4A tetrahedron system: a synergistic framework for panvascular intervention empowered by flexible electronics
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This review introduces the “4 A Tetrahedron System” (Assessment, Assistance, Aftercare, AI-retrofit) as a synergistic framework for panvascular intervention empowered by flexible electronics. Central to this is the novel concept of “suitcordance”—short-term suitability and long-term concordance. By integrating flexible sensors, navigation tools, and AI algorithms, this framework establishes a closed-loop data ecosystem, driving a transition toward intelligent, full-cycle disease management.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Soft Robotics and Applications · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhou, X., Yu, L., Zhao, Y. & Ge, J. Panvascular medicine: an emerging discipline focusing on atherosclerotic diseases. Eur. Heart J. 43, 4528–4531 (2022).10.1093/eurheartj/ehac448 ↗
2. GBD 2021 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators Global incidence, prevalence, years lived with disability (YLDs), disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 371 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet 403, 2133–2161 (2024).10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00757-8 ↗
3. Guo, W. & Yi, X. Advancements and future prospects in the study of panvascular disease. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 89, 198–204 (2025).10.1177/13860291241302593 ↗
4. Chowdhury, M. & Secemsky, E. A. Atherectomy vs other modalities for treatment during peripheral vascular intervention. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 24, 869–877 (2022).10.1007/s11886-022-01709-1 ↗
5. Schartz, D. et al. Impact of aspiration catheter size on clinical outcomes in aspiration thrombectomy. J. Neurointerv. Surg. 15, e111–e116 (2023).10.1136/jnis-2022-019246 ↗
6. You, L., Luo, Y., Cheng, Q., Shen, L. & Ge, J. High-suitcordance intelligent fibers for panvascular disease monitoring-intervention. Adv. Fiber Mater. 7, 1042–1072 (2025).10.1007/s42765-025-00542-9 ↗
7. Yin, Z. et al. Inkjet printing for flexible electronics: materials, processes and equipments. Chin. Sci. Bull. 55, 3383–3407 (2010).10.1007/s11434-010-3251-y ↗
8. Rogers, J. A., Someya, T. & Huang, Y. Materials and mechanics for stretchable electronics. Science 327, 1603–1607 (2010).10.1126/science.1182383 ↗
9. Song, J. K. et al. Stretchable colour-sensitive quantum dot nanocomposites for shape-tunable multiplexed phototransistor arrays. Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 849–856 (2022).10.1038/s41565-022-01160-x ↗
10. Lee, S. et al. A shape-morphing cortex-adhesive sensor for closed-loop transcranial ultrasound neurostimulation. Nat. Electron. 7, 800–814 (2024).10.1038/s41928-024-01240-x ↗
11. Jang, J. et al. Reconfigurable assembly of self-healing stretchable transistors and circuits for integrated systems. Nat. Electron. 8, 474–484 (2025).10.1038/s41928-025-01389-z ↗
12. Jung, H. et al. Hydrogel–elastomer-based conductive nanomembranes for soft bioelectronics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 20, 1822–1830 (2025).10.1038/s41565-025-02031-x ↗
13. Veletić, M. et al. Implants with sensing capabilities. Chem. Rev. 122, 16329–16363 (2022).10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00005 ↗
14. Gao, W., Ota, H., Kiriya, D., Takei, K. & Javey, A. Flexible electronics toward wearable sensing. Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 523–533 (2019).10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00500 ↗
15. Chen, S. et al. Flexible wearable sensors for cardiovascular health monitoring. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 10, 2100116 (2021).10.1002/adhm.202100116 ↗
16. Kwon, K. et al. A battery-less wireless implant for the continuous monitoring of vascular pressure, flow rate and temperature. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 7, 1215–1228 (2023).10.1038/s41551-023-01022-4 ↗
17. Tang, H. et al. Injectable ultrasonic sensor for wireless monitoring of intracranial signals. Nature 630, 84–90 (2024).10.1038/s41586-024-07334-y ↗
18. Wang, L. et al. Tracking peripheral artery motion and vascular resistance with a multimodal wearable sensor under pressure perturbations. J. Biomech. Eng. 144, 081003 (2022).10.1115/1.4053399 ↗
19. Haghi, M., Thurow, K. & Stoll, R. Wearable devices in medical internet of things: scientific research and commercially available devices. Healthc. Inform. Res. 23, 4–15 (2017).10.4258/hir.2017.23.1.4 ↗
20. Gubala, V., Harris, L. F., Ricco, A. J., Tan, M. X. & Williams, D. E. Point of care diagnostics: status and future. Anal. Chem. 84, 487–515 (2012).10.1021/ac2030199 ↗
