Digital preservation and development of architectural heritage from a virtual perspective: a systematic review
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Over the past decade, virtual technology has become a key tool in architectural heritage conservation and communication, producing a large but fragmented body of research. This study aims to systematically organize this knowledge base, analyze research trends, and identify challenges and opportunities for future investigations. Employing a systematic review methodology that combines quantitative and qualitative approaches, we analyzed 328 journal articles sourced from the Scopus and the WOS database. Our findings indicate that future research directions in architectural heritage, in the context of virtual technology, primarily concentrate on three key areas: (i) the development of adaptive management system paradigms that integrate multiple technologies and methodologies; (ii) the construction of multi-scenario relationships between virtual technology and physical architectural heritage; and (iii) the exploration of user-centered architectural heritage experiences. These insights provide a roadmap for advancing the field of digital preservation in architectural heritage studies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · Conservation Techniques and Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Croci, G. The Conservation and Structural Restoration of Architectural Heritage, Vol. 272 (WIT Press, UK, 1998).
2. Knapp, R. G. Chinese Houses: The Architectural Heritage of a Nation 1st edn, Vol. 288 (Tuttle Publishing, North Clarendon, VT, 2012).
3. Silverman, H. International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS): Scientific Committees and Relationship to UNESCO. (Springer, Cham, 2014).10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1921 ↗
4. Jones, B. G. Protecting Historic Architecture and Museum Collections from Natural Disasters. (Elsevier, Netherlands, 2014).
5. Dewi, C. Rethinking architectural heritage conservation in post-disaster context. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 23, 587–600 (2017).10.1080/13527258.2017.1300927 ↗
6. Amore, A. The Governance of Built Heritage in the Post-Earthquake Christchurch CBD 1st edn, Vol. 16 (Routledge, UK, 2016).10.4324/9781315640211-13 ↗
7. Brusaporci, S. Digital Innovations in Architectural Heritage Conservation: Emerging Research and Opportunities: Emerging Research and Opportunities 1st edn, Vol. 100 (IGI Global, Hershey, PA, 2017).10.4018/978-1-5225-2434-2 ↗
8. Caggianese, G., Gallo, L. & Neroni, P. Evaluation of spatial interaction techniques for virtual heritage applications: A case study of an interactive holographic projection. Future Gen. Comput. Syst. 81, 516–527 (2018).10.1016/j.future.2017.07.047 ↗
9. Carrozzino, M. & Bergamasco, M. Beyond virtual museums: Experiencing immersive virtual reality in real museums. J. Cult. Herit. 11, 452–458 (2010).10.1016/j.culher.2010.04.001 ↗
10. Osello, A., Lucibello, G. & Morgagni, F. HBIM and virtual tools: a new chance to preserve architectural heritage. Buildings 8, 12 (2018).10.3390/buildings8010012 ↗
11. Banfi, F., Brumana, R. & Stanga, C. Extended reality and informative models for the architectural heritage: from scan-to-BIM process to virtual and augmented reality. Virt. Archaeol. Rev. 10, 14–30 (2019).10.4995/var.2019.11923 ↗
12. Banfi, F. BIM orientation: grades of generation and information for different type of analysis and management process. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. 43, 57–64, (Ottawa, Canada, 2017).10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W5-57-2017 ↗
13. Puggioni, M., Frontoni, E., Paolanti, M. & Pierdicca, R. ScoolAR: an educational platform to improve students’ learning through virtual reality. IEEE Access 9, 21059–21070 (2021).10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3051275 ↗
14. Guerra, J. P., Pinto, M. M. & Beato, C. Virtual reality-shows a new vision for tourism and heritage. Eur. Sci. J. 11, 49–54 (2015).
