Configurational analysis of dual pathways to environmental responsibility in heritage tourism
Source abstract
Abstract
Balancing tourism growth with heritage conservation requires understanding tourists’ Environmental Responsibility Behaviour (ERB). This study examines the underlying processes of ERB by exploring how environmental stimuli and knowledge are associated with affective responses and subsequent behaviour. Grounded in the Stimulus-Organism-Response framework, we employed a mixed-methods approach with data from 421 visitors to Macao’s Historic Centre. Results show Action Knowledge exerts the strongest direct effect on ERB and consistently serves as a core condition across configurations. Negative Anticipated Emotions play a supportive role in configurations where Tourism Environment is present, particularly when combined with AK and PAEs. fsQCA reveals three distinct configurations leading to high ERB: Knowledge Negative Emotion Collaborative, Knowledge Positive Emotion Collaborative, and Action-Emotion Synergy, with an overall solution coverage of 0.600. The findings advance theoretical understanding of ERB drivers. Practically, heritage managers should prioritize actionable guidelines over abstract campaigns and adopt differentiated strategies based on site conditions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. Han, H. The norm activation model and theory-broadening: Individuals’ decision-making on environmentally-responsible convention attendance. J. Environ. Psychol. 40, 462–471 (2014).10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.10.006 ↗
2. Han, H. & Hwang, J. Cruise travelers’ environmentally responsible decision-making: an integrative framework of goal-directed behaviour and norm activation process. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 53, 94–105 (2016).10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.12.005 ↗
3. Frick, J. et al. Environmental knowledge and conservation behaviour: exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample. Pers. Individ. Differ. 37, 1597–1613 (2004).10.1016/j.paid.2004.02.015 ↗
4. Kim, M. S. & Stepchenkova, S. Altruistic values and environmental knowledge as triggers of pro-environmental behaviour among tourists. Curr. Issues Tour. 23, 1575–1580 (2020).10.1080/13683500.2019.1628188 ↗
5. Liu, J. et al. Understanding tourists’ environmentally responsible behaviour at coastal tourism destinations. Mar. Pol. 143, 105178 (2022).10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105178 ↗
6. Dolnicar, S. et al. A sharing-based approach to enticing tourists to behave more environmentally friendly. J. Travel Res. 58, 241–252 (2019).10.1177/0047287517746013 ↗
7. Ramkissoon, H. et al. Testing the dimensionality of place attachment and its relationships with place satisfaction and pro-environmental behaviours: a structural equation modelling approach. Tour. Manag. 36, 552–566 (2013).10.1016/j.tourman.2012.09.003 ↗
8. Gezhi, C. & Xiang, H. From good feelings to good behaviour: Exploring the impacts of positive emotions on tourist environmentally responsible behaviour. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 50, 1–9 (2022).10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.11.017 ↗
9. Onwezen, M. C. et al. The Norm Activation Model: An exploration of the functions of anticipated pride and guilt in pro-environmental behaviour. J. Econ. Psychol. 39, 141–153 (2013).10.1016/j.joep.2013.07.005 ↗
10. Lin, M. T. B. et al. A meta-analysis of antecedents of pro-environmental behavioural intention of tourists and hospitality consumers. Tour. Manag. 93, 104566 (2022).10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104566 ↗
11. Zhang, X. X. et al. Active and passive social networking sites usage and negative emotions: a reciprocal relationship? J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 39, 195–213 (2020).10.1521/jscp.2020.39.3.195 ↗
12. Wei, H. et al. Heritage tourism and nation-building: politics of the production of Chinese national identity at the Mausoleum of Yellow Emperor. Sustainability 14, 8798 (2022).10.3390/su14148798 ↗
13. Peihong, W. et al. An evaluation model for the recreational carrying capacity of urban aerial trails. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 48, 101152 (2023).
