Sustainable protection measurement of the historical Guangning Bridge in Shaoxing City
Source abstract
Abstract
Shaoxing is a historic water city renowned for its historical bridge settlements, which hold significant architectural and cultural value. This study focuses on the sustainable protection of the Guangning Bridge, a representative heritage structure. Using building information modeling, the structural behavior of the arch ring was analyzed, confirming compliance with design codes. Based on field investigations, appropriate repair and reinforcement measures were implemented. One year of monitoring revealed that displacements, deformations, and cracks remained within allowable limits, ensuring structural safety. The proposed approach preserves historical integrity while enhancing durability, providing a practical model for conserving historical stone bridges and cultural heritage worldwide.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Civil and Structural Engineering Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhang, C. et al. Seismic fragility analysis of sea-crossing continuous rigid frame bridges based on fuzzy failure. Structures 34, 120–134 (2021).10.1016/j.istruc.2021.07.055 ↗
2. Sedmak, A., Radu, D., Arandelovic, M., Sedmak, S. & Bancila, R. Residual life assessment of the historical road riveted bridges. Eng. Fract. Mech. 299, 109960 (2024).10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.109960 ↗
3. Ural, A., Oruç, S., Dogangün, A. & Tuluk, Ö Turkish historical arch bridges and their deteriorations and failures. Eng. Fail. Anal. 15, 43–53 (2008).10.1016/j.engfailanal.2007.01.006 ↗
4. Bayraktar, A., Türker, T. & Altunisik, A. C. Experimental frequencies and damping ratios for historical masonry arch bridges. Constr. Build. Mater. 75, 234–241 (2015).10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.10.044 ↗
5. Luo, H., Xu, J., Liu, J., Wang, K. & Zhang, Y. In 2nd International Conference on Structures and Building Materials (ICSBM) 1225–1230 (2012).10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.446-449.1225 ↗
6. Wenping, S. & Ya, C. In 2020 International Symposium on Computer Engineering and Intelligent Communications (ISCEIC) 196–199 (IEEE).10.1109/ISCEIC51027.2020.00049 ↗
7. Mai, B. et al. Analysis and appraisal of fascine in Shahe ancient bridge ruins, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China. Herit. Sci. 10, 24 (2022).10.1186/s40494-022-00659-9 ↗
8. Cao, J. et al. Analysis of microbial diversity and its degradation function in wooden piles at the Shahe ancient bridge site in Xi’an and protection measures.Herit. Sci 12, 33 (2024).
9. Kong, W. et al. Chinese “Scholars’ Stones”: a potential heritage stone resource under strong anthropogenic pressure. Geoheritage 15, 86 (2023).10.1007/s12371-023-00849-2 ↗
10. Peng, B. & Wang, D. In IABSE Symposium: Engineering the Future, Vancouver, Canada, 21–23 September 2017. 754–761 (2017).10.2749/vancouver.2017.0754 ↗
11. Ma, Y. et al. Structural health monitoring and quantitative safety evaluation methods for ancient stone arch bridges. J. Cult. Herit. 70, 366–380 (2024).10.1016/j.culher.2024.10.011 ↗
12. Conde, B., Ramos, L. F., Oliveira, D. V., Riveiro, B. & Solla, M. Structural assessment of masonry arch bridges by combination of non-destructive testing techniques and three-dimensional numerical modelling: application to Vilanova bridge. Eng. Struct. 148, 621–638 (2017).10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.011 ↗
13. Zhang, C., Chun, Q. & Lin, Y. Optimal sensor placement and structural health monitoring methods of ancient stone bridges based on an improved genetic algorithm: taking Lugou Bridge as an example. Measurement 241, 115680 (2025).10.1016/j.measurement.2024.115680 ↗
14. Guidelines for Historic Bridge Rehabilitation and Replacement. (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, American, 2008).
15. Biscarini, C. et al. UAV photogrammetry, infrared thermography and GPR for enhancing structural and material degradation evaluation of the Roman masonry bridge of Ponte Lucano in Italy. NDT E Int. 115, 102287 (2020).10.1016/j.ndteint.2020.102287 ↗
16. Demirel, I. O. & Aldemir, A. Simplified approach for seismic performance assessment of dry-joint masonry arch bridges. Buildings 11, 313 (2021).10.3390/buildings11070313 ↗
17. Lystad, T. M., Fenerci, A. & Oiseth, O. Buffeting response of long-span bridges considering uncertain turbulence parameters using the environmental contour method. Eng. Struct. 213, 110575 (2020).10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110575 ↗
18. Karalar, M. & Cufali, G. Structural assessment of historical stone bridges with the finite element method under dynamic effects of arch shape: the Antik Iscehisar bridge. Appl. Sci.13, 10740 (2023).10.3390/app131910740 ↗
19. Kilic, G. Wavelet analysis and NDT for condition assessment of historic Masonry bridge. Structures 45, 275–283 (2022).10.1016/j.istruc.2022.09.008 ↗
20. Cavuslu, M. & Ulger, T. Enhancing the seismic resilience of the Batıayaz masonry bridge, aftermath of 2023 Kahramanmaras, earthquakes, using iron and FRP clamp-dowel connectors in the arch: failure tests and numerical modelling. Eng. Fail. Anal. 175, 109544 (2025).10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109544 ↗
21. Zheng, Y. et al. Behavior of basalt-FRP reinforced self-compacting concrete (SCC) deck slabs in a real bridge considering arching action. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 20, e03043 (2024).