15. Koutsoudis, A., Arnaoutoglou, F. & Chamzas, C. On 3D reconstruction of the old city of Xanthi. a minimum budget approach to virtual touring based on photogrammetry. J. Cult. Herit. 8, 26–31 (2007).10.1016/j.culher.2006.08.003 ↗
16. Li, Y. et al. A review of the tools and techniques used in the digital preservation of architectural heritage within disaster cycles. Herit. Sci. 11, 199 (2023).10.1186/s40494-023-01035-x ↗
17. Moyano, J., Nieto-Julián, J. E., Lenin, L. M. & Bruno, S. Operability of point cloud data in an architectural heritage information model. Int. J. Architect. Herit. 16, 1588–1607 (2022).10.1080/15583058.2021.1900951 ↗
18. Li, Y., Zhao, L., Huang, J. & Law, A. Research frameworks, methodologies, and assessment methods concerning the adaptive reuse of architectural heritage: A review. Built Herit. 5, 1–19 (2021).10.1186/s43238-021-00020-2 ↗
19. Yin, X., Liu, H., Chen, Y. & Al-Hussein, M. Building information modelling for off-site construction: review and future directions. Automation Construct. 101, 72–91 (2019).10.1016/j.autcon.2019.01.010 ↗
20. Zhong, B. et al. A scientometric analysis and critical review of construction related ontology research. Automation Construct. 101, 17–31 (2019).10.1016/j.autcon.2018.12.013 ↗
21. Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J. & Graham, W. F. Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Edu. Eval. Policy Anal. 11, 255–274 (1989).10.3102/01623737011003255 ↗
22. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J. & Altman, D. G. & Group*, P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annal. Int. Med. 151, 264–269 (2009).10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 ↗
23. Burnham, J. F. Scopus database: a review. Biomed. Digit. lib. 3, 1–8 (2006).10.1186/1742-5581-3-1 ↗
24. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. & Rothstein, H. R. Introduction to Meta-Analysis. 1st edn, Vol. 452 (John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 2021).10.1002/9781119558378 ↗
25. Vlahakis, V. et al. Archeoguide: first results of an augmented reality, mobile computing system in cultural heritage sites. Virt. Reality, Archeol. Cult. Herit. 9, 584993–585015 (2001).
26. Van Eck, N. & Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. scientometrics 84, 523–538 (2010).10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 ↗
27. Boyack, K. W. & Klavans, R. Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? J.of the Am. Soc. inform. Sci. Technol. 61, 2389–2404 (2010).10.1002/asi.21419 ↗
28. Su, H.-N. & Lee, P.-C. Mapping knowledge structure by keyword co-occurrence: a first look at journal papers in technology Foresight. Scientometrics 85, 65–79 (2010).10.1007/s11192-010-0259-8 ↗
29. Jefferson, T., Alderson, P., Wager, E. & Davidoff, F. Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review. Jama 287, 2784–2786 (2002).10.1001/jama.287.21.2784 ↗
30. Aromataris, E. & Pearson, A. The systematic review: an overview. AJN Am. J. Nursing 114, 53–58 (2014).10.1097/01.NAJ.0000444496.24228.2c ↗
31. Dempsey, P. The teardown: HTC Vive VR headset. Eng. Technol. 11, 80–81 (2016).
32. Santini, S., Cogotti, M., Baggio, C., Sabbatini, V. & Sebastiani, C. Field testing for structural behavior of a stratified monumental complex over time: palazzo colonna-barberini and templum fortunae praeneste. Case Stud.Construct. Mater. 18, e02152 (2023).
33. Agnello, F. & Cannella, M. From aerial survey to representation and visualization: the temple G of selinunte. DisegnareCon 15, 13 (2022). 2.1-2.
34. Simeone, D., Cursi, S. & Acierno, M. BIM semantic-enrichment for built heritage representation. Automation Const. 97, 122–137 (2019).10.1016/j.autcon.2018.11.004 ↗
35. Megahed, N. A. Towards a theoretical framework for HBIM approach in historic preservation and management. ArchNet-IJAR: Int. J. Architect. Res. 9, 130 (2015).10.26687/archnet-ijar.v9i3.737 ↗
36. Godinho, M. et al. BIM as a resource in heritage management: an application for the national Palace of Sintra, Portugal. J. Cult. Herit. 43, 153–162 (2020).10.1016/j.culher.2019.11.010 ↗
37. González, J. et al. Heritage BIM (HBIM) applied in emergency scenarios: a case study of the National Museum in Brazil. Int. J. Const. Manag. 25, 1–15 (2024).
