Full textile-based body-coupled electrical stimulation for wireless, battery-free, and wearable bioelectronics
Source abstract
Abstract
Electrical stimulation is effective for various therapeutic applications; however, to increase convenience, it is crucial to eliminate generators and batteries for wireless power transmission. This paper presents a full textile-based body-coupled electrical stimulation (BCES) system designed for wireless electrical stimulation using energy loss from electronic devices and static electricity from physical activity. We developed the BCES socks by knitting conductive threads to ensure stability and comfort. BCES socks generate electric fields ranging from tens to hundreds of millivolts per millimeter, which are sufficient to activate muscle fibers. Experimental and computational analyses confirmed the effective concentration of the electric fields. Human trials demonstrated significant improvements in exercise performance, with a 21.47% increase in calf raise frequency, an 11.97% increase in repetition count, and a 6.25% reduction in muscle fatigue. These results indicate the potential of BCES socks as a practical battery-free solution for enhancing muscle activity and reducing fatigue.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Wireless Body Area Networks · Muscle activation and electromyography studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Ferrigno, B. et al. Bioactive polymeric materials and electrical stimulation strategies for musculoskeletal tissue repair and regeneration. Bioact. Mater. 5, 468–485 (2020).
2. Thrivikraman, G. et al. Unraveling the mechanistic effects of electric field stimulation towards directing stem cell fate and function: A tissue engineering perspective. Biomaterials 150, 60–86 (2018).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.10.003 ↗
3. Lozano, A. M. et al. Deep brain stimulation: current challenges and future directions. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 15, 148–160 (2019).10.1038/s41582-018-0128-2 ↗
4. Violante, I. R. et al. Non-invasive temporal interference electrical stimulation of the human hippocampus. Nat. Neurosci. 26, 1994–2004 (2023).10.1038/s41593-023-01456-8 ↗
5. Cagnan, H. et al. Emerging technologies for improved deep brain stimulation. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1024–1033 (2019).10.1038/s41587-019-0244-6 ↗
6. Li, L. et al. Implantable Zinc–Oxygen Battery for In Situ Electrical Stimulation-Promoted Neural Regeneration. Adv. Mater. 35, 2302997 (2023).10.1002/adma.202302997 ↗
7. Fisher, R. S. & Velasco, A. L. Electrical brain stimulation for epilepsy. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 10, 261–270 (2014).10.1038/nrneurol.2014.59 ↗
8. Wang, T. et al. Rehabilitation exercise–driven symbiotic electrical stimulation system accelerating bone regeneration. Sci. Adv. 10, eadi6799 (2024).10.1126/sciadv.adi6799 ↗
9. Shirzaei Sani, E. et al. A stretchable wireless wearable bioelectronic system for multiplexed monitoring and combination treatment of infected chronic wounds. Sci. Adv. 9, eadf7388 (2023).10.1126/sciadv.adf7388 ↗
10. Barman, S. R. et al. A self-powered multifunctional dressing for active infection prevention and accelerated wound healing. Sci. Adv. 9, eadc8758 (2023).10.1126/sciadv.adc8758 ↗
11. Jiang, Y. et al. Wireless, closed-loop, smart bandage with integrated sensors and stimulators for advanced wound care and accelerated healing. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 652–662 (2023).10.1038/s41587-022-01528-3 ↗
12. Enoka, R. M. et al. Electrical Stimulation of Muscle: Electrophysiology and Rehabilitation. Physiology 35, 40–56 (2019).10.1152/physiol.00015.2019 ↗
13. Khodabukus, A. et al. Electrical stimulation increases hypertrophy and metabolic flux in tissue-engineered human skeletal muscle. Biomaterials 198, 259–269 (2019).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.08.058 ↗
14. Abramson, A. et al. Ingestible transiently anchoring electronics for microstimulation and conductive signaling. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz0127 (2020).10.1126/sciadv.aaz0127 ↗
15. Ramadi, K. B. et al. Bioinspired, ingestible electroceutical capsules for hunger-regulating hormone modulation. Sci. Robot. 8, eade9676 (2023).10.1126/scirobotics.ade9676 ↗
16. Srinivasan, S. S. et al. An ingestible self-propelling device for intestinal reanimation. Sci. Robot. 9, eadh8170 (2024).10.1126/scirobotics.adh8170 ↗
17. Dagdeviren, C. et al. Conformal piezoelectric energy harvesting and storage from motions of the heart, lung, and diaphragm. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 111, 1927–1932 (2014).10.1073/pnas.1317233111 ↗
18. Sharma, A. et al. Electrical stimulation induced by a piezo-driven triboelectric nanogenerator and electroactive hydrogel composite, accelerate wound repair. Nano Energy 99, 107419 (2022).10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107419 ↗
19. Yao, G. et al. Self-Activated Electrical Stimulation for Effective Hair Regeneration via a Wearable Omnidirectional Pulse Generator. ACS Nano 13, 12345–12356 (2019).10.1021/acsnano.9b03912 ↗
20. Burton, A. et al. Fully implanted battery-free high power platform for chronic spinal and muscular functional electrical stimulation. Nat. Commun. 14, 7887 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-43669-2 ↗
21. Hinchet, R. et al. Transcutaneous ultrasound energy harvesting using capacitive triboelectric technology. Science 365, 491–494 (2019).10.1126/science.aan3997 ↗
