Archeological exploration via integrated shallow geophysical methods: case study from Saqqara, Giza, Egypt
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract An integrated geophysical survey, Seismic Refraction Tomography (SRT), Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), and Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT), was carried out at the UNESCO World Heritage site of Saqqara, Giza, Egypt, as part of the Cairo University’s ongoing exploration project (Phase II). The primary objective of this survey was to detect and map any subsurface archeological features, such as tombs, within the study area. These geophysical methods were selected for their rapid, non-invasive nature, offering a cost-effective alternative to conventional excavation and trenching techniques. By providing valuable insights into the subsurface without disturbing the integrity of the site, the survey contributes significantly to archeological research. Each geophysical method provides unique insights: SRT data distinguished a shallow sandstone layer P-wave velocity (Vp = 400–1100 m/s) above a deeper limestone bedrock (Vp: 1200–1900 m/s), with low-velocity anomalies suggesting potential voids or chambers. GPR profiles detected linear features, likely walls or paths, alongside amplitude anomalies and low-amplitude anomalies suggesting chambers or rooms filled with high-conductive materials like clays and mud bricks. ERT data revealed high-resistivity limestone zones and low-resistivity anomalies suggestive of filled with conductive materials like clays or mud bricks. The integrated approach identified three prominent anomalies A-1, A-2, and A-3 with consistent signatures across datasets: A-1 as a probable room filled with conductive material; A-2, a low-resistivity, low-velocity hall surrounded by sediments; and A-3, a subsurface chamber all of them at approximate depth 2 m. Combined 3D visualization of P-wave velocity and resistivity further reinforce these interpretations, validating the efficacy of integrated geophysical surveys in non-invasively mapping buried archeological features at Saqqara. The study emphasizes the importance of combining multiple geophysical methods for archeological exploration, providing a robust framework for future investigations at the study area and other historically significant sites. Moreover, the research supports ongoing preservation efforts, highlighting the role of advanced geophysical techniques in uncovering the hidden legacies of ancient civilizations while ensuring the protection of these cultural treasures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geophysical Methods and Applications · Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods · Seismic Waves and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Ali, M. F., Moussa, A. & El-Sayed, S. H. Analytical physicochemical survey of the recently excavated murals at the tomb of Iwrakhy/Hatia at Saqqara, Egypt. Sci. Cult. 8, 63–79 (2022).
2. Staring, N. In The Saqqara Necropolis through the New Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004467149 (2023).10.1163/9789004467149 ↗
3. Raven, M. J. The Saqqara Necropolis in the Ramesside Period: Between Tradition and Innovation (2018).
4. Wendorf, F. & Schild, R. Prehistory of the Eastern Sahara (1980).
5. Ortega-Ramírez, J., Bano, M., Cordero-Arce, M. T., Villa-Alvarado, L. A. & Fraga, C. C. Application of non-invasive geophysical methods (GPR and ERT) to locate the ancient foundations of the first cathedral of Puebla, Mexico. A case study. J. Appl Geophys. 174, 103958 (2020).10.1016/j.jappgeo.2020.103958 ↗
6. El-Qady, G. & Metwaly, M. Archaeogeophysics: State of the Art and Case Studies (Springer, 2018).10.1007/978-3-319-78861-6 ↗
7. Abbas, A. M. et al. In Sustainable Conservation of UNESCO and Other Heritage Sites through Proactive Geosciences 189–219 (Springer, 2023).10.1007/978-3-031-13810-2_11 ↗
8. Welc, F., Trzciński, J., Kowalczyk, S. & Mieszkowski, R. Geophysical survey (GPR) in West Saqqara (Egypt): preliminary remarks. Stud. Quaternaria 30, 99–108 (2013).
9. Myśliwiec, K., Herbich, T. & Niwiński, A. Polish research at Saqqara in 1987. EtudTrav 17, 177–203 (1995).
10. Myœliwiec, K. The Old Kingdom Art and Archaeology 233 (2006).
11. Price, C. Scotland at Saqqara: the work of the Saqqara geophysical survey project, 1990-present. Friends Saqqara Found. Newsl. 10, 47–51 (2012).
