A point cloud simplification method using clustering and saliency for cultural heritage reconstruction
Source abstract
Abstract
With the rapid development of 3D scanning technologies, high-density point clouds of cultural heritage artifacts such as stone carvings, statues pose significant challenges in storage, processing, and accurate reconstruction. This paper proposes a point cloud simplification method tailored for cultural heritage applications, combining clustering and saliency analysis to preserve intricate surface details critical for archaeological studies. By segmenting point clouds into clusters with normal vector constraints and evaluating saliency through roughness and curvature metrics, our method adaptively retains primary features including engraved patterns weathered textures while simplifying non-feature regions. Experiments on stone carvings from the Northern Song Imperial Mausoleum, Terracotta Warriors, and Stanford datasets demonstrate that the algorithm effectively avoids mesh holes and maintains geometric fidelity, enabling efficient 3D reconstruction for heritage conservation. This work bridges advanced point cloud processing with practical archaeological needs, offering a robust tool for digitizing and analyzing cultural relics with minimal loss of historically significant details.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis · Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Cameron, F. R. The future of digital data, heritage and curation: in a more-than-human world. (Routledge, 2021).10.4324/9781003149606 ↗
2. Brusaporci S. Digital Innovations in Architectural Heritage Conservation: Emerging Research and Opportunities [Internet]. IGI Global; 2017. https://books.google.com/books?id=iG5xDgAAQBAJ10.4018/978-1-5225-2434-2 ↗
3. Georgopoulos, A. Data Acquisition for the Geometric Documentation of Cultural Heritage. In: Ioannides, M., Magnenat-Thalmann, N., Papagiannakis, G. (eds) Mixed Reality and Gamification for Cultural Heritage. (Springer, 2017).10.1007/978-3-319-49607-8_2 ↗
4. Shao, J. et al. Automated markerless registration of point clouds from TLS and structured light scanner for heritage documentation. J. Cult. Herit. 35, 16–24 (2019).10.1016/j.culher.2018.07.013 ↗
5. Spring, A. P. History of laser scanning, part 2: the later phase of industrial and heritage applications. Photogrammetric Eng. Remote Sens. 86, 479–501 (2020).10.14358/PERS.86.8.479 ↗
6. Sulzer, R. et al. A survey and benchmark of automatic surface reconstruction from point clouds. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, (IEEE, 2024).10.1109/TPAMI.2024.3510932 ↗
7. Luo, H. et al. Large-scale 3d reconstruction from multi-view imagery: a comprehensive review. Remote Sens. 16, 773 (2024).10.3390/rs16050773 ↗
8. Martin, R., Stroud, I. & Marshall, A. Data reduction for reverse engineering. RECCAD, Deliverable Doc. 1, 111 (1997).
9. Kim, S., Kim, C. & Levin, D. Surface simplification using a discrete curvature norm. Comput. Graph. 26, 657–663 (2002).10.1016/S0097-8493(02)00121-8 ↗
10. Yang, S., Hou, M. & Li, S. Three-dimensional point cloud semantic segmentation for cultural heritage: a comprehensive review. Remote Sens. 15, 548 (2023).10.3390/rs15030548 ↗
11. Chen, G. et al. Automatic schelling point detection from meshes. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 29, 2926–2939 (2022).10.1109/TVCG.2022.3144143 ↗
12. Herráez, J. et al. Optimal modelling of buildings through simultaneous automatic simplifications of point clouds obtained with a laser scanner. Measurement 93, 243–251 (2016).10.1016/j.measurement.2016.06.039 ↗
13. Lv, C., Lin, W. & Zhao, B. Intrinsic and isotropic resampling for 3d point clouds. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 45, 3274–3291 (2022).
