Sustainable adaptive reuse of historic buildings: development of a framework from systematic review
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Adaptive reuse of historic buildings is increasingly recognised as a sustainable approach to architectural conservation and urban regeneration, yet its factors and frameworks have lacked systematic synthesis. This study conducted a systematic review using the PRISMA method to identify factors influencing sustainable adaptive reuse of historic buildings. A total of 104 factors were identified and categorised into seven aspects: architectural, economic, social, cultural, environmental, policy and regulatory, and technical and implementation. Architectural factors were most frequently cited. The increasing focus on intangible aspects highlights the importance of conceptual and value-driven considerations. More importantly, these factors are deeply interconnected, forming a multi-faceted web of influence. Building on these insights, an integrated framework was developed, which clarified hierarchical relationships and interdependencies between factors. The proposed framework offers actionable guidance to facilitate stakeholders in prioritising interventions, managing trade-offs, making informed decisions, contributing to a sustainable paradigm for adaptive reuse amid rapid urban change.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · Cultural Industries and Urban Development · Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Cantell, S. F. The adaptive reuse of historic industrial buildings: regulation barriers, best practices and case studies. Va. Polytech. Inst. State Univ. https://sig.urbanismosevilla.org/Sevilla.art/SevLab/r001US2_files/r001_US_1.pdf (2005).
2. Islamoglu, E. & Yenice, T. K. Cultural perception performance assessment of adaptively reused heritage buildings: kilis eski hamam case study. ICONARP Int. J. Archit. Plan. 10, 203–220 (2022).
3. Kelly, D. & Koo, H. J. Challenges managing large historic building renovations: lessons learned from Detroit, Michigan. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 150, 05023015 (2024).10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13555 ↗
4. Navickiene, E. & Mitrovic, J. Challenges of adaptive reuse in new functional typologies of socialist modernism architecture: intangible dimensions. Ann. -ANALI ZA ISTRSKE Mediter. Stud. -Ser. Hist. Sociol. 31, 49–64 (2021).
5. Bullen, P. A. & Love, P. E. D. Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. Struct. Surv. 29, 411–421 (2011).10.1108/02630801111182439 ↗
6. Burns, R. C. Sustainable strategies for the rehabilitation of an historic state office building. J. GREEN Build. 9, 23–42 (2014).10.3992/1943-4618-9.4.23 ↗
7. Elsorady, D. A. Assessment of the compatibility of new uses for heritage buildings: the example of Alexandria National Museum, Alexandria, Egypt. J. Cult. Herit. 15, 511–521 (2014).10.1016/j.culher.2013.10.011 ↗
8. Vehbi, B. O., Gunce, K. & Iranmanesh, A. Multi-criteria assessment for defining compatible new use: old administrative Hospital, Kyrenia, Cyprus. Sustainability 13, 1922 (2021).10.3390/su13041922 ↗
9. Bullen, P. & Love, P. A new future for the past: a model for adaptive reuse decision-making. Built Environ. Proj. Asset Manag. 1, 32–44 (2011).10.1108/20441241111143768 ↗
10. Conejos, S., Langston, C. & Smith, J. Designing for better building adaptability: a comparison of adaptSTAR and ARP models. Habitat Int. 41, 85–91 (2014).10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.07.002 ↗
11. Das, A. & Saraswat, S. Evaluating adaptive reuse potential of abandoned factories in India: a case of Mangalore Tile Factories along the Malabar Coast. Int. J. Architecton. Spat. Environ. Des. 17, 169–192 (2023).10.18848/2325-1662/CGP/v17i02/169-192 ↗
12. Sharifi, A. A. & Farahinia, A. H. Evaluation of the adaptive reuse potential of historic buildings and proposition of preventive-protective measures. Int. J. Build. Pathol. Adapt. 38, 493–507 (2020).10.1108/IJBPA-07-2019-0057 ↗
13. Pourebrahimi, M., Karimi Azeri, A. R. & Pour Ahmadi, M. A decision-making framework to prioritize existing buildings for adaptive reuse with a case study of school buildings in Guilan, Iran. Archit. Sci. Rev. 66, 201–213 (2023).10.1080/00038628.2023.2174067 ↗
14. Tu, H.-M. The attractiveness of adaptive heritage reuse: a theoretical framework. Sustainability 12, 2372 (2020).10.3390/su12062372 ↗
15. Abdullah, M. S. M., Suratkon, A. & Mohamad, S. B. H. S. Criteria for adaptive reuse of heritage shop houses towards sustainable urban development. Int. J. Sustain. Constr. Eng. Technol. 11, 42–52 (2020).
