Microelectrothermoforming (μETF): one-step versatile 3D shaping of flexible microelectronics for enhanced neural interfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
Increasing the proximity of microelectrode arrays (MEA) to targeted neural tissues can establish efficient neural interfaces for both recording and stimulation applications. This has been achieved by constructing protruding three-dimensional (3D) structures on top of conventional planar microelectrodes via additional micromachining steps. However, this approach adds fabrication complexities and limits the 3D structures to certain shapes. We propose a one-step fabrication of MEAs with versatile microscopic 3D structures via “microelectrothermoforming (μETF)” of thermoplastics, by utilizing 3D-printed molds to locally deform planar MEAs into protruding and recessing shapes. Electromechanical optimization enabled a 3D MEA with 80 μm protrusions and/or recession for 100 μm diameter. Its simple and versatile shaping capabilities are demonstrated by diverse 3D structures on a single MEA. The benefits of 3D MEA are evaluated in retinal stimulation through numerical simulations and ex vivo experiments, confirming a threshold lowered by 1.7 times and spatial resolution enhanced by 2.2 times.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Neuroscience and Neural Engineering · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (72)
Show source-provided references
1. Steins, H. et al. A flexible protruding microelectrode array for neural interfacing in bioelectronic medicine. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 8, 131 (2022).10.1038/s41378-022-00466-z ↗
2. Flores, T. et al. Optimization of pillar electrodes in subretinal prosthesis for enhanced proximity to target neurons. J. Neural Eng. 15, 036011 (2018).10.1088/1741-2552/aaac39 ↗
3. Wijdenes, P. et al. Three dimensional microelectrodes enable high signal and spatial resolution for neural seizure recordings in brain slices and freely behaving animals. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–13 (2021).10.1038/s41598-021-01528-4 ↗
4. Airaghi Leccardi, M. J. I., Vagni, P. & Ghezzi, D. Multilayer 3D electrodes for neural implants. J. Neural Eng. 16, 026013 (2019).10.1088/1741-2552/aae191 ↗
5. Beach, S., Grundeen, S., Doyle, A. & Theogarajan, L. Fabrication and validation of flexible 3D pillar electrodes for neural electrophysiological recording. Eng. Res. Express 2 (2020).10.1088/2631-8695/ab407e ↗
6. Wang, J. et al. A highly selective 3D spiked ultraflexible neural (SUN) interface for decoding peripheral nerve sensory information. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 7, 1–8 (2018).10.1002/adhm.201700987 ↗
7. Losada, P. G. et al. Protuberant electrode structures for subretinal electrical stimulation: modeling, fabrication and in vivo evaluation. Front. Neurosci. 13, 1–14 (2019).10.3389/fnins.2019.00885 ↗
8. Borda, E. et al. Three-dimensional multilayer concentric bipolar electrodes restrict spatial activation in optic nerve stimulation. J. Neural Eng. 19, 036016 (2022).10.1088/1741-2552/ac6d7e ↗
9. Tomaskovic-Crook, E. et al. Human neural tissues from neural stem cells using conductive biogel and printed polymer microelectrode arrays for 3D electrical stimulation. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 8, 1–10 (2019).