14. Kerun, L., & Peihong, W. Assessing Urban Aerial Trails’ Capacity in Xiamen, China: a quantitative approach to physical and psychological crowding perceptions. Leis. Sci. 1–28 (2024).10.1080/01490400.2024.2394111 ↗
15. Cai, L. B. & Zhu, X. T. Does tourist-environment fit affect environmentally responsible behaviour? Using memorable tourism experience and place attachment as intervening variables. Tour. Trib. 36, 119–131 (2021).
16. Jia, Y. J. & Lin, D. R. Influence factors and effects of tourists’ environmentally responsible behaviours based on place theory. Chin. J. Pop. Resour. Environ. 25, 161–169 (2015).
17. Bitner, M. J. Servicescapes: the impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees. J. Mark. 56, 57–71 (1992).10.1177/002224299205600205 ↗
18. Manning, R. E. Defining and managing visitor capacity in National Parks: a program of research in the US National Park System. J. Tour. Leis. Stud. 17, 183–214 (2011).
19. Fiss, P. C. Building better causal theories: a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Acad. Manag. J. 54, 393–420 (2011).10.5465/amj.2011.60263120 ↗
20. Rasoolimanesh, S. M. et al. The combined use of symmetric and asymmetric approaches: partial least squares-structural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 33, 1571–1592 (2021).10.1108/IJCHM-10-2020-1164 ↗
21. Rao, X. et al. Predicting private and public pro-environmental behaviours in rural tourism contexts using SEM and fsQCA: the role of destination image and relationship quality. Land 11, 448 (2022).10.3390/land11030448 ↗
22. Torabi, Z. A. et al. Environmental interpretation and environmentally responsible behaviour of tourists in heritage villages. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 22, 5513–5528 (2025).10.1007/s13762-024-06216-0 ↗
23. Wang, Y. et al. A. Does world heritage site initiation promote tourism? A difference-in-difference approach. Tour. Econ. 30, 2111–2133 (2024).10.1177/13548166241253306 ↗
24. Sun, T., Di, K., Hu, J., Shi, Q. & Irfan, M. Digitally empowered green public services in environmentally vulnerable areas: insights from SEM-ANN analysis. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 84, 104216 (2025).10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104216 ↗
25. Sun, T., Di, K., Shi, Q., Hu, J. & Zhang, X. Study on the development path of low-carbon retail clusters empowered by digital empowerment. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 81, 104006 (2024).10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104006 ↗
26. González, A. T. Venice: the problem of overtourism and the impact of cruises. Investig. Reg. 42, 35–51 (2018).
27. 27. Di, K., Chen, W., Shi, Q., Cai, Q. & Zhang, B. Digital empowerment and win-win co-operation for green and low-carbon industrial development: Analysis of regional diff erences based on GMM-ANN intelligence models. J. Clean. Prod. 445, 141332 (2024).10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141332 ↗
28. Di, K., Chen, W., Shi, Q., Cai, Q. & Liu, S. Analysing the impact of coupled domestic demand dynamics of green and low-carbon consumption in the market based on SEM-ANN. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 79, 103856 (2024).10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103856 ↗
29. Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. An Approach to Environmental Psychology. (MIT Press, 1974).
30. Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Modeling. 6, 1–55 (1999).10.1080/10705519909540118 ↗
31. Wang, B., An, S. & Li, K. Shaping green choices: How sensory cues drive behaviour of wood-plastic composites. Behav. Sci. 15, 383 (2025).10.3390/bs15030383 ↗
32. Nguyen, K. H. & Tran, M. D. Fostering sustainable consumer behaviours: integrating minimalism, lifestyle of health and sustainability, and collectivist culture through the theory of planned behaviour. Bus. Strategy Dev. 8, e70127 (2025).10.1002/bsd2.70127 ↗
33. UNESCO. Decisions Adopted at the 29th Session of the World Heritage Committee (WHC-05/29.COM/22) https://whc.unesco.org/archive/2005/whc05-29com-22e.pdf (2005).
