Design of panoramic virtual museum interactive interface based on entropy weight TOPSIS and PSO-SVR
Source abstract
Abstract
This study addresses the neglect of user emotional needs in digital cultural heritage displays by proposing a quantitative methodology to optimize the Panoramic Virtual Museum Interactive Interface (PVMUI). Leveraging Kansei Engineering, we first extracted three core affective dimensions (Technological, Innovative, Fancy) through factor analysis of 45 Kansei terms. Morphological decomposition and entropy-weighted TOPSIS objectively prioritized six critical design features from 14 candidates. A nonlinear mapping model integrating Particle Swarm Optimization Support Vector Regression (PSO-SVR) was developed to correlate these features with user emotions, validated empirically via 100 participants. Results identified an optimal configuration: top-bottom layout (A1-1), 30% screen occupancy (A2-3), transparent navigation icons (A5-5), planar maps (A7-3), arrow-shaped movement icons (A9-7), and no scene interaction (A10-6). The framework advances virtual museum design by establishing emotion-driven optimization principles, bridging theoretical gaps in affective computing for PVMUI while offering actionable guidelines for enhancing user immersion and heritage dissemination.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Color perception and design · Digital Media and Visual Art
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. Vallance, E. & Roberts, L. C. From knowledge to narrative: Educators and the changing museum. Hist. Educ. Q. 38, 344–346 (1998).10.2307/369175 ↗
2. Radder, L. & Han, X. An examination of the museum experience based on Pine and Gilmore’s experience economy realms. J. Appl. Bus. Res. 31, 455 (2015).10.19030/jabr.v31i2.9129 ↗
3. Proctor, N. Digital: Museum as platform, curator as champion, in the age of social media. Curator 53, 35–46 (2010).10.1111/j.2151-6952.2009.00006.x ↗
4. Miller, G. et al. The virtual museum: Interactive 3D navigation of a multimedia database. J. Vis. Comput. Animat. 3, 183–197 (1992).10.1002/vis.4340030305 ↗
5. Dal Falco, F. & Vassos, S. Museum experience design: A modern storytelling methodology. Des. J. 20, S3975–S3983 (2017).
6. Carrozzino, M. & Bergamasco, M. Beyond virtual museums: Experiencing immersive virtual reality in real museums. J. Cult. Herit. 11, 452–458 (2010).10.1016/j.culher.2010.04.001 ↗
7. He, Z., Wu, L. & Li, X. R. When art meets tech: The role of augmented reality in enhancing museum experiences and purchase intentions. Tour. Manag. 68, 127–139 (2018).10.1016/j.tourman.2018.03.003 ↗
8. Sylaiou, S. et al. Exploring the relationship between presence and enjoyment in a virtual museum. Int. J. Hum. -Comput. Stud. 68, 243–253 (2010).10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.11.002 ↗
9. Ardissono, L., Kuflik, T. & Petrelli, D. Personalization in cultural heritage: The road travelled and the one ahead. 22, 73–99 (2012).10.1007/s11257-011-9104-x ↗
10. Styliani, S. et al. Virtual museums, a survey and some issues for consideration. J. Cult. Herit. 10, 520–528 (2009).10.1016/j.culher.2009.03.003 ↗
11. Kersten, T., Tschirschwitz, F. & Deggim, S. Development of a virtual museum including a 4D presentation of building history in virtual reality. In TC II & CIPA 3D Virtual Reconstruction and Visualization of Complex Architectures, 1–3 March 2017, Nafplio, Greece 361–367 (Copernicus, 2017).10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W3-361-2017 ↗
12. Bruno, F. et al. From 3D reconstruction to virtual reality: A complete methodology for digital archaeological exhibition. J. Cult. Herit. 11, 42–49 (2010).10.1016/j.culher.2009.02.006 ↗
13. Mortara, M. et al. Learning cultural heritage by serious games. J. Cult. Herit. 15, 318–325 (2014).10.1016/j.culher.2013.04.004 ↗
14. Anderson, E. F. et al. Developing serious games for cultural heritage: A state-of-the-art review. Virtual Real. 14, 255–275 (2010).10.1007/s10055-010-0177-3 ↗
15. Tsita, C. et al. An approach to facilitate visitors’ engagement with contemporary art in a virtual museum. In International Conference on Transdisciplinary Multispectral Modeling and Cooperation for the Preservation of Cultural Heritage 207–217 (Springer, 2021).10.1007/978-3-031-20253-7_17 ↗
16. Cao, K. Development and design case function comparison of panoramic roaming system of virtual museum based on Pano2VR. Mob. Inf. Syst. 2022, 7363221 (2022).
17. Ahn, B. Y. et al. Construction of cyber science museum. In Proceedings. 2003 International Conference on Cyberworlds 440–445 (IEEE, 2003).
