Exploring the evolution of global trends and knowledge structure in intangible cultural heritage: insights from topic modeling
Source abstract
Abstract
Intangible cultural heritage (ICH) research is increasingly interdisciplinary, yet its evolving knowledge structure remains insufficiently mapped. This study applies Structural Topic Modeling to ICH-labelled publications indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection. Eight latent topics are identified and synthesized into three thematic domains, revealing shifting scholarly priorities across technology, sustainability, and spatial governance within ICH-labelled research. The findings provide a structured overview of recent developments in this field.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Computational and Text Analysis Methods · Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research · Cultural Industries and Urban Development
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (79)
Show source-provided references
1. Lenzerini, F. Intangible cultural heritage: the living culture of peoples. Eur. J. Int. Law 22, 101–120, https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chr006 (2011).10.1093/ejil/chr006 ↗
2. Hu, W., Li, M., Chi, X., Wang, X. & Khan, A. U. Intangible cultural heritage research in China from the perspective of intellectual property rights based on bibliometrics and knowledge mapping. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03314-9 (2024).10.1057/s41599-024-03314-9 ↗
3. Su, X., Li, X. & Kang, Y. A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Intangible Cultural Heritage Using CiteSpace. Sage Open 9; https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019840119 (2019).10.1177/2158244019840119 ↗
4. Vecco, M. A definition of cultural heritage: From the tangible to the intangible. J. Cultural Herit. 11, 321–324, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2010.01.006 (2010).10.1016/j.culher.2010.01.006 ↗
5. Aikawa, N. An Historical Overview of the Preparation of the UNESCO International Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Mus. Int. 56, 137–149, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1350-0775.2004.00468.x (2004).10.1111/j.1350-0775.2004.00468.x ↗
6. Li, N., Li, X. & Xiao, W. Intangible cultural heritage threatened-level categories and criteria. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04595-4 (2025).10.1057/s41599-025-04595-4 ↗
7. Skublewska-Paszkowska, M., Milosz, M., Powroznik, P. & Lukasik, E. 3D technologies for intangible cultural heritage preservation-literature review for selected databases. Herit. Sci. 10, 3, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-021-00633-x (2022).10.1186/s40494-021-00633-x ↗
8. Kwon, H. Villagers’ agency in the Intangible Cultural Heritage designation of a Korean village ritual. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 23, 200–214, https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2016.1261920 (2017).10.1080/13527258.2016.1261920 ↗
9. Eichler, J. Intangible cultural heritage, inequalities and participation: who decides on heritage?. Int. J. Hum. Rights 25, 793–814, https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2020.1822821 (2021).10.1080/13642987.2020.1822821 ↗
10. Paddock, C. & Schofield, J. Authenticity and adaptation: the Mongol Ger as a contemporary heritage paradox. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 23, 347–361, https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2016.1277775 (2017).10.1080/13527258.2016.1277775 ↗
11. Howard, K. Musical instruments as tangible cultural heritage and as/for intangible cultural heritage. Int J. Cult. Prop. 29, 23–44, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739121000436 (2022).10.1017/S0940739121000436 ↗
12. Chung, F. M.-Y. Utilising technology as a transmission strategy in intangible cultural heritage: the case of Cantonese opera performances. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 30, 210–225, https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2023.2284723 (2024).10.1080/13527258.2023.2284723 ↗
13. Li, J. Grounded theory-based model of the influence of digital communication on handicraft intangible cultural heritage. Herit. Sci. 10, 126. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00760-z (2022).10.1186/s40494-022-00760-z ↗
14. Katelieva, M., Muhar, A. & Penker, M. Nature-related knowledge as intangible cultural heritage: safeguarding and tourism utilisation in Austria. J. Tour. Cultural Change 18, 673–689, https://doi.org/10.1080/14766825.2019.1693581 (2020).10.1080/14766825.2019.1693581 ↗
15. Cimbaljević, M., Stankov, U., Demirović, D. & Pavluković, V. Nice and smart: creating a smarter festival – the study of EXIT (Novi Sad, Serbia). Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 26, 415–427, https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2019.1596139 (2021).10.1080/10941665.2019.1596139 ↗
16. Selmanović, E. et al. Improving accessibility to intangible cultural heritage preservation using virtual reality. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 13, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1145/3377143 (2020).10.1145/3377143 ↗
17. Giliberto, F. & Labadi, S. Harnessing cultural heritage for sustainable development: an analysis of three internationally funded projects in MENA Countries. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 28, 133–146, https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2021.1950026 (2022).10.1080/13527258.2021.1950026 ↗
18. Chen, Y., Xue, K. & Dai, M. The academics of Intangible Cultural Heritage-knowledge map analysis based on CiteSpace (2003-2019). Int. J. Intang. Herit. 15, 182–196 (2020).
