Non-destructive detection and three-dimensional imaging of internal defects in Beijing Ming Great Wall
Source abstract
Abstract
The Ming Great Wall in Beijing suffers from hidden voids, detachments, and moisture infiltration from long-term weathering and human impacts. Invasive diagnostics risk irreversible damage to this UNESCO site. This study developed a non-destructive 400 MHz GPR framework integrating attribute analysis and 3D imaging, validated through scaled physical models and field surveys at the Panlongshan section. Instantaneous amplitude enabled 3D reconstruction with 19.41% mean volumetric error. Strong empirical correlations (Pearson |r| = 0.79–0.92) link defect moisture content positively to RMS amplitude and generalised S-transform response, and negatively to central-frequency bandwidth and high-frequency (>0.2 MHz) amplitude stability, achieving semi-quantitative moisture discrimination in 13 infill scenarios. While robust in controlled tests, these relationships require site-specific calibration due to material and environmental heterogeneity. The method provides accurate defect localisation and volume estimation for Ming masonry conservation; broader validation across diverse sections is recommended to confirm general applicability worldwide.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geophysical Methods and Applications · Microwave Imaging and Scattering Analysis · Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Fan, L. & Wang, J. L. Architectural Forms and Materials of the Beijing Ming Great Wall 204–205 (China Bookstore, 2023).
2. Dettmering, T. & Dai, S. Types of lime binders in mortars used for the construction of the Ming Great Wall of China and their importance for the development of a conservation strategy. Built Herit 6, 1 (2022).10.1186/s43238-022-00047-z ↗
3. Zou, L. Risk Assessment of Stormwater Erosion and Drainage Criteria for Typical Sections of Masonry Great Wall Sites in Beijing Area. Master’s dissertation, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture https://doi.org/10.26943/d.cnki.gbjzc.2024.000036 (2024).10.26943/d.cnki.gbjzc.2024.000036 ↗
4. Zhou, W. Application of ground penetrating radar method in the detection of internal damage to ancient city walls. Intell. City 4, 25–26 (2018).
5. Solla, M., Pérez-Gracia, V., Lagüela, S. & Fontul, S. Applications of the ground-penetrating radar technique to heritage buildings: case studies and combination with other non-destructive testing. In Proc. Diagnosis of Heritage Buildings by Non-Destructive Techniques (eds Tejedor Herrán, B. & Bienvenido-Huertas, D.) 575–624 (Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, 2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-16001-1.00022-X10.1016/B978-0-443-16001-1.00022-X ↗
6. Lai, W. W. L., Derobert, X. & Annan, P. A review of Ground Penetrating Radar application in civil engineering: a 30-year journey from locating and testing to imaging and diagnosis. NDT E. Int. 96, 58–78 (2018).10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.04.002 ↗
7. Yang, H., Zou, J., Cheng, D. & Yu, J. Application of ground-penetrating radar in detecting the internal structures of the ancient Great Wall in Linhai City. Geophys. Geochem. Explor. 48, 1741–1746 (2024).
8. Tomita, K. & Chew, M. Y. L. A review of infrared thermography for delamination detection on infrastructures and buildings. Sensors 22, 423 (2022).10.3390/s22020423 ↗
9. Liu, S. & Mamat, M. J. B. Application of 3D laser scanning technology for mapping and accuracy assessment of the point cloud model for the Great Achievement Palace heritage building. Herit. Sci. 12, 153 (2024).10.1186/s40494-024-01252-y ↗
10. Schuller, M. P. Non-destructive testing and damage assessment of masonry structures. In Proc. NSF/RILEM Workshop: In-Situ Evaluation of Historic Wood and Masonry Structures 67–86 (Prague, 2006).