38. Machete, R., Falcão, A. P., Gonçalves, A. B., Godinho, M. & Bento, R. Development of a Manueline style object library for heritage BIM. Inte. J. Architect. Herit. 15, 1930–1941 (2021).10.1080/15583058.2020.1740825 ↗
39. Lo Turco, M., Bono, J. & Tomalini, A. Parameters, modeling and taxonomy for an HBIM Baroque facade. Nexus Netw. J. 26, 609–630 (2024).10.1007/s00004-024-00786-9 ↗
40. Mao, Y., Lu, H., Xiao, Y., Lai, Z. & Huang, L. A parametric HBIM approach for preservation of bai ethnic traditional timber dwellings in Yunnan. China. Build. 14, 1960 (2024).10.3390/buildings14071960 ↗
41. Nieto-Julián, J. E., Antón, D. & Moyano, J. J. Implementation and management of structural deformations into historic building information models. Int. J. Architect. Herit. 14, 1384–1397 (2020).10.1080/15583058.2019.1610523 ↗
42. Moyano, J., Gil-Arizón, I., Nieto-Julián, J. E. & Marín-García, D. Analysis and management of structural deformations through parametric models and HBIM workflow in architectural heritage. J. Build. Eng. 45, 103274 (2022).10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103274 ↗
43. Mansuri, L. E. et al. A systematic mapping of BIM and digital technologies for architectural heritage. Smart Sustain. Built Environ. 11, 1060–1080 (2022).10.1108/SASBE-11-2020-0171 ↗
44. Alexandrou, K., Thravalou, S. & Artopoulos, G. Heritage-BIM for energy simulation: a data exchange method for improved interoperability. Build. Res. Inform. 52, 373–386 (2024).10.1080/09613218.2023.2222856 ↗
45. Calcerano, F. et al. Energy and environmental improvement of built heritage: HBIM simulation-based approach applied to nine Mediterranean case-studies. Build. Res. Inform. 52, 225–247 (2024).10.1080/09613218.2023.2204417 ↗
46. Lucchi, E. & Agliata, R. HBIM-based workflow for the integration of advanced photovoltaic systems in historical buildings. J. Cult. Herit. 64, 301–314 (2023).10.1016/j.culher.2023.10.015 ↗
47. Ponte, M., Bento, R. & Vaz, S. D. A multi-disciplinary approach to the seismic assessment of the national Palace of Sintra. Int. J. Architect. Herit. 15, 757–778 (2021).10.1080/15583058.2019.1648587 ↗
48. Ding, J., Liang, M. & Chen, W. Integration of BIM and Chinese architectural heritage: a bibliometric analysis research. Buildings 13, 593 (2023).10.3390/buildings13030593 ↗
49. Marra, A. & Fabbrocino, G. Open-access web mapping as a virtual survey tool for cultural heritage: an application to the Armenian religious architecture documented by Paolo Cuneo. DisegnareCon 13, 12 (2020).
