Combined approaches of techno-functional and use-wear analysis indicated diverse reuse behaviors of polished bevelled stone tools of Zoumaling site (5500–3900 cal BP), central China
Source abstract
Abstract
Although research on ground stone tools has increasingly embraced multidisciplinary approaches over the years, studies on polished stone axes and adzes still lack deeper and dynamic analysis. This paper presents a study of the function and reuse of polished bevelled stone tools from Zoumaling, a walled-town Neolithic Site in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River. Through the combination of the two approaches of techno-functional and use-wear analysis, we conclude that the polished bevelled stone tools here are highly used for woodworking, along with processing other objects of medium to high hardness and vegetal materials, demonstrating a flexible strategy. Two different types of reuse—modification and repair—were applied, indicating stable consciousness of reuse and focus on balancing efficiency and cost in tool maintenance. The ancient humans here had clear planning, skilled production techniques, flexible use and diverse reuse behaviours for polished bevelled stone tools.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology · Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. He, C., Wei, X. & Li, Y. Overview of the “Neolithic” research method (in Chinese). Jianghan Archaeol. 06, 268–277 (2021).
2. Adams, J. L. Ground stone use-wear analysis: a review of terminology and experimental methods. J. Archaeol. Sci. 48, 129–138 (2014).10.1016/j.jas.2013.01.030 ↗
3. Dubreuil, L., Hayden, B., Bofill, M. & Robitaille, J. Pounding, grinding, transitioning. A use-wear perspective. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 47, 103743 (2023).
4. Hamon, C. Use-wear analysis of grinding tools and the exploration of plant processing in the Neolithic of Europe: state of the art and perspectives. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 43, 103471 (2022).
5. Wright, K. A classification system for ground stone tools from the prehistoric Levant. Paléorient 18, 53–81 (1992).10.3406/paleo.1992.4573 ↗
6. Masclans, A. et al. Use-wear analysis of Neolithic polished axes and adzes: the site of “Bòbila Madurell-Can Gambús-1-2” (Northeast Iberian Peninsula). Quat. Int. 427, 158–174 (2017).10.1016/j.quaint.2015.12.064 ↗
7. Masclans, A., Palomo, A. & Gibaja, J. Functional studies of Neolithic stone axes and adzes. Experimental program and archaeological applications. Cuad. Prehist. Arqueol. Univ. Granada 27, 177–210 (2017).10.30827/cpag.v27i0.8181 ↗
8. Huang, J. Commentary on foreign research of polished stone axes and adzes (in Chinese). Southeast Cult. 02, 113–117 (2010).
9. Dimić, V. The use of polished stone axes and adzes in the Neolithic of Serbia-experimental research. In Proc. International Scientific Conference Methodology & Archaeometry, Zagreb, 1st- 2nd December 2022: Book of Abstracts (ed. Miloglav, I) 42–43 (Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences of the University of Zagreb, 2022).
10. Sahara, M. A Story of Axes (University of Tokyo Press, 1994).
11. Semenov, S. A. Prehistoric Technology: An Experimental Study of The Oldest Tools and Artefacts From Traces of Manufacture and Wear (Adams & Dart, 1970).
12. Odell, G. H. The application of micro-wear analysis to the lithic component of an entire prehistoric settlement: methods, problems and functional reconstructions (PhD thesis). Harvard University (1977).
13. Keeley, L. H. Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses: A Microwear Analysis (University of Chicago Press, 1980).
14. Roy, A., Crellin, R. J. & Harris, O. J. T. Use-wear analysis reveals the first direct evidence for the use of Neolithic polished stone axes in Britain. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 49, 103882 (2023).
15. Zhuang, L. New trends and methods in the study of domestic ground stone tools in the last two decades (in Chinese). A Collect. Stud. Archaeol. 03, 626–637 (2022).
16. Yang, K. A study on the stone industries of Liaoxi region during the prehistoric period (in Chinese) (PhD thesis). Jilin University (2016).
17. Cui, Q. The study of lithic assemblage at Jiahu site, Henan Province (in Chinese) (PhD thesis). University of Science and Technology of China (2018).
18. Gao, P. On Stone Implements from Tenghualuo Site (in Chinese) (PhD thesis). Nanjing University (2018).
19. Huang, K. Study on the process of utilization and abandonment of the stone implements unearthed in the Cuntou site, Dongguan (in Chinese). Cult. Relics South. China 04, 136–154 (2019).
20. Chen, G. Briefing on the excavation of the Neolithic site of Zoumaling, Shishou City, Hubei Province, China (in Chinese). Archaeology 04, 16–38 (1998).
21. Shan, S. et al. The emergence of walled towns in prehistoric middle Yangtze River valley: excavations at the Zoumaling site. Archaeol. Res. Asia 26, 100285 (2021).
