Exploring spatial visual characteristics of scenic archetypes through AI multimodal mapping methods in Hangzhou Westlake
Source abstract
Abstract
Traditional Chinese gardens embody sophisticated spatial design principles often described through abstract terms like “scenic archetypes,” yet systematic methods for analyzing their visual spatial characteristics remain underdeveloped. This study establishes an analytical framework integrating phenomenological theory with AI-enabled multimodal mapping to quantify spatial visual characteristics of four scenic archetypes, including framed, obstructive, porous, and sandwiched scenery, at Hangzhou West Lake. By decomposing scenic compositions and configurations into foreground-middle-background hierarchies characterized through shape, size, position, and texture variables, the framework achieves 94.12% classification accuracy via random forest modeling while revealing each archetype. Statistical analysis identifies archetype-specific spatial strategies: framed scenery employs regular foreground geometry with smooth depth transitions; obstructive scenery utilizes systematic positioning with texture contrasts; porous scenery balances visual permeability with textural variation; sandwiched scenery creates bilateral symmetry with channeling effects. This approach provides replicable methodology for heritage conservation and contemporary landscape design informed by traditional spatial wisdom.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Urban Green Space and Health · Urban Design and Spatial Analysis · Urban Heat Island Mitigation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Nijhuis, S. GIS-based landscape design research: Stourhead landscape garden as a case study. A+BE | Archit. Built Environ. 5, 1–338 (2015).
2. Bell, S. Elements of Visual Design in the Landscape (Routledge, 2004).
3. Liu, M. Mapping landscape spaces: understanding, interpretation, and the use of spatial-visual landscape characteristics in landscape design. A+BE | Archit. Built Environ. 10, 1–248 (2020).
4. Cushman, S. A., Evans, J. S. & McGarigal, K. Landscape ecology: past, present, and future. in Spatial Complexity, Informatics, and Wildlife Conservation (eds. Cushman, S. A. & Huettmann, F.) 65-82 (Springer, 2010).10.1007/978-4-431-87771-4_4 ↗
5. Qi, J. et al. Development and application of 3D spatial metrics using point clouds for landscape visual quality assessment. Landsc. Urban Plan. 228, 104585 (2022).10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104585 ↗
6. Dong, J., Wang, Y. & Yu, R. Application of the semantic network method to sightline compensation analysis of the Humble Administrator’s Garden. Nexus Netw. J. 23, 209–225 (2021).10.1007/s00004-020-00498-w ↗
7. Bullington, J. East-West relational imaginaries: traditional Chinese gardens & self cultivation. Educ. Philos. Theory 54, 1552–1557 (2021).
8. Lin, Y. Spatiotemporal narrative structure of the Lingering Garden based on traditional Chinese conception of time and space. Landsc. Res. 48, 45–63 (2023).10.1080/01426397.2022.2139820 ↗
9. Peng, Y. Analysis of the Traditional Chinese Garden (China Architectural Industry Press, 1986).
10. Zhou, W. The garden art of the summer residence. J. Archit. 6, 29–32 (1960).
11. Pan, G. Viewing points and routes of Suzhou gardens. J. Archit. 6, 14–18 (1963).
12. Liu, T. Research on Suzhou traditional Landscape Architecture Based on Semantic Network (Master’s thesis, Northeast Forestry University, 2020).
13. Yang, H. A treatise on the garden of jiangnan: a study on the art of Chinese traditional Garden; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6924-8 (Springer Nature, 2022).10.1007/978-981-16-6924-8 ↗
14. Lu, L. & Liu, M. Exploring a spatial-experiential structure within the Chinese literati garden: the Master of the Nets Garden as a case study. Front. Archit. Res. 12, 963–977 (2023).10.1016/j.foar.2023.05.011 ↗
15. UNESCO. West Lake Cultural Landscape of Hangzhou https://whc.unesco.org/uploads/nominations/1334.pdf (2011).
16. Lian, J. et al. Conservation and development of the historic garden in a landscape context: a systematic literature review. Landsc. Urban Plan. 246, 105027 (2024).10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105027 ↗
17. Zhou, W. History of traditional Chinese Gardens (Tsinghua University Press, 1999).
18. Wang, J. The research on Chinese painting frame from the form of traditional of enframed scenery (Master’s thesis, Huazhong Agricultural University, 2013).
19. Tong, M. Towards a view with vista: tectonics of visual culture in the gardens of eastern China. Time+ Archit. 5, 56-66 (2016).
20. Abrams, J. & Hall, P. Else/where: Mapping New Cartographies of Networks and Territories (University of Minnesota Press, 2006).
21. Pinzon Cortes, C. Mapping Urban Form. Morphology Studies in the Contemporary Urban Landscape (Dissertation, 2009).
22. Corner, J., Corner, J. M. & MacLean, A. S. Taking Measures Across the American Landscape (Yale University Press, 1996).
