Systematic morphological analysis and stylistic cultural interpretation of Song Dynasty Longquan Porcelain Vases
Source abstract
Abstract
The Longquan Porcelain Vases from China’s Song dynasty represent significant cultural heritage, yet their morphological characteristics and combinatorial patterns have lacked systematic investigation. This study integrates grounded theory with quantitative statistical analysis, examining 125 vase samples from 12 authoritative monographs. Open coding identified features, axial coding established hierarchical classifications, and Pearson correlation analysis revealed combinatorial patterns, while historical literature analysis ensured cultural validity. The study identified 7 major components, 22 morphological codes, and 68 significantly correlated feature combinations. Findings reveal that Longquan porcelain vase morphology exhibits “diversity within standardization,” manifested in systematic form combinations, unity of function and aesthetics, and associations with social hierarchy and cultural trends. These discoveries reveal Song dynasty Longquan porcelain craft standards and demonstrate their value as material culture carriers. This combined analytical approach provides empirical foundation for traditional craft research and new pathways for cultural heritage preservation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction · 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Sang, Z. et al. Study on the coloring mechanism of Longquan light greenish-blue celadon glaze from the Southern Song and Yuan Dynasties. Ceram. Int. 49, 13249–13257, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.12.205 (2023).10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.12.205 ↗
2. Li, L. et al. Study on elemental features of Longquan celadon at Fengdongyan kiln site in Yuan and Ming Dynasties by EDXRF. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 292, 25–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2012.09.034 (2012).10.1016/j.nimb.2012.09.034 ↗
3. Kelun C. Chinese Porcelain: Art, Elegance, and Appreciation (Long River Press, 2004).
4. Zhang, B., Zhang, M., Li, Y., Cheng, H. & Zheng, J. PIXE study on recovery of making-technology of Chinese Longquan celadon made in the Southern Song Dynasty (1127–1279 CE). Ceram. Int. 45, 3081–3087, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.10.195 (2019).10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.10.195 ↗
5. Wang J., Qian W., Liu H. Shape analysis of pottery using elliptic Fourier descriptor and 3D scanning. In: Advances in Ergonomics in Design: Proc. AHFE 2017 International Conference on Ergonomics in Design; July 17−21, 2017; Los Angeles, California, USA. 62–70 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60582-1_7 (Springer International Publishing, 2018).10.1007/978-3-319-60582-1_7 ↗
6. Sipiran, I., Mendoza, A., Apaza, A. & Lopez, C. Data-driven restoration of digital archaeological pottery with point cloud analysis. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 130, 2149–2165, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-022-01637-1 (2022).10.1007/s11263-022-01637-1 ↗
7. Rieke-Zapp, D. H. & Trinkl, E. Face to face-close range inspection of head vases. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 42, 601–604, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W5-601-2017 (2017).10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W5-601-2017 ↗
8. Ao, J., Xu, Z., Li, W., Ji, S. & Qiu, R. Quantitative typological analysis applied to the morphology of export mugs and their social factors in the Ming and Qing dynasties from the perspective of East–West trade. Herit. Sci. 12, 125, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01237-x (2024).10.1186/s40494-024-01237-x ↗
9. Ao, J. et al. Analysis of factors related to the morphological evolution of Lingnan export mugs in the 18th–20th centuries in the context of one belt and one road. PLoS One 19, e0304104, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304104 (2024).10.1371/journal.pone.0304104 ↗
10. Ao, J., Li, W., Ji, S. & Chen, S. Maritime silk road heritage: quantitative typological analysis of Qing dynasty export porcelain bowls from Guangzhou from the perspective of social factors. Herit. Sci. 11, 263, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-023-01103-2 (2023).10.1186/s40494-023-01103-2 ↗
11. Liu, H., Fu, C. & Li, W. Silk road heritage: the artistic representation of port trading culture in the images of characters in Qing Dynasty Guangzhou export paintings. PLoS ONE 19, e0308309, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308309 (2024).10.1371/journal.pone.0308309 ↗
12. Ao, J., Ye, Z., Li, W. & Ji, S. Impressions of Guangzhou city in Qing dynasty export paintings in the context of trade economy: a color analysis of paintings based on k-means clustering algorithm. Herit. Sci. 12, 77, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01195-4 (2024).10.1186/s40494-024-01195-4 ↗
13. Li, W. et al. Artistic heritage conservation: the relevance and cultural value of Guangzhou clan building paintings to traditional rituals from a kinship perspective through perceptual assessment and data mining. Herit. Sci. 12, 216, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01328-9 (2024).10.1186/s40494-024-01328-9 ↗