18. Zhang, J. Innovative application of virtual display technique in virtual museum. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 231, 012043 (2017).10.1088/1757-899X/231/1/012043 ↗
19. Aylan, F. K. & Gök, H. S. Panoramic museum visits as cultural recreation activities: Panorama 1453 History Museum example. J. Tour. Leis. Hosp. 3, 103–117 (2021).
20. Guo, Y. et al. Design of virtual scenes for revolutionary education based on VR technology. In Proceedings of the World Conference on Intelligent and 3-D Technologies (WCI3DT 2022) 649–658 (Springer, 2023).10.1007/978-981-19-7184-6_54 ↗
21. Zhang, L. et al. VR games and the dissemination of cultural heritage. In Distributed, Ambient and Pervasive Interactions: Understanding Humans 439–451 (Springer, 2018).10.1007/978-3-319-91125-0_35 ↗
22. Doulamis, A. et al. Serious games for cultural applications. Intell. Comput. Graph. 2012, 97–115 (2012).
23. Bekele, M. K. et al. A survey of augmented, virtual, and mixed reality for cultural heritage. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 11, 1–36 (2018).10.1145/3145534 ↗
24. Nagamachi, M. Kansei engineering: A new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 15, 3–11 (1995).10.1016/0169-8141(94)00052-5 ↗
25. Hsiao, Y. H., Chen, M. C. & Liao, W. C. Logistics service design for cross-border E-commerce using Kansei engineering with text-mining-based online content analysis. Telemat. Inform. 34, 284–302 (2017).10.1016/j.tele.2016.08.002 ↗
26. Li, M. & Dai, Y. Optimization strategies for the modular resource construction of art gallery’s exhibition halls based on Kansei engineering. IEEE Access 12, 26800–26818 (2024).10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3366548 ↗
27. Llinares, C. & Page, A. F. Differential semantics as a Kansei engineering tool for analyzing the emotional impressions which determine the choice of neighbourhood: The case of Valencia, Spain. Landsc. Urban Plan. 87, 247–257 (2008).10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.06.006 ↗
28. Huang, J. M. et al. Costume innovative design based on Kansei engineering. Appl. Mech. Mater. 651, 2024–2027 (2014).10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.651-653.2024 ↗
29. Jindo, T. & Hirasago, K. Application studies to car interior of Kansei engineering. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 19, 105–114 (1997).10.1016/S0169-8141(96)00007-8 ↗
30. Lai, H. H. et al. User-oriented design for the optimal combination on product design. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 100, 253–267 (2006).10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.11.005 ↗
31. Hsu, S. H., Chuang, M. C. & Chang, C. C. A semantic differential study of designers’ and users’ product form perception. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 25, 375–391 (2000).10.1016/S0169-8141(99)00026-8 ↗
32. Jiao, J. R., Zhang, Y. & Helander, M. A Kansei mining system for affective design. Expert Syst. Appl. 30, 658–673 (2006).10.1016/j.eswa.2005.07.020 ↗
33. Liu, X. & Yang, S. Study on product form design via Kansei engineering and virtual reality. J. Eng. Des. 33, 412–440 (2022).10.1080/09544828.2022.2078660 ↗
34. Sugihara, K., Ishii, H. & Tanaka, H. Interval priorities in AHP by interval regression analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 158, 745–754 (2004).10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00418-1 ↗
35. Chen, C. C. & Chuang, M. C. Integrating the Kano model into a robust design approach to enhance customer satisfaction with product design. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 114, 667–681 (2008).10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.02.015 ↗
36. Nagamachi, M., Okazaki, Y. & Ishikawa, M. Kansei engineering and application of the rough sets model. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. I J. Syst. Control Eng. 220, 763–768 (2006).
37. Wang, T. & Zhou, M. Integrating rough set theory with customer satisfaction to construct a novel approach for mining product design rules. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 41, 331–353 (2021).
38. Lai, H. H., Lin, Y. C. & Yeh, C. H. Form design of product image using grey relational analysis and neural network models. Comput. Oper. Res. 32, 2689–2711 (2005).10.1016/j.cor.2004.03.021 ↗
39. Chen, Z. An elderly-oriented design of HMI in autonomous driving cars based on rough set theory and backpropagation neural network. IEEE Access 12, 26800–26818 (2024).10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3366548 ↗
40. Tsuchiya, T. et al. A method for learning decision tree using genetic algorithm and its application to Kansei engineering system. In 1999 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 6, 279–283 (IEEE, 1999).10.1109/ICSMC.1999.816564 ↗
41. Nagamachi, M. Kansei engineering as a powerful consumer-oriented technology for product development. Appl. Ergon. 33, 289–294 (2002).10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00019-4 ↗
42. Zou, J. & Li, P. Modelling of litchi shelf life based on the entropy weight method. Food Packag. Shelf Life 25, 100509 (2020).10.1016/j.fpsl.2020.100509 ↗
43. Tang, W. Y. et al. Research on multi-objective optimisation of product form design based on Kansei engineering. J. Eng. Des. 2024, 1–26 (2024).
