Exploring virtual restoration of architectural heritage through a systematic review
Source abstract
Abstract
This study conducts a systematic review of 50 articles on virtual restoration of architectural heritage using the PRISMA framework. It proposes an integrated framework based on the analysis of technologies, methods, and platforms used across restoration stages. Future directions include expanding data sources and interdisciplinary integration, enhancing empirical validation, and exploring emerging technologies such as 4D restoration and AI-generated content to improve automation, intelligent reconstruction, and immersive restoration experiences.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · Conservation Techniques and Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (68)
Show source-provided references
1. Higueras, M., Calero, A. I. & Collado-Montero, F. J. Digital 3D modeling using photogrammetry and 3D printing applied to the restoration of a Hispano-Roman architectural ornament. Digit. Appl. Archaeol. Cult. Herit. 20, e00179 (2021).
2. Zhang, Z., Zou, Y. & Xiao, W. Exploration of a virtual restoration practice route for architectural heritage based on evidence-based design: a case study of the Bagong House. Herit. Sci. 11, 35 (2023).10.1186/s40494-023-00878-8 ↗
3. UNESCO Recommendation concerning the preservation of, and access to, documentary heritage including in digital form. https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/recommendation-concerning-preservation-and-access-documentary-heritage-including-digital-form (2015). Accessed 28 Nov 2024.
4. Hou, M. et al. Novel Method for Virtual Restoration of Cultural Relics with Complex Geometric Structure Based on Multiscale Spatial Geometry. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 7, 353 (2018).10.3390/ijgi7090353 ↗
5. Li, Y. et al. A review of the tools and techniques used in the digital preservation of architectural heritage within disaster cycles. Herit. Sci. 11, 199 (2023).10.1186/s40494-023-01035-x ↗
6. Mendoza, M. A. D., De La Hoz Franco, E. & Gómez, J. E. G. Technologies for the Preservation of Cultural Heritage—A Systematic Review of the Literature. Sustainability 15, 1059 (2023).10.3390/su15021059 ↗
7. Basu, A. et al. Digital Restoration of Cultural Heritage With Data-Driven Computing: A Survey. IEEE Access 11, 53939–53977 (2023).10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3280639 ↗
8. Mansuri, L. E. et al. A systematic mapping of BIM and digital technologies for architectural heritage. Smart Sustain Built Environ. 11, 1060–1080 (2022).10.1108/SASBE-11-2020-0171 ↗
9. Trillo, C., Aburamadan, R., Mubaideen, S., Salameen, D. & Makore, B. C. N. Towards a Systematic Approach to Digital Technologies for Heritage Conservation. Insights from Jordan. Preserv. Digit Technol. Cult. 49, 121–138 (2020).10.1515/pdtc-2020-0023 ↗
10. Zhao, X. A scientometric review of global BIM research: Analysis and visualization. Autom. Constr. 80, 37–47 (2017).10.1016/j.autcon.2017.04.002 ↗
11. Lame, G. Systematic literature reviews: An introduction. Proc. Int. Conf. Eng. Des. ICED 1:1633–1642 (2019).10.1017/dsi.2019.169 ↗