50. Castan, M. Q. & Hernandez, L. A. Development of a graphic repository for the virtual inventory of heritage. EGA-REVISTA DE EXPRESION GRAFICA ARQUITECTONICA 29, 150–163 (2024).10.4995/ega.2024.17448 ↗
51. Zhou, Z., Liu, Z. & Wang, G. Driving sustainable cultural heritage tourism in china through heritage building information modeling. Buildings 14, 3120 (2024).10.3390/buildings14103120 ↗
52. Liu, Z., Zhang, M. & Osmani, M. Building information modelling (BIM) driven sustainable cultural heritage tourism. Buildings 13, 1925 (2023).10.3390/buildings13081925 ↗
53. Marra, A., Trizio, I. & Savini, F. Multidisciplinary approach for the knowledge of historical built: digital tools for the virtual restoration. In Digital Restoration and Virtual Reconstructions. Digital Innovations in Architecture, Engineering and Construction (eds. Trizio, I., Demetrescu, E., Ferdani, D.) (Springer, Cham, 2023).10.1007/978-3-031-15321-1_13 ↗
54. Bertacchi, S. & Adembri, B. Entering the Emperor’s Villa: an integrated methodology to enrich cognitive accessibility of an archaeological site. DisegnareCon 17, 14 (2024).
55. Zheng, H., Chen, L., Hu, H., Wang, Y. & Wei, Y. Research on the digital preservation of architectural heritage based on virtual reality technology. Buildings 14, 1436 (2024).10.3390/buildings14051436 ↗
56. Di Pace, S., Ippolito, A. & Juan-Vidal, F. Invisible architecture, communicating space through sound models. DisegnareCon 17, 18.11–18.10 (2024).
57. Maietti, F., Medici, M. & Ferrari, F. From semantic-aware digital models to augmented reality applications for architectural heritage conservation and restoration. Disegnarecon 14, 17.11–17.11 (2021).
58. Cardellicchio, L., Stracchi, P. & Globa, A. Digital heritage construction: testing the heritage value of construction documentation and building processes through virtual reality. Front. Architect. Res. 13, 1039–1055 (2024).10.1016/j.foar.2024.02.012 ↗
59. Lerones, P. M., Llamas, J., Gómez-García-Bermejo, J., Zalama, E. & Oli, J. C. Using 3D digital models for the virtual restoration of polychrome in interesting cultural sites. J. Cult. Herit. 15, 196–198 (2014).10.1016/j.culher.2013.03.009 ↗
60. Pamies, C., Sanchez, A. & Navarro, I. Virtual reconstruction of decontextualized heritage the case of the Cathedral of Girona. DisegnareCon 16, 8.1–8.14 (2023).
61. Fiel, M. V. & Soler-Estrela, A. Augmented reality for historic city centres: an interactive geometric analysis. DisegnareCon 16, 23.21–23.15 (2023).
62. Karadag, I. Machine learning for conservation of architectural heritage. Open House Int. 48, 23–37 (2023).10.1108/OHI-05-2022-0124 ↗
63. Deng, Y., Ju, H., Li, Y., Hu, Y. & Li, A. Abnormal data recovery of structural health monitoring for ancient city wall using deep learning neural network. Int. J. Architect. Herit. 18, 389–407 (2024).10.1080/15583058.2022.2153234 ↗
64. Saravanan, T. J. & Bhaskar, B. Automated evaluation of degradation in stone heritage structures utilizing deep vision in synthetic and real-time environments. J. Built. Eng. 98, 111117 (2024).10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111117 ↗
65. Bienvenido-Huertas, D., Nieto-Julián, J. E., Moyano, J. J., Macías-Bernal, J. M. & Castro, J. Implementing artificial intelligence in H-BIM using the J48 algorithm to manage historic buildings. Int. J. Architect. Herit. 14, 1148–1160 (2020).10.1080/15583058.2019.1589602 ↗
66. Ramm, R. et al. Portable solution for high-resolution 3D and color texture on-site digitization of cultural heritage objects. J. Cult. Herit. 53, 165–175 (2022).10.1016/j.culher.2021.11.006 ↗
67. Li, Q. et al. Single drone-based 3D reconstruction approach to improve public engagement in conservation of heritage buildings: a case of Hakka Tulou. J. Build. Eng. 87, 108954 (2024).10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108954 ↗
68. Russo, M., Panarotto, F., Flenghi, G., Russo, V. & Pellegrinelli, A. Ultralight UAV for steep-hill archaeological 3D survey. DisegnareCon 17, 17.11–17.17 (2022).