16. Farjami, E. & Turker, O. O. The extraction of prerequisite criteria for environmentally certified adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. Sustainability 13, 3536 (2021).10.3390/su13063536 ↗
17. Ikiz Kaya, D., Pintossi, N. & Dane, G. An empirical analysis of driving factors and policy enablers of heritage adaptive reuse within the circular economy framework. Sustainability 13, 2479 (2021).10.3390/su13052479 ↗
18. Vafaie, F., Remoy, H. & Gruis, V. Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings; a systematic literature review of success factors. Habitat Int 142, 102926 (2023).10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102926 ↗
19. Lanz, F. & Pendlebury, J. Adaptive reuse: a critical review. J. Archit. 27, 441–462 (2022).10.1080/13602365.2022.2105381 ↗
20. Della Spina, L. Cultural heritage: a hybrid framework for ranking adaptive reuse strategies. Buildings 11, 132 (2021).10.3390/buildings11030132 ↗
21. Aigwi, I. E., Duberia, A. & Nwadike, A. N. Adaptive reuse of existing buildings as a sustainable tool for climate change mitigation within the built environment. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 56, 102945 (2023).
22. Plevoets, B., Vande Keere, N. & Van Cleempoel, K. Landscape for mourning - adaptive reuse of a rural church and its surroundings as an urn cemetery. J. Inter. Des. 44, 173–184 (2019).
23. Misirlisoy, D. & Günçe, K. Assessment of the adaptive reuse of castles as museums: Case of Cyprus. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan. 11, 147–159 (2016).10.2495/SDP-V11-N2-147-159 ↗
24. Karakok, M. E. C. & Besir, S. E. Usage strategies to increase the socioeconomic sustainability of monumental structures: the example of the Haci Ali Aga Bath. Sustainability 15, 7587 (2023).10.3390/su15097587 ↗
25. Nadkarni, R. R. & Puthuvayi, B. A comprehensive literature review of Multi-Criteria Decision Making methods in heritage buildings. J. Build. Eng. 32, 101814 (2020).10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101814 ↗
26. Montalbano, G. & Martino, M. Methodological approach to renovate buildings through circular design strategies. A BIM workflow for DfA. DfF DfD 20, 123–131 (2024).
27. Gibbeson, C. Perceptions of professional stakeholders in the process of historic building regeneration in the UK: a relational perspective. Cities 151, 105087 (2024).10.1016/j.cities.2024.105087 ↗
28. Page, M. J. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. bmj 372 (2021).
29. Pickering, C. & Byrne, J. The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 33, 534–548 (2014).10.1080/07294360.2013.841651 ↗
30. Carrera-Rivera, A., Ochoa, W., Larrinaga, F. & Lasa, G. How-to conduct a systematic literature review: A quick guide for computer science research. MethodsX 9, 101895 (2022).10.1016/j.mex.2022.101895 ↗
31. Bosone, M., De Toro, P., Fusco Girard, L., Gravagnuolo, A. & Iodice, S. Indicators for Ex-Post Evaluation of Cultural Heritage Adaptive Reuse Impacts in the Perspective of the Circular Economy. Sustainability 13, 4759 (2021).10.3390/su13094759 ↗
32. Purcell, C. E. Modern Movement Conservation. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Caroline-Engel-Purcell/publication/374198866_Modern_Movement_Conservation_International_Principles_and_National_Policies_in_Great_Britain_and_the_United_States_of_America/links/6513e9b12c6cfe2cc2115db1/Modern-Movement-Conservation-International-Principles-and-National-Policies-in-Great-Britain-and-the-United-States-of-America.pdf.
