journal article·2025-05-07Open access

End-of-Life usefulness of degradation by products from transient electronics

Sofia Sandhu, Ravinder Dahiya

npj Flexible Electronics· Volume 9· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Transient electronics, comprising of degradable devices that disintegrate and disappear after their operational life, has received considerable interest in recent years because of the concerns related to the rapidly growing electronic waste (e-waste). However, the degradability or biodegradability of electronic devices alone is insufficient to ascertain environmental safety. The evaluation of the nature of degradation by-products is also essential to assess the environmental impact of a degradable device. Herein, we investigate systematically the hydrolytic degradation by-products of two different types of devices viz. a capacitive pressure sensor and a photodetector, using liquid chromatograph mass spectrometry. The findings reveal that, despite the inherent degradability of constituent materials used in an electronic device, the released by-products can be toxic or could be complex molecules with unknown chemistry such as carcinogenic or contain almost non-degradable polystyrene derivatives/microplastic (e.g., from PEDOT:PSS), or have copper complexes resulting from degraded silk fibroin and poly(ethylene oxide) mass fragments. This analysis underlines the need for careful selection and reassessment of materials employed in transient electronics, as an important factor, to mitigate the end-of-life issues associated with electronics and its environmental impact.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Recycling and Waste Management Techniques · Extraction and Separation Processes · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. Christou, A., Chirila, R. & Dahiya, R. Pseudo‐hologram with aerohaptic feedback for interactive volumetric displays. Adv. Intell. Syst. 4, 2100090 (2022).10.1002/aisy.202100090 ↗
2. Escobedo, P. et al. Flexible strain and temperature sensing NFC tag for smart food packaging applications. IEEE Sens. J. 21, 26406–26414 (2021).10.1109/JSEN.2021.3100876 ↗
3. Ma, S., Dahiya, A. S. & Dahiya, R. Out‐of‐plane electronics on flexible substrates using inorganic nanowires grown on high‐aspect‐ratio printed gold micropillars. Adv. Mater. 35, 2210711 (2023).10.1002/adma.202210711 ↗
4. Mukherjee, R., Ganguly, P. & Dahiya, R. Bioinspired distributed energy in robotics and enabling technologies. Adv. Intell. Syst. 5, 2100036 (2023).10.1002/aisy.202100036 ↗
5. Chakraborty, M., Kettle, J. & Dahiya, R. Electronic waste reduction through devices and printed circuit boards designed for circularity. IEEE J. Flex. Electron. 1, 4–23 (2022).10.1109/JFLEX.2022.3159258 ↗
6. Forti, V.et al. The Global e-Waste Monitor 2020 (United Nations University (UNU), International Telecommunication Union (ITU) & International Solid Waste Association (ISWA), 120, Bonn/Geneva/Rotterdam, 2020).
7. Ghimire, H. & Ariya, P. A. E-wastes: bridging the knowledge gaps in global production budgets, composition, recycling and sustainability implications. Sustain. Chem. 1, 154–182 (2020).10.3390/suschem1020012 ↗
8. Jamshidi, R. et al. Transient electronics as sustainable systems: from fundamentals to applications. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 6, 2100057 (2022).10.1002/adsu.202100057 ↗
9. Han, W. B. et al. Advanced materials and systems for biodegradable, transient electronics. Adv. Mater. 32, 2002211 (2020).10.1002/adma.202002211 ↗
10. Hosseini, E. S. et al. Biodegradable materials for sustainable health monitoring devices. ACS Appl. Biol. Mater. 4, 163–194 (2020).10.1021/acsabm.0c01139 ↗
11. Han, W. B. et al. Ultra-stretchable and biodegradable elastomers for soft, transient electronics. Nat. Commun. 14, 2263 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-38040-4 ↗
12. Lee, D.-M. et al. Ultrasound-mediated triboelectric nanogenerator for powering on-demand transient electronics. Sci. Adv. 8, eabl8423 (2022).10.1126/sciadv.abl8423 ↗
13. Peng, X. et al. A review on emerging biodegradable polymers for environmentally benign transient electronic skins. J. Mater. Sci. 56, 16765–16789 (2021).10.1007/s10853-021-06323-0 ↗
14. Song, J. H. et al. Vitamin C-induced enhanced performance of PEDOT: PSS thin films for eco-friendly transient thermoelectrics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15, 2852–2860 (2023).10.1021/acsami.2c17263 ↗
15. Khandelwal, G. et al. Aligned PLLA electrospun fibres based biodegradable triboelectric nanogenerator. Nano Energy 110, 108325 (2023).10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108325 ↗
16. Min, G. et al. Multisource energy harvester on textile and plants for clean energy generation from wind and rainwater droplets. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 12, 695–705 (2024).10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c03620 ↗
17. Paul, A., Yogeswaran, N. & Dahiya, R. Ultra‐flexible biodegradable pressure sensitive field effect transistors for hands‐free control of robot movements. Adv. Intell. Syst. 4, 2200183 (2022).10.1002/aisy.202200183 ↗
18. Heseltine, P. L. et al. Facile one-pot method for all aqueous green formation of biocompatible silk fibroin-poly (ethylene oxide) fibers for use in tissue engineering. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 8, 1290–1300 (2022).10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c01555 ↗