10. Butterwick, A. et al. Effect of shape and coating of a subretinal prosthesis on its integration with the retina. Exp. Eye Res. 88, 22–29 (2009).10.1016/j.exer.2008.09.018 ↗
11. Seo, H. W. et al. A 3D flexible microelectrode array for subretinal stimulation. J. Neural Eng. 16, 056016 (2019).10.1088/1741-2552/ab36ab ↗
12. Mateus, J. C. et al. Improved in vitro electrophysiology using 3D-structured microelectrode arrays with a micro-mushrooms islets architecture capable of promoting topotaxis. J. Neural Eng. 16, 036012 (2019).10.1088/1741-2552/ab0b86 ↗
13. Rui, Y., Liu, J., Wang, Y. & Yang, C. Parylene-based implantable Pt-black coated flexible 3-D hemispherical microelectrode arrays for improved neural interfaces. Microsyst. Technol. 17, 437–442 (2011).10.1007/s00542-011-1279-x ↗
14. Kuo, J. T. W. et al. Novel flexible Parylene neural probe with 3D sheath structure for enhancing tissue integration. Lab Chip 13, 554–561 (2013).10.1039/C2LC40935F ↗
15. Koo, K. et al. Arrowhead-shaped micro-electrode array on polyimide substrate for retinal prostheses enabling close approach to target cells. In TRANSDUCERS 2009 - 2009 International Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference 342–345 (IEEE, 2009).10.1109/SENSOR.2009.5285492 ↗
16. Vetter, R. J., Williams, J. C., Hetke, J. F., Nunamaker, E. A. & Kipke, D. R. Chronic neural recording using silicon-substrate microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 51, 896–904 (2004).10.1109/TBME.2004.826680 ↗
17. Musick, K., Khatami, D. & Wheeler, B. C. Three-dimensional micro-electrode array for recording dissociated neuronal cultures. Lab Chip 9, 2036–2042 (2009).10.1039/b820596e ↗
18. Kundu, A. et al. Fabrication and characterization of 3D printed, 3D microelectrode arrays for interfacing with a peripheral nerve-on-a-chip. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 7, 3018–3029 (2021).10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01184 ↗
19. Truckenmüller, R. et al. Thermoforming of film-based biomedical microdevices. Adv. Mater. 23, 1311–1329 (2011).10.1002/adma.201003538 ↗
20. Vrij, E. J. et al. 3D high throughput screening and profiling of embryoid bodies in thermoformed microwell plates. Lab Chip 16, 734–742 (2016).10.1039/C5LC01499A ↗
21. Hadavi, E. et al. In vitro degradation profiles and in vivo biomaterial–tissue interactions of microwell array delivery devices. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.109, 117–127 (2021).10.1002/jbm.b.34686 ↗
22. Baptista, D. et al. 3D lung-on-chip model based on biomimetically microcurved culture membranes. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 8, 2684–2699 (2022).10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c01463 ↗
23. Borowiec, J. et al. Thermoforming techniques for manufacturing porous scaffolds for application in 3D cell cultivation. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 49, 509–516 (2015).10.1016/j.msec.2015.01.002 ↗
24. Stumpf, F. et al. LabDisk with complete reagent prestorage for sample-to-answer nucleic acid based detection of respiratory pathogens verified with influenza A H3N2 virus. Lab Chip 16, 199–207 (2016).10.1039/C5LC00871A ↗
25. Truckenmüller, R. et al. Flexible fluidic microchips based on thermoformed and locally modified thin polymer films. Lab Chip 8, 1570–1579 (2008).10.1039/b803619e ↗
26. Jeong, J. et al. A miniaturized, eye-conformable, and long-term reliable retinal prosthesis using monolithic fabrication of liquid crystal polymer (LCP). IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 62, 982–989 (2015).10.1109/TBME.2014.2377197 ↗
27. Palanker, D., Vankov, A., Huie, P. & Baccus, S. Design of a high-resolution optoelectronic retinal prosthesis. J. Neural Eng. 2, S105–S120 (2005).10.1088/1741-2560/2/1/012 ↗
28. Ho, E. et al. Characteristics of prosthetic vision in rats with subretinal flat and pillar electrode arrays. J. Neural Eng. 16, 066027 (2019).10.1088/1741-2552/ab34b3 ↗
29. Flores, T. et al. Honeycomb-shaped electro-neural interface enables cellular-scale pixels in subretinal prosthesis. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–12 (2019).10.1038/s41598-019-47082-y ↗
30. Hogan, N. C., Talei-Franzesi, G., Abudayyeh, O., Taberner, A. & Hunter, I. Low-cost, flexible polymer arrays for long-term neuronal culture. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 1010, 803–806 (2012).
