Immersive digital reconstruction using AR and holograms in Metaponto and Canosa di Puglia
Source abstract
Abstract
Tangible and intangible cultural heritage today faces accelerating threats of degradation and disappearance. This research explores the use of Augmented Reality (AR) and holographic modelling to document and enhance archaeological heritage in fragile contexts. Interactive 3D models were developed using modelling software and AR platforms, and applied to the archaeological sites of Metaponto (Matera) and Canosa di Puglia. At Metaponto, AR integrated the existing ruins with stratigraphic reconstructions, improving the understanding of historical and spatial sequences. At Canosa, it enabled the virtual restitution of lost architectural elements, offering immersive experiences and educational tools. The results demonstrate that AR and holograms strengthen both research and dissemination, expanding physical and virtual accessibility to sites not yet included in established cultural networks.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Augmented Reality Applications · Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Conte, A. et al. AR a bridge between past and present. The Archaeological Park of Metaponto and the Lagrasta Hypogea in Canosa di Puglia (Original language: L’AR un ponte tra passato e presente. Il Parco Archeologico di Metaponto e gli Ipogei Lagrasta a Canosa di Puglia) (edited by) Tommaso Empler. 3D Modelling & BIM. For a digital transformation (Original language: 3D Modeling & BIM. Per una trasformazione digitale). I Ed. Argentina 2024, DEI s.r.l.Tipografia del Genio Civile, 127-138 (2024).
2. Strappa, G. Observations on Urban Growth (Milano, Franco Angeli, 2018).
3. Docci, M. & Maestri, D. Architectural and Urban Survey Manual (Original language: Manuale di rilevamento architettonico e urbano) (Roma-Bari, Laterza, 2009).
4. Brusaporci, S. (edited by). Digital modeling and representation for architectural heritage (Original language: Modellazione e rappresentazione digitale per i beni architettonici) (Roma, Gangemi, 2013).
5. Brusaporci, S. & Centofanti, M. (edited by). Integrated information systems for the protection, conservation, and enhancement of architectural and urban heritage (Original language: Sistemi informativi integrati per la tutela, la conservazione e la valorizzazione del patrimonio architettonico e urbano) (Roma, Gangemi, 2010).
6. Rossi, A. The Architecture of the City (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1966, ed. English 1982).
7. Hu, J. Individually Integrated Virtual/Augmented Reality Environment for Interactive Perception of Cultural Heritage. Assoc. Comput. Machin. 17, 9 (2024).
8. Hall, T. et al. The visitor as virtual archaeologist: explorations in mixed reality technology to enhance educational and social interaction in the Museum. in VAST ‘01: Proceedings of the 2001 Conference on Virtual Reality, Archaeology, and Cultural Heritage 91–96, (2001).10.1145/584993.585008 ↗
9. Gatto, C. et al. Extended reality in performing arts: enhancing the experience of archaeological heritage. in International Conference on eXtended Reality, XR Salento 2024, 15029 LNCS, 310-319 (2024).10.1007/978-3-031-71710-9_24 ↗
10. Malliri, A., Siountri, K., Skondras, E., Vergados, D. D. & Anagnostopoulos, C.-N. The enhancement of underwater cultural heritage assets using augmented reality (AR). ISPRS Ann. Photogrammetry Remote Sens. Spatial Inform. Sci. 42, 119–125 (2019).
11. Kozlova, N. & Ivanov, A. Cultural preservation and digital heritage: challenges and opportunities. Amazon. Investig. 13, 216–229 (2024).
12. Fondazione Archeologica Canosina. Canosa: Historical research (Original language: Canosa: Ricerche storiche) (Fasano, Schena Editore, 2003).
13. Corrado, G. et al. Late Quaternary evolution of the Metaponto coastal plain, southern Italy, inferred from geomorphological and borehole data. Quat. Int. Elsevier Ltd INQUA 638–639, 84–110 (2022).10.1016/j.quaint.2022.01.008 ↗
14. Tropeano, M. et al. Surface and subsurface of the Metaponto Coastal Plain (Gulf of Taranto—southern Italy): present-day- vs LGM-landscape. Geomorphology 203, 115–131 (2013).10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.07.017 ↗
15. Ciminale, M. & Ricchetti, E. Non-destructive exploration in the archaeological park of Metaponto (Southern Italy) in “Archaeological Prospection Archaeol”. Wiley Online Library 6, 75–84 (1999).
16. Bertelli, G., Roubis, D. See Tower I. Archaeological research in the medieval settlement of Metaponto 1995–1999 (Original language: Torre di Mare I. Ricerche Archeologiche Nell’insediamento Medievale Di Metaponto 1995–1999) (Mario Adda Editore, 2002).
17. Ieva, M. Canosa from the territory to the castle: the characteristics of the structuring of the territory in relation to the defensive system and the birth of the castellum (Original language: Canosa dal territorio al castello: i caratteri della strutturazione del territorio in rapporto al sistema difensivo e alla nascita del castellum) (Bari, Mario Adda Editore, 2003).
