journal article·2025-12-05Open access

A bioinspired deep-sea iontronic skin for underwater robotic tactile sensing

Qingyang Zheng, Daohui Zhang, Tianzhao Bu, Xin Fu, Naijia Xu, Shaoyu Liu, Sen Zhou, Bin Xie, Shuwen Chen, Chwee Teck Lim, Changsheng Wu, Hao Wu

npj Flexible Electronics· Volume 10· Issue 1

Abstract

The non-destructive operation of intelligent underwater robotics with human-like sensory capabilities is essential for deep-sea resource exploration. However, extreme deep-sea hydrostatic pressure easily distorts sensor signals or damages devices, and detecting hundred-pascal-level contact forces under tens-of-megapascal hydrostatic pressures presents a critical challenge that hinders the advancement of underwater tactile sensing technology. Inspired by deep-sea sponges’ hydrostatic skeletal supporting mechanisms, we developed a fully open-pore hydrophobic ionogel as the sensing layer to construct a biomimetic deep-sea tactile sensor. The contact force is converted into electrical signals for object classification and non-destructive manipulation of marine organisms. This innovative sensing layer features aquatic stability and a pore structure balancing internal-external hydrostatic pressure, reducing environmental disturbances. The sensor maintains stable contact force detection under 50 MPa hydrostatic pressure, and accurately classify objects of varying hardness with an overall recognition accuracy of 95.5%, holding great potential for deep-sea exploration and sustainable resource exploitation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition · Marine animal studies overview

