Remote sensing diagnosis of ecosystem resilience dynamics in agricultural heritage landscapes
Source abstract
Abstract
Agricultural heritage landscapes are complex socio-ecological systems increasingly challenged by human pressures and climate change, yet the mechanisms underlying their ecosystem resilience remain unclear. This study combines time-series remote sensing data and analytical algorithms to quantify the dynamics of ecosystem disturbance and recovery within this agricultural heritage landscape. Stepwise regression and generalized additive modeling (GAM) were applied to identify the key environmental drivers of resilience. Results reveal that resilience patterns are highly heterogeneous, with widespread rapid recovery coexisting alongside localized long-term stress. Major disturbance types within the agricultural heritage landscape were identified, and their associated environmental characteristics were characterized. The study further quantifies the influence of landscape configuration, water management, and human activities on ecosystem resilience. This work provides a transferable framework for monitoring and managing agricultural heritage landscapes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Agricultural Systems and Practices · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Climate change impacts on agriculture
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Fuller, A. M., Min, Q., Jiao, W. & Bai, Y. Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) of China: the challenge of complexity in research. Ecosyst. Health Sustain. 1, 1–10 (2015).10.1890/EHS14-0007.1 ↗
2. Altieri, M. A. & Koohafkan, P. Globally Important Ingenious Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS): extent, significance, and implications for development. In Proc. Second International Workshop and Steering Committee Meeting for the Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) Project 7–9 (FAO, 2004).
3. Koohafkan, P. & Price, T. L. Agricultural heritage systems, their resilience and climate smart communities. In (Labadi, S. & Logan, W. eds) Communities and Cultural Heritage 57–66 (Routledge, 2020).10.4324/9781003031192-7 ↗
4. Vounba, C. et al. Differentiated adaptation dynamics to climate change in the Cameroonian Sahel: local perceptions and agricultural resilience in a context of multidimensional vulnerability. Agric. Rural Stud. 3, 20–20 (2025).
5. Bera, M. & Nag, P. K. Integrated natural resource management and sustainable livelihoods: a review of ecosystem-based approaches for sustainability and community resilience. Agric. Rural Stud. 3, 23–23 (2025).
6. Gunderson, L. H. Ecological resilience—in theory and application. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31, 425–439 (2000).10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425 ↗
7. Folke, C. Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Glob. Environ. Change 16, 253–267 (2006).10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002 ↗
8. Van Meerbeek, K., Jucker, T. & Svenning, J. C. Unifying the concepts of stability and resilience in ecology. J. Ecol. 109, 3114–3132 (2021).10.1111/1365-2745.13651 ↗
9. Capdevila, P. et al. Reconciling resilience across ecological systems, species and subdisciplines. J. Ecol. 109, 3102–3113 (2021).10.1111/1365-2745.13775 ↗
10. Agnoletti, M. & Santoro, A. Agricultural heritage systems and agrobiodiversity. Biodivers. Conserv. 31, 2231–2241 (2022).10.1007/s10531-022-02460-3 ↗
11. Zhao, L. et al. Enhancing the spatial resilience of agricultural heritage through constructing a balanced production-living-ecological space protection network. npj Herit. Sci. 13, 368 (2025).10.1038/s40494-025-01920-7 ↗
12. Holling, C. S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4, 1–23 (1973).10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245 ↗
13. Gunderson, L. H. & Holling, C. S. Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. (Washington, DC: Island Press, 2002).
14. Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Anderies, J. M. & Abel, N. From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what?. Ecosystems 4, 765–781 (2001).10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9 ↗
15. May, R. M. Stability in randomly fluctuating versus deterministic environments. Am. Nat. 107, 621–650 (1973).10.1086/282863 ↗
16. Pimm, S. L. The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Nature 307, 321–326 (1984).10.1038/307321a0 ↗
17. Scheffer, M. & Carpenter, S. R. Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: linking theory to observation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 648–656 (2003).10.1016/j.tree.2003.09.002 ↗
18. Meyer, K. A mathematical review of resilience in ecology. Nat. Resour. Model. 29, 339–352 (2016).10.1111/nrm.12097 ↗
19. Lindegren, M. et al. Early detection of ecosystem regime shifts: a multiple method evaluation for management application. PLoS ONE 7, e38410 (2012).10.1371/journal.pone.0038410 ↗
20. Gsell, A. S. et al. Evaluating early-warning indicators of critical transitions in natural aquatic ecosystems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, E8089–E8095 (2016).10.1073/pnas.1608242113 ↗
21. Arumugam, R., Guichard, F. & Lutscher, F. Early warning indicators capture catastrophic transitions driven by explicit rates of environmental change. Ecology 105, e4240 (2024).10.1002/ecy.4240 ↗
22. Dakos, V. et al. Methods for detecting early warnings of critical transitions in time series illustrated using simulated ecological data. PLoS ONE 7, e41010 (2012).10.1371/journal.pone.0041010 ↗
23. Lenton, T. M. Early warning of climate tipping points. Nat. Clim. Change 1, 201–209 (2011).10.1038/nclimate1143 ↗
24. Nazarimehr, F., Jafari, S., Perc, M. & Sprott, J. C. Critical slowing down indicators. Europhys. Lett. 132, 18001 (2020).10.1209/0295-5075/132/18001 ↗
25. Boulton, C. A., Lenton, T. M. & Boers, N. Pronounced loss of Amazon rainforest resilience since the early 2000s. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 271–278 (2022).10.1038/s41558-022-01287-8 ↗
26. Blaschke, L. L. et al. Spatial correlation increase in single-sensor satellite data reveals loss of Amazon rainforest resilience. Earth’s Future 12, e2023EF004040 (2024).10.1029/2023EF004040 ↗
27. Lv, X., Chen, G., Wang, Q. & Chen, T. Exploring the resilience of global vegetation ecosystem: Nonlinearity, driving forces, and management. J. Environ. Manag. 377, 124634 (2025).10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124634 ↗
28. Jacquin, A., Sheeren, D. & Lacombe, J. P. Vegetation cover degradation assessment in Madagascar savanna based on trend analysis of MODIS NDVI time series. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 12, S3–S10 (2010).
