Early experiments in the making of Moravian ceramics in North Carolina c. 1770–1820
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The Moravian community settled in North Carolina in 1753, and local ceramic production soon began in Bethabara, with the opening of the first pottery workshop in 1756. However, by 1771, the main ceramic activity had moved to Salem. This study examines the exploratory approach to raw materials that characterised the work of the first two master potters: Gottfried Aust (1722–1788), who was trained in Europe, and Rudolf Christ (1750–1833), who trained under Aust. The extremely well-documented history of Moravian ceramic production allows us to trace the story of technological adaptation in changing geographical conditions. This paper highlights characteristics of the glazes through the analysis with X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry and cross-references those results with the archival written sources. This approach foregrounds the experimental nature of the medium in the hands of artist-practitioners, rather than seeks to challenge previous attributions or dating of specific pieces.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis · Moravian Church and William Blake · Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Pajer, J. Anabaptist Faience from Moravia 1593–1620: Catalogue of Documents from Institutional and Private Collections (Strážnice, 2011).
2. Kalinová, A. Anabaptist, Haban and Post-Haban Faience in the Moravian Museum (1600-1765) (Brno, 2017).
3. Balint, E. Anabaptist migration and the diffusion of the Maiolica from Faenza to Central Europe. Hist. Technol. 32, 131–152 (2014).10.5040/9781474210713.0012 ↗
4. Beckerdite, L. & Brown, J. Eighteenth-Century Earthenware from North Carolina: The Moravian Tradition Reconsidered. In Ceramics in America (eds. Hunter, S., Beckerdite L.) 3–67 (University of New England Press for the Chipstone Foundation, 2009).
5. Bivins, J. The Moravian Potters in North Carolina (Chapel Hill, 1972).
6. Records of the Moravians in North Carolina (ed. Fries, A.) 1–7 (Edwards & Broughton Print, 1922-1947).
7. Bivins, J. The Moravian Potters in North Carolina, 82 (Chapel Hill, 1972).
8. Born, B. A. Josiah Wedgwood’s Queensware. Metropolitan Mus. Art. Bull 22, 289–299 (1964).10.2307/3258221 ↗
9. Compton, S. C. North Carolina’s Moravian Potters: The Art and Mystery of Pottery-Making in Wachovia (America Through Time Press, 2019).
10. Bivins, J. The Moravian Potters in North Carolina, 236 (Chapel Hill, 1972).
11. Rauschenberg, B. Carl Eisenberg’s introduction of tin-glazed ceramics to Salem, North Carolina and evidence for early tin-glaze production elsewhere in North America. J. Early South. Decor. Arts 31, 45–104 (2005).
12. Owen, J. V. & Greenough, J. D. Mineralogical and geochemical characterization of eighteenth-century Moravian Pottery from North Carolina. In Ceramics in America, 168–187 (University of New England Press for the Chipstone Foundation, 2010).
13. Bivins, J. The Moravian Potters in North Carolina, 115 (Chapel Hill, 1972).
14. Sarnecka, Z. et al. Technical changes in the glaze composition of tin-glazed sculptures by Benedetto Buglioni c. 1490–1510. Archaeometry. 67, 984–1000 (2025).10.1111/arcm.13064 ↗
15. Pappalardo, G. et al. Non-destructive characterization of Della Robbia sculptures at the Bargello Museum in florence by the combined use of PIXE and XRF portable systems. J. Cultural Herit. 5, 183–189 (2004).10.1016/j.culher.2003.08.002 ↗
16. Zumbulyadis, N. & Van Thienen, V. Changes in the body, glaze and enamel compositions of early Meissen Porcelain, 1723–c. 1740. Archaeometry. 62, 22–41 (2020).10.1111/arcm.12502 ↗
17. Idjouadiene, L., Mostefaoui T. A., Djermoune, H. & Bonizzoni L. Application of X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy to provenance studies of Algerian archaeological pottery. X-Ray Spectrometry 48, 505–512 (2019).10.1002/xrs.3020 ↗
18. Bonizzoni, L., Galli, A., Gondola, M. & Martini, M. Comparison between XRF, TXRF, and PXRF analyses for provenance classification of archaeological bricks. X-Ray Spectrom. 42, 262–267 (2013).10.1002/xrs.2465 ↗