19. Tricco, A. C. et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. 169, 467–473, https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850 (2018).10.7326/M18-0850 ↗
20. Han, Q. & Zhao, C. Unleashing the potential of chatbots in mental health: bibliometric analysis. Front. Psychiatry 16, 1494355. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1494355 (2025).10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1494355 ↗
21. Han, Q. Topics and trends of health informatics education research: scientometric analysis. JMIR Med. Educ. 10, e58165, https://doi.org/10.2196/58165 (2024).10.2196/58165 ↗
22. Cisek, K. & Kelleher, J. D. Current topics in technology-enabled stroke rehabilitation and reintegration: a scoping review and content analysis. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehab. Eng. : a Publ. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 31, 3341–3352, https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2023.3304758 (2023).10.1109/TNSRE.2023.3304758 ↗
23. Sheng, B. et al. Detecting latent topics and trends of digital twins in healthcare: A structural topic model-based systematic review. Digital health 9, 20552076231203672. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231203672 (2023).10.1177/20552076231203672 ↗
24. Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M. & Tingley, D. stm : An R Package for Structural Topic Models. J. Stat. Soft. 91; https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v091.i02 (2019).10.18637/jss.v091.i02 ↗
25. Kuhn, K. D. Using structural topic modeling to identify latent topics and trends in aviation incident reports. Transportation Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 87, 105–122, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.12.018 (2018).10.1016/j.trc.2017.12.018 ↗
26. Ratner, B. The correlation coefficient: Its values range between +1/−1, or do they?. J. Target Meas. Anal. Mark. 17, 139–142, https://doi.org/10.1057/jt.2009.5 (2009).10.1057/jt.2009.5 ↗
27. Hou, Y., Kenderdine, S., Picca, D., Egloff, M. & Adamou, A. Digitizing Intangible Cultural Heritage Embodied: State of the Art. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 15, 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1145/3494837 (2022).10.1145/3494837 ↗
28. Shailesh, S. & Judy, M. V. Understanding dance semantics using spatio-temporal features coupled GRU networks. Entertain. Comput. 42, 100484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2022.100484 (2022).10.1016/j.entcom.2022.100484 ↗
29. Shen, Y., Duan, O., Xin, X., Yan, M. & Li, Z. Styled and characteristic Peking opera facial makeup synthesis with co-training and transfer conditional styleGAN2. Herit Sci 12; https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01463-3 (2024).10.1186/s40494-024-01463-3 ↗
30. Zhang, F. Quantitative analysis of color characteristics for Yangjiabu New Year woodblock paintings based on color science and spectral imaging. Color Res. Appl. 48, 801–813, https://doi.org/10.1002/col.22896 (2023).10.1002/col.22896 ↗
31. Stefanidi, E. et al. Transferring traditional crafts from the physical to the virtual world: an authoring and visualization method and platform. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 15, 1–24, https://doi.org/10.1145/3484397 (2022).10.1145/3484397 ↗
32. Khalloufi, H. et al. El-FnaVR: an immersive virtual reality representation of jemaa el-fna in marrakech for intangible cultural heritage experiences. IEEE Access 12, 9331–9349, https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3347195 (2024).10.1109/access.2023.3347195 ↗
33. Peng, Y. Research on dance teaching based on motion capture system. Math. Probl. Eng. 2022, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1455849 (2022).10.1155/2022/1455849 ↗
34. La Codre, de, H. et al. Non-invasive characterization of yellow dyes in tapestries of the 18th century: Influence of composition on degradation. Color Res. Application 46, 613–622, https://doi.org/10.1002/col.22646 (2021).10.1002/col.22646 ↗