31. Kim, J. M., Im, C. & Lee, W. R. Plateau-shaped flexible polymer microelectrode array for neural recording. Polymers 9, 1–17 (2017).10.3390/polym9120690 ↗
32. Jeong, J., Min, K. S. & Kim, S. J. Microfabrication process for long-term reliable neural electrode arrays using liquid crystal polymer (LCP). Microelectron. Eng. 216, 111096 (2019).10.1016/j.mee.2019.111096 ↗
33. Oldroyd, P. & Malliaras, G. Achieving long-term stability of thin-film electrodes for neurostimulation. Acta Biomater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2021.05.004 (2021).10.1016/j.actbio.2021.05.004 ↗
34. Kim, D. H. et al. Optimized structural designs for stretchable silicon integrated circuits. Small 5, 2841–2847 (2009).10.1002/smll.200900853 ↗
35. Kim, D. H., Xiao, J., Song, J., Huang, Y. & Rogers, J. A. Stretchable, curvilinear electronics based on inorganic materials. Adv. Mater. 22, 2108–2124 (2010).10.1002/adma.200902927 ↗
36. Zhang, Y. et al. Buckling in serpentine microstructures and applications in elastomer-supported ultra-stretchable electronics with high areal coverage. Soft Matter 9, 8062–8070 (2013).10.1039/c3sm51360b ↗
37. Fan, Z. et al. A finite deformation model of planar serpentine interconnects for stretchable electronics. Int. J. Solids Struct. 91, 46–54 (2016).10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.04.030 ↗
38. Yang, S., Qiao, S. & Lu, N. Elasticity solutions to nonbuckling serpentine ribbons. J. Appl. Mech. Trans. ASME 84, 30–32 (2017).10.1115/1.4035118 ↗
39. Xue, Z., Song, H., Rogers, J. A., Zhang, Y. & Huang, Y. Mechanically-guided structural designs in stretchable inorganic electronics. Adv. Mater. 32, 1–32 (2020).10.1002/adma.201902254 ↗
40. Cho, C. et al. Strain-resilient electrical functionality in thin-film metal electrodes using two-dimensional interlayers. Nat. Electron. 4, 126–133 (2021).10.1038/s41928-021-00538-4 ↗
41. Widlund, T., Yang, S., Hsu, Y. Y. & Lu, N. Stretchability and compliance of freestanding serpentine-shaped ribbons. Int. J. Solids Struct. 51, 4026–4037 (2014).10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.07.025 ↗
42. Jeong, H. S., Hwang, S., Min, K. S. & Jun, S. B. Fabrication of planar microelectrode array using laser-patterned ito and su-8. Micromachines 12, 1–16 (2021).10.3390/mi12111347 ↗
43. Kakooei, S. Electrochemical study of iridium oxide coating on stainless steel substrate. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 48, 2128–32 (2013).
44. Zhang, W., Huang, L., Weinreb, R. N. & Cheng, H. Wearable electronic devices for glaucoma monitoring and therapy. Mater. Des. 212, 110183 (2021).10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110183 ↗
45. Czosnyka, M. & Pickard, J. D. Monitoring and interpretation of intracranial pressure. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 75, 813–821 (2004).10.1136/jnnp.2003.033126 ↗
46. Mishra, A. & Cleveland, R. O. Agarose as a tissue mimic for the porcine heart, kidney, and liver: measurements and a springpot model. Bioengineering 11, 589 (2024).10.3390/bioengineering11060589 ↗
47. Pomfret, R., Miranpuri, G. & Sillay, K. The substitute brain and the potential of the gel model. Ann. Neurosci. 20, 118–122 (2013).10.5214/ans.0972.7531.200309 ↗
48. Su, T., Xu, M., Lu, F. & Chang, Q. Adipogenesis or osteogenesis: destiny decision made by mechanical properties of biomaterials. RSC Adv. 12, 24501–24510 (2022).10.1039/D2RA02841G ↗
49. Cao, X., Sui, X., Lyu, Q., Li, L. & Chai, X. Effects of different three-dimensional electrodes on epiretinal electrical stimulation by modeling analysis. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 12, 1–15 (2015).10.1186/s12984-015-0065-x ↗
50. Zhou, D. D. & Greenberg, R. J. Microelectronic Visual Prostheses. In Implantable Neural Prostheses 1: Devices and Applications (eds. Greenbaum, E. & Zhou, D.) (Springer, 2009).10.1007/978-0-387-77261-5_1 ↗
51. Kasi, H. et al. Simulations to study spatial extent of stimulation and effect of electrode-tissue gap in subretinal implants. Med. Eng. Phys. 33, 755–763 (2011).10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.01.015 ↗
52. Asghar, S. A. & Mahadevappa, M. Honeycomb-patterned graphene microelectrodes: a promising approach for safe and effective retinal stimulation based on electro-thermo-mechanical modeling and simulation. IEEE Trans. Nanobiosci. 23, 262–271 (2024).10.1109/TNB.2023.3319084 ↗
