Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of archaeological and modern wood tar
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Wood tars were historically valued for their versatile applications, stemming from their complex chemical composition. This study investigated the structure, composition, and properties of wood tars produced via traditional methods, both contemporary and archaeological. The analysis employed a multi-faceted approach using TGA, FT-IR ATR, Py-GC/MS, and ICP MS, while antioxidant activity was evaluated through DPPH and FRAP tests. The results demonstrate that combining these techniques provides a comprehensive profile of the chemical components responsible for redox reactions. The research confirms that wood tars produced hundreds of years ago retain their antioxidant properties, though they also contain components classified as hazardous. Understanding these relationships allows for a better explanation of the presence or absence of antioxidant activity in different tar samples. The study concludes that the synergy of organic functional groups and specific chemical elements determines the overall functional value of wood tar.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Sabatini, L., Palma, F., Giorgi, L., Andreazzo, L. & Campana, R. Isolation and molecular identification of a strain belonging to the new species Zalaria obscura from a deteriorated wooden artwork. Braz. J. Microbiol. 51, 1241–1246 (2020).10.1007/s42770-020-00255-8 ↗
2. Ninich, O. et al. Plant sources, techniques of production and uses of tar: a review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 285, 114889 (2022).10.1016/j.jep.2021.114889 ↗
3. Czopek, S. Beitrag zum Wissen über Holzteer- und Holzpechherstellung auf dem Gebiet Südpolens im 18.–19.Jh. In Proc. First International Symposium on Wood Tar and Pitch Held by the Biskupin Museum (Department of the State Archaeological Museum in Warsaw) and the Museumsdorf Döppel (Berlin) at Biskupin Museum, Warszawa (eds Brzeziński, W. & Piotrowski, W.) 342 (State Archaeological Museum, 1993).
4. Kurt, Y., Kaçar, M. S. & Isik, K. Traditional tar production from Cedrus libani A. Rich on the Taurus Mountains in Southern Turkey. Econ. Bot. 62, 615–620 http://www.jstor.org/stable/40390394 (2008).10.1007/s12231-008-9023-x ↗
5. Van Gijn, A. L. Birch bark tar, Schipluiden: a neolithic settlement on the Dutch North Sea Coast c. 3500 Cal Bc. 261–266. Faculty of Archeology, Leiden University (2006).
6. Urem-Kotsou, D., Stern, B., Heron, C. & Kotsakis, K. Birch-bark tar at Neolithic Makriyalos, Greece. Antiquity 76, 962–967 (2002).10.1017/S0003598X00091766 ↗
7. Ribechini, E., Bacchiocchi, M., Deviese, T. & Colombini, M. P. Analytical pyrolysis with in situ thermally assisted derivatisation, Py (HMDS)-GC/MS, for the chemical characterization of archaeological birch bark tar. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 91, 219–223 (2011).10.1016/j.jaap.2011.02.011 ↗
8. Rageot, M. et al. Exploitation of beehive products, plant exudates and tars in Corsica during the Early Iron Age. Archaeometry 58, 315–332 (2016).10.1111/arcm.12172 ↗
9. Nordby, C. Continuity or change? The use and function of birch bark tar in Norwegian Early Iron Age. in Holding It All Together: Ancient and Modern Approaches to Joining, Repair and Consolidation (eds Ambers, J., Higgitt, C., Harrison, L. & Saunders, D.) 54–60 (Archetype Publications, 2008).
10. Koller, J., Baumer, U. & Mania, D. High-tech in the middle Palaeolithic: Neandertal-manufactured pitch identified. Eur. J. Archaeol. 4, 385–397 (2001).10.1179/eja.2001.4.3.385 ↗
11. Grünberg, J. M. Weißmüller, Wolfgang, Sesselfelsgrotte II. Die Silexartefakte der Unteren Schichten der Sesselfelsgrotte. Ein Beitrag zum Problem des Moustérien. Jahresschr. Mitteldtsch. Vorgesch. 81, 471–475 (1999).
12. Samsonowicz, H. Rzemiosło wiejskie w Polsce XIV-XVII w (Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1954).
13. Pietrzak, S. Wood tar in the Dnieper and Elbe communities: vi–ii millenium bc. Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań (ed. Kośko, A.) (2012).