35. Yang, T.-T., Guan, J.-P., Chen, G. & Tang, R.-C. Instrumental characterization and functional assessment of the two-color silk fabric coated by the extract from Dioscorea cirrhosa tuber and mordanted by iron salt-containing mud. Ind. Crops Products 111, 117–125, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.016 (2018).10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.016 ↗
36. Dong, L.-Y. & Zhu, Y.-J. Fire-resistant inorganic analogous xuan paper with thousands of years’ super-durability. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 6, 17239–17251, https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b04630 (2018).10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b04630 ↗
37. Rwawiire, S. & Tomkova, B. Static and dynamic mechanical properties of barkcloth (ficus natalensis) -reinforced epoxy composite. J. Nat. Fibers 13, 137–145, https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2014.984061 (2016).10.1080/15440478.2014.984061 ↗
38. Shao, Y.-T., Zhu, Y.-J., Dong, L.-Y. & Zhang, Q.-Q. A new kind of nanocomposite Xuan paper comprising ultralong hydroxyapatite nanowires and cellulose fibers with a unique ink wetting performance. RSC Adv. 9, 40750–40757, https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ra08349a (2019).10.1039/c9ra08349a ↗
39. Tan, Y., Wang, H., Zhao, Z. & Fan, T. A joint entity-relation detection and generalization method based on syntax and semantics for chinese intangible cultural heritage texts. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 17, 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1145/3631124 (2024).10.1145/3631124 ↗
40. Sun, K.-K., Huang, J.-W., Yuan, Y.-Y. & Chen, M.-Y. Classification and recognition of the Nantong blue calico pattern based on deep learning. J. Eng. Fibers Fabr https://doi.org/10.1177/15589250241270618 (2024).10.1177/15589250241270618 ↗
41. Chen, X., Chen, Z., Xiao, L. & Zhou, M. A novel sentiment analysis model of museum user experience evaluation data based on unbalanced data analysis technology. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2022, 2096634. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2096634 (2022).10.1155/2022/2096634 ↗
42. Qing, F., Tan, G., Sun, C. & Chen, P. Research on Knowledge Organization of Intangible Cultural Heritage Based on Metadata. ITAL https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v41i2.14093 (2022).10.6017/ital.v41i2.14093 ↗
43. Koukopoulos, Z., Koukopoulos, D. & Jung, J. J. A trustworthy multimedia participatory platform for cultural heritage management in smart city environments. Multimed. Tools Appl 76, 25943–25981, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-4785-8 (2017).10.1007/s11042-017-4785-8 ↗
44. Tiribelli, S., Pansoni, S., Frontoni, E. & Giovanola, B. Ethics of artificial intelligence for cultural heritage: opportunities and challenges. IEEE Trans. Technol. Soc. 5, 293–305, https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2024.3432407 (2024).10.1109/TTS.2024.3432407 ↗
45. Quintero-Angel, M., Mendoza-Salazar, D. M. & Martínez-Girón, J. Food fears and risk of loss of food heritage: A little-explored effect of food modernity and times of pandemic. Int. J. Gastronomy Food Sci. 28, 100499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2022.100499 (2022).10.1016/j.ijgfs.2022.100499 ↗
46. Yousef, G. A., Elazony, M. A., Abdelsattar, A., Sewailam, M. M. & Elsaid, O. H. Applying an integrated Remote Sensing-GIS approach in the documentation of handicraft centers at New Valley Governorate, Egypt. Egypt. J. Remote Sens. Space Sci. 25, 731–739, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2022.04.004 (2022).10.1016/j.ejrs.2022.04.004 ↗
47. Vandebroek, I. et al. Root tonics and resilience: building strength, health, and heritage in Jamaica. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 5, 640171. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.640171 (2021).10.3389/fsufs.2021.640171 ↗
48. Borcoman, M. & Sorea, D. Ethnic Soups from Rupea Area (Romania) as Resources for Sustainable Local Development. Sustainability 15, 943, https://doi.org/10.3390/su15020943 (2023).10.3390/su15020943 ↗
