High-strength mechanically gradient hydrogels via physical crosslinking for tendon-mimetic tissue repair
Source abstract
Abstract
The biomimetic materials that replicate the mechanical gradient transitions from muscle to tendon to bone remain a significant challenge in tissue engineering, particularly through simple and environmentally friendly approaches. This mechanical gradient is crucial for applications such as rotator cuff and Achilles tendon repair patches, which prevent stress shielding and ensure uniform stress distribution, addressing the stress concentration issues common in traditional repairs. Here, we present a strategy that achieves high strength even at high water content, enabling programmable modulus/structural gradients with broad applicability. Using rotator cuff tendon repair as a model system, we demonstrate successful in vivo tissue regeneration with integrated real-time sensing capabilities, providing quantitative data for rehabilitation protocols. The hydrogels exhibit precisely controlled regional mechanical properties and seamless interface transitions, mimicking the hierarchical structure of native tissue. This approach not only improves healing outcomes compared to conventional methods but also establishes a quantitative standard for rehabilitation training.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tendon Structure and Treatment · Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Cui, W. et al. Strong tough conductive hydrogels via the synergy of ion-induced cross-linking and salting-out. Ad. Funct. Mater. 2204823 (2022).10.1002/adfm.202204823 ↗
2. Lin, M. et al. Soft wearable devices for deep-tissue sensing. Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 850–869 (2022).10.1038/s41578-022-00427-y ↗
3. Freedman, B. R. et al. Enhanced tendon healing by a tough hydrogel with an adhesive side and high drug-loading capacity. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 6, 1167–1179 (2022).10.1038/s41551-021-00810-0 ↗
4. Gracey, E. et al. Tendon and ligament mechanical loading in the pathogenesis of inflammatory arthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 16, 193–207 (2022).10.1038/s41584-019-0364-x ↗
5. Bedi, A. et al. Rotator cuff tears. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 10, 8 (2024).10.1038/s41572-024-00492-3 ↗
6. Song, W. et al. Circadian rhythm-regulated ADSC-derived sEVs and a triphasic microneedle delivery system to enhance tendon-to-bone healing. Adv. Mater. e2408255 (2024).10.1002/adma.202408255 ↗
7. Chung, S. W. et al. Rotator cuff tear and sarcopenia: are these related?. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 25, e249–e255 (2016).10.1016/j.jse.2016.02.008 ↗
8. Amendola, F. et al. The acute achilles tendon rupture: an evidence-based approach from the diagnosis to the treatment. Medicina 58, 1195 (2022).10.3390/medicina58091195 ↗
9. Capogna, B. et al. Distal patellar tendon avulsion in association with high-energy knee trauma: A case series and review of the literature. Knee 24, 468–476 (2017).10.1016/j.knee.2016.10.020 ↗
10. Cai, Z. et al. Hierarchical chiral calcium silicate hydrate films promote vascularization for tendon-to-bone healing. Adv. Mater. 36, e2404842 (2024).10.1002/adma.202404842 ↗
11. Lei, T. et al. Biomimetic strategies for tendon/ligament-to-bone interface regeneration. Bioact. Mater. 6, 2491–2510 (2021).
12. Ker, D. F. E. et al. Functionally graded, bone- and tendon-like polyurethane for rotator cuff repair. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1707107 (2018).10.1002/adfm.201707107 ↗
13. Walton, J. R. et al. Restore orthobiologic implant: not recommended for augmentation of rotator cuff repairs. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 89, 786–791 (2007).