12. Nightingale, A. A guide to systematic literature reviews. Surgery 27, 381–384 (2009).
13. Zhang, D. et al. Study on sustainable urbanization literature based on Web of Science, scopus, and China national knowledge infrastructure: A scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. J. Clean. Prod. 264, 121537 (2020).10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121537 ↗
14. Harzing, A.-W. & Alakangas, S. Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics 106, 787–804 (2016).10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9 ↗
15. Page, M. J. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int. J. Surg. 88, 105906 (2021).10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906 ↗
16. Papadopoulou, E. E. & Papakonstantinou, A. Combining Drone LiDAR and Virtual Reality Geovisualizations towards a Cartographic Approach to Visualize Flooding Scenarios. Drones 8, 398 (2024).10.3390/drones8080398 ↗
17. Acke, L., Corradi, D. & Verlinden, J. Comprehensive educational framework on the application of 3D technologies for the restoration of cultural heritage objects. J. Cult. Herit. 66, 613–627 (2024).10.1016/j.culher.2024.01.013 ↗
18. Pietroni, E. & Ferdani, D. Virtual Restoration and Virtual Reconstruction in Cultural Heritage: Terminology, Methodologies, Visual Representation Techniques and Cognitive Models. Information 12, 167 (2021).10.3390/info12040167 ↗
19. Solla, M. et al. A Building Information Modeling Approach to Integrate Geomatic Data for the Documentation and Preservation of Cultural Heritage. Remote Sens. 12, 4028 (2020).10.3390/rs12244028 ↗
20. Matoušková, E., Pavelka, K., Smolík, T. & Pavelka, K. Earthen Jewish Architecture of Southern Morocco: Documentation of Unfired Brick Synagogues and Mellahs in the Drâa-Tafilalet Region. Appl. Sci. 11, 1712 (2021).10.3390/app11041712 ↗
21. Reinoso-Gordo, J. F., Rodríguez-Moreno, C., Gómez-Blanco, A. J. & León-Robles, C. Cultural Heritage Conservation and Sustainability Based on Surveying and Modeling: The Case of the 14th Century Building Corral del Carbón (Granada, Spain). Sustainability 10, 1370 (2018).10.3390/su10051370 ↗
22. Di Filippo, A. et al. Use of a Wearable Mobile Laser System in Seamless Indoor 3D Mapping of a Complex Historical Site. Remote Sens. 10, 1897 (2018).10.3390/rs10121897 ↗
23. Cozzolino, M, et al. Combined use of 3D metric surveys and non-invasive geophysical surveys for the determination of the state of conservation of the Stylite Tower (Umm ar-Rasas, Jordan). Ann. Geophys. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-8060 (2019).10.4401/ag-8060 ↗
24. Fadli, F. & AlSaeed, M. Digitizing Vanishing Architectural Heritage; The Design and Development of Qatar Historic Buildings Information Modeling [Q-HBIM] Platform. Sustainability 11, 2501 (2019).10.3390/su11092501 ↗
25. Giuliani, F., Gaglio, F., Martino, M. & De Falco, A. A HBIM pipeline for the conservation of large-scale architectural heritage: the city Walls of Pisa. Herit. Sci. 12, 35 (2024).10.1186/s40494-024-01141-4 ↗
26. Chen, Y., Wu, Y., Sun, X., Ali, N. & Zhou, Q. Digital Documentation and Conservation of Architectural Heritage Information: An Application in Modern Chinese Architecture. Sustainability 15, 7276 (2023).10.3390/su15097276 ↗
27. Taraben, J. & Morgenthal, G. Integration and Comparison Methods for Multitemporal Image-Based 2D Annotations in Linked 3D Building Documentation. Remote Sens. 14, 2286 (2022).10.3390/rs14092286 ↗
28. Al-Bayari, O. & Shatnawi, N. Geomatics techniques and building information model for historical buildings conservation and restoration. Egypt J. Remote Sens. Sp. Sci. 25, 563–568 (2022).
29. Moraitou, E. et al. Supporting the Conservation and Restoration OpenLab of the Acropolis of Ancient Tiryns through Data Modelling and Exploitation of Digital Media. Computers 12, 96 (2023).10.3390/computers12050096 ↗
30. Rodríguez-Gonzálvez, P., Guerra Campo, Á., Muñoz-Nieto, Á., Sánchez-Aparicio, L. & González-Aguilera, D. Diachronic Reconstruction and Visualization of Lost Cultural Heritage Sites. ISPRS Int. J. Geo. Inf. 8, 61 (2019).10.3390/ijgi8020061 ↗
31. Malagnino, A., Mangialardi, G., Zavarise, G. & Corallo, A. Process modeling for historical buildings restoration: an innovation in the management of cultural heritage. ACTA IMEKO 7, 95 (2018).10.21014/acta_imeko.v7i3.602 ↗
32. Lauro, V., Giovannangelo, M., De Riggi, M., Lanzaro, N. & Murtas, V. R.A.O. Project Recovery: Methods and Approaches for the Recovery of a Photographic Archive for the Creation of a Photogrammetric Survey of a Site Unreachable over Time. Heritage 6, 4710–4721 (2023).10.3390/heritage6060250 ↗
33. Zhang, C., Deng, K., Yan, D., Mao, J. & Yang, X. Research on Multi-Source Image Fusion Technology in the Digital Reconstruction of Classical Garden and Ancient Buildings. Int. Rev. Spat. Plan Sustain. Dev. 11, 116–116 (2023).10.14246/irspsd.11.3_116 ↗
34. Ortiz-Zamora, F. J. et al. Realidad aumentada aplicada a la recuperación del patrimonio histórico. DYNA-Ing.ía e Ind. 98, 86–90 (2023).
35. Abergel, V., Manuel, A., Pamart, A., Cao, I. & De Luca, L. Aïoli: A reality-based 3D annotation cloud platform for the collaborative documentation of cultural heritage artefacts. Digit. Appl. Archaeol. Cult. Herit. 30, e00285 (2023).