49. Ojeda-Linares, C. et al. Traditional fermented beverages of Mexico: a biocultural unseen foodscape. Foods 10, 2390, https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10102390 (2021).10.3390/foods10102390 ↗
50. Luo, B., Ahmed, S. & Long, C. Bamboos for weaving and relevant traditional knowledge in Sansui, Southwest China. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 16, 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-020-00418-9 (2020).10.1186/s13002-020-00418-9 ↗
51. Liufu, Y., Hu, R., Fu, Q. & Luo, B. Bobai Hakka weaving: plant diversity, traditional culture, and a model for rural revitalization. Environ. Dev. Sustain 26, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03340-8 (2023).10.1007/s10668-023-03340-8 ↗
52. Ingrassia, M. et al. Mediterranean Diet, Sustainability, and Tourism-A Study of the Market’s Demand and Knowledge. Foods 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12132463 (2023).10.3390/foods12132463 ↗
53. Plaiphum, S. & Tansuchat, R. Cultural Capital of Sea Salt Farming in Ban Laem District of Phetchaburi Province as per the Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS). Sustainability 15, 11947, https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511947 (2023).10.3390/su151511947 ↗
54. Cordova-Buiza, F., Gabriel-Campos, E., Castaño-Prieto, L. & García-García, L. The Gastronomic Experience: Motivation and Satisfaction of the Gastronomic Tourist—The Case of Puno City (Peru). Sustainability 13, 9170, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169170 (2021).10.3390/su13169170 ↗
55. Cerquetti, M., Ferrara, C., Romagnoli, A. & Vagnarelli, G. Enhancing Intangible Cultural Heritage for Sustainable Tourism Development in Rural Areas: The Case of the “Marche Food and Wine Memories” Project (Italy). Sustainability 14, 16893, https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416893 (2022).10.3390/su142416893 ↗
56. Choi, S., Imon, S. S. & Couto, U. Negotiating with Authenticity to Ensure Sustainability of Traditional Cultural Festivals: Residents’ Perspectives about Macao’s Drunken Dragon Festival. Sustainability 12, 885, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030885 (2020).10.3390/su12030885 ↗
57. Rajangam, K. & Rajani, M. B. Applications of Geospatial Technology in the Management of Cultural Heritage Sites – Potentials and Challenges for the Indian Region. Curr. Sci. 113, 1948, https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v113/i10/1948-1960 (2017).10.18520/cs/v113/i10/1948-1960 ↗
58. Hashimoto, S. et al. Mapping and characterizing ecosystem services of social–ecological production landscapes: case study of Noto, Japan. Sustain Sci. 10, 257–273, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0285-1 (2015).10.1007/s11625-014-0285-1 ↗
59. Fatorić, S. & Daly, C. Towards a climate-smart cultural heritage management. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Clim. Change 14, e855. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.855 (2023).10.1002/wcc.855 ↗
60. Romero-Bautista, Y. A., Moreno-Calles, A. I., Alvarado-Ramos, F., Reyes Castillo, M. & Casas, A. Environmental interactions between people and birds in semiarid lands of the Zapotitlán Valley, Central Mexico. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 16, 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-020-00385-1 (2020).10.1186/s13002-020-00385-1 ↗
61. Trichopoulou, A. Mediterranean diet as intangible heritage of humanity: 10 years on. Nutr., Metab., cardiovascular Dis. : NMCD 31, 1943–1948, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2021.04.011 (2021).10.1016/j.numecd.2021.04.011 ↗
62. Stefan, D. et al. Trademark potential increase and entrepreneurship rural development: A case study of Southern Transylvania, Romania. PLOS ONE 16, e0245044, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245044 (2021).10.1371/journal.pone.0245044 ↗
63. Vido, S. & de Protecting Yazidi cultural heritage through women: An international feminist law analysis. J. Cultural Herit. 33, 264–270, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2018.02.008 (2018).10.1016/j.culher.2018.02.008 ↗