23. Zhou, K., Wu, W., Dai, X. & Li, T. Quantitative estimation of the internal spatio-temporal characteristics of ancient temple heritage space with space syntax models: a case study of Daming Temple. Buildings 13, 1345 (2023).10.3390/buildings13051345 ↗
24. Chen, H. & Yang, L. Analysis of narrative space in the Chinese traditional garden based on narratology and space syntax–taking the Humble Administrator’s Garden as an example. Sustainability 15, 12232 (2023).10.3390/su151612232 ↗
25. Zhang, C., Lv, Z., Liu, Z. & Sun, Y. A case study based on space syntax theory: West Shu Garden of Qingxi, Dujiangyan scenic area. Sustainability 16, 9459 (2024).10.3390/su16219459 ↗
26. Chen, X. H., Yu, H. T., Xiong, R. J. & Ye, Y. Construction of an analytical framework for spatial indicator of Chinese traditional gardens based on space syntax and machine learning. Landsc. Archit. 31, 123−131 (2024).10.3724/j.fjyl.202305080216 ↗
27. Zhao, H., Shi, J., Qi, X., Wang, X. & Jia, J. Pyramid scene parsing network. In Proc. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2881−2890 (IEEE, 2017).10.1109/CVPR.2017.660 ↗
28. Zhou, Z., Fan, X., Shi, P. & Xin, Y. R-MSFM: recurrent multi-scale characteristic modulation for monocular depth estimating. In Proc. 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 12777-12786; https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.01254 (IEEE, 2021).10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.01254 ↗
29. Bochkovskii, A. et al. Depth Pro: sharp monocular metric depth in less than a second; https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.02073 (2024).10.48550/arXiv.2410.02073 ↗
30. Li, Z., Bhat, S. F. & Wonka, P. PatchRefiner: leveraging synthetic data for real-domain high-resolution monocular metric depth estimation. In Proc. 2025 European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) 250-267 (Springer, 2025).10.1007/978-3-031-72855-6_15 ↗
31. Li, C. et al. UrbanSAM: learning invariance-inspired adapters for segment anything models in urban construction; https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.15199 (2025).10.48550/arXiv.2502.15199 ↗
32. Deng, J., Hong, D., Li, C. & Yokoya, N. Joint super-resolution and segmentation for 1-m impervious surface area mapping in China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt; https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.05367 (2025).10.48550/arXiv.2505.05367 ↗
33. Li, C. et al. Learning disentangled priors for hyperspectral anomaly detection: a coupling model-driven and data-driven paradigm. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 36, 6883–6896 (2025).10.1109/TNNLS.2024.3401589 ↗
34. Peirce, C. S. Peirce on Signs: Writings on Semiotic (UNC Press Books, 1991).
35. Liu, M. & Nijhuis, S. Talking about landscape spaces: towards a spatial-visual landscape design vocabulary. Des. J. 25, 263–281 (2022).
36. Hatfield, G. Kant on the perception of space (and time). in The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy (ed. Guyer, P.) 61-93 (Cambridge University Press, 2006).10.1017/CCOL052182303X.003 ↗
37. Merleau-Ponty, M. Phenomenology of Perception (Routledge, 1962).
38. Tveit, M., Ode, A. & Fry, G. Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character. Landsc. Res. 31, 229–255 (2006).10.1080/01426390600783269 ↗
39. Chen, C. On Chinese Gardens (Better Link Press, 2008).
40. Ji, C. The Craft of Gardens (Yale University Press, 1988).
41. Li, Y. Xianqing Ouji (Good Fortune Culture Press, 2020).
42. Liu, D. Suzhou traditional Gardens (China Architecture & Building Press, 2005).
43. Higuchi, T. Visual and Spatial Structure of Landscapes (MIT Press, 1988).
44. Lu, S. & Liu, S. Dictionary of Ancient Chinese Architecture (Beijing Institute of Cultural Relics Press, 1992).
45. Lu, A. Lost in translation: modernist interpretation of the Chinese garden as experiential space and its assumptions. J. Archit. 16, 499–527 (2011).10.1080/13602365.2011.598703 ↗
46. Du, X. T. & Ji, F. Q. Experience of the sense of “farness”: instability of spatial depth in traditional Chinese gardens. Landsc. Archit. 30, 130–136 (2023).
47. Beijing Landscape Architecture School. Garden Planning and Design (Beijing Science and Technology Press, 1988).
48. Attneave, F. Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychol. Rev. 61, 183–193 (1954).10.1037/h0054663 ↗
49. Palmer, S. E. Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology (MIT Press, 1999).
50. Bertin, J. Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps (transl. Berg, W. J.) (University of Wisconsin Press, 1983).
