journal article·2026-01-30Open access

3D micropatterning of PEDOT:PSS/Gelatin conductive hydrogels via two-photon lithography for soft bioelectronics

Marco Buzio, Martina Gini, Tom C. Schneider, Nevena Stajkovic, Sven Ingebrandt, Laura De Laporte, Andreas Offenhäusser, Valeria Criscuolo, Francesca Santoro

npj Flexible Electronics· Volume 10· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract The mechanical similarity between bioelectronic platforms and native tissue microenvironments is critical for successful cell-microdevice interfacing. Advances in high-resolution microfabrication have enabled the creation of 3D conductive microstructures; however, these approaches typically yield to structures that are electrically active but mechanically stiff relative to biological tissues. In this work, we present a strategy for the fabrication of soft 3D bioelectronic interfaces by blending PEDOT:PSS with a methacrylate-modified gelatin and leveraging two-photon polymerization lithography for micropatterning. Incorporating the conducting polymer into the hydrogel matrix resulted in reduced electrical impedance and exhibited soft mechanical properties both at the macro- and micro-scale. Here, the conductive hydrogel blends have been 3D printed, their versatility was assessed through different geometries and were used for neuronal cell culture. This approach enables the fabrication of soft neural interfaces with biomimetic architectures, using multimaterial blends, supporting improved electrical and mechanical integration at the cell-electrode interface.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Neuroscience and Neural Engineering · Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies · Advanced Materials and Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Rivnay, J., Wang, H., Fenno, L., Deisseroth, K. & Malliaras, G. G. Next-generation probes, particles, and proteins for neural interfacing. Sci. Adv. 3, e1601649 (2017).10.1126/sciadv.1601649 ↗
2. Cox-Pridmore, D. M., Castro, F. A., Silva, S. R. P., Camelliti, P. & Zhao, Y. Emerging Bioelectronic Strategies for Cardiovascular Tissue Engineering and Implantation. Small 18, 2105281 (2022).10.1002/smll.202105281 ↗
3. Procès, A., Luciano, M., Kalukula, Y., Ris, L. & Gabriele, S. Multiscale Mechanobiology in Brain Physiology and Diseases. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 823857 (2022).10.3389/fcell.2022.823857 ↗
4. Sunwoo, S.-H., Ha, K.-H., Lee, S., Lu, N. & Kim, D.-H. Wearable and Implantable Soft Bioelectronics: Device Designs and Material Strategies. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 12, 359–391 (2021).10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-101420-024336 ↗
5. Guo, B., Glavas, L. & Albertsson, A.-C. Biodegradable and electrically conducting polymers for biomedical applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 38, 1263–1286 (2013).10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.06.003 ↗
6. Axpe, E., Orive, G., Franze, K. & Appel, E. A. Towards brain-tissue-like biomaterials. Nat. Commun. 11, 3423 (2020).10.1038/s41467-020-17245-x ↗
7. Yuk, H., Lu, B. & Zhao, X. Hydrogel bioelectronics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 1642–1667 (2019).10.1039/C8CS00595H ↗
8. Mariano, A., Bovio, C. L., Criscuolo, V. & Santoro, F. Bioinspired micro- and nano-structured neural interfaces. Nanotechnology 33, 492501 (2022).10.1088/1361-6528/ac8881 ↗
9. Aboal-Castro, L. et al. Laser-Assisted Micropatterned 3D Printed Scaffolds with Customizable Surface Topography and Porosity for Modulation of Cell Function. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 14, 2403992 (2025).10.1002/adhm.202403992 ↗