34. Li, K. Research on the factors influencing the spatial quality of high-density urban streets: a framework using deep learning, street scene images, and principal component analysis. Land 13, 1161 (2024).10.3390/land13081161 ↗
35. Macao Government Tourism Office. Tourism Bureau Activity Report https://www.dst.gov.mo/static/ebook/da9849fb18524f2d8416600d16a38b73/index.html (2024).
36. Winter, T. Rethinking tourism in Asia. Ann. Tour. Res. 34, 27–44 (2007).10.1016/j.annals.2006.06.004 ↗
37. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y. & Podsakoff, N. P. Common method biases in behavioural research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88, 879 (2003).10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 ↗
38. Olya, H. & Nia, T. H. The medical tourism index and behavioural responses of medical travelers: a mixed-method study. J. Travel Res. 60, 779–798 (2021).10.1177/0047287520915278 ↗
39. Kline, R. B. Becoming a Behavioural Science Researcher: A Guide to Producing Research that Matters 2nd edn 77 (Guilford Press Publishing, 2008).
40. Hair, J. F. et al. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 31, 2–24 (2019).10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203 ↗
41. Verhoef, P. et al. Contribution of caffeine to the homocysteine-raising effect of coffee: a randomized controlled trial in humans. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 76, 1244–1248 (2002).10.1093/ajcn/76.6.1244 ↗
42. Durgapal, B. P. & Singhal, B. P. Tourism in Uttarakhand. Int. J. Manag. Stud. 5, 08 (2018).10.18843/ijms/v5iS5/02 ↗
43. Marsh, H. W. & Hau, K. T. Assessing goodness of fit: is parsimony always desirable?. J. Exp. Educ. 64, 364–390 (1996).10.1080/00220973.1996.10806604 ↗
44. Ragin, C. C., & Fiss, P. C. Net effects analysis versus configurational analysis: an empirical demonstration. In Proceedings of Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond 190–212 (University of Chicago Press, 2008).10.7208/chicago/9780226702797.001.0001 ↗
45. Du, Y. & Kim, P. H. One size does not fit all: Strategy configurations, complex environments, and new venture performance in emerging economies. J. Bus. Res. 124, 272–285 (2021).10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.059 ↗
46. Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 2012).10.1017/CBO9781139004244 ↗
47. Higgins, E. T. Beyond pleasure and pain. Am. Psychol. 52, 1280 (1997).10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280 ↗
48. Peihong, W., Kerun, L., & Feng, S. Visualizing sustainability: how landscape diversity shapes crowding tolerance on urban aerial trails. J. Sustain. Tour 1–30 (2026).10.1080/09669582.2026.2655279 ↗
49. Han, H. Consumer behaviour and environmental sustainability in tourism and hospitality: a review of theories, concepts, and latest research. J. Sustain. Tour. 29, 1021–1042 (2021).10.1080/09669582.2021.1903019 ↗
50. Sánchez, J. et al. Perceived value of the purchase of a tourism product. Tour. Manag. 27, 394–409 (2006).10.1016/j.tourman.2004.11.007 ↗
51. Timothy, D. J., & Boyd, S. W. Heritage Tourism (Harlow: Prentice Hall, 2003).
52. Cheng, T. M. & Wu, H. C. How do environmental knowledge, environmental sensitivity, and place attachment affect environmentally responsible behaviour? An integrated approach for sustainable island tourism. J. Sustain. Tour. 23, 557–576 (2015).10.1080/09669582.2014.965177 ↗
53. Izard, C. E. Four systems for emotion activation: cognitive and noncognitive processes. Psychol. Rev. 100, 68 (1993).10.1037/0033-295X.100.1.68 ↗
54. Vaske, J. J. & Kobrin, K. C. Place attachment and environmentally responsible behaviour. J. Environ. Educ. 32, 16–21 (2001).10.1080/00958960109598658 ↗
55. Lee, T. H. How recreation involvement, place attachment and conservation commitment affect environmentally responsible behaviour. J. Sustain. Tour. 19, 895–915 (2011).10.1080/09669582.2011.570345 ↗