33. Mehr, S. Y. & Wilkinson, S. The importance of place and authenticity in adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. Int. J. Build. Pathol. Adapt. 38, 689–701 (2020).10.1108/IJBPA-01-2020-0005 ↗
34. Misirlisoy, D. & Gunce, K. Adaptive reuse strategies for heritage buildings: a holistic approach. Sustain. CITIES Soc. 26, 91–98 (2016).10.1016/j.scs.2016.05.017 ↗
35. De Medici, S., De Toro, P. & Nocca, F. Cultural heritage and sustainable development: impact assessment of two adaptive reuse projects in siracusa, Sicily. Sustainability 12, 311 (2020).10.3390/su12010311 ↗
36. Vardopoulos, I. Critical sustainable development factors in the adaptive reuse of urban industrial buildings. A fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Sustain. CITIES Soc. 50, 101684 (2019).10.1016/j.scs.2019.101684 ↗
37. Boutron, I. et al. Considering bias and conflicts of interest among the included studies. In Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (eds. Higgins, J. P. T. et al.) 177–204 (Wiley, 2019).https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119536604.ch7.10.1002/9781119536604.ch7 ↗
38. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N. & Lim, W. M. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 133, 285–296 (2021).10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 ↗
39. Van Eck, N. & Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84, 523–538 (2010).10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 ↗
40. Greifenstein, M. Factors influencing the user behaviour of shared autonomous vehicles (SAVs): a systematic literature review. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 100, 323–345 (2024).10.1016/j.trf.2023.10.027 ↗
41. Foster, G. Circular economy strategies for adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings to reduce environmental impacts. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 152, 104507 (2020).10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104507 ↗
42. He, X., Zang, T., Zhou, T. & Ikebe, K. Historic conservation and tourism economy: challenges facing adaptive reuse of historic conservation areas in Chengdu, China. Conservation 2, 485–498 (2022).10.3390/conservation2030033 ↗
43. Pintossi, N., Kaya, D. I., van Wesemael, P. & Roders, A. P. Challenges of cultural heritage adaptive reuse: a stakeholders-based comparative study in three European cities. Habitat Int 136, 102807 (2023).10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102807 ↗
44. Maselli, G., Cucco, P., Nestico, A. & Ribera, F. Historical heritage-MultiCriteria Decision Method (H-MCDM) to prioritize intervention strategies for the adaptive reuse of valuable architectural assets. Methodsx 12, 102487 (2024).10.1016/j.mex.2023.102487 ↗
45. Sharifi, A. A. & Farahinia, A. H. A theoretical framework for developing the MAU model to determine the most appropriate use for historic buildings. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 30, 238–258 (2023).10.1108/ECAM-06-2021-0500 ↗
46. Conejos, S., Langston, C., Chan, E. H. W. & Chew, M. Y. L. Governance of heritage buildings: Australian regulatory barriers to adaptive reuse. Build. Res. Inf. 44, 507–519 (2016).10.1080/09613218.2016.1156951 ↗
47. Hanfi, M. H., Umar, M. U., Nah, M. N. M. & Fauzi, S. N. F. M. Managerial and technical perceptions in decision making process of adaptive reuse: Malaysian heritage building. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng. 8, 292–298 (2019).