21. Rahmani, S. et al. 3D-printed microneedles in biomedical applications. iScience 24, 102012 (2020).
22. Vora, L. K. et al. Microneedle-based biosensing. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 2, 64–81 (2024).10.1038/s44222-023-00108-7 ↗
23. Hu, Y., Chatzilakou, E., Pan, Z., Traverso, G. & Yetisen, A. K. Microneedle sensors for point-of-care diagnostics. Adv. Sci. (Weinh.) 11, e2306560 (2024).
24. Friedel, M. et al. Opportunities and challenges in the diagnostic utility of dermal interstitial fluid. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 7, 1541–1555 (2023).10.1038/s41551-022-00998-9 ↗
25. Xu, J., Yang, B., Kong, J., Zhang, Y. & Fang, X. Real-time monitoring and early warning of a cytokine storm in vivo using a wearable noninvasive skin microneedle patch. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 12, e2203133 (2023).10.1002/adhm.202203133 ↗
26. Zheng, L., Zhu, D., Xiao, Y., Zheng, X. & Chen, P. Microneedle coupled epidermal sensor for multiplexed electrochemical detection of kidney disease biomarkers. Biosens. Bioelectron. 237, 115506 (2023). 2023.10.1016/j.bios.2023.115506 ↗
27. Huang, X. et al. 3D-assembled microneedle ion sensor-based wearable system for the transdermal monitoring of physiological ion fluctuations. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 9, 25 (2023).10.1038/s41378-023-00497-0 ↗
28. Ju, J., Li, L., Regmi, S., Zhang, X. & Tang, S. Microneedle-based glucose sensor platform: from vitro to wearable point-of-care testing systems. Biosensors. (Basel) 12, 606 (2022).10.3390/bios12080606 ↗
29. Rawson, T. M. et al. Microneedle biosensors for real-time, minimally invasive drug monitoring of phenoxymethylpenicillin: a first-in-human evaluation in healthy volunteers. Lancet Digit.al Health 1, e335–e343 (2019).10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30131-1 ↗
30. Li, Z. et al. Electrochemical detection of cholesterol in human biofluid using microneedle sensor. J. Mater. Chem. B 11, 6075–6081 (2023).10.1039/D2TB02142K ↗
31. Dervisevic, M. et al. Wearable microneedle array-based sensor for transdermal monitoring of pH levels in interstitial fluid. Biosens. Bioelectron. 222, 114955 (2023).10.1016/j.bios.2022.114955 ↗
32. Li, J. et al. Interstitial fluid biomarkers’ minimally invasive monitoring using microneedle sensor arrays. Anal. Chem. 94, 968–974 (2022).10.1021/acs.analchem.1c03827 ↗
33. Puttaswamy, S. V. et al. Nanophotonic-carbohydrate lab-on-a-microneedle for rapid detection of human cystatin C in finger-prick blood. ACS Nano 14, 11939–11949 (2020).10.1021/acsnano.0c05074 ↗
34. Yang, J. et al. Microneedle-based integrated pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation platform for personalized medicine. Nat. Commun. 16, 6260 (2025).10.1038/s41467-025-61549-9 ↗
35. Ranamukhaarachchi, S. A. et al. Integrated hollow microneedle-optofluidic biosensor for therapeutic drug monitoring in sub-nanoliter volumes. Sci. Rep. 6, 29075 (2016).10.1038/srep29075 ↗
36. Zhu, J., Zhou, X., Libanori, A. & Sun, W. Microneedle-based bioassays. Nanoscale Adv. 2, 4295–4304 (2020).10.1039/D0NA00543F ↗
37. Yang, K. et al. A wearable dual-modal patch for rapid pre-hospital diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. ACS Nano 19, 23969–23981 (2025).10.1021/acsnano.5c05461 ↗
38. Chang, A. et al. Integration of chemical and physical inputs for monitoring metabolites and cardiac signals in diabetes. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 10, 94–109 (2026).10.1038/s41551-025-01439-z ↗
39. Kutys, M. L. & Chen, C. S. Forces and mechanotransduction in 3D vascular biology. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 42, 73–79 (2016).10.1016/j.ceb.2016.04.011 ↗
40. Trimm, E. & Red-Horse, K. Vascular endothelial cell development and diversity. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 20, 197–210 (2023).10.1038/s41569-022-00770-1 ↗
41. Shi, J., Yang, Y., Cheng, A., Xu, G. & He, F. Metabolism of vascular smooth muscle cells in vascular diseases. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 319, H613–H631 (2020).10.1152/ajpheart.00220.2020 ↗
42. Wei, K., Nguyen, H. N. & Brenner, M. B. Fibroblast pathology in inflammatory diseases. J. Clin. Invest. 131, e149538 (2021).10.1172/JCI149538 ↗
43. Chistiakov, D. A. et al. Mechanisms of foam cell formation in atherosclerosis. J. Mol. Med. (Berl.) 95, 1153–1165 (2017).10.1007/s00109-017-1575-8 ↗