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Kennedy, B. R. C. & Rotjan, R. D. Mind the gap: comparing exploration effort with global biodiversity patterns and climate projections to determine ocean areas with greatest exploration needs. Front. Mar. Sci. 10, 1219799 (2023).10.3389/fmars.2023.1219799 ↗
2. Hein, J. R., Koschinsky, A. & Kuhn, T. Deep-ocean polymetallic nodules as a resource for critical materials. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 158–169 (2020).10.1038/s43017-020-0027-0 ↗
3. Zou, C. N. et al. Formation, distribution, potential and prediction of global conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon resources. Pet. Explor. Dev. 42, 14–28 (2015).10.1016/S1876-3804(15)60002-7 ↗
4. Blowes, S. A. et al. The geography of biodiversity change in marine and terrestrial assemblages. Science 366, 339–345 (2019).10.1126/science.aaw1620 ↗
5. Yoerger, D. R. et al. A hybrid underwater robot for multidisciplinary investigation of the ocean twilight zone. Sci. Robot. 6, eabe1901 (2021).10.1126/scirobotics.abe1901 ↗
6. Picardi, G. et al. Bioinspired underwater legged robot for seabed exploration with low environmental disturbance. Sci. Robot. 5, eaaz1012 (2020).10.1126/scirobotics.aaz1012 ↗
7. Tao, K. et al. Origami-inspired electret-based triboelectric generator for biomechanical and ocean wave energy harvesting. Nano Energy 67, 104197 (2020).10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104197 ↗
8. Aggarwal, A., Kampmann, P., Lemburg, J. & Kirchner, F. Haptic object recognition in underwater and deep-sea environments. J. Field Robot. 32, 167–185 (2015).10.1002/rob.21538 ↗
9. Vetter, E. W. & Dayton, P. K. Macrofaunal communities within and adjacent to a detritus-rich submarine canyon system. Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 45, 25–54 (1998).10.1016/S0967-0645(97)00048-9 ↗
10. Marani, G., Choi, S. K. & Yuh, J. Underwater autonomous manipulation for intervention missions AUVs. Ocean Eng. 36, 15–23 (2009).10.1016/j.oceaneng.2008.08.007 ↗
11. Sahoo, A., Dwivedy, S. K. & Robi, P. S. Advancements in the field of autonomous underwater vehicle. Ocean Eng. 181, 145–160 (2019).10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.04.011 ↗
12. Sinatra, N. R. et al. Ultragentle manipulation of delicate structures using a soft robotic gripper. Sci. Robot. 4, eaax5425 (2019).10.1126/scirobotics.aax5425 ↗
13. Li, D. et al. A review of technical advances and applications of intelligent inspection robots in structural health monitoring. SmartBot 1, e70000 (2025).10.1002/smb2.70000 ↗
14. Yuan, W. Z., Dong, S. Y. & Adelson, E. H. Gelsight: high-resolution robot tactile sensors for estimating geometry and force. Sensors 17, 2762 (2017).10.3390/s17122762 ↗
15. Li, G. R. et al. Bioinspired soft robots for deep-sea exploration. Nat. Commun. 14, 7097 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-42882-3 ↗
16. Dong, Y. et al. Exploring human motions for smart wearables: energy conversion, harvesting and self–powered sensing. Nano Energy 143, 111289 (2025).10.1016/j.nanoen.2025.111289 ↗
17. Wu, H. et al. On-skin biosensors for noninvasive monitoring of postoperative free flaps and replanted digits. Sci. Transl. Med. 15, eabq1634 (2023).10.1126/scitranslmed.abq1634 ↗
18. Gu, Y. et al. Empowering human-machine interfaces: self-powered hydrogel sensors for flexible and intelligent systems. Adv. Funct. Mater. 36, 2509085 (2025).
19. Zheng, Q. Y., Xie, B., Xu, Z. L. & Wu, H. A systematic printability study of direct ink writing towards high-resolution rapid manufacturing. Int. J. Extrem. Manuf. 5, 035002 (2023).10.1088/2631-7990/acd090 ↗
20. Liu, Z. et al. A three-dimensionally architected electronic skin mimicking human mechanosensation. Science 384, 987–994 (2024).10.1126/science.adk5556 ↗
21. Mannsfeld, S. C. B. et al. Highly sensitive flexible pressure sensors with microstructured rubber dielectric layers. Nat. Mater. 9, 859–864 (2010).10.1038/nmat2834 ↗
22. Li, J., Yu, Q., Shen, Z., Wang, D. & Gu, G. Soft 3D lattice iontronic tactile sensor. SmartBot 1, e70002 (2025).10.1002/smb2.70002 ↗
23. Yi, Z. R. et al. Piezoelectric dynamics of arterial pulse for wearable continuous blood pressure monitoring. Adv. Mater. 34, 2110291 (2022).10.1002/adma.202110291 ↗
24. Fang, H. et al. Anatomically designed triboelectric wristbands with adaptive accelerated learning for human-machine interfaces. Adv. Sci. 10, 2205960 (2023).10.1002/advs.202205960 ↗
25. Dai, H. et al. Split-type magnetic soft tactile sensor with 3D force decoupling. Adv. Mater. 36, 2310145 (2023).10.1002/adma.202310145 ↗
26. Wang, H. Y. et al. An optical-based multipoint 3-axis pressure sensor with a flexible thin-film form. Sci. Adv. 9, eadi2445 (2023).10.1126/sciadv.adi2445 ↗