19. Micheletti, F. et al. The role of IRT in the archaeometric study of ancient glass through XRF and FORS. Microchem. J. 153, 104388 (2020).10.1016/j.microc.2019.104388 ↗
20. Pradell, T. et al. Metallic and non-metallic shine in luster: an elastic ion backscattering study. J. Appl. Phys. 101, 103518 (2007).10.1063/1.2734944 ↗
21. Kanngießer, B., Malzer, W., Mantouvalou, I., Sokaras, D. & Karydas, A. G. A deep view in cultural heritage - confocal micro X-ray spectroscopy for depth resolved elemental analysis. Appl. Phys. A 106, 325–338 (2012).10.1007/s00339-011-6698-0 ↗
22. Orsilli, J., Migliori, A., Padilla-Alvarez, R., Martini, M. & Galli, A. AR-XRF measurements and data treatment for the evaluation of gilding samples of cultural heritage. J. Anal. Spectrom. 38, 174–185 (2023).10.1039/D2JA00227B ↗
23. Brocchieri, J., Scialla, E. & Sabbarese, C. Estimation of Ag coating thickness by different methods using a handheld XRF instrument. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 486, 73–84 (2021).10.1016/j.nimb.2020.11.006 ↗
24. Trojek, T. Iterative Monte Carlo procedure for quantitative X-ray fluorescence analysis of copper alloys with a covering layer. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 167, 108294 (2020).10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.04.044 ↗
25. James, G. et al. An Introduction to Statistical Learning (Springer, 2013).10.1007/978-1-4614-7138-7 ↗
26. Bivins, J. The Moravian Potters in North Carolina, 24–25 (Chapel Hill, 1972).
27. The Moravian Archives, Winston-Salem, Aufseher Collegium minutes, Sept. 12 (1780).
28. The Moravian Archives, Winston-Salem, inv.no. R 701: 2 Inventories.
29. The Moravian Archives, Winston-Salem, inv.no. R 706: 9, c. 4 verso.
30. Kühn, H. Lead-tin yellow, artists’ pigments. In A Handbook of their History and Characteristics (ed. Roy A.) vol. 2, 85 (Washington: National Gallery of Art, 1993).
31. Caiger-Smith, A. Tin-glaze Pottery in Europe and the Islamic world. In The Tradition of 1000 years in Maiolica, Faience and Delftware, 225 (Faber and Faber, 1973).
32. Kloužková, A. et al. Multi‑methodical study of Early Modern Age archaeological glazed ceramics from Prague. Herit. Sci. 8, 82 (2020).10.1186/s40494-020-00423-x ↗
33. Sarnecka, Z. Multisensory perspectives on central European ceramics. Eur. History Quarterly 56, 67–95 (2026).10.1177/02656914251401755 ↗
34. The Moravian Archives, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA, inv.no. R 706: 9.
35. The Moravian Archives, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA, inv.no. R 706: 9., c. 2 verso.
36. DOA: 10.02.2026, https://www.ovnsaetterne.dk/.
37. Tite, M. S. et al. Lead glazes in antiquity—methods of production and reasons for use. Archaeometry 39, 241–260 (1997).
38. Pradell, T. & Molera, J. Ceramic technology. How to characterise ceramic glazes. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. 12, 198 (2020).10.1007/s12520-020-01136-9 ↗
39. Bivins, J. The Moravian Potters in North Carolina, 83 (Chapel Hill, 1972).
40. Brown, J. Tradition and Adaptation in Moravian Press-Molded Earthenware, Ceramics in America (eds. Hunter, S., Beckerdite L.) 105–138 (University of New England Press for the Chipstone Foundation, 2009).
41. The Moravian Archives, Winston-Salem, Correspondence from Frederic William Marshall to the Unity Vorsteher Collegium, Misc. (1793).
42. Bivins, J. The Moravian Potters in North Carolina, 84 (Chapel Hill, 1972).
43. Robert Hunter and Michelle Erickson, “Making a Moravian Faience Ring Bottle”, Ceramics in America, eds. R. Hunter and L. Beckerdite (Hanover, N.H.: University of New England Press for the Chipstone Foundation, 2009).
44. Bivins, J. The Moravian Potters in North Carolina, 120 (Chapel Hill, 1972).
45. Gmelin, J. F. Grundsätze der technischen Chemie (Halle, 1786).
46. Bivins, J. The Moravian Potters in North Carolina, 76 (Chapel Hill, 1972).
47. Aufseher Collegium minutes, Moravian Archives South, translation Erika Huber, Nov. 3 (1795).