14. Richert, A., Malinowski, R., Ringwelska, M. & Dąbrowska, G. B. Birch tar introduced into polylactide and its influence on the barrier, thermal, functional and biological properties of the film obtained by industrial extrusion. Materials 15, 7382 (2022).10.3390/ma15207382 ↗
15. Richert, A., Olewnik-Kruszkowska, E., Dąbrowska, G. B. & Dąbrowski, H. P. The role of birch tar in changing the physicochemical and biocidal properties of polylactide-based films. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 268 (2021).10.3390/ijms23010268 ↗
16. Hagner, M., Pasanen, T. & Lindqvist, B. Effects of birch tar oils on soil organisms and plants. Agric. Food Sci. 19, 13–23 (2010).10.2137/145960610791015096 ↗
17. Hagner, M., Penttinen, O.-P., Pasanen, T., Tiilikkala, K. & Setälä, H. Acute toxicity of birch tar oil on aquatic organisms. Agr. Food Sci. 19, 24–33 (2010).10.2137/145960610791015023 ↗
18. Lindqvist, I., Lindqvist, B. & Tiilikkala, K. Birch tar oil is an effective mollusc repellent: field and laboratory experiments using Arianta arbustorum (Gastropoda: Helicidae) and Arion lusitanicus (Gastropoda: Arionidae). Agric. Food Sci. 19, 1–12 (2010).10.2137/145960610791015050 ↗
19. Nash, B. J. Economic history: tar and turpentine. Econ. Focus 15, 45–47 (2011).
20. Paghdal, K. V. & Schwartz, R. A. Topical tar: back to the future. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 61, 294–302 (2009).10.1016/j.jaad.2008.11.024 ↗
21. Roelofzen, J. H. J. et al. Coal tar in dermatology. J. Dermatol. Treat. 18, 329–334 (2007).10.1080/09546630701496347 ↗
22. Piotrowski, W. Birch bark tar and wood pitch in old Polish proverbs and sayings. In Proc. First International Symposium on Wood Tar and Pitch Held by the Biskupin Museum (Department of the State Archaeological Museum in Warsaw) and the Museumsdorf Döppel (Berlin) at Biskupin Museum, Warszawa (eds Brzeziński W. & Piotrowski W.) 342 (State Archaeological Museum, 1993).
23. Guillen, M. D., Iglesias, M. J., Dominguez, A. & Blanco, C. G. Semi-quantitative FTIR analysis of a coal tar pitch and its extracts and residues in several organic solvents. Energy Fuels 6, 518–525 (1992).10.1021/ef00034a025 ↗
24. Alcañiz-Monge, J., Cazorla-Amorós, D. & Linares-Solano, A. Characterisation of coal tar pitches by thermal analysis, infrared spectroscopy and solvent fractionation. Fuel 80, 41–48 (2001).10.1016/S0016-2361(00)00057-0 ↗
25. Sarohia, G. S., Ghuman, H. S., James, A. K., Thring, R. W. & Plourde, G. L. Characterization of tar from wood pellet production. Int. J. Chem. 6, 1 (2014.10.5539/ijc.v6n4p1 ↗
26. Vahur, S., Kriiska, A. & Leito, I. Investigation of the adhesive residue on the flint insert and the adhesive lump found from the Pulli Early Mesolithic settlement site (Estonia) by micro-ATR-FT-IR spectroscopy. Est. J. Archaeol. 15, 3 (2011).10.3176/arch.2011.1.01 ↗
27. Stacey, R. J. et al. Birch bark tar in early Medieval England—continuity of tradition or technological revival? J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 29, 102118 (2020).
28. Ribechini, E., Orsini, S., Silvano, F. & Colombini, M. P. Py-G.C/MS, GC/MS and FTIR investigations on LATE Roman-Egyptian adhesives from opus sectile: new insights into ancient recipes and technologies. Anal. Chim. Acta 638, 79–87 (2009).10.1016/j.aca.2009.02.004 ↗
29. Mazza, P. P. A. et al. A new Palaeolithic discovery: tar-hafted stone tools in a European Mid-Pleistocene bone-bearing bed. J. Archaeol. Sci. 33, 1310–1318 (2006).10.1016/j.jas.2006.01.006 ↗
30. Duce, C. et al. Thermal degradation chemistry of archaeological pine pitch containing beeswax as an additive. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 111, 254–264 (2015).10.1016/j.jaap.2014.10.020 ↗
31. Yang, B. S. et al. Characteristics of wood tar produced as byproduct from two types of the kiln in the manufacture of oak charcoal. J. Korean Wood Sci. Technol. 45, 772–786 (2017).10.5658/WOOD.2017.45.6.772 ↗
32. Barnes, T. M. & Greive, K. A. Topical pine tar: history, properties and use as a treatment for common skin conditions. Australas. J. Dermatol. 58, 80–85 (2017).10.1111/ajd.12427 ↗
33. Jaouadi, I. et al. Chemical variability and antioxidant activity of Cedrus atlantica Manetti essential oils isolated from wood tar and sawdust. Arab. J. Chem. 14, 103441 (2021).10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103441 ↗
34. Degen, I. A. Detection of the methoxyl group by infrared spectroscopy. Appl. Spectrosc. 22, 164–166 (1968).10.1366/000370268774383444 ↗