22. Department of Archaeology, School of History, Wuhan University & Zoumaling Archaeological Park Management Office, Shishou City. The excavation of the Zhoumaling city site of the Neolithic Age in Shishou City, Hubei (in Chinese). Archaeology 09, 3-4+126+5–24+2 (2018).
23. School of History, Wuhan University & Zoumaling Archaeological Site Park Center. Brief report of the 2018 excavation in the northern section of the inner town of Zoumaling in Shishou of Hubei (in Chinese). Jianghan Archaeol. 04, 5–23 (2024).
24. Li, T. et al. Compositional study of household ceramic assemblages from a Late Neolithic (5300–4500 cal BP) earthen walled-town in the middle Yangtze River valley of China. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 39, 103159 (2021).
25. Tang, L. et al. The identification and study of prehistoric plant remains from the Zoumaling Site in Shishou, Hubei (in Chinese). Jianghan Archaeol. 13, 511 (2021).
26. He, C. Analysis on the provenance of lithic materials at Zoumaling site, Shishou City, Hubei Province (in Chinese). Sichuan Cult. Relics 06, 43–51 (2021).
27. He, C. Analysis of lithic artefacts from Zoumaling site in Shishou, Hubei province (in Chinese) (Master’s thesis). Wuhan University (2022).
28. Wang, F. Starch grains analysis of stone tools from Zoumaling site, Hubei Province (in Chinese) (Master’s thesis). Wuhan University (2024).
29. Boëda, E. Techno-logique & Technologie Une Paléo-histoire des Objets Lithiques Tranchants (@rchéo-éditions.com, 2013).
30. Boëda, E. Determination des unités tecno-fonctinelles de pièces bifaciales provenant de la couche acheuléenne C'3 Base du site de Barbas I. In Proc. Les Industries à Outils Bifaciaux du Paléolithique Moyen d’Europe Occidentale (ed. Cliquet, D.) 51–76 (ERAUL, 2001).
31. Delpiano, D. & Uthmeier, T. Techno-functional and 3D shape analysis applied for investigating the variability of backed tools in the Late Middle Paleolithic of Central Europe. PLoS ONE 15, e0236548 (2020).10.1371/journal.pone.0236548 ↗
32. Pérez, A. et al. Cobbles, tools, and plants: techno-functional variability within lithic industries of complex societies in Central Coast, Peru (~1800–400 BP). J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 34, 102584 (2020).
33. Zhou, Y. Diversity and homogeneity: the lithic technology in Southwest China from the late Pleistocene to early Holocene and its implication to Southeast Asia prehistory (PhD thesis). Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle (2021).
34. Gao, X. & Shen, C. Archaeological Study of Lithic Use-wear Experiments (in Chinese). (Science Press, 2008).
35. Rots, V. Prehension and Hafting Traces on Flint Tools: a Methodology (Leuven University Press, 2010).10.2307/j.ctt9qf05s ↗
36. Van Gijn, A. L. The wear and tear of flint: principles of functional analysis applied to Dutch Neolithic assemblages (PhD thesis). Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia. Leiden University (1990).
37. Vaughan, P. C. Use-Wear Analysis of Flaked Stone Tools (The University of Arizona Press, 1985).
38. Moss, E. H. The Functional Analysis of Flint Implements: Pincevent and Pont d’Ambon: Two Case Studies From the French Final Palaeolithic (BAR Publishing, 1983).10.30861/9780860542278 ↗
39. Odell, G. H. The mechanics of use-breakage of stone tools: some testable hypotheses. J. Field Archaeol. 8, 197–209 (1981).10.1179/009346981791505120 ↗
40. Tringham, R. et al. Experimentation in the formation of edge damage: a new approach to lithic analysis. J. Field Archaeol. 1, 171–196 (1974).
41. Chen, H. et al. A functional study of ground stone tools from the Bronze Age site of Dingjiacun in South China: based on use-wear evidence. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 40, 103215 (2021).
42. Chen, H., Shen, Y., Xu, Z. & Si, H. Functional use of the ground stone tools unearthed from the Fenghuangshan site in Danyang City of Jiangsu Province (in Chinese). Jianghan Archaeol. 01, 115–123 (2023).
43. Xue, L., Chen, H. & Chen, M. An experimental investigation of the ground stone knives and sickles in the Lower Yangtze River Region during the Late Neolithic and Bronze Age. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 51, 104208 (2023).
44. Clemente-Conte, I. & Bao, J. F. G. Formation of use-wear traces in non-flint rocks: the case of quartzite and rhyolite-Differences and similarities. In Proc. Non-Flint Raw Material Use in Prehistory: Old Prejudices and New Directions (eds. Sternke, F., Eigeland, L. & Costa, L.) 93–98 (Archaeopress, 2009).
