Binary damage classification of built heritage with a 3D neural network
Source abstract
Abstract
Preservation and restoration of historical buildings are important tasks and require accurate assessment of structural damage. However, human and economic efforts are limited, therefore, it is important to automatize such a task. While there are several studies that can identify damages in the buildings, the majority use images to identify slight or moderate damage and only a few can detect severe or very severe damages (where the structure has been affected). This gap is partially due to two challenges: (i) the uniqueness of the built heritage limits the number of available datasets, and (ii) to deal with detailed 3D representations requires high computational resources. To address these challenges, this paper proposes an automatic classification of the structural state of the built heritage, considering severe or very severe degrees of damage. Due to the limited number of available models, this work uses point clouds converted to voxel map representations, improving the generalization of the method. To achieve the classification, a 3D Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) with five layers is adapted and trained under supervised learning with a minimal dataset. The training dataset contains 130 built heritage structures and was specifically created by authors using CAD tools. The trained 3D CNN was tested on two real-world buildings: (1) a Posa chapel with very severe damage belonging to the Natividad former convent at Tepoztlán, Morelos, Mexico. The convent has been recognized as a UNESCO World Heritage site since 1994. (2) The Kukulkán temple with no severe damage. This is one of the 7 Wonders of the World, located at the archeological site of Chichén Itzá at Yucatán, Mexico. This site has been recognized as a UNESCO World Heritage since 1988. The results show that the proposed method successfully classifies the structural state of the heritage buildings. Key findings include: (i) low-resolution voxel maps effectively preserve essential structural features for supervised learning while requiring a moderate number of examples, and (ii) the approach is scalable for other unique heritage structures. This method provides a viable tool for automated damage assessment, supporting preservation and restoration efforts for cultural heritage. This paper proposes a scheme of automatic classification of the current structural state of built heritage with severe and very severe damage degree. Low resolution voxel map of 3D representation (point cloud) and 3D Convolutional Neural Network are exploited. A practical test confirms the effectiveness of the proposed scheme.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. El Hazzat, S., El Akkad, N., Merras, M., Saaidi, A. & Satori, K. Fast 3d reconstruction and modeling method based on the good choice of image pairs for modified match propagation. Multimed. Tools Appl. 79, 7159–7173 (2020).10.1007/s11042-019-08379-2 ↗
2. Bian, Y. et al. Quantification method for the uncertainty of matching point distribution on 3d reconstruction. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 9, 187 (2020).10.3390/ijgi9040187 ↗
3. Cao, M.-W. et al. Parallel k nearest neighbor matching for 3d reconstruction. IEEE Access 7, 55248–55260 (2019).10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2912647 ↗
4. Godfrey, S., Cooper, J., Bezombes, F. & Plater, A. Monitoring coastal morphology: the potential of low-cost fixed array action cameras for 3d reconstruction. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 45, 2478–2494 (2020).10.1002/esp.4892 ↗
5. Khaloo, A. & Lattanzi, D. Hierarchical dense structure-from-motion reconstructions for infrastructure condition assessment. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 31, 04016047-1– 04016047-13 (2017).10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000616 ↗
6. Czerniawski, T., Nahangi, M., Haas, C. & Walbridge, S. Pipe spool recognition in cluttered point clouds using a curvature-based shape descriptor. Autom. Constr. 71, 346–358 (2016).10.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.011 ↗