51. Ranftl, R., Lasinger, K., Hafner, D., Schindler, K. & Koltun, V. Towards robust monocular depth estimation: mixing datasets for zero-shot cross-dataset transfer. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 44, 1623–1637 (2022).10.1109/TPAMI.2020.3019967 ↗
52. Arnheim, R. Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye (University of California Press, 1954).
53. Kosslyn, S. M. Information representation in visual images. Cognit. Psychol. 7, 341–370 (1975).10.1016/0010-0285(75)90015-8 ↗
54. Ching, F. D. K. Architecture: Form, Space, and Order (John Wiley & Sons, 2023).
55. Li, H. Chinese architecture in 1962, from style to composition and others. Time + Architecture 3, 20–26 (2021).
56. Li, K. & Jan, W. Phenomenological landscape study: the modernity of Chinese traditional perception of landscape reflected in serial scenes. Chin. Landsc. Archit. 25, 29–33 (2009).
57. Zhou, B. et al. Scene parsing through ADE20K dataset. In Proc. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 633-641 (IEEE, 2017).10.1109/CVPR.2017.544 ↗
58. Kirillov, A. et al. Segment anything. In Proc. 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 4015-4026; https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.1995.598994 (IEEE, 2023).10.1109/ICDAR.1995.598994 ↗
59. Ho, T. K. Random decision forests. In Proc. 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition 1, 278-282 (IEEE, 1995).10.1109/ICDAR.1995.598994 ↗
60. Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
61. Arndt, S., Turvey, C. & Andreasen, N. C. Correlating and predicting psychiatric symptom ratings: Spearman’s r versus Kendall’s tau correlation. J. Psychiatr. Res. 33, 97–104 (1999).10.1016/S0022-3956(98)90046-2 ↗
62. Hauke, J. & Kossowski, T. Comparison of values of Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients on the same sets of data. Quaest. Geogr. 30, 87–93 (2011).
63. Drezner, Z., Turel, O. & Zerom, D. A. modified Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality. Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput. 39, 693–704 (2010).10.1080/03610911003615816 ↗
64. Kline, R. B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (Guilford Publications, 2023).
65. Zhu, H., Kong, Y., Zhang, H., Gu, Z. & Ohno, R. Effects of scenery frame on visual depth perception in traditional Chinese gardens: a case study of the Lvyin Pavilion in Lingering Garden. Front. Archit. Res. 14, 402–415 (2025).10.1016/j.foar.2024.08.009 ↗
66. Chen, Y. et al. Unveiling the dynamics of “scenes changing as steps move” in a Chinese traditional garden: a case study of Jingxinzhai Garden. Herit. Sci. 12, 131 (2024).10.1186/s40494-024-01246-w ↗
67. Li, J. & Cahill, J. Paintings of Zhi Garden by Zhang Hong: Revisiting a Seventeenth-Century Chinese Garden (Los Angeles County Museum of Art, 1996).
68. Song, Z., Jiang, H., Cui, T. Exploring the correlation of space creation in Suzhou traditional gardens and the Chinese calligraphy Yan Zhenqing’s three manuscripts. J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2024.2358202 (2023).10.1080/13467581.2024.2358202 ↗
69. Chen, H., Li, Y. & Yang, L. Creating an endless visual space: an isovist analysis of a small traditional Chinese garden. Environ. Plann. B Urban Anal. City Sci. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083241298739 (2024).10.1177/23998083241298739 ↗
70. Wu, W., Zhou, K., Li, T. & Dai, X. Spatial configuration analysis of a traditional garden in Yangzhou city: a comparative case study of three typical gardens. J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng. 24, 593–604 (2024).10.1080/13467581.2023.2300391 ↗
71. Wen, Z. Zhangwu Zhi [Treatise on Superfluous Things] (trans. and annot. Li, R.) (Zhonghua Book Company, 2021).
72. Sun, C., Jiang, Z. & Yu, B. How to interpret Jiangnan gardens: a study of the spatial layout of Jiangnan gardens from the perspective of fractal geometry. Herit. Sci. 12, 353 (2024).10.1186/s40494-024-01469-x ↗
73. Bandarin, F. & van Oers, R. The Historic Urban Landscape: Managing Heritage in an Urban Century (Wiley-Blackwell, 2012).10.1002/9781119968115 ↗
74. Smith, L. Uses of Heritage (Routledge, 2006).10.4324/9780203602263 ↗
75. Avrami, E., Macdonald, S., Mason, R. & Myers, D. (eds.) Values in Heritage Management: Emerging Approaches and Research Directions (Getty Conservation Institute, 2019).