45. Lunardi, A. Experimental testing with polished green stone axes and adzes: technology and use. In Proc. 'Prehistoric Technology’. 40 Years Later: Functional Studies And The Russian Legacy. Wear-traces, Ethnoarchaeology, Experimental Archaeology (eds. Longo, L. & Skakun, N.) 369-373 (Archaeopress, 2008).
46. Chen, F., Cao, M., Guan, Y. & Lv, J. Report of wood-working experiment and use-wear analysis (in Chinese). In Proc Archaeological Study of Lithic Use-Wear Experiments (in Chinese) (eds. Gao, X. & Shen, C.) 41-60, 217-221 (Science Press, 2008).
47. Iwase, A. et al. Experiments with replicas of Early Upper Paleolithic edge-ground stone axes and adzes provide criteria for identifying tool functions. J. Archaeol. Sci. 163, 105891 (2024).10.1016/j.jas.2023.105891 ↗
48. Yerkes, R. W. & Barkai, R. Tree-felling, woodworking, and changing perceptions of the landscape during the Neolithic and Chalcolithic periods in the southern Levant. Curr. Anthropol. 54, 222–231 (2013).10.1086/669705 ↗
49. Adams, J. L. Ground Stone Analysis: A technological Approach (University of Utah Press, 2002).
50. Xi, Z. The Simulated manufacturing and logging experiment of polished stoneware illustrated by the case of unearthed stoneware of Luotuodun site (in Chinese) (Master’s thesis). Nanjing University (2011).
51. Yang, M. Research on the tool marks on animal bones from Luotuodun Site (in Chinese) (Master’s thesis). Nanjing University (2015).
52. Yu, J. The analytical observations on the patterns on antlers excavated from luotuodun site - the simulation experiment of the patterns’ generation (in Chinese) (Master’s thesis). Nanjing University (2016).
53. Chen, H. Study of the chaîne opératoire and life history of the ground stone tools from the Wufengbei site, Suzhou (in Chinese). Archaeology 11, 72–82+2 (2020).
54. Liu, J. & Chen, H. An experimental case of wood-working use-wear on quartzite artefacts. Doc. Praehist. 43, 507–514 (2016).10.4312/dp.43.27 ↗
55. Shen C. Towards a comprehensive understanding of the lithic production system of the Princess Point Complex, southwestern Ontario (PhD thesis). University of Toronto (1997).
56. Fullagar, R. et al. A functional study of denticulate sickles and knives, ground stone tools from the early Neolithic Peiligang culture, China. Archaeol. Res. Asia 26, 100265 (2021).
57. Xue, L. et al. A functional study of ground stone knives and sickles in the Lower Yangtze River Region during the Late Neolithic and Bronze Age. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 61, 104892 (2025).
58. Cunnar, G. A. Study of lian sickles and dao knives from the Longshan Culture site of Liangchengzhen in southeastern Shandong. In Proc. A Companion to Chinese Archaeology (ed. Underhill, A. P.) 459–472 (Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2013).10.1002/9781118325698.ch22 ↗
59. Tsoraki, C. Neolithic society in northern Greece: the evidence of ground stone artefacts (PhD thesis). University of Sheffield (2009).
60. Tsoraki, C. Unravelling ground stone life histories> the spatial organization of stone tools and human activities at LN Makriyalos, Greece. Doc. Praehist. 34, 289–297 (2007).10.4312/dp.34.22 ↗
61. Zhai, S. Replication experiments on lithic products from the Taosi site, including analysis of production techniques for ground stone tools (in Chinese). Acta Anthropol. Sin. 34, 192–201 (2015).
62. Qi, Y. The Study on Stone Implements from Xingang Site, Jiangsu Province (in Chinese) (Master’s thesis). Nanjing University (2016).
63. Dubreuil, L. et al. Current analytical frameworks for studies of use–wear on ground stone tools. In Proc. Use-Wear and Residue Analysis in Archaeology (eds. Marreiros, J. M., Gibaja Bao, J. F. & Ferreira Bicho, N.) 105–158 (Springer International Publishing, 2014).10.1007/978-3-319-08257-8_7 ↗
64. Moník, M. et al. Rock physics and the circulation of Neolithic axeheads in Central Europe and the western Mediterranean. Wear 474-475, 203708 (2021).10.1016/j.wear.2021.203708 ↗
65. Zhou, Z., Huan, Y., Liu, W. & Dong, J. The application of lithic raw material mechanical analysis in Paleolithic archaeology. Acta Anthropol. Sin. 35, 407–417 (2016).
66. Vapnik, Y. et al. Stone-tool workshops of the Hatrurim basin, Israel: mineralogy, geochemistry, and rock mechanics of lithic industrial materials. In Proc. Coal and Peat Fires: A Global Perspective, Volume 3: Case Studies – Coal Fires (eds. Stracher, G. B., Prakash, A. & Sokol, E. V.) 282-316 (Elsevier, 2015).