29. Eklundh, L. & Jönsson, P. TIMESAT: a software package for time-series processing and assessment of vegetation dynamics. Remote Sens. Time Ser. 22, 141–158 (2015).
30. Cleveland, R. B., Cleveland, W. S., McRae, J. E. & Terpenning, I. STL: a seasonal-trend decomposition. J. Off. Stat. 6, 3–73 (1990).
31. Verbesselt, J., Hyndman, R., Newnham, G. & Culvenor, D. Detecting trend and seasonal changes in satellite image time series. Remote Sens. Environ. 114, 106–115 (2010).10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.014 ↗
32. Bandara, K., Hyndman, R. J. & Bergmeir, C. MSTL: a seasonal-trend decomposition algorithm for time series with multiple seasonal patterns. Int. J. Oper. Res. 52, 79–98 (2025).10.1504/IJOR.2025.143957 ↗
33. Huang, Z. et al. Quantifying the spatiotemporal characteristics of multi-dimensional karst ecosystem stability with Landsat time series in southwest China. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 104, 102575 (2021).
34. Tan, L., Mu, M., Zhang, H., Wang, C. & Li, Y. Ecological and carbon footprint based sustainability of traditional polder heritage in Nanxun Huzhou China. npj Herit. Sci. 13, 330 (2025).10.1038/s40494-025-01846-0 ↗
35. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (2024).
36. Posit Software, PBC. RStudio: integrated development environment for R. (2024).
37. Xiang, Q. et al. The impact of grazing activities and environmental conditions on the stability of alpine grassland ecosystems. J. Environ. Manag. 360, 121176 (2024).10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121176 ↗
38. Zhang, Z. Variable selection with stepwise and best subset approaches. Ann. Transl. Med. 4, 136 (2016).10.21037/atm.2016.03.35 ↗
39. Wood, S. N. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2017).10.1201/9781315370279 ↗
40. Dormann, C. F. et al. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography 30, 609–628 (2007).10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05171.x ↗
41. Loreau, M., Mouquet, N. & Gonzalez, A. Biodiversity as spatial insurance in heterogeneous landscapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 12765–12770 (2003).10.1073/pnas.2235465100 ↗
42. Cumming, G. S. et al. An exploratory framework for the empirical measurement of resilience. Ecosystems 8, 975–987 (2005).10.1007/s10021-005-0129-z ↗
43. Shi, L. et al. Vegetation cover dynamics and resilience to climatic and hydrological disturbances in seasonal floodplain: the effects of hydrological connectivity. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 2196 (2017).10.3389/fpls.2017.02196 ↗
44. Mor, J. R. et al. Dam regulation and riverine food-web structure in a Mediterranean river. Sci. Total Environ. 625, 301–310 (2018).10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.296 ↗
45. Singh, R. B. & Kumar, A. Climate variability and water resource scarcity in drylands of Rajasthan, India. Geoenviron. Disasters 2, 7 (2015).10.1186/s40677-015-0018-5 ↗
46. Didan, K. MOD13A1 MODIS/Terra Vegetation Indices 16-Day L3 Global 500m SIN Grid V061. NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC. (2021).
47. Vermote, E. MOD09A1 MODIS/Terra Surface Reflectance 8-Day L3 Global 500m SIN Grid V061. NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC. (2021).
48. Yang, J. & Huang, X. The 30 m annual land cover datasets and its dynamics in China from 1985 to 2024 [Data set]. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13, 3907–3925 (2024).10.5194/essd-13-3907-2021 ↗
49. McGarigal, K., Cushman, S.A. & Ene, E. FRAGSTATS v4: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical and Continuous Maps. Computer Software Program Produced by the Authors at the University of Massachusetts (2012).
50. NASA JPL. NASA Shuttle Radar Topography Mission Global 1 arc second [Data set]. NASA Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center (2013).
51. Wang, Z., Shrestha, R. M., Román, M. O. & Kalb, V. L. VNP46A3 - VIIRS/NPP Lunar BRDF-Adjusted Nighttime Lights Monthly L3 Global 15 arc second Linear Lat Lon Grid (NPP VIIRS collection 1.0 (ArchiveSet 5000)). GEO Knowledge Hub (2022).