journal article·2020-09-09Open access

Curved digital X-ray detectors

Albert J.J.M. van Breemen, Matthias Simon, Olivier Tousignant, Santhosh Shanmugam, Jan-Laurens van der Steen, Hylke B. Akkerman, Auke Kronemeijer, Walter Ruetten, Rob Raaijmakers, Lex Alving, Jan Jacobs, Pawel E. Malinowski, Florian De Roose, Gerwin H. Gelinck

npj Flexible Electronics· Volume 4· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract A curved image sensor on plastic foil has been developed for cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) X-ray imaging. The image sensor of about 6 × 8 cm2 size has been built on a thin polyimide foil with an indium gallium zinc oxide (IGZO) backplane and an organic photodetectors (OPD) frontplane. A flexible cesium iodide (CsI) scintillator has been attached to the optical sensor with 480 × 640 pixels of 126 µm size. Dark current density of the OPD was low with less than 10−7 mA/cm2 at −2 V, while an external quantum efficiency (EQE) of about 50% was reached in the visible wavelength range matched to the scintillator output. The image quality of the digital X-ray detector allowed for 3D reconstruction images of a bone phantom on a rotating stage with a lab setup. The curved detector with 32 cm curvature radius opens up the path for very compact CBCT gantries with largely reduced footprint.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications · Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging · Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Xu, X., Qi, X., Davanco, M. & Forrest, S. R. Organic photodetector focal plane arrays fabricated on hemispherical substrates by three-dimensional stamping. LEOS 2007—IEEE Lasers and Electro-Optics Society Annual Meeting Conference Proceedings, 578 (2007).10.1109/LEOS.2007.4382538 ↗
2. Guenter, B. Highly curved image sensors: a practical approach for improved optical performance. Opt. Express 25, 13010–13023 (2017).10.1364/OE.25.013010 ↗
3. Dinyari, R., Rim, S. B., Huang, K., Catrysse, P. B. & Peumans, P. Curving monolithic silicon for nonplanar focal plane array applications. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 091114 (2008).10.1063/1.2883873 ↗
4. Rim, S.-B., Catrysse, P. B., Dinyari, R., Huang, K. & Peumans, P. The optical advantages of curved focal plane arrays. Opt. Express 16, 4965–4971 (2008).10.1364/OE.16.004965 ↗
5. Ko, H. C. et al. A hemispherical electronic eye camera based on compressible silicon optoelectronics. Nature 454, 748–753 (2008).10.1038/nature07113 ↗
6. Lee, W. et al. Two-dimensional materials in functional three-dimensional architectures with applications in photodetection and imaging. Nat. Commun. 9, 1417 (2018).10.1038/s41467-018-03870-0 ↗
7. Fan, D., Lee, K. & Forrest, S. R. Flexible thin-film InGaAs photodiode focal plane array. ACS Photonics 3, 670–676 (2016).10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00042 ↗
8. Zbijewski, W. et al. A dedicated cone-beam CT system for muscoloskeletal extremities imaging: Design, optimization, and initial performance characterization. Med. Phys. 38, 4700–4713 (2011).10.1118/1.3611039 ↗
9. Miracle, A. C. & Mukherji, S. K. Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 1: physical principles. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 30, 1088−1096 (2009).10.3174/ajnr.A1653 ↗
10. Sisniega, A. et al. Image quality, scatter, and dose in compact CBCT systems with flat and curved detectors. Proc. SPIE 10573, 105734E (2018).
11. Gelinck, G. et al. X-ray detector-on-plastic with high sensitivity using low cost, solution-processed organic photodiodes. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 63, 197–204 (2016).10.1109/TED.2015.2432572 ↗
12. Jansen-van Vuuren, R. D., Armin, A., Pandey, A. K., Burn, P. L. & Meredith, P. Organic photodiodes: the future of full color detection and image sensing. Adv. Mater. 28, 4766–4802 (2016).10.1002/adma.201505405 ↗
13. Liu, X., Lin, Y., Liao, Y., Wu, J. & Zheng, Y. Recent advances in organic near-infrared photodiodes. J. Mater. Chem. C. 6, 3499–3513 (2018).10.1039/C7TC05042A ↗
14. García de Arquer, F. P., Armin, A., Meredith, P. & Sargent, E. H. Solution-processed semiconductors for next-generation photodetectors. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 16100 (2017).10.1038/natrevmats.2016.100 ↗
15. Adrien, P. & Ana Claudia, A. Solution-processed image sensors on flexible substrates. Flex. Print. Electron. 1, 043001 (2016).10.1088/2058-8585/1/4/043001 ↗
16. Ratcliff, E. L. et al. Energy level alignment in PCDTBT:PC70BM solar cells: Solution processed NiOx for improved hole collection and efficiency. Org. Electron. 13, 744–749 (2012).10.1016/j.orgel.2012.01.022 ↗
17. Pandey, A. K. et al. Dynamics of charge generation and transport in polymer-fullerene blend elucidated using a photoFET architecture. ACS Photonics 1, 114–120 (2014).10.1021/ph400047b ↗
18. Yoshida, H. Low-Energy inverse photoemission study on the electron affinities of fullerene derivatives for organic photovoltaic cells. J. Phys. Chem. C. 118, 24377 (2014).10.1021/jp509141y ↗
19. van de Weijer, P. & Akkerman, H. B. Spotless hybrid thin-film encapsulation stack for organic light-emitting diodes on organic foils. Org. Electron. 66, 43–46 (2019).10.1016/j.orgel.2018.12.003 ↗
20. Lujan, R. A. & Street, R. A. Flexible X-ray detector array fabricated with oxide thin-film transistors. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 33, 688–690 (2012).10.1109/LED.2012.2188825 ↗
21. Ng, T. N. et al. Low temperature a-Si:H photodiodes and flexible image sensor arrays patterned by digital lithography. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 063505-1–063505-7 (2007).
22. Kielar, M. et al. Long-term stable organic photodetectors with ultra-low dark currents for high detectivity applications. Sci. Rep. 6, 39201 (2016).10.1038/srep39201 ↗
23. Biele, M. et al. Spray-coated organic photodetectors and image sensors with silicon-like performance. Adv. Mater. Technol. 4, 1800158 (2019).10.1002/admt.201800158 ↗
24. Blakesley, J. C. & Speller, R. Modeling the imaging performance of prototype organic X-ray imagers. Med. Phys. 35, 225–239 (2008).10.1118/1.2805479 ↗
25. Overdick, M., Solf, T. & Wischmann, H. A. Temporal artifacts in flat dynamic X-ray detectors. Proc. SPIE 4320, 47–58 (2001).10.1117/12.430913 ↗
26. Street, R. A. Localized state distribution and its effect on recombination in organic solar cells. Phys. Rev. B 84, 075208 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevB.84.075208 ↗
27. Akkerman, H. B. et al. High-temperature thin-film barriers for foldable AMOLED displays. J. SID 26, 214–222 (2018).
28. Hajdok, G. & Cunningham, I. A. Penalty on the detective quantum efficiency from off-axis incident x rays. Proc. SPIE 5368, 109–118 (2004).10.1117/12.535933 ↗
29. Li, F. et al. Integration of flexible AMOLED Displays using oxide semiconductor TFT backplanes. SID Symp. Dig. 45, 431–435 (2014).10.1002/j.2168-0159.2014.tb00116.x ↗