27. Qiu, Y. et al. Quantitative softness and texture bimodal haptic sensors for robotic clinical feature identification and intelligent picking. Sci. Adv. 10, eadp0348 (2024).10.1126/sciadv.adp0348 ↗
28. Yan, Y. C. et al. Soft magnetic skin for super-resolution tactile sensing with force self-decoupling. Sci. Robot. 6, eabc8801 (2021).10.1126/scirobotics.abc8801 ↗
29. Jin, T. et al. Triboelectric nanogenerator sensors for soft robotics aiming at digital twin applications. Nat. Commun. 11, 5381 (2020).10.1038/s41467-020-19059-3 ↗
30. Li, Y. et al. Soft, pressure-tolerant, flexible electronic sensors for sensing under harsh environments. ACS Sens. 7, 2400–2409 (2022).10.1021/acssensors.2c01059 ↗
31. Wan, X. D., He, Y. F., Xu, Z. Y., Li, C. C. & Yang, C. H. Progress of hydrophobic ionogels: a review. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 44, 2200957 (2023).10.1002/marc.202200957 ↗
32. Shaikh, S. F. et al. Noninvasive featherlight wearable compliant “Marine Skin”: standalone multisensory system for deep-sea environmental monitoring. Small 15, 1804385 (2019).10.1002/smll.201804385 ↗
33. Teeple, C. B., Becker, K. P. & Wood, R. J. Soft curvature and contact force sensors for deep-sea grasping via soft optical waveguides. In 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (ed. Maciejewski, A. A.) 1621–1627 (IEEE, 2018).10.1109/IROS.2018.8594270 ↗
34. Cheng, Y. et al. Aquatic skin enabled by multi-modality iontronic sensing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2205947 (2022).10.1002/adfm.202205947 ↗
35. Zhou, Y. H. et al. A multimodal magnetoelastic artificial skin for underwater haptic sensing. Sci. Adv. 10, eadj8567 (2024).10.1126/sciadv.adj8567 ↗
36. Liu, S. et al. Tactile sensing for soft robotic manipulators in 50 MPa hydrostatic pressure environments. Adv. Intell. Syst. 5, 2300296 (2023).10.1002/aisy.202300296 ↗
37. Li, G. et al. Self-powered soft robot in the Mariana Trench. Nature 591, 66–71 (2021).10.1038/s41586-020-03153-z ↗
38. Busch, K. et al. Biodiversity, environmental drivers, and sustainability of the global deep-sea sponge microbiome. Nat. Commun. 13, 5160 (2022).10.1038/s41467-022-32684-4 ↗
39. Koch, M. J. et al. Impact of growth media and pressure on the diversity and antimicrobial activity of isolates from two species of hexactinellid sponge. Microbiology 167, 001123 (2021).10.1099/mic.0.001123 ↗
40. Zhou, R. et al. Janus hydrophobic structural gel with asymmetric adhesion in air/underwater for reliable mechanosensing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2316687 (2024).10.1002/adfm.202316687 ↗
41. Wei, J. J., Zheng, Y. F. & Chen, T. A fully hydrophobic ionogel enables highly efficient wearable underwater sensors and communicators. Mater. Horiz. 8, 2761–2770 (2021).10.1039/D1MH00998B ↗
42. Li, H. J., Li, L., Wei, J. J., Chen, T. & Wei, P. Salt-adaptively conductive ionogel sensor for marine sensing. Small 20, 2305848 (2024).10.1002/smll.202305848 ↗
43. Yuan, Y. M. et al. Microstructured polyelectrolyte elastomer-based ionotronic sensors with high sensitivities and excellent stability for artificial skins. Adv. Mater. 36, 2310429 (2024).10.1002/adma.202310429 ↗
44. Yang, J. W., Illeperuma, W. & Suo, Z. G. Inelasticity increases the critical strain for the onset of creases on hydrogels. Extreme Mech. Lett. 40, 100966 (2020).10.1016/j.eml.2020.100966 ↗
45. Yang, G. G. et al. Adhesive and hydrophobic bilayer hydrogel enabled on-skin biosensors for high-fidelity classification of human emotion. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2200457 (2022).10.1002/adfm.202200457 ↗
46. Leys, S. P. & Hill, A. The physiology and molecular biology of sponge tissues. Adv. Mar. Biol. 62, 1–56 (2012).10.1016/B978-0-12-394283-8.00001-1 ↗
47. Kier, W. M. The diversity of hydrostatic skeletons. J. Exp. Biol. 215, 1247–1257 (2012).10.1242/jeb.056549 ↗
48. Gibson, L. J. & Ashby, M. F. Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties 175–234 (Cambridge University Press, 1997).10.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
49. He, Y. F., Cheng, Y., Yang, C. H. & Guo, C. F. Creep-free polyelectrolyte elastomer for drift-free iontronic sensing. Nat. Mater. 23, 1107–1114 (2024).10.1038/s41563-024-01848-6 ↗
50. Phillips, B. T. et al. A dexterous, glove-based teleoperable low-power soft robotic arm for delicate deep-sea biological exploration. Sci. Rep. 8, 14779 (2018).10.1038/s41598-018-33138-y ↗
51. Galloway, K. C. et al. Soft robotic grippers for biological sampling on deep reefs. Soft Robot. 3, 23–33 (2016).10.1089/soro.2015.0019 ↗
52. Vogt, D. M. et al. Shipboard design and fabrication of custom 3D-printed soft robotic manipulators for the investigation of delicate deep-sea organisms. PLoS ONE 13, e0200386 (2018).10.1371/journal.pone.0200386 ↗