22. Lee, D.-M. et al. Ultrasound-mediated triboelectric nanogenerator for powering on-demand transient electronics. Sci. Adv. 8, eabl8423 (2022).10.1126/sciadv.abl8423 ↗
23. Li, J. et al. Body-Area Powering With Human Body-Coupled Power Transmission and Energy Harvesting ICs. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 14, 1263–1273 (2020).10.1109/TBCAS.2020.3039191 ↗
24. Li, J. et al. Body-coupled power transmission and energy harvesting. Nat. Electron. 4, 530–538 (2021).10.1038/s41928-021-00592-y ↗
25. Kim, T. et al. Energy-loss return gate via liquid dielectric polarization. Nat. Commun. 9, 1437 (2018).10.1038/s41467-018-03893-7 ↗
26. Yong, H. et al. Synchronous Generation of Electrical and Cellular Energies via Body-Mediated Energy Transfer: Inevitable Electric Field Concentration. ACS Energy Lett. 8, 2954–2961 (2023).10.1021/acsenergylett.3c00708 ↗
27. Jung, S. et al. Unraveling the Missing Link of Bio-Electrical Stimulation from Body-Mediated Energy Transfer. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33, 2302465 (2023).10.1002/adfm.202302465 ↗
28. Yong, H. et al. Body-mediated energy loss conversion for personalized cell vitalization. Nano Energy 87, 106209 (2021).10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106209 ↗
29. Cho, E. et al. Highly transparent and water-repellent hierarchical-wrinkled-architecture triboelectric nanogenerator with ultrathin plasma-polymer-fluorocarbon film for artificial triboelectric skin. Nano Energy 103, 107785 (2022).10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107785 ↗
30. Heo, D. et al. Human activity-driven self-powered hair follicle stimulation system. Nano Energy 103, 107772 (2022).10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107772 ↗
31. Jung, S. et al. Body-Mediated Bioelectronics for Zero-Powered Ion Release and Electrical Stimulation. ACS Energy Lett. 7, 3997–4004 (2022).10.1021/acsenergylett.2c01968 ↗
32. Yong, H. et al. Versatile energy loss conversion for recovering waste alternating potential through polarization transfer medium. Nano Energy 69, 104400 (2020).10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104400 ↗
33. Das, D. et al. Enabling Covert Body Area Network using Electro-Quasistatic Human Body Communication. Sci. Rep. 9, 4160 (2019).10.1038/s41598-018-38303-x ↗
34. J. Park & P. P. Mercier. Magnetic human body communication. 2015 37th Ann. Intl. Conference IEEE Engineer. Med. Biol. Soc. (EMBC), 1841–1844 (2015).10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318739 ↗
35. Patel, M. & Wang, J. Applications, challenges, and prospective in emerging body area networking technologies. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 17, 80–88 (2010).10.1109/MWC.2010.5416354 ↗
36. Liu, F. et al. Body-based capacitive coupling and conductive channel power transfer for wearable and implant electronics. Nano Energy 115, 108761 (2023).10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108761 ↗
37. Wicaksono, I. et al. A tailored, electronic textile conformable suit for large-scale spatiotemporal physiological sensing in vivo. npj Flex. Electron. 4, 5 (2020).10.1038/s41528-020-0068-y ↗
38. Singal, K. et al. Programming mechanics in knitted materials, stitch by stitch. Nat. Commun. 15, 2622 (2024).10.1038/s41467-024-46498-z ↗
39. Zhang, W. et al. Measuring the actual voltage of a triboelectric nanogenerator using the non-grounded method. Nano Energy 77, 105108 (2020).10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105108 ↗
40. Shin, G. et al. Condensed droplet-based electricity generation via water-phase change. Nano Energy 82, 105713 (2021).10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105713 ↗
41. Lee, J.-s et al. Stackable Disk-Shaped Triboelectric Nanogenerator to Generate Energy from Omnidirectional Wind. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green. Technol. 9, 557–565 (2022).10.1007/s40684-021-00340-9 ↗
42. Kim, M. Y. et al. Silver electroceutical technology to treat sarcopenia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 120, e2300036120 (2023).10.1073/pnas.2300036120 ↗
43. Chen, C. et al. Electrical stimulation as a novel tool for regulating cell behavior in tissue engineering. Biomater. Res. 23, 25 (2019).10.1186/s40824-019-0176-8 ↗
44. Paillard, T. et al. Electrical stimulation superimposed onto voluntary muscular contraction reduces deterioration of both postural control and quadriceps femoris muscle strength. Neuroscience 165, 1471–1475 (2010).10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.11.052 ↗
45. Allen, D. G. et al. Skeletal Muscle Fatigue: Cellular Mechanisms. Physiological Rev. 88, 287–332 (2008).10.1152/physrev.00015.2007 ↗
46. H.-J. Yoo, et al. Effects of electrical muscle stimulation on core muscle activation and physical performance in non-athletic adults: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine 102 (2023).10.1097/MD.0000000000032765 ↗
47. Hossain, M. M. et al. Adhesive free, conformable and washable carbon nanotube fabric electrodes for biosensing. npj Flex. Electron. 6, 97 (2022).10.1038/s41528-022-00230-3 ↗
48. Tashakori, A. et al. Capturing complex hand movements and object interactions using machine learning-powered stretchable smart textile gloves. Nat. Mach. Intell. 6, 106–118 (2024).10.1038/s42256-023-00780-9 ↗
49. De Luca, C. J. The Use of Surface Electromyography in Biomechanics. J. Appl. Biomech. 13, 135–163 (1997).10.1123/jab.13.2.135 ↗
50. Sarmento, A. et al. Changes in electromyographic activity, mechanical power, and relaxation rates following inspiratory ribcage muscle fatigue. Sci. Rep. 11, 12475 (2021).10.1038/s41598-021-92060-y ↗