, M. R., Milošević, D. M., Stanojević, A. D., Stević, D. M. & Simjanović, D. J. Fuzzy and interval AHP approaches in sustainable management for the architectural heritage in smart cities. Mathematics 9, 304 (2021).10.3390/math9040304 ↗
46. Eldiasty, A., Hegazi, Y. S. & El-Khouly, T. Using space syntax and TOPSIS to evaluate the conservation of urban heritage sites for possible UNESCO listing the case study of the historic centre of Rosetta, Egypt. Ain Shams Eng. J. 12, 4233–4245 (2021).10.1016/j.asej.2021.04.017 ↗
47. Ma, H., Li, S. & Chan, C.-S. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP)-based assessment of the value of non-world heritage tulou: a case study of Pinghe county, Fujian province. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 26, 67–77 (2018).
48. Fu, J., Zhou, J. & Deng, Y. Heritage values of ancient vernacular residences in traditional villages in western Hunan, China: spatial patterns and influencing factors. Build. Environ. 188, 107473 (2021).10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107473 ↗
49. Yung, E. H. K., Zhang, Q. & Chan, E. H. W. Underlying social factors for evaluating heritage conservation in urban renewal districts. Habitat Int 66, 135–148 (2017).10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.06.004 ↗
50. Severo, M. Heritage Networks. Managing Network Cultural Heritage with the Web (VDM Verlag Dr. Müller, 2009).
51. Byrne, D. Heritage corridors: transnational flows and the built environment of migration. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud. 42, 2360–2378 (2016).10.1080/1369183X.2016.1205805 ↗
52. Li, H. et al. Identifying cultural heritage corridors for preservation through multidimensional network connectivity analysis — a case study of the ancient tea-horse road in Simao, China. Landsc. Res. 46, 96–115 (2021).10.1080/01426397.2020.1833850 ↗
53. Estermann, B. Development paths towards open government—an empirical analysis among heritage institutions. Gov. Inf. Q. 35, 599–612 (2018).10.1016/j.giq.2018.10.005 ↗
54. Hubbard, P. & Lilley, K. Selling the past: heritage-tourism and place identity in Stratford-upon-Avon. Geography 85, 221–232 (2000).10.1080/20436564.2000.12219753 ↗
55. Cinà, G., Kamjou, E. & Tavangar, M. R. Learning from urban heritage conservation in Yazd: achievements and warnings. Hist. Environ. Policy Pract. 9, 53–77 (2018).10.1080/17567505.2018.1424617 ↗
56. Yang, B., Yang, X. & Xiao, H. Public interest litigation protection policy of commemorative architectural cultural heritage: a case study from China. Hum Soc. Sci. Commun. 12, 440 (2025).
57. Maeer, G. The values and benefits of heritage: do economists think about more than money? APT Bull. J. Preserv. Technol. 45, 57–63 (2014).
58. Kincaid, D. Adaptability potentials for buildings and infrastructure in sustainable cities. Facilities 18, 155–161 (2000).10.1108/02632770010315724 ↗
59. Riuttala, M., Harala, L., Aarikka-Stenroos, L. & Huuhka, S. How building component reuse creates economic value – identifying value capture determinants from a case study. J. Clean. Prod. 443, 141112 (2024).10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141112 ↗
60. Díaz-Andreu, M. Heritage values and the public. J. Commun. Archaeol. Herit. 4, 2–6 (2017).10.1080/20518196.2016.1228213 ↗
61. Muthuma, L. The conservation of public monuments as a tool for building collective identity in Nairobi. in Conservation of Natural and Cultural Heritage in Kenya (eds Deisser, A.-M. & Njuguna, M.) 59–74 (UCL Press, 2016).10.2307/j.ctt1gxxpc6.11 ↗
62. Buthke, J., Larsen, N. M., Pedersen, S. O. & Bundgaard, C. Adaptive reuse of architectural heritage. in Impact: Design with All Senses (eds Gengnagel, C., Baverel, O., Burry, J., Ramsgaard Thomsen, M. & Weinzierl, S.) 59–68 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29829-6_5.10.1007/978-3-030-29829-6_5 ↗
63. Pearce, G. Conservation as a component of urban regeneration. Reg. Stud. 28, 88–93 (1994).
64. Malheiro, M. Thresholds in the settings of medieval monuments: the case of the Portuguese Romanesque route. Int. J. Herit. Archit. 1, 538–548 (2017).
65. Hubbard, P. The value of conservation: a critical review of behavioural research. Town Plan. Rev. 64, 359–373 (1993).10.3828/tpr.64.4.v758731671422276 ↗
66. Saaty, T. L. Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks (RWS Publications, 2005).