journal article·2026-05-14Open access

A 3D printing-enabled soft continuum robot with integrated sensing for multi-purpose predictions with machine learning

Guo Liang Goh, Chunpeng Yu, Kyohei Watanabe, Guo Dong Goh, Xinchao Gao, Ruichen Zhang, Han Wei Chua, Max Austin, Kohei Nakajima, Wai Yee Yeong

npj Flexible Electronics· Volume 10· Issue 1

Abstract

Soft continuum robots enable dexterous manipulation but present challenges for shape sensing due to their continuous deformability. We report a soft continuum robot that integrates a conductive polymer composite (CPC) based on graphite and PDMS directly into a node-based lattice structure for intrinsic sensing, coupled with a neural network for near-real-time shape reconstruction. The CPC serves both as the structural material and a distributed strain sensor, with multiple mesh-like sensing segments embedded along the robot to preserve compliance without external sensors. A tendon-driven system with three motors enables actuation, while a compact data acquisition unit monitors resistance changes in the CPC network. To address the nonlinear and hysteretic response of the CPC, we employ a Conformer-based neural network that fuses resistance time-series with tendon inputs for state estimation. Experiments show reliable strain sensing and accurate shape reconstruction even under external loads, while the trained reconstruction model achieved an end-effector RMSE of 6.3 mm and a mean position error of 3.8 mm. In addition, we demonstrate the capability to accurately predict the geometry of grasped objects using the self-sensing soft continuum structure. This approach enables near-real-time proprioception without compromising flexibility, with potential applications in biomedical manipulation and remote inspection.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Soft Robotics and Applications · Micro and Nano Robotics · Advanced Materials and Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Rahman, N., Deaton, N. J., Sheng, J., Cheng, S. S. & Desai, J. P. Modular FBG bending sensor for continuum neurosurgical robot. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 4, 1424–1430 (2019).10.1109/LRA.2019.2896451 ↗
2. Sincak, P. J. et al. Sensing of continuum robots: a review. Sensors 24, 4 (2024).10.3390/s24041311 ↗
3. Galloway, K. C. et al. Fiber optic shape sensing for soft robotics. Soft Robot. 6, 671–684 (2019).10.1089/soro.2018.0131 ↗
4. Yaniv, Z., Wilson, E., Lindisch, D. & Cleary, K. Electromagnetic tracking in the clinical environment. Med. Phys. 36, 876–892 (2009).10.1118/1.3075829 ↗
5. Sofla, M. S., Sadigh, M. J. & Zareinejad, M. Shape estimation of a large workspace continuum manipulator with fusion of inertial sensors. Mechatronics 80, 102684 (2021).10.1016/j.mechatronics.2021.102684 ↗
6. Goh, G. L., Yeong, W. Y., Altherr, J., Tan, J. & Campolo, D. 3D printing of soft sensors for soft gripper applications. Mater. Today. Proc. 70, 224–229 (2022).10.1016/j.matpr.2022.09.025 ↗
7. Goh, G. L. et al. Printing 3D metallic structures through reduction processes: principle, approaches, and applications. Progr. Mater. Sci. 157, 101610 (2026).10.1016/j.pmatsci.2025.101610 ↗
8. Goh, G. L., Agarwala, S. & Yong, W. Y. 3D printing of microfludic sensor for soft robots: A preliminary study in design and fabrication. In Proc. 2nd International Conference on Progress in Additive Manufacturing (Pro AM 2016), 177–181 (Research Publishing, Singapore, 2016).
9. So, J. et al. Shape estimation of soft manipulator using stretchable sensor. Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2021, 9843894 (2021).10.34133/2021/9843894 ↗
10. Shi, C. et al. Shape sensing techniques for continuum robots in minimally invasive surgery: a survey. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 64, 1665–1678 (2016).10.1109/TBME.2016.2622361 ↗
11. Liu, H. et al. Large deflection shape sensing of a continuum manipulator for minimally-invasive surgery. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 201–206 (IEEE, 2015).10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139000 ↗
12. Stauffer, D. & Aharony, A. Introduction to Percolation Theory (Taylor & Francis, 2018).10.1201/9781315274386 ↗
13. Zhou, X. & Cao, W. Flexible and stretchable carbon-based sensors and actuators for soft robots. Nanomaterials https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13020316 (2023).10.3390/nano13020316 ↗
14. Zhai, W. et al. Multifunctional flexible carbon black/polydimethylsiloxane piezoresistive sensor with ultrahigh linear range, excellent durability and oil/water separation capability. Chem. Eng. J. 372, 373–382 (2019).10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.142 ↗
15. Zhu, Y. et al. Carbon black/PDMS based flexible capacitive tactile sensor for multi-directional force sensing. Sensors https://doi.org/10.3390/s22020628 (2022).10.3390/s22020628 ↗
16. Goh, G. L. et al. A 3D printing-enabled artificially innervated smart soft gripper with variable joint stiffness. Adv. Mater. Technol. 8, 2301426 (2023).10.1002/admt.202301426 ↗
17. Zhang, Q., Xu, J. & Fang, H. Earthworm-like planar locomotion robot based on Yoshimura-origami structure. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference V08BT08A045 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2021).10.1115/DETC2021-71868 ↗