12. Speece, M., Miller, C., El-Werr, A.-K. & Link, C. Land Steamer Aided, Seismic Diving Wave Tomography at an Archaeological Site, Saqqara, Egypt Vol. 22 (2003).10.1190/1.1817511 ↗
13. Metwaly, M. et al. Combined seismic tomographic and ultrashallow seismic reflection study of an Early Dynastic mastaba, Saqqara, Egypt. Archaeol. Prospect. 12, 245–256 (2005).10.1002/arp.261 ↗
14. Gaballah, M., Grasmueck, M. & Sato, M. Characterizing subsurface archaeological structures with full resolution 3D GPR at the early dynastic foundations of Saqqara Necropolis, Egypt. Sens Imaging 19, 1–15 (2018).10.1007/s11220-018-0209-8 ↗
15. EL Aguizy, O. M., Gobashy, M. M., Metwally, A., Soliman, K. S. & Nader, E. L. The discovery of the tomb of the great army General Iwrhya: A quasi 3D electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), Saqqara, Giza, Egypt. Contrib. Geophys. Geod. 50, 425–446 (2020).10.31577/congeo.2020.50.4.3 ↗
16. Selim, E. I., Basheer, A. A., Elqady, G. & Hafez, M. A. Shallow seismic refraction, two-dimensional electrical resistivity imaging, and ground penetrating radar for imaging the ancient monuments at the western shore of Old Luxor city, Egypt. Archaeol. Discov. 2, 31–43 (2014).10.4236/ad.2014.22005 ↗
17. EL Hameedy, M. A., Mabrouk, W. M., Dahroug, S. & Metwally, A. M. Detection of karst features and associated geohazard using ground penetrating radar and 2D electrical resistivity imaging; case study from Sannur protectorate, Egypt. Contrib. Geophys. Geod. 53, 167–190 (2023).
18. Jabrane, O. et al. Integration of electrical resistivity tomography and seismic refraction tomography to investigate subsiding sinkholes in Karst areas. Water 15, 2192 (2023).10.3390/w15122192 ↗
19. Metwally, A., Hanafy, S., Guo, B. & Kosmicki, M. Imaging of subsurface faults using refraction migration with fault flooding. J. Appl. Geophys. 143, 103–115 (2017).10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.05.003 ↗
20. Conyers, L. B. Ground-Penetrating Radar for Archaeology (Rowman & Littlefield, 2023).10.5771/9781538179369 ↗
21. Martinho, E. Electrical resistivity and induced polarization methods for environmental investigations: an overview. Water Air Soil Pollut. 234, 215 (2023).10.1007/s11270-023-06214-x ↗
22. EL Hameedy, M. A., Mabrouk, W. M., Dahroug, S., Youssef, M. S. & Metwally, A. M. Role of seismic refraction tomography (SRT) in bedrock mapping; case study from industrial zone, Ain-Sokhna area, Egypt. Contrib. Geophys. Geod. 53, 111–128 (2023).10.31577/congeo.2023.53.2.2 ↗
23. Sato, M. et al. GPR and ERT Exploration in the Western Cemetery in Giza, Egypt. Archaeol. Prospect. 31, 187–198 (2024).10.1002/arp.1940 ↗
24. Schuster, G. T. et al. Opportunities and pitfalls in surface-wave interpretation. Interpretation 5, T131–T141 (2016).10.1190/INT-2016-0011.1 ↗
25. Li, M., Zhang, Z., Yang, J. & Xie, S. Integrated geophysical study in the cemetery of Marquis of Haihun. Archaeol. Prospect 28, 453–465 (2021).10.1002/arp.1815 ↗
26. Kuraszkiewicz, K. O., Welc, F., Trzciński, J. & Kaczmarek, M. Old Kingdom Structures between the Step Pyramid Complex and the Dry Moat (Neriton, 2013).