11. Maierhofer, C. & Wostmann, J. Investigation of dielectric properties of brick materials as a function of moisture and salt content using a microwave impulse technique at very high frequencies. NDT E. Int. 31, 259–263 (1998).10.1016/S0963-8695(98)00011-5 ↗
12. Khan, M. S. et al. Assessment of concrete strength using the combination of NDT—review and performance analysis. Appl. Sci. 12, 12190 (2022).10.3390/app122312190 ↗
13. Bolborea, B. et al. A review of non-destructive testing methods for structural health monitoring of earthen constructions. Alex. Eng. J. 114, 55–81 (2025).10.1016/j.aej.2024.11.083 ↗
14. Hou, H. & Qin, B. B. Research numerical simulation of GPR based on GprMax for the road cavity. Transp. Energy Environ. Prot. 20, 157–161 (2024).
15. Gagarin, N. et al. Development of novel methodology for assessing bridge deck conditions using step frequency antenna array ground penetrating radar. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 34, 04019113 (2020).10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001365 ↗
16. Joshaghani, A. & Shokrabadi, M. Ground penetrating radar (GPR) applications in concrete pavements. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 23, 4504–4531 (2022).10.1080/10298436.2021.1954182 ↗
17. Xi, C. C., Chi, F. X. & Yan, S. J. Research on a simulation model of soil cavity defects based on ground-penetrating radar. Technol. Innov. Appl. 95–98 (2024).
18. Zhou, D. et al. 3D visualization of karst caves in tunnels based on GPR attribute analysis. Chin. J. Rock. Mech. Eng. 45, 310–317 (2023).
19. Sonkamble, S. & Chandra, S. GPR for earth and environmental applications: case studies from India. J. Appl. Geophys. 193, 104422 (2021).10.1016/j.jappgeo.2021.104422 ↗
20. Lemke, S. R. & Mankowski, L. C. GPR attribute analysis. In Proc. 13th EEGS Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems (European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2000).10.4133/1.2922752 ↗
21. Luo, H. & Zhang, Q. Application of different central frequency antennas of ground penetrating radar in the detection of ancient wall diseases. Geotech. Eng. Tech. 32, 226–230 (2018).
22. Meng, Z., Gao, W., Ma, J. & Zhang, N. Application of georadar to detect hidden dangers in ancient city walls. Geotech. Invest. Surv. 52, 75–80 (2024).
23. Al-Hameedawi, M. M., Thabit, J. M., Al-Menshed, F. H. & Conyers, L. Integrating electrical resistivity tomography and ground-penetrating radar methods to map archaeological walls near Northern Ishtar gate, ancient Babylon city, Iraq. Archaeol. Prospect. 29, 293–304 (2022).10.1002/arp.1852 ↗
24. Adachi, S., Yamaguchi, S., Ozeki, T. & Kose, K. Application of a magnetic resonance imaging method for non-destructive, three-dimensional, high-resolution measurement of the water content of wet snow samples. Front. Earth Sci. 8, 179 (2020).10.3389/feart.2020.00179 ↗
25. Khan, M. Y., Shafique, M., Turab, S. A. & Ahmed, N. Characterization of an unstable slope using geophysical, UAV, and geological techniques: Karakoram Himalaya, northern Pakistan. Front. Earth Sci. 9, 705 (2021).10.3389/feart.2021.668011 ↗
26. Lv, G. et al. Detection of cracks in cemented loess of ancient buildings using remote sensing. Front. Mater. 9, 952631 (2022).10.3389/fmats.2022.952631 ↗
27. Pieraccini, M. & Miccinesi, L. Ground Penetrating Radar for Investigating Painted Walls and Floors of Ancient Buildings. In Proc. Sustainable Conservation of UNESCO and Other Heritage Sites Through Proactive Geosciences (eds El-Qady, G. M. & Margottini, C.) 221–235 (Springer, 2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13810-2_12.10.1007/978-3-031-13810-2_12 ↗
28. Ercoli, M. et al. Integrated GPR and laboratory water content measures of sandy soils: from laboratory to field scale. Constr. Build. Mater. 159, 734–744 (2018).10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.082 ↗
29. Agliata, R. et al. Non-invasive estimation of moisture content in tuff bricks by GPR. Constr. Build. Mater. 160, 698–706 (2018).10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.103 ↗
30. Pérez-Gracia, V. et al. Combining ground penetrating radar and seismic surveys in the assessment of cultural heritage buildings: The study of roofs, columns, and ground of the Gothic church Santa Maria del Mar, in Barcelona (Spain). Struct. Control Health Monit. 26, e2327 (2019).10.1002/stc.2327 ↗