18. Micheletti, A., Giannetti, I., Mattei, G. & Tiero, A. Kinematic and static design of rigid origami structures: application to modular yoshimura patterns. J. Archit. Eng. 28, 04022009 (2022).10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000531 ↗
19. Wang, C., Xu, D., Song, S., Zhao, Y. & Zhang, J. Design and analysis of Yoshimura tubular origami mechanisms. Appl. Sci. 14, 12048 (2024).10.3390/app142412048 ↗
20. Xue, W. et al. Rigid-flexible coupled origami robots via multimaterial 3D printing. Smart Mater. Struct. 33, 035004 (2024).10.1088/1361-665X/ad212c ↗
21. Zhang, M. & Xie, W. The application of origami structures in soft grippers: recent advances. Smart Mater. Struct. 34, 113001 (2025).10.1088/1361-665X/ae190e ↗
22. Peng, B. & Gao, Z. Optimization design of Yoshimura-ori inspired worm-like robot. In 2023 IEEE 13th International Conference on CYBER Technology in Automation, Control, and Intelligent Systems (CYBER) 1267–1272 (IEEE, 2023).10.1109/CYBER59472.2023.10256483 ↗
23. Xu, Z. & Dollar, A. M. Chain-based lattice printing for efficient robotically-assembled structures. Commun. Eng. 3, 157 (2024).10.1038/s44172-024-00305-1 ↗
24. Bliah, O., Hegde, C., Tan, J. M. R. & Magdassi, S. Fabrication of soft robotics by additive manufacturing: from materials to applications. Chem. Rev. 125, 7275–7320 (2025).10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00749 ↗
25. Lee, H. et al. 3D-printed programmable tensegrity for soft robotics. Sci. Robot. 5, eaay9024 (2020).10.1126/scirobotics.aay9024 ↗
26. Abdul-Hussain, G., Holderbaum, W., Theodoridis, T. & Wei, G. Modified nonlinear hysteresis approach for a tactile sensor. Sensors 23, 7293 (2023).10.3390/s23167293 ↗
27. Yong, S. & Aw, K. Modeling electrical resistance behavior of soft and flexible piezoresistive sensors based on carbon-black/silicone elastomer composites. Sens. Imaging 23, 22 (2022).10.1007/s11220-022-00392-4 ↗
28. Qu, M. et al. Electric resistance of elastic strain sensors—fundamental mechanisms and experimental validation. Nanomaterials 13, 1813 (2023).10.3390/nano13121813 ↗
29. Cao, J. & Zhang, X. Modulating the percolation network of polymer nanocomposites for flexible sensors. J. Appl. Phys. 128, 220901 (2020).10.1063/5.0033652 ↗
30. Wang, L., Ding, T. & Wang, P. Research on stress and electrical resistance of skin-sensing silicone rubber/carbon blacknanocomposite during decompressive stress relaxation. Smart Mater. Struct. 18, 065002 (2009).10.1088/0964-1726/18/6/065002 ↗
31. Simmons, J. G. Generalized formula for the electric tunnel effect between similar electrodes separated by a thin insulating film. J. Appl. Phys. 34, 1793–1803 (1963).10.1063/1.1702682 ↗
32. Wang, X., Yang, B., Li, Q., Wang, F. & Tao, X. Modeling the stress and resistance relaxation of conductive composites-coated fabric strain sensors. Compos. Sci. Technol. 204, 108645 (2021).10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108645 ↗
33. Mu, Q., Hu, T., Tian, X., Li, T. & Kuang, X. The effect of filler dimensionality and content on resistive viscoelasticity of conductive polymer composites for soft strain sensors. Polymers 15, 3379 (2023).10.3390/polym15163379 ↗
34. Akkerman, H. B. et al. Electron tunneling through alkanedithiol self-assembled monolayers in large-area molecular junctions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 11161–11166 (2007).10.1073/pnas.0701472104 ↗
35. Persson, B. N. On the electric contact resistance. Tribol. Lett. 70, 88 (2022).10.1007/s11249-022-01630-2 ↗
36. Li, C., Thostenson, E. T. & Chou, T.-W. Dominant role of tunneling resistance in the electrical conductivity of carbon nanotube–based composites. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 223114 (2007).10.1063/1.2819690 ↗
37. Boland, C. S. et al. Sensitive, high-strain, high-rate bodily motion sensors based on graphene–rubber composites. ACS Nano 8, 8819–8830 (2014).10.1021/nn503454h ↗
38. Tang, J., Wu, Y., Ma, S., Yan, T. & Pan, Z. Sensing mechanism of a flexible strain sensor developed directly using electrospun composite nanofiber yarn with ternary carbon nanomaterials. iScience 25, 105162 (2022).10.1016/j.isci.2022.105162 ↗
39. Zhan, L., Qu, S. & Xiao, R. A review on the Mullins effect in tough elastomers and gels. Acta Mech. Solid. Sin. 37, 181–214 (2024).10.1007/s10338-023-00460-6 ↗
40. Amjadi, M., Kyung, K.-U., Park, I. & Sitti, M. Stretchable, skin-mountable, and wearable strain sensors and their potential applications: a review. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 1678–1698 (2016).10.1002/adfm.201504755 ↗
41. Nakajima, K. Physical reservoir computing—an introductory perspective. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 59, 060501 (2020).10.35848/1347-4065/ab8d4f ↗
42. Nakajima, K. Reservoir computing: theory, physical implementations, and applications. IEICE Tech. Rep. 118, 149–154 (2018).
43. Chen, Z. et al. A novel and accurate BiLSTM configuration controller for modular soft robots with module number adaptability. Soft Robot. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2024.0015 (2024).10.1089/soro.2024.0015 ↗