64. Nie, X., Xie, Y., Xie, X. & Zheng, L. The characteristics and influencing factors of the spatial distribution of intangible cultural heritage in the Yellow River Basin of China. Herit Sci 10; https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00754-x (2022).10.1186/s40494-022-00754-x ↗
65. Wang, X., Zhang, T., Duan, L., Liritzis, I. & Li, J. Spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of intangible cultural heritage in the Yellow River Basin. J. Cultural Herit. 66, 254–264, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2023.11.024 (2024).10.1016/j.culher.2023.11.024 ↗
66. Zhang, Z., Cui, Z., Fan, T., Ruan, S. & Wu, J. Spatial distribution of intangible cultural heritage resources in China and its influencing factors. Sci. Rep. 14, 4960. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55454-2 (2024).10.1038/s41598-024-55454-2 ↗
67. Li, X. et al. Research on the construction of intangible cultural heritage corridors in the Yellow River Basin based on geographic information system (GIS) technology and the minimum cumulative resistance (MCR) model. Herit Sci 12; https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01387-y (2024).10.1186/s40494-024-01387-y ↗
68. Chen, Z., Gao, Q., Li, X., Yang, X. & Wang, Z. Beyond inundation: a comprehensive assessment of sea level rise impact on coastal cultural heritage in China. Herit Sci 12; https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01233-1 (2024).10.1186/s40494-024-01233-1 ↗
69. Fatorić, S. & Seekamp, E. Are cultural heritage and resources threatened by climate change? A systematic literature review. Climatic Change 142, 227–254, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1929-9 (2017).10.1007/s10584-017-1929-9 ↗
70. Dastgerdi, A. S., Sargolini, M. & Pierantoni, I. Climate Change Challenges to Existing Cultural Heritage Policy. Sustainability 11, 5227, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195227 (2019).10.3390/su11195227 ↗
71. Sevieri, G. et al. A multi-hazard risk prioritisation framework for cultural heritage assets. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 20, 1391–1414, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1391-2020 (2020).10.5194/nhess-20-1391-2020 ↗
72. Tlemsani Bozdağ, H., Benabbou, R. & Vural Arslan, T. A framework proposal for resilience assessment in traditional commercial centres: case of the historical bazaar of bursa as a resilient world heritage site. Herit Sci 10; https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00792-5 (2022).10.1186/s40494-022-00792-5 ↗
73. Xie, R. Intangible Cultural Heritage High-Definition Digital Mobile Display Technology Based on VR Virtual Visualization. Mob. Inf. Syst. 2021, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4034729 (2021).10.1155/2021/4034729 ↗
74. Kocaturk, T., Mazza, D., McKinnon, M. & Kaljevic, S. GDOM: An Immersive Experience of Intangible Heritage through Spatial Storytelling. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 15, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1145/3498329 (2022).10.1145/3498329 ↗
75. Harrison, R. Heritage Futures (UCL Press, 2020).10.2307/j.ctv13xps9m ↗
76. Fan, T., Wang, H. & Hodel, T. CICHMKG: a large-scale and comprehensive Chinese intangible cultural heritage multimodal knowledge graph. Herit Sci 11; https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-023-00927-2 (2023).10.1186/s40494-023-00927-2 ↗
77. Hirsenberger, H., Ranogajec, J., Vucetic, S., Lalic, B. & Gracanin, D. Collaborative projects in cultural heritage conservation – management challenges and risks. J. Cultural Herit. 37, 215–224, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2018.10.006 (2019).10.1016/j.culher.2018.10.006 ↗
78. Pizzirani, S., McLaren, S. J. & Seadon, J. K. Is there a place for culture in life cycle sustainability assessment?. Int J. Life Cycle Assess. 19, 1316–1330, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0722-5 (2014).10.1007/s11367-014-0722-5 ↗
79. Shakeri Hossein Abad, Z. et al. Digital public health surveillance: a systematic scoping review. npj Digit. Med. 4, 41, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00407-6 (2021).10.1038/s41746-021-00407-6 ↗