Heritage preservation in quantum computing era – reference procedures
Source abstract
Abstract
Many cultural heritage preservation processes today are linked to digital technology. Not only are traditional artifacts being digitized and stored in digital form, but more and more new artifacts are being created natively in digital form. Once they are in digital form, cryptography is a key means of preserving them. However, due to advances in quantum computing, many of the cryptographic means used today are at risk. And not only cryptographic means, but also advanced architectures such as blockchains, which are increasingly used for the preservation of cultural heritage. Therefore, an analysis that focuses on the preservation of digital and digitized cultural heritage serves as a starting point for deriving appropriate reference procedures considering the aforementioned developments. In order to understand these procedures, one must also be familiar with the associated conceptual changes resulting from the quantum computing paradigm. This will enable the profiles involved to anticipate and implement appropriate solutions when needed. Furthermore, the procedures developed have been experimentally applied to a novel blockchain architecture called Culturae Archivum that focuses on the (trans)national level and is in line with recent efforts towards sustainability in our societies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Data Storage Technologies · Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. UNESCO. Protection and management of tangible cultural heritage. https://www.unesco.org/en/patrimonio-cultural-material (2023).
2. UNESCO. Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. Preprint at http://whc.unesco.org/en/conventiontext (1979).
3. UNESCO. Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Preprint at https://ich.unesco.org/en/convention (2003).
4. Trunfio, M., Jung, T. & Campana, S. Mixed reality experiences in museums: Exploring the impact of functional elements of the devices on visitors’ immersive experiences and post-experience behaviours. Inf. Manag. 59, 103698 (2022).10.1016/j.im.2022.103698 ↗
5. Christie’s. Online Auction 20447 - Beeple, The First 5000 Days. https://onlineonly.christies.com/s/beeple-first-5000-days/beeple-b-1981-1/112924 (2021).
6. The Museum of Other Realities. The Museum of Other Realities,. https://www.museumor.com/ (2024).
7. UNESCO. Artescienza: Climate Change, Traditional Knowledge, and New Technologies in Cultural Heritage Protection. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/artescienza-climate-change-traditional-knowledge-and-new-technologies-cultural-heritage-protection (2024).
8. Italian Ministry of Cultural Affairs. The Great Pompeii Project. https://pompeiisites.org/en/the-great-pompeii-project/ (2012).
9. RTV Slovenija. Jazbinšek: Nezakonito sprejeti odlok o Kolizeju. https://www.rtvslo.si/kultura/drugo/jazbinsek-nezakonito-sprejeti-odlok-o-kolizeju/157192 (2007).
10. EU Commission. Europeana: Digital Access to European Cultural Heritage. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/europeana (2024).
11. Aboulnaga, M. et al. Climate change and cultural heritage: A global mapping of the UNESCO Thematic Indicators in conjunction with advanced technologies for Cultural Sustainability. Sustainability 16, 4650 (2024).10.3390/su16114650 ↗
12. CORDIS. How Digital Technologies Can Play a Vital Role for the Preservation of Cultural Heritage https://cordis.europa.eu/article/id/413473-how-digital-technologies-can-play-a-vital-role-for-the-preservation-of-cultural-heritage (2024).
13. Lian, Y. & Xie, J. The evolution of digital cultural heritage research: Identifying key trends, hotspots, and challenges through bibliometric analysis. Sustainability 16, 7125 (2024).10.3390/su16167125 ↗
14. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Advanced Encryption Standard (AES). Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 197, U.S. Department of Commerce (2001). Available at: https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/fips/197/final.
15. Rivest, R. L., Shamir, A. & Adleman, L. A Method for Obtaining Digital Signatures and Public-Key Cryptosystems. Commun. ACM 21, 120–126 (1978).10.1145/359340.359342 ↗
16. Menezes, A. J., Vanstone, S. A. & Oorschot, P. C. Van. Handbook of Applied Cryptography. (CRC Press, Inc., USA, 1996).
17. National Institute of Standards and Technology. SHA-3 Standard: Permutation-Based Hash and Extendable-Output Functions (FIPS PUB 180-4 Update 1), U.S. Department of Commerce (2023). Available at: https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/fips/180-4/upd1/final.
18. Shor, P. W. Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring. in Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science 124–134 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1994.365700.10.1109/SFCS.1994.365700 ↗
19. Grover, L. K. A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. in Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing 212–219 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1996). https://doi.org/10.1145/237814.237866.10.1145/237814.237866 ↗
20. Ajtai, M. Generating hard instances of lattice problems (extended abstract). in Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing 99–108 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1996). https://doi.org/10.1145/237814.237838.10.1145/237814.237838 ↗
21. Trček, D. Cultural heritage preservation by using blockchain technologies. Herit Sci pp. 1-11 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-021-00643-9.10.1186/s40494-021-00643-9 ↗
22. International Organization for Standardization. Information processing systems — Open Systems Interconnection — Basic Reference Model — Part 2: Security Architecture. ISO 7498-2:1989 (1989). Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/14256.html.
23. ISO. Information Processing Systems — Open Systems Interconnection — Basic Reference Model — Part 2: Security Architecture. (International Organization for Standardization, Geneve, 1989).
24. Genkina, D., Moseman, A., Bourzac, K., Hautala, L. & Hutson, M. Cryptographic Standards for a Post-Quantum World. IEEE Spectr. 61, 5–7 (2024).10.1109/MSPEC.2024.10705386 ↗
25. Castelvecchi, D. IBM Releases First-Ever 1,000-Qubit Quantum Chip. Scientific American (2023) https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ibm-releases-first-ever-1-000-qubit-quantum-chip/.10.1038/d41586-023-03854-1 ↗
26. Anderson, P., et al. Project Silica: Towards Sustainable Cloud Archival Storage in Glass. in Proceedings of the 29th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles 166–181 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2023). https://doi.org/10.1145/3600006.3613208.10.1145/3600006.3613208 ↗
27. Trček, D. Cultural heritage preservation by using blockchain technologies. Herit. Sci. 10, 1–11 (2022).10.1186/s40494-021-00643-9 ↗
28. Khelifi, A., Altaweel, M., Hashir, M., Hadjitofi, T. & Ghazal, M. Salsal: blockchain for vetting cultural object collections. Herit. Sci. 12, 15 (2024).10.1186/s40494-023-01129-6 ↗
29. Parisi, C., Mazza, A., Pozzolini, N. Mastering Ethereum: Building Smart Contracts and DApps. (O’Reilly Media, 2025).
30. Baraniuk, C. Bitcoin’s energy consumption ‘equals that of Switzerland’. Preprint at https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-48853230 (2019).
31. Protocol Labs. InterPlanetary File System (IPFS). Preprint at https://ipfs.tech/ (2015).
32. National Institute of Standards and Technology. CRYSTALS-Kyber: Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization. NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization Project 1–20 (2022) https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-208.10.6028/NIST.SP.800-208 ↗
33. Albshaier, L., Almarri, S. & Hafizur Rahman, M. A review of blockchain’s role in E-commerce transactions: Open challenges, and future research directions. Computers 13, 27 (2024).10.3390/computers13010027 ↗
34. Zhou, F. et al. Blockchain for digital healthcare: Case studies and adoption challenges. Intell. Med. 04, 215–225 (2024).10.1016/j.imed.2024.09.001 ↗
35. Collomosse, J., et al., ARCHANGEL: Trusted Archives of Digital Public Documents. in Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering 2018 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3209280.3229120.10.1145/3209280.3229120 ↗