36. Santini, S., Canciani, M., Borghese, V., Sabbatini, V. & Sebastiani, C. From Digital Restitution to Structural Analysis of a Historical Adobe Building: The Escuela José Mariano Méndez in El Salvador. Heritage 6, 4362–4379 (2023).10.3390/heritage6050231 ↗
37. Karasaka, L. & Ulutas, N. Point Cloud-Based Historical Building Information Modeling (H-BIM) in Urban Heritage Documentation Studies. Sustainability 15, 10726 (2023).10.3390/su151310726 ↗
38. Altadonna, A., Cucinotta, F., Raffaele, M., Salmeri, F. & Sfravara, F. Environmental Impact Assessment of Different Manufacturing Technologies Oriented to Architectonic Recovery and Conservation of Cultural Heritage. Sustainability 15, 13487 (2023).10.3390/su151813487 ↗
39. Romanova, I. A. & Poluboyarova N. M. The Virtual Reconstruction of Historical and Cultural Heritage Monuments of the Vodyansky Settlement. Sci. Vis. https://doi.org/10.26583/sv.13.3.02 (2021).10.26583/sv.13.3.02 ↗
40. Bruno, S. et al. VERBUM – virtual enhanced reality for building modelling (virtual technical tour in digital twins for building conservation). J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 27, 20–47 (2022).
41. Fiorini, G., Friso, I. & Balletti, C. A Geomatic Approach to the Preservation and 3D Communication of Urban Cultural Heritage for the History of the City: The Journey of Napoleon in Venice. Remote Sens 14, 3242 (2022).10.3390/rs14143242 ↗
42. Saura-Gómez, P., Spairani-Berrio, Y., Huesca-Tortosa, J. A., Spairani-Berrio, S. & Rizo-Maestre, C. Advances in the Restoration of Buildings with LIDAR Technology and 3D Reconstruction: Forged and Vaults of the Refectory of Santo Domingo de Orihuela (16th Century). Appl. Sci. 11, 8541 (2021).10.3390/app11188541 ↗
43. Fanini, B., Ferdani, D. & Demetrescu, E. Temporal Lensing: An Interactive and Scalable Technique for Web3D/WebXR Applications in Cultural Heritage. Heritage 4, 710–724 (2021).10.3390/heritage4020040 ↗
44. Lercari, N. et al. Building Cultural Heritage Resilience through Remote Sensing: An Integrated Approach Using Multi-Temporal Site Monitoring, Datafication, and Web-GL Visualization. Remote Sens. 13, 4130 (2021).10.3390/rs13204130 ↗
45. Grama, V. et al. Digital Technologies Role in the Preservation of Jewish Cultural Heritage: Case Study Heyman House, Oradea, Romania. Buildings 12, 1617 (2022).10.3390/buildings12101617 ↗
46. Giuffrida, D. et al. The Church of S. Maria Delle Palate in Tusa (Messina, Italy): Digitization and Diagnostics for a New Model of Enjoyment. Remote Sens. 14, 1490 (2022).10.3390/rs14061490 ↗
47. Petrovič, D., Grigillo, D., Kosmatin Fras, M., Urbančič, T. & Kozmus Trajkovski, K. Geodetic Methods for Documenting and Modelling Cultural Heritage Objects. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 15, 885–896 (2021).10.1080/15583058.2019.1683779 ↗
48. Pinti, L. & Bonelli, S. A Methodological Framework to Optimize Data Management Costs and the Hand-Over Phase in Cultural Heritage Projects. Buildings 12, 1360 (2022).10.3390/buildings12091360 ↗
49. Giuffrida, D. et al. A Multi-Analytical Study for the Enhancement and Accessibility of Archaeological Heritage: The Churches of San Nicola and San Basilio in Motta Sant’Agata (RC, Italy). Remote Sens. 13, 3738 (2021).10.3390/rs13183738 ↗
50. Simou, S., Baba, K. & Nounah, A. The integration of 3D technology for the conservation and restoration of ruined archaeological artifacts. Hist. Sci. Technol. 12, 150–168 (2022).10.32703/2415-7422-2022-12-1-150-168 ↗
51. Elhalawani, M. A., Zeidan, Z. M. & Beshr, A. A. A. Implementation of close range photogrammetry using modern non-metric digital cameras for architectural documentation. Geod. Cartogr. 47, 45–53 (2021).10.3846/gac.2021.11269 ↗
52. Castán, M. Q. & Hernández, L. A. 3D survey and virtual reconstruction of heritage. The case study of the City Council and Lonja of Alcañiz. Vitr. Int. J. Arch. Technol. Sustain 6, 12–25 (2021).