31. Zhao, W. K. & Tian, G. Geophysical explorations on buried ruins of the ancient walls. Science 65, 38–41 (2013).
32. Bornik, A. & Neubauer, W. 3D visualization techniques for analysis and archaeological interpretation of GPR data. Remote Sens. 14, 1709 (2022).10.3390/rs14071709 ↗
33. Leucci, G. et al. 3D GPR survey for the archaeological characterization of the ancient Messapian necropolis in Lecce, South Italy. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 7, 290–302 (2016).
34. Kelly, T. B. et al. A novel approach to 3D modelling ground-penetrating radar (GPR) data – a case study of a cemetery and applications for criminal investigation. Forensic Sci. Int. 325, 110882 (2021).10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110882 ↗
35. Lombardi, F., Lualdi, M. & Garavaglia, E. Masonry texture reconstruction for building seismic assessment: practical evaluation and potentials of ground penetrating radar methodology. Constr. Build. Mater. 299, 124189 (2021).10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124189 ↗
36. Yan, Z. et al. Research on the application of 3D GPR in the detection of road collapse diseases in loess region of Ningxia. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2887, 012023 (2024).10.1088/1742-6596/2887/1/012023 ↗
37. Zheng, X. Application of ground penetrating radar imaging technology in expressway roadbed inspection. China High. N. Technol. 68, 70 (2024).
38. Dinh, K. et al. Full-resolution 3D imaging for concrete structures with dual-polarization GPR. Autom. Constr. 125, 103652 (2021).10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103652 ↗
39. Ocaña-Levario, S. J., Carreño-Alvarado, E. P., Ayala-Cabrera, D. & Izquierdo, J. GPR image analysis to locate water leaks from buried pipes by applying variance filters. J. Appl. Geophys. 152, 236–247 (2018).10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.03.025 ↗
40. Catapano, I. et al. Structural assessment via ground penetrating radar at the Consoli Palace of Gubbio (Italy). Remote Sens. 10, 45 (2017).10.3390/rs10010045 ↗
41. Medina, P. Z. et al. Using ground penetrating radar and attribute analysis for identifying depositional units in a fluvial-aeolian interaction environment: the Guandacol Valley, northwest Argentina. J. South Am. Earth Sci. 98, 102467 (2020).10.1016/j.jsames.2019.102467 ↗
42. Huang, Z. et al. Research on void signal recognition algorithm of 3D ground-penetrating radar based on the digital image. Front. Mater. 9, 850694 (2022).10.3389/fmats.2022.850694 ↗
43. Dai, Q. et al. 3DInvNet: a deep learning-based 3D ground-penetrating radar data inversion. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 61, 1–16, (2023).10.1109/TGRS.2023.3275306 ↗
44. Taner, M. T., Koehler, F. & Sheriff, R. E. Complex seismic trace analysis. Geophysics 44, 1041–1063 (1979).10.1190/1.1440994 ↗
45. Stockwell, R. G. Why use the S-transform? In Proc. Pseudo-Differential Operators: Partial Differential Equations and Time-Frequency Analysis (eds Rodino, L. & Wong, M. W.) 279–309 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2007).10.1090/fic/052/12 ↗
46. Pinnegar, C. R. & Mansinha, L. The S-transform with windows of arbitrary and varying shape. Geophysics 68, 210–218 (2003).10.1190/1.1543223 ↗
47. Meng, T. et al. Application of high-frequency ground penetrating radar in the evaluation of ancient city wall restoration effect. Geotech. Eng. Tech. 38, 196–202 (2024).