10. Sharaf, A., Frimat, J.-P. & Accardo, A. Mechanical confinement matters: Unveiling the effect of two-photon polymerized 2.5D and 3D microarchitectures on neuronal YAP expression and neurite outgrowth. Mater. Today Bio 29, 101325 (2024).10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101325 ↗
11. Flamourakis, G. et al. Deciphering the Influence of Effective Shear Modulus on Neuronal Network Directionality and Growth Cones’ Morphology via Laser-Assisted 3D-Printed Nanostructured Arrays. Adv. Funct. Mater. 35, 2409451 (2025).10.1002/adfm.202409451 ↗
12. Pennacchio, F. A. et al. Three-dimensionally Patterned Scaffolds Modulate the Biointerface at the Nanoscale. Nano Lett. 19, 5118–5123 (2019).10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01468 ↗
13. Sands, I. et al. Interface-Mediated Neurogenic Signaling: The Impact of Surface Geometry and Chemistry on Neural Cell Behavior for Regenerative and Brain-Machine Interfacing Applications. Adv. Mater. 36, 2401750 (2024).10.1002/adma.202401750 ↗
14. Jiang, Y. et al. The Roles of Micro- and Nanoscale Materials in Cell-Engineering Systems. Adv. Mater. 36, 2410908 (2024).10.1002/adma.202410908 ↗
15. Yin, J. et al. Leveraging biomimetic materials for bioelectronics. Matter 8, 101961 (2025).10.1016/j.matt.2025.101961 ↗
16. Santoro, F., Schnitker, J., Panaitov, G. & Offenhäusser, A. On Chip Guidance and Recording of Cardiomyocytes with 3D Mushroom-Shaped Electrodes. Nano Lett. 13, 5379–5384 (2013).10.1021/nl402901y ↗
17. Santoro, F., van de Burgt, Y., Keene, S. T., Cui, B. & Salleo, A. Enhanced Cell–Chip Coupling by Rapid Femtosecond Laser Patterning of Soft PEDOT:PSS Biointerfaces. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 39116–39121 (2017).10.1021/acsami.7b12308 ↗
18. Cho, Y. H., Park, Y., Kim, S. & Park, J. 3D Electrodes for Bioelectronics. Adv. Mater. 33, 2005805 (2021).10.1002/adma.202005805 ↗
19. Ruggiero, A. et al. Two-photon polymerization lithography enabling the fabrication of PEDOT:PSS 3D structures for bioelectronic applications. Chem. Commun. 58, 9790–9793 (2022).10.1039/D2CC03152C ↗
20. Wang, P. et al. Direct-Print 3D Electrodes for Large-Scale, High-Density, and Customizable Neural Interfaces. Adv. Sci. 12, 2408602 (2025).10.1002/advs.202408602 ↗
21. Kurselis, K., Kiyan, R., Bagratashvili, V. N., Popov, V. K. & Chichkov, B. N. 3D fabrication of all-polymer conductive microstructures by two photon polymerization. Opt. Express, OE 21, 31029–31035 (2013).10.1364/OE.21.031029 ↗
22. Bansal, M. et al. Patternable Gelatin Methacrylate/PEDOT/Polystyrene Sulfonate Microelectrode Coatings for Neuronal Recording. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 8, 3933–3943 (2022).10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00231 ↗
23. Zhou, X., Liu, X. & Gu, Z. Photoresist Development for 3D Printing of Conductive Microstructures via Two-Photon Polymerization. Adv. Mater. 36, 2409326 (2024).10.1002/adma.202409326 ↗
24. Zhou, X. et al. Photoinduced double hydrogen-atom transfer for polymerization and 3D printing of conductive polymer. Nat. Synth. 3, 1145–1157 (2024).10.1038/s44160-024-00582-w ↗
25. Sanjuan-Alberte, P. et al. Development of Conductive Gelatine-Methacrylate Inks for Two-Photon Polymerisation. Polymers 13, 1038 (2021).10.3390/polym13071038 ↗
26. Restaino, M. et al. In Situ Direct Laser Writing of 3D Graphene-Laden Microstructures. Adv. Mater. Technol. 6, 2100222 (2021).10.1002/admt.202100222 ↗
27. Dadras-Toussi, O. et al. Multiphoton Lithography of Organic Semiconductor Devices for 3D Printing of Flexible Electronic Circuits, Biosensors, and Bioelectronics. Adv. Mater. 34, 2200512 (2022).10.1002/adma.202200512 ↗
28. Lichade, K. M., Shiravi, S., Finan, J. D. & Pan, Y. Direct printing of conductive hydrogels using two-photon polymerization. Addit. Manuf. 84, 104123 (2024).