53. Croce, V., Caroti, G., Piemonte, A. & Bevilacqua, M. G. From survey to semantic representation for Cultural Heritage: the 3D modeling of recurring architectural elements. ACTA IMEKO 10, 98 (2021).10.21014/acta_imeko.v10i1.842 ↗
54. Matrone, F. & Martini, M. Transfer learning and performance enhancement techniques for deep semantic segmentation of built heritage point clouds. Virtual Archaeol. Rev. 12, 73 (2021).10.4995/var.2021.15318 ↗
55. Vázquez de Ágredos Pascual, M. L. et al. 3D Model Acquisition and Image Processing for the Virtual Musealization of the Spezieria di Santa Maria della Scala, Rome. Heritage 5, 1253–1275 (2022).10.3390/heritage5020065 ↗
56. Chen, S., Yang, H., Wang, S. & Hu, Q. Surveying and Digital Restoration of Towering Architectural Heritage in Harsh Environments: a Case Study of the Millennium Ancient Watchtower in Tibet. Sustainability 10, 3138 (2018).10.3390/su10093138 ↗
57. Walmsley, A. P. & Kersten, T. P. The Imperial Cathedral in Königslutter (Germany) as an Immersive Experience in Virtual Reality with Integrated 360° Panoramic Photography. Appl. Sci. 10, 1517 (2020).10.3390/app10041517 ↗
58. Soto-Martin, O., Fuentes-Porto, A. & Martin-Gutierrez, J. A Digital Reconstruction of a Historical Building and Virtual Reintegration of Mural Paintings to Create an Interactive and Immersive Experience in Virtual Reality. Appl. Sci. 10, 597 (2020).10.3390/app10020597 ↗
59. Delegou, E. T., Mourgi, G., Tsilimantou, E., Ioannidis, C. & Moropoulou, A. A Multidisciplinary Approach for Historic Buildings Diagnosis: The Case Study of the Kaisariani Monastery. Heritage 2, 1211–1232 (2019).10.3390/heritage2020079 ↗
60. Sestras, P. et al. Feasibility Assessments Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Technology in Heritage Buildings: Rehabilitation-Restoration, Spatial Analysis and Tourism Potential Analysis. Sensors 20, 2054 (2020).10.3390/s20072054 ↗
61. Messaoudi, T., Véron, P., Halin, G. & De Luca, L. An ontological model for the reality-based 3D annotation of heritage building conservation state. J. Cult. Herit. 29, 100–112 (2018).10.1016/j.culher.2017.05.017 ↗
62. Nabiev, A. S., Nurkusheva, L. T., Suleimenova, K. K., Sadvokasova, G. K. & Imanbaeva, Z. A. Virtual Reconstruction of Historical Architectural Monuments: Methods and Technologies. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor Eng. 8, 3880–3887 (2019).10.35940/ijitee.J9901.0881019 ↗
63. Bakhareva, O. & Kordonchik, D. Investments in preservation and development of regional cultural heritage: a library of BIM elements representing national architectural and urban-planning landmarks. Arch. Eng. 4, 39–48 (2019).
64. Turillazzi, B. et al. Heritage-led Ontologies: Digital Platform for Supporting the Regeneration of Cultural and Historical Sites. WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 249, 307–318 (2020).10.2495/SC200261 ↗
65. Andriasyan, M., Moyano, J., Nieto-Julián, J. E. & Antón, D. From Point Cloud Data to Building Information Modelling: An Automatic Parametric Workflow for Heritage. Remote Sens. 12, 1094 (2020).10.3390/rs12071094 ↗
66. Alsadik, B., Abdulateef, N. A. & Khalaf, Y. H. Out of Plumb Assessment for Cylindrical-Like Minaret Structures Using Geometric Primitives Fitting. ISPRS Int. J. Geo. Inf. 8, 64 (2019).10.3390/ijgi8020064 ↗
67. Martins, G. D., de Oliveira, H. C., de Gallis, R. A. B. & Vaz, D. V. Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Photogrammetric Model from Low-Cost Digital Camera Applied in the Cultural Heritage Registry. Anu. do Inst. Geocienc. 42, 338–348 (2019).10.11137/2019_4_338_348 ↗
68. Portalés, C., Alonso-Monasterio, P. & Viñals, M. J. Reconstrucción virtual y visualización 3d del yacimiento arqueológico Castellet de Bernabé (Lliria, España). Virtual Archaeol. Rev. 8, 75 (2017).10.4995/var.2017.5890 ↗