22. Kozlowski, R. Microclimate for cultural heritage - measurement, risk assessment, conservation, restoration and maintenance of indoor and outdoor monuments, 3d edition. J. Cult. Herit. 43, 356–357 (2020).10.1016/j.culher.2020.01.003 ↗
23. Zhang, Y. & Dong, W. Determining minimum intervention in the preservation of heritage buildings. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 15, 698–712 (2021).
24. Baik, A. A comprehensive heritage BIM methodology for digital modelling and conservation of built heritage: application to Ghiqa Historical Market, Saudi Arabia. Remote Sens. 16, 2833 (2024).10.3390/rs16152833 ↗
25. Milosz, M., Kesik, J. & Montusiewicz, J. Three-dimensional digitization of documentation and perpetual preservation of cultural heritage buildings at risk of liquidation and loss-the methodology and case study of St Adalbert’s Church in Chicago. Electron.-switz. 13, 561 (2024).
26. Remondino & Fabio Heritage recording and 3D modeling with photogrammetry and 3D scanning. Remote Sens. 3, 1104–1138 (2011).10.3390/rs3061104 ↗
27. Ozcan, Z. Structural assessment and seismic response of the historic Justinian stone arch bridge. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 22, 04471 (2025).
28. Tonyali, Z., Kayaalp, F. B., Kiral, A. & Ozesen, A. Basic evaluation and restoration process for the structural characteristics of historically significant timber bridges in Türkiye: case studies in Eastern Black Sea Region. Wood Mater. Sci. Eng. 1–29 (2025).10.1080/17480272.2025.2469711 ↗
29. Ierimonti, L., Cavalagli, N., Venanzi, I., Garcia-Macias, E. & Ubertini, F. A Bayesian-based inspection-monitoring data fusion approach for historical buildings and its post-earthquake application to a monumental masonry palace. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 21, 1139–1172 (2023).10.1007/s10518-022-01576-9 ↗
30. Usta, P., Karimzadeh, S. & Lourenço, P. B. Seismic fragility assessment of historical Khan structures in Izmir (Türkiye). Structures 81, 110208 (2025).10.1016/j.istruc.2025.110208 ↗
31. Karalar, M. & Yesil, M. Effect of near-fault earthquakes on a historical masonry arch bridge (Konjic Bridge). Earthq. Struct. 21, 125–136 (2021).
32. Karalar, M. & Yesil, M. Structural investigation of a historical Masonry arch bridge under far-fault earthquakes. Teh. Vjesn. 30, 1443–1450 (2023).
33. Karalar, M. & Yesil, M. Investigation on seismic behavior of Historical Tokatli bridge under near-fault earthquakes. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2021, 5596760 (2021).10.1155/2021/5596760 ↗
34. Qian, L. New insight into an ancient stone arch bridge—the Zhao-Zhou Bridge of 1400 years old. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 29, 831–843 (1987).10.1016/0020-7403(87)90068-3 ↗
35. Knapp, R. G. Chinese bridges: living architecture from China’s Past. (Tuttle Publishing, North Clarendon, 2012).
36. Jajac, N., Rogulj, K. & Radnic, J. Selection of the method for rehabilitation of historic bridges-a decision support concept for the planning of rehabilitation projects. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 11, 261–277 (2017).10.1080/15583058.2016.1207113 ↗
37. Han, Z. Aesthetics innovation and practice of urban bridge design. Struct. Eng. Int. 31, 543–549 (2021).10.1080/10168664.2020.1848368 ↗
38. Tang, M.-C. Forms and aesthetics of bridges. Engineering 4, 267–276 (2018).10.1016/j.eng.2017.12.013 ↗
39. Rodrigo, B. G., Olària, S., Fernández-Ordoez, D. & Gómez, C. Rehabilitation of historic masonry bridges: lessons learned from a medieval bridge in Northeast Spain. Rev. Constr. 14, 9–13 (2015).
40. Yung, E. H. K., Chan, E. H. W. & Xu, Y. Sustainable development and the rehabilitation of a historic urban district - social sustainability in the Case of Tianzifang in Shanghai. Sustain. Dev. 22, 95–112 (2014).10.1002/sd.534 ↗
41. Carnegie, E. Managing cultural heritage: an international research perspective. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 23, 486–488 (2017).10.1080/13527258.2016.1261922 ↗
42. Standards for Technical Condition Evaluation of Highway Bridges. JTG/T H21-2011 (China Communications Press, Beijing, 2011).
43. Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. Code for Design of Highway Masonry Bridges and Culverts. JTG D61–2005 (China Communications Press, Beijing, 2005).
44. Code for Design of Foundation and Foundation of Highway Bridges and Culverts. JTG 3363–2019 (China Communications Press, Beijing, 2019).
45. Dore, C. & Murphy, M. In 2012 18th International conference on virtual systems and multimedia. 369–376 (IEEE).10.1109/VSMM.2012.6365947 ↗
46. Taylor, K. & Lennon, J. Cultural landscapes: a bridge between culture and nature?. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 17, 537–554 (2011).10.1080/13527258.2011.618246 ↗