27. Akarish, A. I. M. Report on the Geology of Saqqara Area, Egypt. Semawy Menu 2, 143–149 (2011).
28. Welc, F., Mieszkowski, R., Trzciński, J. & Kowalczyk, S. Western section of the ‘Dry Moat’ channel surrounding step pyramid complex in Saqqara in the light of ground‐penetrating radar prospection. Archaeol. Prospect. 22, 293–305 (2015).10.1002/arp.1514 ↗
29. White, D. J. Two-dimensional seismic refraction tomography. Geophys J. Int. 97, 223–245 (1989).10.1111/j.1365-246X.1989.tb00498.x ↗
30. Aldridge, D. F. & Oldenburg, D. W. Refractor imaging using an automated wavefront reconstruction method. Geophysics 57, 378–385 (1992).10.1190/1.1443252 ↗
31. Hanafy, S. M., Mattson, A., Bruhn, R. L., Liu, S. & Schuster, G. T. Outcrops and well logs as a practicum for calibrating the accuracy of traveltime tomograms. Interpretation 3, SY27–SY40 (2015).10.1190/INT-2014-0217.1 ↗
32. Imposa, S. et al. Seismic refraction tomography surveys as a method for voids detection: an application to the archaeological park of Cava Ispica, Sicily, Italy. Int. J. Architect. Herit. 12, 806–815 (2018).10.1080/15583058.2017.1419311 ↗
33. Schlindwein, V., Bönnemann, C., Reichert, C., Grevemeyer, I. & Flueh, E. Three-dimensional seismic refraction tomography of the crustal structure at the ION site on the Ninetyeast Ridge, Indian Ocean. Geophys. J. Int. 152, 171–184 (2003).10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01838.x ↗
34. Natawidjaja, D. H. et al. RETRACTED: Geo‐archaeological prospecting of Gunung Padang buried prehistoric pyramid in West Java, Indonesia. Archaeol. Prospect. 31, O1–025 (2024).10.1002/arp.1912 ↗
35. Mohamed, A.-M. S. et al. Mapping the archaeological relics of catacombs at Northeast Saqqara using GPR data, Egypt. NRIAG J. Astron. Geophys. 9, 362–374 (2020).10.1080/20909977.2020.1746891 ↗
36. Manataki, M., Vafidis, A. & Sarris, A. GPR data interpretation approaches in archaeological prospection. Appl. Sci. 11, 7531 (2021).10.3390/app11167531 ↗
37. Ganiyu, S. A., Oladunjoye, M. A., Onakoya, O. I., Olutoki, J. O. & Badmus, B. S. Combined electrical resistivity imaging and ground penetrating radar study for detection of buried utilities in Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria. Environ. Earth Sci. 79, 1–20 (2020).10.1007/s12665-020-08919-2 ↗
38. Gómez-Ortiz, D. & Martín-Crespo, T. Assessing the risk of subsidence of a sinkhole collapse using ground penetrating radar and electrical resistivity tomography. Eng. Geol. 149, 1–12 (2012).10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.07.022 ↗
39. Grasmueck, M., Quintà, M. C., Pomar, K. & Eberli, G. P. Diffraction imaging of sub‐vertical fractures and karst with full‐resolution 3D Ground‐Penetrating Radar. Geophys. Prospect. 61, 907–918 (2013).10.1111/1365-2478.12004 ↗
40. Abbas, A. M., El-sayed, E. A., Shaaban, F. A. & Abdel-Hafez, T. Uncovering the Pyramids-Giza Plateau in a search for archaeological relics by utilizing ground penetrating radar. J. Am. Sci. 8, 1–16 (2012).
41. Ward, S. H. The resistivity and induced polarization methods. in 1st EEGS Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems cp-214 (European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 1988).
42. Okpoli, C. C. Sensitivity and resolution capacity of electrode configurations. Int. J. Geophys. 2013, 608037 (2013).10.1155/2013/608037 ↗
43. Tsokas, G. N., Tsourlos, P. I., Stampolidis, A., Katsonopoulou, D. & Soter, S. Tracing a major Roman road in the area of ancient Helike by resistivity tomography. Archaeol. Prospect 16, 251–266 (2009).10.1002/arp.355 ↗
44. Tsokas, G. N., Tsourlos, P. I., Vargemezis, G. & Novack, M. Non‐destructive electrical resistivity tomography for indoor investigation: the case of Kapnikarea Church in Athens. Archaeol. Prospect 15, 47–61 (2008).10.1002/arp.321 ↗
45. Tsourlos, P. I. & Tsokas, G. N. Non‐destructive electrical resistivity tomography survey at the south walls of the Acropolis of Athens. Archaeol. Prospect 18, 173–186 (2011).10.1002/arp.416 ↗
46. Mol, L. & Preston, P. R. The writing’s in the wall: a review of new preliminary applications of electrical resistivity tomography within archaeology. Archaeometry 52, 1079–1095 (2010).10.1111/j.1475-4754.2010.00516.x ↗
47. Leucci, G. & Greco, F. 3D ERT survey to reconstruct archaeological features in the subsoil of the “Spirito Santo” Church Ruins at the Site of Occhiolà (Sicily, Italy). Archaeology 1, 1–6 (2012).
48. Benech, C. & Hesse, A. Some considerations on the integration of geophysical data into archaeological research. Geophysik und Ausgrabung. Einsatz und Auswertung zerstörungsfreier Prospektion in der Archäologie 175–186 (2007).
49. EL Hameedy, M. A., Mabrouk, W. M., Dahroug, S. & Metwally, A. M. Detection of subsurface basaltic sheets and associated structures utilising forward modelling and inversion of 2D electrical resistivity data: a case study from Jebel-Qatrani, Fayoum, Egypt. Contrib. Geophys. Geod. 53, 43–63 (2023).10.31577/congeo.2023.53.1.3 ↗