29. Amruth, C., Singh, A. K., Sharma, A., Corzo, D. & Baran, D. Micro-3D Printed Conductive Polymer Composite via Two-Photon Polymerization for Sensing Applications. Adv. Mater. Technol. 9, 2400290 (2024).10.1002/admt.202400290 ↗
30. Blasco, E. et al. Fabrication of Conductive 3D Gold-Containing Microstructures via Direct Laser Writing. Adv. Mater. 28, 3592–3595 (2016).10.1002/adma.201506126 ↗
31. Tanaka, T., Ishikawa, A. & Kawata, S. Two-photon-induced reduction of metal ions for fabricating three-dimensional electrically conductive metallic microstructure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 081107 (2006).10.1063/1.2177636 ↗
32. Vyatskikh, A. et al. Additive manufacturing of 3D nano-architected metals. Nat. Commun. 9, 593 (2018).10.1038/s41467-018-03071-9 ↗
33. Wang, F. et al. 3D Printed Implantable Hydrogel Bioelectronics for Electrophysiological Monitoring and Electrical Modulation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2314471 (2024).10.1002/adfm.202314471 ↗
34. Zhao, G. Z. et al. Feng. Rational design of electrically conductive biomaterials toward excitable tissues regeneration. Prog. Polym. Sci. 131, 101573–101573 (2022).10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2022.101573 ↗
35. Tropp, J. et al. Conducting Polymer Nanoparticles with Intrinsic Aqueous Dispersibility for Conductive Hydrogels. Adv. Mater. 36, 2306691 (2024).10.1002/adma.202306691 ↗
36. Rivnay, J. et al. Structural control of mixed ionic and electronic transport in conducting polymers. Nat. Commun. 7, 11287 (2016).10.1038/ncomms11287 ↗
37. Li, H. et al. PEDOTs-Based Conductive Hydrogels: Design, Fabrications, and Applications. Adv. Mater. 37, 2415151 (2025).10.1002/adma.202415151 ↗
38. Pennacchio, F. A. et al. Three-Dimensional Microstructured Azobenzene-Containing Gelatin as a Photoactuable Cell Confining System. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 91–97 (2018).10.1021/acsami.7b13176 ↗
39. Yue, K. et al. Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials 73, 254–271 (2015).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.045 ↗
40. Van Den Bulcke, A. I. et al. Structural and Rheological Properties of Methacrylamide Modified Gelatin Hydrogels. Biomacromolecules 1, 31–38 (2000).10.1021/bm990017d ↗
41. Brigo, L. et al. 3D high-resolution two-photon crosslinked hydrogel structures for biological studies. Acta Biomater. 55, 373–384 (2017).10.1016/j.actbio.2017.03.036 ↗
42. Spencer, A. R. et al. Electroconductive Gelatin Methacryloyl-PEDOT:PSS Composite Hydrogels: Design, Synthesis, and Properties. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 4, 1558–1567 (2018).
43. Testore, D., Zoso, A., Kortaberria, G., Sangermano, M. & Chiono, V. Electroconductive Photo-Curable PEGDA-Gelatin/PEDOT:PSS Hydrogels for Prospective Cardiac Tissue Engineering Application. Front Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10, 897575 (2022).10.3389/fbioe.2022.897575 ↗
44. Chou, C.-C. et al. Injectable GelMA–PEDOT:PSS conductive hydrogel for cardiac-tissue engineering and integrated organic electrochemical transistor–based bioelectronic patch for biosensing and controlled extracellular vesicle release. Chem. Eng. J. 523, 168573 (2025).10.1016/j.cej.2025.168573 ↗
45. Furlani, F. et al. Electroconductive and injectable hydrogels based on gelatin and PEDOT:PSS for a minimally invasive approach in nervous tissue regeneration. Biomater. Sci. 10, 2040–2053 (2022).10.1039/D2BM00116K ↗
46. Lopez-Larrea, N. et al. Fast Visible-Light 3D Printing of Conductive PEDOT:PSS Hydrogels. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 45, 2300229 (2024).10.1002/marc.202300229 ↗
47. Wloka, T., Gottschaldt, M. & Schubert, U. S. From Light to Structure: Photo Initiators for Radical Two-Photon Polymerization. Chem. – A Eur. J. 28, e202104191 (2022).10.1002/chem.202104191 ↗
48. Tarricone, G., Carmagnola, I. & Chiono, V. Tissue-Engineered Models of the Human Brain: State-of-the-Art Analysis and Challenges. J. Funct. Biomater. 13, 146 (2022).10.3390/jfb13030146 ↗
49. Paleti, S. H. K. et al. Impact of doping on the mechanical properties of conjugated polymers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 53, 1702–1729 (2024).10.1039/D3CS00833A ↗
50. Claaßen, C. et al. Quantification of Substitution of Gelatin Methacryloyl: Best Practice and Current Pitfalls. Biomacromolecules 19, 42–52 (2018).10.1021/acs.biomac.7b01221 ↗
51. Brewer, G. J., Torricelli, J. R., Evege, E. K. & Price, P. J. Optimized survival of hippocampal neurons in B27-supplemented neurobasalTM, a new serum-free medium combination. J. Neurosci. Res. 35, 567–576 (1993).10.1002/jnr.490350513 ↗
52. Seabold, S. & Perktold, J. Statsmodels: Econometric and Statistical Modeling with Python. Scipy https://doi.org/10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-011 (2010).10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-011 ↗