69. Sender, M., Roso, R. P., Ribera, M. G. & Pla, A. A. The graphic survey of the architectural heritage supported by the 3D laser scanner. Case study: the castellot house. DisegnareCon 16, 9.1–9.11 (2023).
70. Zlot, R. et al. Efficiently capturing large, complex cultural heritage sites with a handheld mobile 3D laser mapping system. J. Cult. Herit. 15, 670–678 (2014).10.1016/j.culher.2013.11.009 ↗
71. Cuperschmid, A. R. M., Neves de Oliveira, G. & Froner, Y.-A. Exploring the use of lidar in smartphones: documenting the frontispiece of Saint Francis of Assisi Church in Ouro Preto, Brazil. Int. J. Architect. Herit. 19, 1–18 (2024).
72. Rodríguez-Gonzálvez, P. & Fernández-Palacios, B. J. Point cloud optimization based on 3D geometric features for architectural heritage modelling. DisegnareCon 14, 18.11–18.19 (2021).
73. Zhang, Y. et al. Weakly supervised semantic segmentation for large-scale point cloud. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 3421−3429 (AAAI, 2021).10.1609/aaai.v35i4.16455 ↗
74. Bianchini, C. A methodological approach for the study of domes. Nexus Netw. J. 22, 983–1013 (2020).10.1007/s00004-020-00526-9 ↗
75. Costa-Jover, A., i, Ginovart, J. L., Coll-Pla, S. & Piquer, M. L. Using the terrestrial laser scanner and simple methodologies for geometrically assessing complex masonry vaults. J. Cult. Herit. 36, 247–254 (2019).10.1016/j.culher.2018.10.003 ↗
76. Escudero, P. A., González, C. L. & Valldecabres, J. L. G. Methodology for Data Integration in 3D-HBIM Digital Models. Case Study: the Holy Chalice Chapel of Valencia Cathedral. DisegnareCon 17, 11.11–11.19 (2024).
77. Özer, D. G. & Nagakura, T. & Vlavıanos, N. Augmented reality (AR) of historic environments: Representation of parion theater, Biga, Turkey. A/Z ITU J. Faculty Architect. 13, 185–193 (2016).10.5505/itujfa.2016.66376 ↗
78. Hajirasouli, A., Banihashemi, S., Kumarasuriyar, A., Talebi, S. & Tabadkani, A. Virtual reality-based digitisation for endangered heritage sites: Theoretical framework and application. J. Cult. Herit. 49, 140–151 (2021).10.1016/j.culher.2021.02.005 ↗
79. Kavakli, M. A people-centric framework for mobile augmented reality systems (MARS) design: ArcHIVE 4Any. Hum. Centric Comput. Inform. Sci. 5, 1–21 (2015).10.1186/s13673-014-0018-6 ↗
80. Duguleană, M., Briciu, V.-A., Duduman, I.-A. & Machidon, O. M. A virtual assistant for natural interactions in museums. Sustainability 12, 6958 (2020).10.3390/su12176958 ↗
81. Fonseca, D. et al. Assessment of wearable virtual reality technology for visiting World Heritage buildings: an educational approach. J. Edu. Cmput. Res. 56, 940–973 (2018).
82. Bruno, F. et al. Virtual dives into the underwater archaeological treasures of South Italy. Virt. Reality 22, 91–102 (2018).10.1007/s10055-017-0318-z ↗
83. Hain, V. & Ganobjak, M. Forgotten industrial heritage in virtual reality—case study: old power plant in Piešt’any, Slovakia. Presence Teleop. Virt. Environ. 26, 355–365 (2017).10.1162/PRES_a_00309 ↗
84. Haydar, M., Roussel, D., Maïdi, M., Otmane, S. & Mallem, M. Virtual and augmented reality for cultural computing and heritage: a case study of virtual exploration of underwater archaeological sites (preprint). Virt. Reality 15, 311–327 (2011).10.1007/s10055-010-0176-4 ↗
85. Ghani, I., Rafi, A. & Woods, P. The effect of immersion towards place presence in virtual heritage environments. Personal0 Ubiquitous Comput. 24, 861–872 (2020).10.1007/s00779-019-01352-8 ↗
86. MacIntyre, B., Bolter, J. D. & Gandy, M. Presence and the aura of meaningful places. Presence Teleop. Virt. Environ. 6, 197–206 (2004).