35. Smith, B. The CO bond III: ethers by a knockout. Spectroscopy 32, 22–26 (2017).
36. Jennings, K. R. Spectrometric identification of organic compounds. In Mass Spectrom 5th edn, Vol. 26 (eds Silverstein, R. M., Bassler, G. C. & Morrill, T. C.) 813–813. https://doi.org/10.1002/oms.1210260923 (Wiley, New York, 1991).10.1002/oms.1210260923 ↗
37. Burger, P., Stacey, R. J., Bowden, S. A., Hacke, M. & Parnell, J. Identification, geochemical characterisation and significance of bitumen among the grave goods of the 7th Century Mound 1 Ship-Burial at Sutton Hoo (Suffolk, UK). PLoS ONE 11, e0166276 (2016).10.1371/journal.pone.0166276 ↗
38. Kobus-Cisowska, J. et al. Variability of Hordeum vulgare L. cultivars in yield, antioxidant potential, and cholinesterase inhibitory activity. Sustainability 12, 1938 (2020).10.3390/su12051938 ↗
39. Olatunji, O. O., Akinlabi, S. A., Mashinini, M. P., Fatoba, S. O. & Ajayi, O. O. Thermo-gravimetric characterization of biomass properties: a review. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 423, 012175 (2018).10.1088/1757-899X/423/1/012175 ↗
40. Acquah, G. E. et al. Chemometric modeling of thermogravimetric data for the compositional analysis of forest biomass. PLoS ONE 12, e0172999 (2017).10.1371/journal.pone.0172999 ↗
41. Coats, A. W. & Redfern, J. P. Thermogravimetric analysis. A review. Analyst 88, 906 (1963).10.1039/an9638800906 ↗
42. Ross, J. A. & Kasum, C. M. Dietary flavonoids: bioavailability, metabolic effects, and safety. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 22, 19–34 (2002).10.1146/annurev.nutr.22.111401.144957 ↗
43. Ivanova, A., Gerasimova, E. & Gazizullina, E. Study of antioxidant properties of agents from the perspective of their action mechanisms. Molecules 25, 4251 (2020).10.3390/molecules25184251 ↗
44. Lin, R.-C., Mohamed, M. G., Chen, T. & Kuo, S.-W. Coumarin-and carboxyl-functionalized supramolecular polybenzoxazines form miscible blends with polyvinylpyrrolidone. Polymers 9, 146 (2017).10.3390/polym9040146 ↗
45. Durairaj, N. & Kalainathan, S. Growth and characterization of stilbene doped bibenzyl scintillator crystal by solution growth technique. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 29, 10480–10486 (2018).10.1007/s10854-018-9112-2 ↗
46. Krekora, M., Markiewicz, K. H., Wilczewska, A. Z. & Nawrocka, A. Raman and thermal (TGA and DSC) studies of gluten proteins supplemented with flavonoids and their glycosides. J. Cereal Sci. 111, 103672 (2023).10.1016/j.jcs.2023.103672 ↗
47. Banjarnahor, S. D. S. & Artanti, N. Antioxidant properties of flavonoids. Med. J. Indones. 23, 239–244 (2015).10.13181/mji.v23i4.1015 ↗
48. Parcheta, M. et al. Recent developments in effective antioxidants: The structure and antioxidant properties. Materials 14, 1984 (2021).10.3390/ma14081984 ↗
49. Foti, M. C., Daquino, C., Mackie, I. D., DiLabio, G. A. & Ingold, K. U. Reaction of phenols with the 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical. Kinetics and DFT calculations applied to determine ArO-H bond dissociation enthalpies and reaction mechanism. J. Org. Chem. 73, 9270–9282 (2008).10.1021/jo8016555 ↗
50. Assimopoulou, A. N., Zlatanos, S. N. & Papageorgiou, V. P. Antioxidant activity of natural resins and bioactive triterpenes in oil substrates. Food Chem. 92, 721–727 (2005).10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.08.033 ↗
51. Wołonciej, M., Milewska, E. & Roszkowska-Jakimiec, W. Pierwiastki śladowe jako aktywatory enzymów antyoksydacyjnych. Postepy Hig. Med. Dosw. 70, 1483–1498 (2016).10.5604/17322693.1229074 ↗
52. Antolovich, M., Prenzler, P. D., Patsalides, E., McDonald, S. & Robards, K. Methods for testing antioxidant activity. Analyst 127, 183–198 (2002).10.1039/b009171p ↗