48. Yung, E. H., Langston, C. & Chan, E. H. Adaptive reuse of traditional Chinese shophouses in government-led urban renewal projects in Hong Kong. Cities 39, 87–98 (2014).10.1016/j.cities.2014.02.012 ↗
49. Haroun, H.-A. A. F., Bakr, A. F. & Hasan, A. E.-S. Multi-criteria decision making for adaptive reuse of heritage buildings: Aziza Fahmy Palace, Alexandria, Egypt. Alex. Eng. J. 58, 467–478 (2019).10.1016/j.aej.2019.04.003 ↗
50. Angrisano, M., Nocca, F. & Di Santolo, A. S. Multidimensional evaluation framework for assessing cultural heritage adaptive reuse projects: the case of the seminary in Sant’Agata de’ Goti (Italy). URBAN Sci. 8, 50 (2024).10.3390/urbansci8020050 ↗
51. Ragheb, G. A. Multi-criteria decision making of sustainable adaptive reuse of heritage buildings based on the A’WOT analysis: a case study of Cordahi Complex, Alexandria, Egypt. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan. 16, 485–495 (2021).10.18280/ijsdp.160309 ↗
52. Wang, G. & Liu, S. Adaptability evaluation of historic buildings as an approach to propose adaptive reuse strategies based on complex adaptive system theory. J. Cult. Herit. 52, 134–145 (2021).10.1016/j.culher.2021.09.009 ↗
53. Della Spina, L., Carbonara, S., Stefano, D. & Viglianisi, A. Circular evaluation for ranking adaptive reuse strategies for abandoned industrial heritage in vulnerable contexts. Buildings 13, 458 (2023).10.3390/buildings13020458 ↗
54. Jasim, S. A. & Ismaeel, E. H. The most appropriate reuse of historic buildings. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan. 18, 1865–1875 (2023).10.18280/ijsdp.180622 ↗
55. Shehada, Z. M. M., Bin Ahmad, Y., Yaacob, N. M. & Keumala, N. I. M. Developing methodology for adaptive re-use: case study of heritage buildings in Palestine. ARCHNET-IJAR Int. J. Archit. Res. 9, 216–229 (2015).10.26687/archnet-ijar.v9i2.486 ↗
56. Vizzarri, C., Sangiorgio, V., Fatiguso, F. & Calderazzi, A. A holistic approach for the adaptive reuse project selection: The case of the former Enel power station in Bari. Land Use Policy 111, 105709 (2021).10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105709 ↗
57. Dyson, K., Matthews, J. & Love, P. E. D. Critical success factors of adapting heritage buildings: an exploratory study. BUILT Environ. Proj. ASSET Manag. 6, 44–57 (2016).10.1108/BEPAM-01-2015-0002 ↗
58. Gunce, K. & Misirlisoy, D. Assessment of adaptive reuse practices through user experiences: traditional houses in the Walled City of Nicosia. Sustainability 11, 540 (2019).10.3390/su11020540 ↗
59. Zeadat, Z. F. Adaptive reuse challenges of Jordan’s heritage buildings: a critical review. Int. J. URBAN Sustain. Dev. 16, 95–107 (2024).10.1080/19463138.2024.2329661 ↗
60. Mehr, S. Y. & Wilkinson, S. A model for assessing adaptability in heritage buildings. Int. J. Conserv. Sci. 12, 87–104 (2021).
61. Bayraktaroglu, B. & Erkartal, P. O. Adaptive reuse potential of cultural heritage: the case of Istanbul Drapers’ Bazaar. Archit. Civ. Eng. Environ. 16, 1–20 (2023).
62. Mohamed, B. & Marzouk, M. Post-adaptive reuse evaluation of heritage buildings using multi-criteria decision-making techniques. J. Build. Eng. 99, 111485 (2024).10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111485 ↗
63. Sharifi, A. A. & Farahinia, A. H. Evaluation of the future adaptive reuse of Mashrooteh house using the adaptSTAR model. Int. J. Build. Pathol. Adapt. 38, 771–784 (2020).10.1108/IJBPA-07-2019-0065 ↗
64. Djebbour, I. & Biara, R. W. Sustainability comparative assessment of adaptive reuse of heritage buildings as museums: a case of Tlemcen. Environ. Res. Eng. Manag. 75, 7–20 (2019).10.5755/j01.erem.75.3.22133 ↗
65. Elsorady, D. A. Adaptive reuse decision making of a heritage building Antoniadis Palace, Egypt. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 14, 658–677 (2020).10.1080/15583058.2018.1558313 ↗