87. Krokos, E., Plaisant, C. & Varshney, A. Virtual memory palaces: immersion aids recall. Virt. Reality 23, 1–15 (2019).10.1007/s10055-018-0346-3 ↗
88. Jacobson, J. Digital dome versus desktop display in an educational game: gates of Horus. Int. J. Gaming Comput. Med. Simul. (IJGCMS 3, 13–32 (2011).10.4018/jgcms.2011010102 ↗
89. Stricker, D., Karigiannis, J., Christou, I. T., Gleue, T. & Ioannidis, N. Augmented Reality for Visitors of Cultural Heritage Sites. (Springer, Cham, 2001).
90. Tao, G. & Archambault, P. S. Powered wheelchair simulator development: implementing combined navigation-reaching tasks with a 3D hand motion controller. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 13, 1–13 (2016).10.1186/s12984-016-0112-2 ↗
91. Panou, C., Ragia, L., Dimelli, D. & Mania, K. An architecture for mobile outdoors augmented reality for cultural heritage. ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inform. 7, 463 (2018).10.3390/ijgi7120463 ↗
92. Christofi, M. et al. A tour in the archaeological site of choirokoitia using virtual reality: a learning performance and interest generation assessment. In Advances in Digital Cultural Heritage. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (eds. Ioannides, M., Martins, J., Žarnić, R., Lim, V.) 10754 (Springer, Cham, 2018).10.1007/978-3-319-75789-6_15 ↗
93. Pérez, E., Merchán, M. J., Moreno, M. D., Merchán, P. & Salamanca, S. touring the forum adiectum of augusta emerita in a virtual reality experience. Euro-Mediterranean Conf. Barcelona Spain 11196, 548–559 (2018).
94. Pérez, E., Merchán, P., Merchán, M. J. & Salamanca, S. Virtual reality to foster social integration by allowing wheelchair users to tour complex archaeological sites realistically. Remote Sens. 12, 419 (2020).10.3390/rs12030419 ↗
95. Stoyanova-Doycheva, A., Ivanova, V., Glushkova, T., Stoyanov, S. & Radeva, I. Dynamic generation of cultural routes in a tourist guide. Int. J. Comput. 19, 39–48 (2020).10.47839/ijc.19.1.1691 ↗
96. Lee, J., Kim, J., Ahn, J. & Woo, W. Context-aware risk management for architectural heritage using historic building information modeling and virtual reality. J. Cult. Herit. 38, 242–252 (2019).10.1016/j.culher.2018.12.010 ↗
97. Barazzetti, L. et al. HBIM and augmented information: towards a wider user community of image and range-based reconstructions. In 25th International CIPA Symposium 2015, 35−42 (2015).10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-5-W7-35-2015 ↗
98. Bruno, F. et al. From 3D reconstruction to virtual reality: A complete methodology for digital archaeological exhibition. J. Cult. Herit. 11, 42–49 (2010).10.1016/j.culher.2009.02.006 ↗
99. Ioannides, M., Magnenat-Thalmann, N. & Papagiannakis, G. Mixed Reality and Gamification For Cultural Heritage. 1st edn, Vol. 594 (Springer, Cham, 2017).10.1007/978-3-319-49607-8 ↗
100. Croce, D. et al. Supporting Autonomous Navigation of Visually Impaired People for Experiencing Cultural Heritage. (Springer, Cham, 2020).10.1007/978-3-030-36107-5_2 ↗