14. Bellina, B. Maritime Silk Roads’ ornament industries: socio-political practices and cultural transfers in the South China Sea. Camb. Archaeol. J. 24, 345–377, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774314000547 (2014).10.1017/S0959774314000547 ↗
15. Xu, Y. & Tao, Y. Cultural impacts of state interventions: traditional craftsmanship in China’s porcelain capital in the mid to late 20th century. Int. J. Intang. Herit. 17, 214–231, https://doi.org/10.35638/ijih.2022.17.014 (2022).10.35638/ijih.2022.17.014 ↗
16. Charmaz, K. & Thornberg, R. The pursuit of quality in grounded theory. Qual. Res. Psychol. 18, 305–327, https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1780357 (2021).10.1080/14780887.2020.1780357 ↗
17. Yan J., Sun M. Traditional costume culture of She ethnic group from ecological perspective. Rev. Etnografie si Folclor J. Ethnogr. Folklore. 127–145. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.796.554 (2021).10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.796.554 ↗
18. Bakri, A. F., Zaman, N. Q. & Kamarudin, H. Understanding local community and the cultural heritage values at a World Heritage City: a grounded theory approach. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 1067, 012006, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1067/1/012006 (2022).10.1088/1755-1315/1067/1/012006 ↗
19. Seaman, J. O. Adopting a grounded theory approach to cultural-historical research: conflicting methodologies or complementary methods. Int. J. Qual. Methods 7, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690800700101 (2008).10.1177/160940690800700101 ↗
20. Barnes, D. M. An analysis of the grounded theory method and the concept of culture. Qual. Health Res. 6, 429–441, https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239600600309 (1996).10.1177/104973239600600309 ↗
21. Charmaz, K. Thinking about data with grounded theory. Qual. Inq. 25, 743–753, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418809455 (2019).10.1177/1077800418809455 ↗
22. Guetterman, T. C., Babchuk, W. A., Howell Smith, M. C. & Stevens, J. Contemporary approaches to mixed methods–grounded theory research: a field-based analysis. J. Mix Methods Res. 13, 179–195, https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817710877 (2019).10.1177/1558689817710877 ↗
23. Hutchison, A. J., Johnston, L. H. & Breckon, J. D. Using QSR-NVivo to facilitate the development of a grounded theory project: an account of a worked example. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 13, 283–302, https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570902996301 (2010).10.1080/13645570902996301 ↗
24. Xi, Y. et al. A study of the spatial–temporal development patterns and influencing factors of China’s national archaeological site parks. Sustainability 16, 3397, https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083397 (2024).10.3390/su16083397 ↗
25. Wu Y., Zou X. Traditional and contemporary: meaning and value of the study on the Ming Dynasty’s ceramic appreciation literature. In: Proc. 2nd International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities (ICCESSH 2017); June 2017; p. 407–409. https://doi.org/10.2991/iccessh-17.2017.97 (Atlantis Press, 2017).10.2991/iccessh-17.2017.97 ↗
26. Zhang, N. & Zheng, X. A visual analytics approach for national intangible cultural heritage in Heilongjiang province. J. Comput. Methods Sci. Eng. 23, 1625–1633, https://doi.org/10.3233/JCM-226679 (2023).10.3233/JCM-226679 ↗
27. Pavlidis, G., Koutsoudis, A., Arnaoutoglou, F., Tsioukas, V. & Chamzas, C. Methods for 3D digitization of cultural heritage. J. Cult. Herit. 8, 93–98, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2006.10.007 (2007).10.1016/j.culher.2006.10.007 ↗
28. Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L. & Strutzel, E. The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. Nurs. Res. 17, 364 (1968).10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 ↗
29. Corbin, J., Strauss, A. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 4th ed. (Sage Publications, 2014).
30. Glaser B. G. Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory (Sociology Press, 1978).
31. Saunders, B. et al. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual. Quant. 52, 1893–1907, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8 (2018).10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8 ↗
32. Cheung, K. K. C. & Tai, K. W. The use of intercoder reliability in qualitative interview data analysis in science education. Res. Sci. Technol. Educ. 41, 1155–1175, https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1993179 (2023).10.1080/02635143.2021.1993179 ↗
33. Algina, J. & Olejnik, S. Sample size tables for correlation analysis with applications in Pearson correlation and multiple regression analysis. Multivar. Behav. Res. 38, 309–323, https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3803_02 (2003).10.1207/S15327906MBR3803_02 ↗
34. Chen, Y. et al. Unveiling the dynamics of “scenes changing as steps move” in a Chinese classical garden: a case study of Jingxinzhai Garden. Herit. Sci. 12, 131, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01246-w (2024).10.1186/s40494-024-01246-w ↗