66. Cucco, P., Maselli, G., Nestico, A. & Ribera, F. An evaluation model for adaptive reuse of cultural heritage in accordance with 2030 SDGs and European Quality Principles. J. Cult. Herit. 59, 202–216 (2023).10.1016/j.culher.2022.12.002 ↗
67. Porkar, M. J., Khakzand, M. & Mardanlou, N. Achievement to adaptive reuse strategies of industrial heritage: learning from Iranian cases. Int. J. Build. Pathol. Adapt. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-09-2021-0117 (2023).10.1108/IJBPA-09-2021-0117 ↗
68. Torrieri, F., Fumo, M., Sarnataro, M. & Ausiello, G. An integrated decision support system for the sustainable reuse of the former monastery of ‘Ritiro del Carmine’ in Campania Region. Sustainability 11, 5244 (2019).10.3390/su11195244 ↗
69. Yung, E. H. K., Chan, E. H. W. & Xu, Y. Community-initiated adaptive reuse of historic buildings and sustainable development in the inner city of Shanghai. J. URBAN Plan. Dev. 140, 05014003 (2014).10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000174 ↗
70. Bottero, M., D’Alpaos, C. & Oppio, A. Ranking of adaptive reuse strategies for abandoned industrial heritage in vulnerable contexts: a multiple criteria decision aiding approach. Sustainability 11, 785 (2019).10.3390/su11030785 ↗
71. Arfa, F. H., Lubelli, B., Zijlstra, H. & Quist, W. Criteria of ‘effectiveness’ and related aspects in adaptive reuse projects of heritage buildings. Sustainability 14, 1251 (2022).10.3390/su14031251 ↗
72. Meng, F., Zhi, Y. & Pang, Y. Assessment of the adaptive reuse potentiality of industrial heritage based on improved entropy TOPSIS method from the perspective of urban regeneration. Sustainability 15, 7735 (2023).10.3390/su15097735 ↗
73. Shehata, W. T. A., Moustafa, Y., Sherif, L. & Botros, A. Towards the comprehensive and systematic assessment of the adaptive reuse of Islamic architectural heritage in Cairo A conceptual framework. J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 5, 14–29 (2015).10.1108/JCHMSD-02-2014-0003 ↗
74. Andrade, M. J., Jimenez-Morales, E., Rodriguez-Ramos, R. & Martinez-Ramirez, P. Reuse of port industrial heritage in tourist cities: shipyards as case studies. Front. Archit. Res. 13, 164–183 (2024).10.1016/j.foar.2023.09.005 ↗
75. Djebbour, I. & Biara, R. W. The challenge of adaptive reuse towards the sustainability of heritage buildings. Int. J. Conserv. Sci. 11, 519–530 (2020).
76. Yoon, J. & Lee, J. Adaptive reuse of apartments as heritage assets in the Seoul Station urban regeneration area. Sustainability 11, 3124 (2019).10.3390/su11113124 ↗
77. Misirlisoy, D. & Gunce, K. A critical look to the adaptive reuse of traditional urban houses in the Walled City of Nicosia. J. Archit. Conserv. 22, 149–166 (2016).
78. Bottero, M., Datola, G., Fazzari, D. & Ingaramo, R. Re-thinking Detroit: a multicriteria-based approach for adaptive reuse for the Corktown District. Sustainability 14, 8343 (2022).10.3390/su14148343 ↗
79. De Silva, G. D. R., Perera, B. A. K. S. & Rodrigo, M. N. N. Adaptive reuse of buildings: the case of Sri Lanka. J. Financ. Manag. Prop. Constr. 24, 79–96 (2019).10.1108/JFMPC-11-2017-0044 ↗
80. Aigwi, I. E. et al. A performance-based framework to prioritise underutilised historical buildings for adaptive reuse interventions in New Zealand. Sustain. Cities Soc. 48, 101547 (2019).10.1016/j.scs.2019.101547 ↗
81. Bianchi, A. & De Medici, S. A sustainable adaptive reuse management model for disused railway cultural heritage to boost local and regional competitiveness. Sustainability 15, 5127 (2023).10.3390/su15065127 ↗
82. Ebas, N. A., Suratkon, A., Abdullah, M. S. M., Jamil, S. A. M. & Suwandari, Y. D. Evaluating adaptive reuse criteria for Malaysia’s pre-war shophouses: a correlation analysis. Int. J. Sustain. Constr. Eng. Technol. 15, 209–221 (2024).