44. Lee, M. S. & Banka, G. In-stent restenosis. Interv. Cardiol. Clin. 5, 211–220 (2016).
45. Mauri, L. et al. Relationship of late loss in lumen diameter to coronary restenosis in sirolimus-eluting stents. Circulation 111, 321–327 (2005).10.1161/01.CIR.0000153356.72810.97 ↗
46. Chen, X., Assadsangabi, B., Hsiang, Y. & Takahata, K. Enabling angioplasty-ready “smart” stents to detect in-stent restenosis and occlusion. Adv. Sci. (Weinh.) 5, 1700560 (2018).
47. Rigo, B. et al. Soft implantable printed bioelectronic system for wireless continuous monitoring of restenosis. Biosens. Bioelectron. 241, 115650 (2023).10.1016/j.bios.2023.115650 ↗
48. Hoare, D. et al. Predicting cardiovascular stent complications using self-reporting biosensors for noninvasive detection of disease. Adv. Sci. 9, 2105285 (2022).10.1002/advs.202105285 ↗
49. You, L., Shen, L. & Ge J. The foundation and development of China’s National Basic Science Center for panvascular interventional complex systems: pioneering device-vessel suitcordance research. Eur. Heart J. 46, 3400-3403 (2025).10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf418 ↗
50. Wang, L. et al. Ultra-sensitive wireless pressure sensor for real-time cardiovascular restenosis monitoring in smart stents. IEEE 38th Int. Conf. Micro Electro Mech. Syst. (MEMS), 12–15 (2025).10.1109/MEMS61431.2025.10917782 ↗
51. Xu, H. et al. Flexible tensile strain-pressure sensor with an off-axis deformation-insensitivity. Nano. Energy 99, 107384 (2022).10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107384 ↗
52. Sun, M. et al. Flexible graphene field-effect transistors and their application in flexible biomedical sensing. Nano-Micro Lett. 17, 34 (2025).10.1007/s40820-024-01534-x ↗
53. Wang, L., Jackman, J. A., Ng, W. B. & Cho, N.-J. Flexible, graphene-coated biocomposite for highly sensitive, real-time molecular detection. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 8623–8630 (2016).10.1002/adfm.201603550 ↗
54. Gao, J. et al. Ultrasensitive label-free MiRNA sensing based on a flexible graphene field-effect transistor without functionalization. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2, 1090–1098 (2020).10.1021/acsaelm.0c00095 ↗
55. Hao, Z. et al. Measurement of cytokine biomarkers using an aptamer-based affinity graphene nanosensor on a flexible substrate toward wearable applications. Nanoscale 10, 21681–21688 (2018).10.1039/C8NR04315A ↗
56. Chen, L. et al. A DNA-functionalized graphene field-effect transistor for quantitation of vascular endothelial growth factor. Sens. Actuators B. 351, 130964 (2022).10.1016/j.snb.2021.130964 ↗
57. Ashraf, J. et al. Conducting Polymer-Infused Electrospun Fibre Mat Modified by POEGMA Brushes as Antifouling Biointerface. Biosensors (Basel.) 12, 1143 (2022).10.3390/bios12121143 ↗
58. Zhang, S., Liu, W., Wu, Z. & Chen, H. Tri-functional platform for the facile construction of dual-functional surfaces via a one-pot strategy. Mater. Chem. B. 8, 5602–5605 (2020).10.1039/D0TB01222J ↗