7. Zhu, L. & Hyyppa, J. The use of airborne and mobile laser scanning for modeling railway environments in 3d. Remote Sens. 6, 3075–3100 (2014).10.3390/rs6043075 ↗
8. Dimitrov, A. & Golparvar-Fard, M. Segmentation of building point cloud models including detailed architectural/structural features and MEP systems. Autom. Constr. 51, 32–45 (2015).10.1016/j.autcon.2014.12.015 ↗
9. Hu, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, S. & Zhao, X. Fusion key frame image confidence assessment of the medical service robot whole scene reconstruction. J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 65, 30409–1 (2021).10.2352/J.ImagingSci.Technol.2021.65.3.030409 ↗
10. Li, X., Wang, D., Ao, H., Belaroussi, R. & Gruyer, D. Fast 3d semantic mapping in road scenes. Appl. Sci. 9, 631 (2019).10.3390/app9040631 ↗
11. Su, Y. & Wang, Z. 3d reconstruction of submarine landscape ecological security pattern based on virtual reality. J. Coast. Res. 83, 615–620 (2018).10.2112/SI83-101.1 ↗
12. Wang, B., Yin, C., Luo, H., Cheng, J. C. & Wang, Q. Fully automated generation of parametric bim for mep scenes based on terrestrial laser scanning data. Autom. Constr. 125, 103615 (2021).10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103615 ↗
13. Sung, M., Cho, H., Kim, T., Joe, H. & Yu, S.-C. Crosstalk removal in forward scan sonar image using deep learning for object detection. IEEE Sens. J. 19, 9929–9944 (2019).10.1109/JSEN.2019.2925830 ↗
14. Wei, K., Dai, Y. & Ren, B. Automatic identification and autonomous sorting of cylindrical parts in cluttered scene based on monocular vision 3d reconstruction. Sens. Rev. 39, 763–775 (2019).10.1108/SR-01-2019-0033 ↗
15. Cheng, Q., Sun, P., Yang, C., Yang, Y. & Liu, P. X. A morphing-based 3d point cloud reconstruction framework for medical image processing. Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed. 193, 105495 (2020).10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105495 ↗
16. Deligiorgi, M. et al. A 3d digitisation workflow for architecture-specific annotation of built heritage. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 37, 102787 (2021).
17. Obeso, A. M., Benois-Pineau, J., Vázquez, M. G. & Acosta, A. R. Saliency-based selection of visual content for deep convolutional neural networks: application to architectural style classification. Multimed. Tools Appl. 78, 9553–9576 (2019).10.1007/s11042-018-6515-2 ↗
18. Mishra, M., Barman, T. & Ramana, G. Artificial intelligence-based visual inspection system for structural health monitoring of cultural heritage. J. Civil Struct. Health Monit. 14, 1–18 (2022).
19. Cao, Y. & Scaioni, M. 3dleb-net: label-efficient deep learning-based semantic segmentation of building point clouds at lod3 level. Appl. Sci. 11, 8996 (2021).10.3390/app11198996 ↗
20. Chaiyasarn, K., Sharma, M., Ali, L., Khan, W. & Poovarodom, N. Crack detection in historical structures based on convolutional neural network. Int. J. GEOMATE 15, 240–251 (2018).10.21660/2018.51.35376 ↗
21. Wang, N., Zhao, Q., Li, S., Zhao, X. & Zhao, P. Damage classification for masonry historic structures using convolutional neural networks based on still images. Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 33, 1073–1089 (2018).10.1111/mice.12411 ↗
22. Kumar, P., Ofli, F., Imran, M. & Castillo, C. Detection of disaster-affected cultural heritage sites from social media images using deep learning techniques. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 13, 1–31 (2020).10.1145/3383314 ↗
23. Rodrigues, F. et al. Application of deep learning approach for the classification of buildings’ degradation state in a bim methodology. Appl. Sci. 12, 7403 (2022).10.3390/app12157403 ↗
24. Nugraheni, D. M. K., Nugroho, A. K., Dewi, D. I. K. & Noranita, B. Deca convolutional layer neural network (dcl-nn) method for categorizing concrete cracks in heritage building. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 14, 722–730 (2023).
