Dynamic response prediction and safety assessment of suspended ancient wooden structures under tourist-induced pedestrian loads
Source abstract
Abstract
Suspended ancient timber structures, characterized by complex construction and unique load-transfer mechanisms, are prone to pronounced dynamic responses under pedestrian walking loads. This study aims to systematically investigate the structural responses from both deterministic and stochastic perspectives. Graded vertical loading tests were conducted to reveal the mechanical behavior and safety redundancy of the structure under pedestrian loads. Based on a stochastic load model, a comprehensive crowd–structure interaction model was developed by incorporating step-frequency synchronization, spatial coherence, and weak crowd–structure coupling effects, enabling accurate prediction of vibration responses. Monte Carlo simulations were employed to evaluate dynamic responses and explore the nonlinear relationship between pedestrian numbers and structural behavior. A parametric prediction model with 95% accuracy was established, allowing reliable response prediction and safety warning. Finally, safety prediction and graded pedestrian control strategies are proposed to support refined protection, intelligent monitoring, and visitor management of such heritage structures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · Railway Engineering and Dynamics · Wood Treatment and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Rezende, F. et al. Evaluation of TMD performance in footbridges using human walking probabilistic models. Vibration 4(2), 323–340 (2021).10.3390/vibration4020021 ↗
2. Samuel, A. et al. Durability and protection of mass timber structures: a review. J. Build. Eng. 46, 103731 (2022).10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103731 ↗
3. Muhammad, Z. O. & Reynolds, P. Probabilistic multiple pedestrian walking force model including pedestrian inter-and intrasubject variabilities. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2020(1), 9093037 (2020).10.1155/2020/9093037 ↗
4. Cheraghi-Shirazi, N., Crews, K. & Malek, S. Review of vibration assessment methods for steel-timber composite floors. Buildings 12(12), 2061 (2022).10.3390/buildings12122061 ↗
5. Figueiredo, F. et al. A parametric study of composite footbridges under pedestrian walking loads. Eng. Struct. 30(3), 605–615 (2007).10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.04.021 ↗
6. Song Z. G. & Jin W. L. Peak acceleration response spectrum of long span floor vibration by pedestrian excitation. J. Build. Struct. 2004(02), 57–63+98 (2004).
7. Chen, J., Xu, R. & Zhang, M. Acceleration response spectrum for predicting floor vibration due to occupant walking. J. Sound Vib. 333(15), 3564–3579 (2014).10.1016/j.jsv.2014.03.023 ↗
8. Wang, J., Chen, J. & Yokoyama, Y. Spectral model for crowd walking load. J. Struct. Eng. 146(3), 04019220 (2020).10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002514 ↗
9. Basaglia, B. M., Li, J., Shrestha, R. & Crews, K. Response prediction to walking-induced vibrations of a long-span timber floor. J. Struct. Eng. 147(2), 04020326 (2021).10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002888 ↗
10. Bayat, E. & Tubino, F. Dynamic response of floors induced by a single walking pedestrian including walking path variability. Structures 46(2022), 1280–92 (2022).10.1016/j.istruc.2022.10.112 ↗
11. Cristoforo, D., Maria, A. A. & Francesco, R. Deterministic and probabilistic serviceability assessment of footbridge vibrations due to a single walker crossing. Shock Vib. 2018(2018), 1–26 (2018).
12. Picozzi, V., Avossa, A. & Ricciardelli, F. Probabilistic assessment of footbridge response to single walkers. Arch. Appl. Mech. 92(6), 1913–27 (2022).10.1007/s00419-022-02156-8 ↗
13. Abdeljaber, O. et al. A novel video-vibration monitoring system for walking pattern identification on floors. Adv. Eng. Softw. 139(2020), 102710 (2022).
14. Zhang, X. et al. Vibration of a U-shaped steel–concrete composite hollow waffle floor under human-induced excitations. Adv. Struct. Eng. 23(14), 2996–3008 (2020).10.1177/1369433220927278 ↗
15. Wang, C. & Shi, W. Optimal design and application of a multiple tuned mass damper system for an in-service footbridge. Sustainability 11(10), 1–20 (2019).10.3390/su11102801 ↗
16. He, W. & Xie, W. Characterization of stationary and walking people on vertical dynamic properties of a lively lightweight bridge. Struct. Control Health Monit. 25(3), 1–24 (2018).10.1002/stc.2123 ↗
17. Wang, C. et al. Predicting the human-induced vibration of cross laminated timber floor under multi-person loadings. Structures 29(2021), 65–78 (2021).10.1016/j.istruc.2020.10.074 ↗
18. Wang, J. et al. Spectral model for crowd walking load. J. Struct. Eng. 146(3), 04019220 (2020).10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002514 ↗
19. Mao, X. et al. Analysis of flood resistance of masonry arch bridges combining numerical simulation and probabilistic analysis. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 19(10), 1–14 (2024).
20. Georgakis, C. T. & Ingólfsson, E. T. Vertical footbridge vibrations: the response spectrum methodology. Proc. 3rd Int. Footbridge Conf. 2008(2008), 267–275 (2008).
21. Piccardo, G. & Tubino, F. Equivalent spectral model and maximum dynamic response for the serviceability analysis of footbridges. Eng. Struct. 40(2012), 445–456 (2012).10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.005 ↗
22. Bayat, E. & Tubino, F. Probabilistic assessment of the dynamic response of floors under multi-pedestrian walking loads. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 213, 111363 (2024).10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111363 ↗
23. Marta, G. et al. Bespoke footbridge for studying pedestrian–structure interaction with vertical vibration. J. Bridge Eng. 30(1), 11363 (2025).
24. Zhang, R. et al. A virtual reconstruction method for corridor gable buildings based on the knowledge of structural dynamics: taking Leiyin Cave as an example. Herit. Sci. 12(1), 316 (2024).10.1186/s40494-024-01430-y ↗
25. David, S. et al. Apparent and resistant section parametric modelling of timber structures in HBIM. J. Build. Eng. 49(2022), 103990 (2022).
26. Xu, F. et al. Experimental study on deformation characteristics of new prestressed subgrade under static and dynamic loads. Constr. Build. Mater. 447, 138123 (2024).10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138123 ↗
27. Tang, Z. et al. Numerical analysis of impact resistance mechanical properties of energy-absorbing columns under static and dynamic loads. Sci. Rep. 14(1), 25347 (2024).10.1038/s41598-024-75911-2 ↗
28. He F. T. et al. Research on step length estimation method for indoor navigation based on fuzzy logic. Electron. Technol. Appl. 42(11), 59–61+65 (2016).
29. Ingólfsson, E. T. et al. Experimental identification of pedestrian-induced lateral forces on footbridges. J. Sound Vib. 330(6), 1265–1284 (2011).10.1016/j.jsv.2010.09.034 ↗
30. Cao, D., Pan, Z. & Fang, Y. Dynamic response analysis of the floor structure under random crowd excitation. Shock Vib. 2024(1), 1451839 (2024).10.1155/2024/1451839 ↗
31. Liu, K. et al. Dynamic testing and numerical simulation of human-induced vibration of cantilevered floor with tuned mass dampers. Structures 34, 1475–1488 (2021).10.1016/j.istruc.2021.08.079 ↗