59. Sheng, D. et al. Phosphorylcholine/heparin composite coatings on artificial lung membrane for enhanced hemo-compatibility. Langmuir 39, 9796–9807 (2023).10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c00945 ↗
60. Zhang, Z., Chen, S., Chang, Y. & Jiang, S. Surface grafted sulfobetaine polymers via atom transfer radical polymerization as superlow fouling coatings. Phys. Chem. B. 110, 10799–10804 (2006).10.1021/jp057266i ↗
61. Wu, Y. et al. 5 years of serial intravascular imaging outcomes of XINSORB sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 12, 602–603 (2019).10.1016/j.jcin.2018.11.029 ↗
62. Ouyang, H. et al. A bioresorbable dynamic pressure sensor for cardiovascular postoperative care. Adv. Mater. 33, e2102302 (2021).10.1002/adma.202102302 ↗
63. Chen, X. & Ahn, J. H. Biodegradable and bioabsorbable sensors based on two-dimensional materials. J. Mater. Chem. B 8, 1082–1092 (2020).10.1039/C9TB02519G ↗
64. Sun, Z. Synchrotron radiation computed tomography assessment of calcified plaques and coronary stenosis with different slice thicknesses and beam energies on 3D printed coronary models. Quant. imaging Med. Surg. 9, 6–22 (2019).10.21037/qims.2018.09.11 ↗
65. Ginn-Hedman, A. M. et al. Diffusible contrast-enhanced micro-CT improves visualization of stented vessels. Cardiovasc. Pathol. 60, 107428 (2022).10.1016/j.carpath.2022.107428 ↗
66. Vennemann, B., Obrist, D. & Rösgen, T. A smartphone-enabled wireless and batteryless implantable blood flow sensor for remote monitoring of prosthetic heart valve function. PLoS One 15, e0227372 (2020).10.1371/journal.pone.0227372 ↗
67. Jalal, Z. et al. Long-term complications after transcatheter atrial septal defect closure: a review of the medical literature. Can. J. Cardiol. 32, 1315.e11–1315.e18 (2016).
68. Wang, S., Qiao, W. & Dong, N. Residual shunt and microthrombosis associated with new-onset migraine after transcatheter atrial septal defect closure. Eur. Heart J. 44, 4605 (2023).10.1093/eurheartj/ehad645 ↗
69. Criscuolo, V. et al. Double-framed thin elastomer devices. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 55255–55261 (2020).10.1021/acsami.0c16312 ↗
70. Hu, X., Chen, A., Luo, Y., Zhang, C. & Zhang, E. Steerable catheters for minimally invasive surgery: a review and future directions. Comput. Assist. Surg. 23, 21–41 (2018).10.1080/24699322.2018.1526972 ↗
71. Safian, R. D. Magnetic navigation: what’s the attraction?. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Interv. 84, 668–669 (2014).
72. Limpabandhu, C., Hu, Y., Ren, H., Song, W. & Tse, Z. T. H. Actuation technologies for magnetically guided catheters. Minim. Invasive Ther. Allied Technol. 32, 137–152 (2023).10.1080/13645706.2023.2198004 ↗
73. Singh, A. & Mehta, Y. Intraoperative aortic dissection. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 18, 537–542 (2015).