35. Jolliffe, I. T., Cadima, J. Principal Component Analysis. 2nd ed. (Springer, 2016).
36. Abdi H., Williams L. J. Principal component analysis. In: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics. 2:433–459 (Wiley, 2010).10.1002/wics.101 ↗
37. Creswell J. W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 3rd ed. 211–220 (Sage Publications, 2009).
38. Morgan, D. L. Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: applications to health research. Qual. Health Res. 8, 362–376, https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239800800307 (1998).10.1177/104973239800800307 ↗
39. Huang, W. Y. Artistic characteristics of Longquan celadon in Southern Song Dynasty. Ceam. Stud. 32, 24–28, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-9892.2018.01.005 (2018).10.3969/j.issn.1000-9892.2018.01.005 ↗
40. Zhang X., Zhang H. Research on Meiping in the application of Chinese traditional wine packaging. In: Proc. International Conference on Education, Language, Art and Intercultural Communication (ICELAIC-14); May 2014 May, 479–482 (Atlantis Press, 2014).10.2991/icelaic-14.2014.120 ↗
41. Zhu, Z., Yu, C., Miao, Y., Lu, Z. & Yang, J. Mass spectrometry identification of the liquor contained in the plum vase excavated from Jurou Li’s Grave of the Jin Dynasty (1115–1234 CE) in Xi’an, Shannxi, China. Herit. Sci. 6, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-018-0210-5 (2018).10.1186/s40494-018-0210-5 ↗
42. Li, F. & Wu, C. H. A brief discussion on the aesthetic cultural accumulation of Song Dynasty Longquan Kiln Celadon shapes. Ceram. Sci. Art. 57, 12–13, https://doi.org/10.13212/j.cnki.csa.2023.04.108 (2023).10.13212/j.cnki.csa.2023.04.108 ↗
43. Wang, S. An archaeological perspective of alcoholic beverages in the Song Dynasty (960–1279). Archaeologies 18, 436–467, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-022-09452-3 (2022).10.1007/s11759-022-09452-3 ↗
44. Shi, Q. Study on ceramics technology and artistic style of Southern Song Longquan Kiln. China Ceram. Ind. 25, 20–26, https://doi.org/10.13958/j.cnki.ztcg.2018.03.005 (2018).10.13958/j.cnki.ztcg.2018.03.005 ↗
45. Xu S. Song Hui Yao Ji Gao [Collected Statutes of the Song Dynasty] (Shanghai Guji Press, 2014).
46. Meng Y. Dongjing Meng Hua Lu [Dreams of Splendor of the Eastern Capital] (Zhonghua Book Company, 2000).
47. Wu Z. Meng Liang Lu [A Record of Dreamlike Life] (Sanqin Publishing House; 2004).
48. Meng Y. Dongjing Meng Hua Lu [Dreams of Splendor of the Eastern Capital] (Zhonghua Book Company, 2020).
49. Li J. Yingzao Fashi [Treatise on Architectural Methods or State Building Standards] (Zhonghua Book Company, 2023).
50. Zhou M. Wu Lin Jiu Shi [Old Stories of Wulin] (Zhonghua Book Company, 2007).
51. Han, G., Zheng, N. & Junming, W. U. Ceramic art reality in the context of technology history. Cult. Relig. Stud.: Engl. Version 9, 17, https://doi.org/10.17265/2328-2177/2021.07.002 (2021).10.17265/2328-2177/2021.07.002 ↗
52. Zheng, X. D. The aesthetic and artistic development of Longquan Celadon from the history of Longquan Kiln ceramics. Ceram. Sci. Art. 57, 91–92, https://doi.org/10.13212/j.cnki.csa.2023.09.107 (2023).10.13212/j.cnki.csa.2023.09.107 ↗
53. Yang Y. Song Dynasty Mural Tomb at Tanxi, Xiangyang, Hubei. Cultural Relics. 2015;:33-43+2+1. https://doi.org/10.13619/j.cnki.cn11-1532/k.2015.02.010.10.13619/j.cnki.cn11-1532/k.2015.02.010 ↗
54. Thér, R. Ceramic technology. How to reconstruct and describe pottery-forming practices. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. 12, 172, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-020-01131-0 (2020).10.1007/s12520-020-01131-0 ↗
55. Wang, L. Y. & Marwick, B. Standardization of ceramic shape: a case study of Iron Age pottery from northeastern Taiwan. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 33, 102554, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102554 (2020).10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102554 ↗
56. Piličiauskas, G. et al. The globular amphora culture in the eastern Baltic: new discoveries. Acta Archaeol. 92, 203–227, https://doi.org/10.1163/16000390-20210037 (2023).10.1163/16000390-20210037 ↗