53. Muzzi, L. et al. Rapid generation of functional engineered 3D human neuronal assemblies: Network dynamics evaluated by micro-electrodes arrays. J. Neural Eng. 18 (2021).10.1088/1741-2552/ac3e02 ↗
54. Park, Y. et al. Three-dimensional, multifunctional neural interfaces for cortical spheroids and engineered assembloids. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf9153 (2021).10.1126/sciadv.abf9153 ↗
55. Huang, Q. et al. Shell microelectrode arrays (MEAs) for brain organoids. Sci. Adv. 8, eabq5031 (2022).10.1126/sciadv.abq5031 ↗
56. Yoon, D. & Nam, Y. A 3D neuronal network read-out interface with high recording performance using a neuronal cluster patterning on a microelectrode array. Biosens. Bioelectron. 261, 116507 (2024).10.1016/j.bios.2024.116507 ↗
57. Baek, C., Kim, J., Lee, Y. & Seo, J. M. Fabrication and evaluation of cyclic olefin copolymer based implantable neural electrode. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 67, 2542–2551 (2020).10.1109/TBME.2020.2963992 ↗
58. Kim, J. S., Jang, K. H., Ahn, S. H. & Seo, J. M. Micro electrode arrays fabrication using flexible perfluoroalkoxy alkane films. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2019, 4350–4353 (2019).10.1109/EMBC.2019.8856807 ↗
59. Lis-Bartos, A., Smieszek, A., Frańczyk, K. & Marycz, K. Fabrication, characterization, and cytotoxicity of thermoplastic polyurethane/poly(lactic acid) material using human adipose derived mesenchymal stromal stem cells (hASCs). Polymers 10, 1073 (2018).10.3390/polym10101073 ↗
60. Trinh, K. T. L., Thai, D. A., Chae, W. R. & Lee, N. Y. Rapid fabrication of poly(methyl methacrylate) devices for lab-on-a-chip applications using acetic acid and UV treatment. ACS Omega 5, 17396–17404 (2020).10.1021/acsomega.0c01770 ↗
61. Lee, J., Jeong, H., Kim, J. & Seo, J. Investigation of neural electrode fabrication process on polycarbonate substrate. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2022, 3138–3142 (2022).10.1109/EMBC48229.2022.9871364 ↗
62. Patnam, H., Dudem, B., Graham, S. A. & Yu, J. S. High-performance and robust triboelectric nanogenerators based on optimal microstructured poly(vinyl alcohol) and poly(vinylidene fluoride) polymers for self-powered electronic applications. Energy 223, 120031 (2021).10.1016/j.energy.2021.120031 ↗
63. Aplin, F. P. et al. Stimulation of a suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis drives cortical responses in a feline model of retinal degeneration. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 57, 5216–5229 (2016).10.1167/iovs.16-19926 ↗
64. Kim, K. H. et al. Monitoring mouse retinal degeneration with high-resolution spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. J. Vis. 8, 17.1–11 (2008).10.1167/8.1.17 ↗
65. Hariri, S., Moayed, A. A., Choh, V. & Bizheva, K. In vivo assessment of thickness and reflectivity in a rat outer retinal degeneration model with ultrahigh resolution optical coherence tomography. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 53, 1982–1989 (2012).10.1167/iovs.11-8395 ↗
66. Lee, S. W., Fallegger, F., Casse, B. D. F. & Fried, S. I. Implantable microcoils for intracortical magnetic stimulation. Sci. Adv. 2, e1600889 (2016).10.1126/sciadv.1600889 ↗
67. Ye, H., Hall, V. & Hendee, J. Improving focality and consistency in micromagnetic stimulation. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 17, 1–18 (2023).10.3389/fncom.2023.1105505 ↗
68. Lee, S. W., Min, K. S., Jeong, J., Kim, J. & Kim, S. J. Monolithic encapsulation of implantable neuroprosthetic devices using liquid crystal polymers. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 58, 2255–2263 (2011).10.1109/TBME.2011.2136341 ↗
69. Park, S. W., Kim, J. H., Park, W. J. & Kim, J. H. Limbal approach-subretinal injection of viral vectors for gene therapy in mice retinal pigment epithelium. J. Vis. Exp. 2015, 1–8 (2015).
70. Cunquero, M. et al. Calcium imaging in electrically stimulated flat-mounted retinas. J. Vis. Exp. 2023, 1–15 (2023).
71. Park, Y. et al. Focused ultrasound as a novel non-invasive method for the delivery of gold nanoparticles to retinal ganglion cells. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 13, 5 (2024).10.1167/tvst.13.5.5 ↗
72. Reutsky-Gefen, I. et al. Holographic optogenetic stimulation of patterned neuronal activity for vision restoration. Nat. Commun. 4, 1509 (2013).10.1038/ncomms2500 ↗