74. Kobayashi, M., Cheng-Kuei, J. & Levesque, D. Flexible ultrasonic transducers. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 53, 1478–1486 (2006).10.1109/TUFFC.2006.1665105 ↗
75. Manwar, R., Kratkiewicz, K. & Avanaki, K. Overview of ultrasound detection technologies for photoacoustic imaging. Micromachines (Basel) 11, 692 (2020).10.3390/mi11070692 ↗
76. Chen, Y. et al. High-frequency PIN-PMN-PT single crystal ultrasonic transducer for imaging applications. Appl. Phys. A. 108, 987–991 (2012).10.1007/s00339-012-7009-0 ↗
77. Schmitz, G. & Dencks, S. Ultrasound imaging. Recent Results Cancer Res. 216, 135–154 (2020).10.1007/978-3-030-42618-7_4 ↗
78. Park, E. Y., Lee, H., Han, S., Kim, C. & Kim, J. Photoacoustic imaging systems based on clinical ultrasound platform. Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood.) 247, 551–560 (2022).10.1177/15353702211073684 ↗
79. Wang, C. et al. Bioadhesive ultrasound for long-term continuous imaging of diverse organs. Science 377, 517–523 (2022).10.1126/science.abo2542 ↗
80. Lin, M. et al. A fully integrated wearable ultrasound system to monitor deep tissues in moving subjects. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 448–457 (2024).10.1038/s41587-023-01800-0 ↗
81. Liu, T. et al. Flexible thin-film PZT ultrasonic transducers on polyimide substrates. Sensors 21, 1014 (2021).10.3390/s21031014 ↗
82. Liu, W., Zhu, C. & Wu, D. Flexible and stretchable ultrasonic transducer array conformed to complex surfaces. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 42, 240–243 (2021).10.1109/LED.2020.3045037 ↗
83. Zhou, X. et al. Sputtered ZnO film on aluminium foils for flexible ultrasonic transducers. Ultrasonics 54, 1991–1998 (2014).10.1016/j.ultras.2014.05.006 ↗
84. Hu, H. et al. A wearable cardiac ultrasound imager. Nature 613, 667–675 (2023).10.1038/s41586-022-05498-z ↗
85. Yuan, J. et al. Skin-adaptive focused flexible micromachined ultrasound transducers for wearable cardiovascular health monitoring. Sci. Adv. 11, eadw7632 (2025).10.1126/sciadv.adw7632 ↗
86. Kang, D. H. et al. Silicon nanocolumn-based disposable and flexible ultrasound patches. Nat. Commun. 16, 6609 (2025).10.1038/s41467-025-61903-x ↗
87. van Neer, P. L. M. J. et al. Flexible large-area ultrasound arrays for medical applications made using embossed polymer structures. Nat. Commun. 15, 2802 (2024).10.1038/s41467-024-47074-1 ↗
88. Ma, J. et al. Procedural simplification in mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair: full echocardiographic guidance and outcomes. IJC Heart Vasc. 59, 101730 (2025).10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101730 ↗
89. Dong, J. et al. Embracing a new era of echocardiography-guided percutaneous and non-fluoroscopical procedure for structure heart disease. Med. Rev. 5, 174–176 (2025).10.1515/mr-2024-0101 ↗
90. Sousonis, V. et al. The use of Intracardiac Echocardiography in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 26, 893–901 (2024).10.1007/s11886-024-02091-w ↗
91. Wang, X., Ji, Z., Yang, S. & Xing, D. Morphological-adaptive photoacoustic tomography with flexible transducer and flexible orientation light. Opt. Lett. 42, 4486–4489 (2017).10.1364/OL.42.004486 ↗
92. Huynh, N. T. et al. A fast all-optical 3D photoacoustic scanner for clinical vascular imaging. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 9, 638–655 (2025).10.1038/s41551-024-01247-x ↗
93. Yang, X., Chen, Y. H., Xia, F. & Sawan, M. Photoacoustic imaging for monitoring of stroke diseases: a review. Photoacoustics 23, 100287 (2021).10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100287 ↗
94. Neprokin, A., Broadway, C., Myllylä, T., Bykov, A. & Meglinski, I. Photoacoustic Imaging in Biomedicine and Life Sciences. Life (Basel.) 12, 588 (2022).
95. Matsumoto, Y. et al. Visualising peripheral arterioles and venules through high-resolution and large-area photoacoustic imaging. Sci. Rep. 8, 14930 (2018).10.1038/s41598-018-33255-8 ↗
96. Zhang, Y. et al. Ultrafast longitudinal imaging of haemodynamics via single-shot volumetric photoacoustic tomography with a single-element detector. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 8, 712–725 (2024).10.1038/s41551-023-01149-4 ↗
97. Pashaei, V. et al. Flexible body-conformal ultrasound patches for image-guided neuromodulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 14, 305–318 (2020).10.1109/TBCAS.2019.2959439 ↗
98. de Oliveira et al. Development of a 2.25 MHz flexible array ultrasonic transducer. Res. Biomed. Eng. 35, 27–37 (2019).10.1007/s42600-019-00006-1 ↗
99. Shen, S. et al. Effect of aortic arch type on technical indicators in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting. J. Int. Med. Res. 47, 682–688 (2019).10.1177/0300060518807604 ↗
100. Patterson, M. S., Schotten, J., van Mieghem, C., Kiemeneij, F. & Serruys, P. W. Magnetic navigation in percutaneous coronary intervention. J. Interv. Cardiol. 19, 558–565 (2006).10.1111/j.1540-8183.2006.00202.x ↗