25. Yazdi, H., Sad Berenji, S., Ludwig, F. & Moazen, S. Deep learning in historical architecture remote sensing: automated historical courtyard house recognition in Yazd, Iran. Heritage 5, 3066–3080 (2022).10.3390/heritage5040159 ↗
26. Zou, H., Ge, J., Liu, R. & He, L. Feature recognition of regional architecture forms based on machine learning: a case study of architecture heritage in Hubei province, China. Sustainability 15, 3504 (2023).10.3390/su15043504 ↗
27. Obeso, A. M., Benois-Pineau, J., Acosta, A. Á. R. & Vázquez, M. S. G. Architectural style classification of Mexican historical buildings using deep convolutional neural networks and sparse features. J. Electron. Imaging 26, 011016 (2017).10.1117/1.JEI.26.1.011016 ↗
28. Matrone, F. & Martini, M. Transfer learning and performance enhancement techniques for deep semantic segmentation of built heritage point clouds. Virtual Archaeol. Rev. 12, 73–84 (2021).10.4995/var.2021.15318 ↗
29. Díaz-Rodríguez, N. et al. Explainable neural-symbolic learning (x-nesyl) methodology to fuse deep learning representations with expert knowledge graphs: the Monumai cultural heritage use case. Inf. Fusion 79, 58–83 (2022).10.1016/j.inffus.2021.09.022 ↗
30. Artopoulos, G. et al. An artificial neural network framework for classifying the style of Cypriot hybrid examples of built heritage in 3d. J. Cult. Herit. 63, 135–147 (2023).10.1016/j.culher.2023.07.016 ↗
31. Gao, L. et al. Research on image classification and retrieval using deep learning with attention mechanism on diaspora Chinese architectural heritage in Jiangmen, China. Buildings 13, 275 (2023).10.3390/buildings13020275 ↗
32. Llamas, J., M. Lerones, P., Medina, R., Zalama, E. & Gómez-García-Bermejo, J. Classification of architectural heritage images using deep learning techniques. Appl. Sci. 7, 992 (2017).10.3390/app7100992 ↗
33. Janković, R. Machine learning models for cultural heritage image classification: comparison based on attribute selection. Information 11, 12 (2019).10.3390/info11010012 ↗
34. Haznedar, B., Bayraktar, R., Ozturk, A. E. & Arayici, Y. Implementing pointnet for point cloud segmentation in the heritage context. Herit. Sci. 11, 1–18 (2023).10.1186/s40494-022-00844-w ↗
35. Zou, Z., Zhao, X., Zhao, P., Qi, F. & Wang, N. Cnn-based statistics and location estimation of missing components in routine inspection of historic buildings. J. Cult. Herit. 38, 221–230 (2019).10.1016/j.culher.2019.02.002 ↗
36. Hatir, M. E., Barstuğan, M. & İnce, İ. Deep learning-based weathering type recognition in historical stone monuments. J. Cult. Herit. 45, 193–203 (2020).10.1016/j.culher.2020.04.008 ↗
37. Wang, N., Zhao, X., Zou, Z., Zhao, P. & Qi, F. Autonomous damage segmentation and measurement of glazed tiles in historic buildings via deep learning. Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 35, 277–291 (2020).10.1111/mice.12488 ↗
38. Meklati, S., Boussora, K., Abdi, M. E. H. & Berrani, S.-A. Surface damage identification for heritage site protection: a mobile crowd-sensing solution based on deep learning. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 16, 1–24 (2023).10.1145/3569093 ↗
39. Burland, J. B., Broms, B. B. & De Mello, V. F. Behaviour of foundations and structures. In 9th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 495–546 (Tokio, JPN, 1977).
40. Maturana, D. & Scherer, S. Voxnet: A 3d convolutional neural network for real-time object recognition. In 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 922–928 (IEEE, 2015).10.1109/IROS.2015.7353481 ↗
41. Sketchup. 3d warehouse. https://3dwarehouse.sketchup.com/model/Model-URL. Accessed: November 2024.
42. Boulch, A. Convpoint: continuous convolutions for point cloud processing. Comput. Graph. 88, 24–34 (2020).10.1016/j.cag.2020.02.005 ↗
43. Maas, A. L. et al. Rectifier nonlinearities improve neural network acoustic models. In 30th International Conference on Machine Learning, 1–6 (Giorgia, USA, JMLR: W&CP, vol. 28, 2013).
44. Han, J. & Moraga, C. The influence of the sigmoid function parameters on the speed of backpropagation learning. In International Workshop on Artificial Neural Networks 195–201 (Springer, 1995).10.1007/3-540-59497-3_175 ↗
45. Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) 1–13 (San Diego, USA, 2015).
46. Paszke, A. et al. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In Proc. International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 8026–8037 (Vancouver, Canada, 2019).