76. Liu, Y., Pan, X., Liu, Q. & Li, G. Establishing a reliable assessment of the green view index based on image classification techniques, estimation, and a hypothesis testing route. Land 12, 1030 (2023).10.3390/land12051030 ↗
77. Gong, F.-Y. et al. Mapping sky, tree, and building view factors of street canyons in a high-density urban environment. Build. Environ. 134, 155–167 (2018).10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.02.042 ↗
78. Ode, Å, Hagerhall, C. M. & Sang, N. Analysing visual landscape complexity: theory and application. Landsc. Res. 35, 111–131 (2010).10.1080/01426390903414935 ↗
79. Silva, K. D. (ed.) The Routledge Handbook on Historic Urban Landscapes in the Asia-Pacific (Routledge, 2020).10.4324/9780429486470 ↗
80. Veldpaus, L. & Pereira Roders, A. R. Historic urban landscapes: an assessment framework, part I. In Proc. 33rd Annu. Conf. Int. Assoc. Impact Assess. (IAIA13) (International Association for Impact Assessment, 2013).
81. Jin, X. Jing, the concept of scenery in texts on the traditional Chinese garden: an initial exploration. Stud. Hist. Gard. Des. Landsc. 18, 339–365 (1998).10.1080/14601176.1998.10435557 ↗
82. Sun, C. H. China’s traditional empirical way of thinking and its influence. Jiangxi Soc. Sci. 32, 27–31 (2012). (in Chinese).
83. Gao, C. et al. Cross-cultural insights into traditional Jiangnan gardens of China and Japanese gardens through algorithm-enhanced comparative analysis. npj Herit. Sci. 13, 315 (2025).10.1038/s40494-025-01880-y ↗
84. Yan, L. et al. Application of computer vision technology in surface damage detection and analysis of shed thin tiles in China: a case study of the traditional gardens of Suzhou. Herit. Sci. 12, 72 (2024).10.1186/s40494-024-01185-6 ↗
85. Court, S., Jo, E., Mackay, R., Murai, M. & Therivel, R. Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage Context (UNESCO, ICCROM, ICOMOS & IUCN, Paris, France, 2022). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000382347
86. Ashrafi, B., Kloos, M. & Neugebauer, C. Heritage impact assessment, beyond an assessment tool: a comparative analysis of urban development impact on visual integrity in four UNESCO World Heritage Properties. J. Cult. Herit. 47, 199−207 (2021).10.1016/j.culher.2020.08.002 ↗
87. Smith, L. Intangible heritage: a challenge to the authorised heritage discourse?. Rev. Etnol. Catalunya 40, 133–142 (2015).
88. Nic Craith, M. & Kockel, U. (Re-)Building heritage: integrating tangible and intangible. in A Companion to Heritage Studies (eds. Logan, W., Nic Craith, M. & Kockel, U.) 426-442 (Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2015).10.1002/9781118486634.ch29 ↗
89. DeSilvey, C. Curated Decay: Heritage Beyond Saving (University of Minnesota Press, 2017).
90. Vandesande, A. & Van Balen, K. Preventive conservation applied to built heritage: a working definition and influencing factors. in Innovative Built Heritage Models 63-72 (CRC Press, 2018).10.1201/9781351014793-8 ↗
91. Della Torre, S. Italian perspective on the planned preventive conservation of architectural heritage. Front. Archit. Res. 10, 108–116 (2021).10.1016/j.foar.2020.07.008 ↗
92. Van Balen, K. Preventive conservation of historic buildings. Int. J. Restor. Build. Monum. 21, 99–104 (2015).
93. Azzopardi, E., Mason, K., Strlic, M. & Dillon, C. The social value of built heritage: an interdisciplinary discourse. Built Herit 9, 3 (2025).10.1186/s43238-024-00168-7 ↗
94. Tang, C. et al. Heritage perspectives on cultural memory and spatial identity in Yuan River Basin, Hunan, China. npj Herit. Sci 2, 12 (2025).
95. Zhang, S. et al. Spatial distribution and pedigree age of intangible cultural heritage along the Grand Canal of China. npj Herit. Sci. 12, 198 (2024).10.1186/s40494-024-01314-1 ↗
96. Robson, E. Assessing the social values of built heritage: participatory methods as ways of knowing. Architecture 3, 489–510 (2023).10.3390/architecture3030023 ↗
97. Li, J. et al. Community participation in cultural heritage management: a systematic literature review comparing Chinese and international practices. Cities 96, 102476 (2020).10.1016/j.cities.2019.102476 ↗
98. Taylor, K. & Lennon, J. Cultural landscapes: a bridge between culture and nature?. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 17, 537–554 (2011).10.1080/13527258.2011.618246 ↗
99. Mason, R. Assessing values in conservation planning: methodological issues and choices. in Assessing the Values of Cultural Heritage (ed. de la Torre, M.) 5-30 (Getty Conservation Institute, 2002).
100. Waterton, E. & Smith, L. The recognition and misrecognition of community heritage. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 16, 4–15 (2010).10.1080/13527250903441671 ↗