14. Shang, P. et al. Gradient bipolar nanofiber scaffolds with a structure of biomimetic tendon-bone interface as rotator cuff patches. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 5, 6107–6116 (2023).10.1021/acsapm.3c00791 ↗
15. Zhu, C. et al. Augmenting tendon-to-bone repair with functionally graded scaffolds. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 10, e2002269 (2021).10.1002/adhm.202002269 ↗
16. Song, G. et al. Bioinspired intervertebral disc with multidirectional stiffness prepared via multimaterial additive manufacturing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33, 2300298 (2023).10.1002/adfm.202300298 ↗
17. Lu, C. et al. Biomimetic design of 3D fibrous mesh reinforced hydrogel replicating the form and function of the intervertebral disc. Small Struct. 4, 2200254 (2023).10.1002/sstr.202200254 ↗
18. Wang, L. et al. Innovative design of minimal invasive biodegradable poly(glycerol-dodecanoate) nucleus pulposus scaffold with function regeneration. Nat. Commun. 14, 3865 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-39604-0 ↗
19. Miescher, I. et al. In vitro assessment of bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation on novel bioactive, biodegradable electrospun fiber meshes intended to support tendon rupture repair. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 16, 6348–6355 (2024).10.1021/acsami.3c15710 ↗
20. Li, X. & Gong, J. P. Design principles for strong and tough hydrogels. Nat. Rev. Mater. 9, 380–398 (2024).10.1038/s41578-024-00672-3 ↗
21. Blache, U. et al. Engineered hydrogels for mechanobiology. Nat. Rev. Methods Prim. 2, 99 (2022).10.1038/s43586-022-00189-5 ↗
22. Chen, Y. et al. Gelatin-based metamaterial hydrogel films with high conformality for ultra-soft tissue monitoring. Nanomicro. Lett. 16, 34 (2023).
23. Zhang, L. et al. Multileveled hierarchical hydrogel with continuous biophysical and biochemical gradients for enhanced repair of full-thickness osteochondral defect. Adv. Mater. 35, e2209565 (2023).10.1002/adma.202209565 ↗
24. Khodambashi, R. et al. Heterogeneous hydrogel structures with spatiotemporal reconfigurability using addressable and tunable voxels. Adv. Mater. 33, 2005906 (2021).10.1002/adma.202005906 ↗
25. Ying, G. L. et al. Aqueous two-phase emulsion bioink-enabled 3D bioprinting of porous hydrogels. Adv. Mater. 30, 1805460 (2018).10.1002/adma.201805460 ↗
26. Escobar, A. R. et al. Fluidic infiltrative assembly of 3D hydrogel with heterogeneous composition and function. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2103288 (2021).10.1002/adfm.202103288 ↗
27. Zhang, K. et al. Shape morphing of hydrogels by harnessing enzyme enabled mechanoresponse. Nat. Commun. 15, 249 (2024).10.1038/s41467-023-44607-y ↗
28. Liu, H. et al. Spatially modulated stiffness on hydrogels for soft and stretchable integrated electronics. Mater. Horiz. 7, 203–213 (2020).10.1039/C9MH01211G ↗
29. Chen, F. et al. Phase-separation facilitated one-step fabrication of multiscale heterogeneous two-aqueous-phase gel. Nat. Commun. 14, 2793 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-38394-9 ↗
30. Liu, Y. et al. Muscle-inspired formable wood-based phase change materials. Adv. Mater. 36, e2406915 (2024).10.1002/adma.202406915 ↗
31. Liu, B. et al. 4D printed hydrogel scaffold with swelling-stiffening properties and programmable deformation for minimally invasive implantation. Nat. Commun. 15, 1587 (2024).10.1038/s41467-024-45938-0 ↗
32. Hua, M. et al. Strong tough hydrogels via the synergy of freeze-casting and salting out. Nature 590, 594–599 (2021).10.1038/s41586-021-03212-z ↗
33. Cao, G. et al. Salting out" in hofmeister effect enhancing mechanical and electrochemical performance of amide-based hydrogel electrolytes for flexible zinc-ion battery. Small 19, e2207610 (2023).10.1002/smll.202207610 ↗
34. Wu, S. et al. Poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels with broad-range tunable mechanical properties via the hofmeister effect. Adv. Mater. 33, e2007829 (2021).10.1002/adma.202007829 ↗
35. No, Y. J. et al. Role of biomaterials and controlled architecture on tendon/ligament repair and regeneration. Adv. Mater. 32, e1904511 (2020).10.1002/adma.201904511 ↗
36. Wu, Y. et al. Solvent-exchange assisted wet-annealing: a new strategy for super-strong, tough, stretchable and anti-fatigue hydrogels. Adv. Mater. 35, e2210624 (2023).10.1002/adma.202210624 ↗