18. Singh, P. et al. Enhancing tourism experiences and preserving cultural heritage with AR and VR. 2nd International Conference on Disruptive Technologies, ICDT 2024, 225-231, (2024).10.1109/ICDT61202.2024.10489490 ↗
19. Quattrini, R., Pierdicca, R., Frontoni, E. & Barcaglioni, R. Virtual reconstruction of lost architectures: from the TLS survey to AR visualization. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inform. Sci. ISPRS Archiv. 41, 383–390 (2016).
20. Panciroli, C., Macauda, A. Heritage education and augmented reality: what prospects. (Original language: Educazione al patrimonio e realtà aumentata: quali prospettive). Giornale Italiano della Ricerca Educativa (2018).
21. Wang, H. et al. Gamifying cultural heritage: Exploring the potential of immersive virtual exhibitions. Telemat. Inform. Rep. 15, 100150 (2024).10.1016/j.teler.2024.100150 ↗
22. Matthys, M., De Cock, L., Vermaut, J., Van de Weghe, N. & De Maeyer, P. An “animated spatial time machine” in co-creation: reconstructing history using gamification integrated into 3d city modelling, 4D web and transmedia storytelling. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inform. 10, 460 (2021).10.3390/ijgi10070460 ↗
23. Pedersen, I., Gale, N., Mirza-Babaei, P. & Reid, S. More than meets the eye: the benefits of augmented reality and holographic displays for digital cultural heritage. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 10, 11 (2017).10.1145/3051480 ↗
24. Bruno, F. et al. Virtual and augmented reality tools to improve the exploitation of underwater archaeological sites by diver and non-diver tourists. Springer Nat. 10058, 269–280 (2016). LNCS.
25. Guidi, G., Russo, M. & Angheleddu, D. 3D survey and virtual reconstruction of archaeological sites. Digit. Appl. Archaeol. Cult. Herit. 1, 55–69 (2014).
26. Karkina, S., Klyuchnikova, K., Mena, J. & Mukhametzyanova, L. Cultural identity through 3d modeling: learning national architecture heritage based on hologram technology. Springer Nat. F 3283, 1095–1104 (2024).
27. Tang, T. & Zhang, H. An Interactive Holographic Multimedia Technology and Its Application in the Preservation and Dissemination of Intangible Cultural Heritage. Int. J. Digit. Multimedia Broadcast. 2023, 6527345 (2023).
28. Teruggi, S. & Fassi, F. Hololens 2 spatial mapping capabilities in vast monumental heritage environments. Int. Arch. Photogrammetry Remote Sens. Spat. Inform. Sci. ISPRS Archiv. 46, 489–496 (2022).
29. Ibiş, A., Çakici & Alp, N. Augmented reality and wearable technology for cultural heritage preservation. Sustainability 16, 4007 (2024).10.3390/su16104007 ↗
30. Ramos Sánchez, J. A., Cruz Franco, P. A. & Rueda Márquez de la Plata, A. Achieving universal accessibility through remote virtualization and digitization of complex archaeological features: a graphic and constructive study of the columbarios of Merida. Multidiscipl. Digit. Publish. Instit. 14, 3319 (2022).
31. Monna, F. et al. Contextualization of archaeological information using augmented photospheres, viewed with head-mounted displays. Sustainability 11, 3894 (2019).10.3390/su11143894 ↗
32. Bekele, M. K., Pierdicca, R., Frontoni, E., Malinverni, E. S. & Gain, J. A survey of augmented, virtual, and mixed reality for cultural heritage. J. Comput. Cult Heritage (JOCCH 11, 1–36 (2018).10.1145/3145534 ↗
33. Van Nguyen, S., Le, S. onT., Tran, M. K. & Tran, H. M. Reconstruction of 3D digital heritage objects for VR and AR applications. J. Inform. Telecommun. 6, 254–269 (2022).10.1080/24751839.2021.2008133 ↗
34. Shih, N.-J., Chen, H.-X., Chen, T.-Y. & Qiu, Y.-T. Digital preservation and reconstruction of old cultural elements in augmented reality (AR). Sustainability 12, 1–191 (2020).10.3390/su12219262 ↗
35. Remondino, F. Heritage recording and 3D modeling with photogrammetry and laser scanning. Remote Sens. 3, 1104–1138 (2011).10.3390/rs3061104 ↗
36. Apollonio, F. I. Classification schemes for visualization and 3D reconstruction in archaeology. J. Cult. Heritage 17, 158–164 (2016).
37. Fai, S., Graham, K., Duckworth, T., Wood, N. & Attar, R. Building Information Modelling and heritage documentation. In Proceedings of the 23rd International CIPA Symposium, Prague, Czech Republic. ISPRS Archives, XXXVIII-5/W16, 107–112 (2011).
38. Carrozzino, M. & Bergamasco, M. Beyond virtual museums: Experiencing immersive virtual reality in real museums. J. Cult. Heritage 11, 452–458 (2010).10.1016/j.culher.2010.04.001 ↗
39. Mortara, M. et al. Learning cultural heritage by serious games. J. Cult. Heritage 15, 318–325 (2014).10.1016/j.culher.2013.04.004 ↗
40. ICOMOS. Charter for the Interpretation and Presentation of Cultural Heritage Sites. Paris: ICOMOS. (no DOI available) (2017).
41. Addison, A. C. Emerging trends in virtual heritage. IEEE Multimed. 7, 22–25 (2000).10.1109/93.848421 ↗