83. Gravagnuolo, A. et al. Participatory evaluation of cultural heritage adaptive reuse interventions in the circular economy perspective: a case study of historic buildings in Salerno (Italy). J. URBAN Manag. 13, 107–139 (2024).10.1016/j.jum.2023.12.002 ↗
84. Abdullah, F., Basha, B. & Soomro, A. R. Sustainable heritage: analytical study on the viability of adaptive reuse with social approach, case study of Asia Heritage Row, Kuala Lumpur. Adv. Sci. Lett. 23, 6179–6183 (2017).10.1166/asl.2017.9231 ↗
85. Claver, J., Garcia-Dominguez, A. & Sebastian, M. A. Multicriteria decision tool for sustainable reuse of industrial heritage into its urban and social environment. Case studies. Sustainability 12, 7430 (2020).10.3390/su12187430 ↗
86. Chen, C.-S., Chiu, Y.-H. & Tsai, L. Evaluating the adaptive reuse of historic buildings through multicriteria decision-making. Habitat Int. 81, 12–23 (2018).10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.09.003 ↗
87. Nasr, E. H. M. & Khalil, M. A. M. Assessing the adaptive reuse of heritage houses in Sultanate of Oman. J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 14, 963–980 (2024).10.1108/JCHMSD-03-2021-0057 ↗
88. Vardopoulos, I. et al. An integrated SWOT-PESTLE-AHP model assessing sustainability in adaptive reuse projects. Appl. Sci. BASEL 11, 7134 (2021).10.3390/app11157134 ↗
89. Aigwi, I. E., Ingham, J., Phipps, R. & Filippova, O. Identifying parameters for a performance-based framework: towards prioritising underutilised historical buildings for adaptive reuse in New Zealand. Cities 102, 102756 (2020).10.1016/j.cities.2020.102756 ↗
90. Mohamed, N. & Alauddin, K. Decision making criteria for adaptive reuse strategy in UNESCO World Heritage City. J. Facil. Manag. 21, 169–181 (2023).10.1108/JFM-06-2021-0068 ↗
91. Guo, P., Li, Q., Guo, H. & Li, H. Quantifying the core driving force for the sustainable redevelopment of industrial heritage: implications for urban renewal. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28, 48097–48111 (2021).10.1007/s11356-021-14054-7 ↗
92. Hong, Y. & Chen, F. Evaluating the adaptive reuse potential of buildings in conservation areas. Facilities 35, 202–219 (2017).10.1108/F-10-2015-0077 ↗
93. Ding, X., Shao, Y. & Feng, B. Rethinking the sustainability of industrial buildings in high-density urban areas: balancing adaptability and public satisfaction. Buildings 15, 747 (2025).10.3390/buildings15050747 ↗
94. van Laar, B., Greco, A., Remoy, H. & Gruis, V. What matters when? - An integrative literature review on decision criteria in different stages of the adaptive reuse process. Dev. Built Environ. 18, 100439 (2024).10.1016/j.dibe.2024.100439 ↗
95. Madani, S. S., Kamelnia, H. & Ghalehnovi, A. Assessing user’s satisfaction in innovation centers with industrial heritage renovation. Int. J. Hum. Cap. Urban Manag. 9, 279–298 (2024).
96. Vilcea, C., Popescu, L. & Nita, A. Urban revitalisation within the historical quarter: A comprehensive analysis of a medium sized city in Romania. Morav. Geogr. Rep. 32, 37–50 (2024).
97. Liu, Y., Li, H., Li, W., Li, Q. & Hu, X. Value assessment for the restoration of industrial relics based on analytic hierarchy process: a case study of Shaanxi Steel Factory in Xi’an, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28, 69129–69148 (2021).10.1007/s11356-021-14897-0 ↗
98. Abastante, F., Lami, I. M. & Mecca, B. Performance Indicators Framework to Analyse Factors Influencing the Success of Six Urban Cultural Regeneration Cases. In: Bevilacqua, C., Calabrò, F. & Della Spina, L. (eds) New Metropolitan Perspectives. NMP 2020. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol. 178. (Springer, Cham, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_8310.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_83 ↗
99. Abdul Aziz, M. F. Post-Conservation Evaluation (PCE) on historic buildings: authenticity of adaptive reuse museums in George Town, UNESCO World Heritage Site. Plan. Malays. 19, 76–87 (2021).
100. Djebbour, I. & Biara, R. W. Adaptive Reuse a Sustainable Strategy for the Revitalization of the City: the Case of Monuments Reconverted to Museums in the City of Tlemcen, Algeria. Arch.-Archit. Hist. Restor. 1268–1285 https://doi.org/10.14633/AHR267 (2020).10.14633/AHR267 ↗