14. Lv, C., Lin, W. & Zhao, B. Approximate intrinsic voxel structure for point cloud simplification. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 30, 7241–7255 (2021).10.1109/TIP.2021.3104174 ↗
15. Zhou, G., Yuan, S. & Luo, S. Mesh simplification algorithm based on the quadratic error metric and triangle collapse. IEEE Access 8, 196341–196350 (2020).10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3034075 ↗
16. Li, M. & Nan, L. Feature-preserving 3D mesh simplification for urban buildings. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 173, 135–150 (2021).10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.01.006 ↗
17. Aljumaily, H., Laefer, D. F. & Cuadra, D. Urban point cloud mining based on density clustering and MapReduce. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 31, 04017021 (2017).10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000674 ↗
18. Shi, B., Liang, J. & Liu, Q. Adaptive simplification of point cloud using k-means clustering. Comput. Aided Des. 43, 910–922 (2011).10.1016/j.cad.2011.04.001 ↗
19. Sachdeva, I. et al. Computational AI models in VAT photopolymerization: a review, current trends, open issues, and future opportunities. Neural Comput. Appl. 34, 17207–17229 (2022).10.1007/s00521-022-07694-4 ↗
20. Yang, Y., Li, M. & Ma, X. A point cloud simplification method based on modified fuzzy C-means clustering algorithm with feature information reserved. Mathematical Problems Eng 2020, 5713137 (2020).10.1155/2020/5713137 ↗
21. Ji, C. et al. A novel simplification method for 3D geometric point cloud based on the importance of point. IEEE Access 7, 129029–129042 (2019).10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939684 ↗
22. Chen, H. et al. Point cloud simplification for the boundary preservation based on extracted four features. Displays 78, 102414 (2023).10.1016/j.displa.2023.102414 ↗
23. Xuan, W. et al. A new progressive simplification method for point cloud using local entropy of normal angle. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 46, 581–589 (2018).10.1007/s12524-017-0730-6 ↗
24. Zhang, K. et al. Feature-preserved point cloud simplification based on natural quadric shape models. Appl. Sci. 9, 2130 (2019).10.3390/app9102130 ↗
25. Nezhadarya, E. et al. Adaptive hierarchical down-sampling for point cloud classification. in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. (IEEE, 2020).10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.01297 ↗
26. Lang, I., A. Manor and S. Avidan. Samplenet: Differentiable point cloud sampling. in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. (IEEE, 2020).10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00760 ↗
27. Li, Y. et al. Deep point cloud simplification for high-quality surface reconstruction. arXiv Prepr. arXiv 2203, 09088 (2022).
28. Arav, R., Filin, S. & Pfeifer, N. Content-aware point cloud simplification of natural scenes. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 60, 1–12 (2022).10.1109/TGRS.2022.3208348 ↗
29. Gatzke, T. M. & Grimm, C. M. Comparing features of three-dimensional object models using registration based on surface curvature signatures [Internet]. 2007 May. Report No.: WUCS-2007-7. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/cse_research/921.
30. Nguyen, V-S., Bac, A. & Daniel, M. Simplification of 3D point clouds sampled from elevation surfaces. 21th International Conference on Computer Graphics, Visualization and Computer Vision, WSCG2013 [Internet]. Plenz, Czech Republic; 2013. p. 60–9. https://hal.science/hal-01311430.
31. Liu, H. et al. Point cloud segmentation based on Euclidean clustering and multi-plane extraction in rugged field. Meas. Sci. Technol. 32, 095106 (2021).10.1088/1361-6501/abead3 ↗
32. Liu, M. Robotic online path planning on point cloud. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 46, 1217–1228 (2015).10.1109/TCYB.2015.2430526 ↗
33. Nyimbili, P. H. et al. Structure from motion (SfM)-approaches and applications. in Proceedings of the international scientific conference on applied sciences, Antalya, Turkey. (2016).
34. Corsini, M., Cignoni, P. & Scopigno, R. Efficient and flexible sampling with blue noise properties of triangular meshes. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 18, 914–924 (2012).10.1109/TVCG.2012.34 ↗
35. Wang, G. et al. Point cloud simplification algorithm based on the feature of adaptive curvature entropy. Meas. Sci. Technol. 32, 065004 (2021).10.1088/1361-6501/abd497 ↗