44. Wang, W. et al. Multilevel comprehensive evaluation and decision making of ergonomics. Discrete. Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2015, 689203 (2015).10.1155/2015/689203 ↗
45. Zhang, S. et al. Cognitive matching of design subjects in product form evolutionary design. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2021, 8456736 (2021).10.1155/2021/8456736 ↗
46. Opricovic, S. & Tzeng, G. H. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 156, 445–455 (2004).10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1 ↗
47. Tzeng, G. H. & Huang, J. J. Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications (CRC Press, 2011).10.1201/b11032 ↗
48. Zanakis, S. H. et al. Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 107, 507–529 (1998).10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00147-1 ↗
49. Behzadian, M. et al. A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 13051–13069 (2012).10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056 ↗
50. Lin, Y. C., Chen, C. C. & Yeh, C. H. Intelligent decision support for new product development: A consumer-oriented approach. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 8, 2761–2770 (2014).10.12785/amis/080611 ↗
51. Wang, M., Cheng, X. & He, Z. Research on multiple affective responses design of product based on Kansei engineering and TOPSIS-AISM. Math. Probl. Eng. 2022, 6945986 (2022).
52. Quan, H. et al. Personalized product evaluation based on GRA-TOPSIS and Kansei engineering. Symmetry 11, 867 (2019).10.3390/sym11070867 ↗
53. Vapnik, V. The nature of statistical learning theory (Springer, 2013).
54. Burges, C. J. C. A. tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2, 121–167 (1998).10.1023/A:1009715923555 ↗
55. Vapnik, V., Golowich, S. & Smola, A. Support vector method for function approximation, regression estimation and signal processing. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 9, 281–287 (1996).
56. Yang, C. C. & Shieh, M. D. A support vector regression based prediction model of affective responses for product form design. Comput. Ind. Eng. 59, 682–689 (2010).10.1016/j.cie.2010.07.019 ↗
57. Kennedy, J. & Eberhart, R. Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of ICNN'95 4, 1942–1948 (IEEE, 1995).10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968 ↗
58. Yang, C. C. Constructing a hybrid Kansei engineering system based on multiple affective responses: Application to product form design. Comput. Ind. Eng. 60, 760–768 (2011).10.1016/j.cie.2011.01.011 ↗
59. Yuan, B. et al. Applying latent Dirichlet allocation and support vector regression to the aesthetic design of medical nursing beds. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 23, 051014 (2023).10.1115/1.4062350 ↗
60. Shieh, M. D., Li, Y. & Yang, C. C. Comparison of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms in a hybrid Kansei engineering system for product form design. Adv. Eng. Inform. 36, 31–42 (2018).10.1016/j.aei.2018.02.002 ↗
61. Davis, M. & Putnam, H. A computing procedure for quantification theory. J. ACM 7, 201–215 (1960).10.1145/321033.321034 ↗
62. Abdi, H. & Williams, L. J. Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 2, 433–459 (2010).10.1002/wics.101 ↗
63. Ishihara, S. et al. An analysis of Kansei structure on shoes using self-organizing neural networks. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 19, 93–104 (1997).10.1016/S0169-8141(96)00006-6 ↗
64. Kang, X. & Nagasawa, S. Integrating Kansei engineering and interactive genetic algorithm in Jiangxi red cultural and creative product design. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 44, 647–660 (2023).
65. Wu, Y. & Zhang, H. Image style recognition and intelligent design of oiled paper bamboo umbrella based on deep learning. Comput. -Aided Des. Appl. 19, 76–90 (2021).10.14733/cadaps.2022.76-90 ↗
66. Tharangie, K. G. D. et al. Insight into Kansei color combinations in interactive user interface designing. In Human-Computer Interaction. New Trends 735–744 (Springer, 2009).10.1007/978-3-642-02574-7_82 ↗
67. Deng, L. & Wang, G. Quantitative evaluation of visual aesthetics of human-machine interaction interface layout. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2020, 9815937 (2020).10.1155/2020/9815937 ↗
68. Naim, N. F. M. & Hwang, M. Emotional correlation test from binary gender perspective using Kansei Engineering approach on IVML prototype. J. Ind. Eng. Manuf. Lett. 23, 68–74 (2023).
69. Qu, Q. X. Kansei knowledge extraction based on evolutionary genetic algorithm: An application to e-commerce web appearance design. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 16, 299–313 (2015).10.1080/1463922X.2014.1001006 ↗
70. Gretalita, N. W. M., Suzianti, A. & Ardi, R. Visual usability design of financial personal assistant application. In 2017 International Conference on Information Technology 142–147 (IEEE, 2017).10.1145/3176653.3176700 ↗