19. Bucciarelli, A. & Motta, A. Use of Bombyx mori silk fibroin in tissue engineering: From cocoons to medical devices, challenges, and future perspectives. Biomater. Adv. 139, 212982 (2022).10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.212982 ↗
20. Niu, Q. et al. Biodegradable silk fibroin-based bio-piezoelectric/triboelectric nanogenerators as self-powered electronic devices. Nano Energy 96, 107101 (2022).10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107101 ↗
21. Samir, A. et al. Recent advances in biodegradable polymers for sustainable applications. Npj Mater. Degrad. 6, 68 (2022).10.1038/s41529-022-00277-7 ↗
22. Shi, D. et al. To PEGylate or not to PEGylate: immunological properties of nanomedicine’s most popular component, polyethylene glycol and its alternatives. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 180, 114079 (2022).10.1016/j.addr.2021.114079 ↗
23. Murali, V. S. et al. Rapid detection of polyethylene glycol sonolysis upon functionalization of carbon nanomaterials. Exp. Biol. Med. 240, 1147–1151 (2015).10.1177/1535370214567615 ↗
24. James, B. D. et al. Minimizing the environmental impacts of plastic pollution through ecodesign of products with low environmental persistence. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 12, 1185–1194 (2024).10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c05534 ↗
25. Zhang, W. et al. Recent progress on PEDOT‐based wearable bioelectronics. View 3, 20220030 (2022).10.1002/VIW.20220030 ↗
26. Shi, X.-X. et al. Introducing a toxicological perspective to view chemicals: a web-based class for educating green molecular design. J. Chem. Educ. 101, 1514–1525 (2024).10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00899 ↗
27. Sengupta, D. et al. Fabric-like electrospun PVAc–graphene nanofiber webs as wearable and degradable piezocapacitive sensors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15, 22351–22366 (2023).10.1021/acsami.3c03113 ↗
28. Han, W. B. et al. Micropatterned elastomeric composites for encapsulation of transient electronics. ACS Nano 17, 14822–14830 (2023).10.1021/acsnano.3c03063 ↗
29. Fumeaux, N. et al. Organic electrochemical transistors printed from degradable materials as disposable biochemical sensors. Sci. Rep. 13, 11467 (2023).10.1038/s41598-023-38308-1 ↗
30. Du, C. et al. Flexible and simply degradable mxene–methylcellulose piezoresistive sensor for human motion detection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 16, 12996–13005 (2024).10.1021/acsami.3c16125 ↗
31. Gold, V.et al. The IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminology 10 (International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC), 2019).
32. Jayakumar, A. et al. Recent progress of bioplastics in their properties, standards, certifications and regulations: a review. Sci. Total Environ. 878, 163156 (2023).10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163156 ↗
33. Fu, K. K. et al. Transient electronics: materials and devices. Chem. Mater. 28, 3527–3539 (2016).10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04931 ↗
34. Electronics can be more sustainable. Nat. Mater. 22, 1273–1273 (2023).10.1038/s41563-023-01731-w ↗
35. Rogers, J. D. et al. Degradation of polyethylene glycols and polypropylene glycols in microcosms simulating a spill of produced water in shallow groundwater. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 21, 256–268 (2019).10.1039/C8EM00291F ↗
36. Bratek-Skicki, A. et al. Mixed polymer brushes for the selective capture and release of proteins. Biomacromolecules 20, 778–789 (2019).10.1021/acs.biomac.8b01353 ↗
37. Yadav, N. & Hakkarainen, M. Degradable or not? Cellulose acetate as a model for complicated interplay between structure, environment and degradation. Chemosphere 265, 128731 (2021).10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128731 ↗
38. Yang, T. et al. PEDOT: PSS hydrogels with high conductivity and biocompatibility for in situ cell sensing. J. Mater. Chem. B 11, 3226–3235 (2023).10.1039/D3TB00014A ↗
39. Schultheiss, A. et al. Insight into the degradation mechanisms of highly conductive poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene) thin films. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2, 2686–2695 (2020).10.1021/acsapm.0c00301 ↗
40. Mantione, D. et al. Poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene)(PEDOT) derivatives: innovative conductive polymers for bioelectronics. Polymers 9, 354 (2017).10.3390/polym9080354 ↗
41. Rai, R. & Mantione, D. The future of electronic materials is… degradable! J. Mater. Chem. C 11, 11803–11813 (2023).10.1039/D3TC01128C ↗
42. Kaur, M., Xu, M. & Wang, L. Cyto–genotoxic effect causing potential of polystyrene micro-plastics in terrestrial plants. Nanomaterials 12, 2024 (2022).10.3390/nano12122024 ↗
43. Schirinzi, G. F. et al. Trace analysis of polystyrene microplastics in natural waters. Chemosphere 236, 124321 (2019).10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.07.052 ↗
44. Zhang, Y. et al. Effects of polystyrene nanoplastics (PSNPs) on the physiology and molecular metabolism of corn (Zea mays L.) seedlings. Sci. Total Environ. 806, 150895 (2022).10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150895 ↗
45. Caselli, M. et al. A wireless biosensor node for in vivo and real-time plant monitoring in precision agriculture. IEEE Trans. AgriFood Electron 2, 268–275 (2024).10.1109/TAFE.2024.3386938 ↗
46. Diforti, J. F. et al. Empowering bioelectronics with supramolecular nanoarchitectonics: PEDOT-based organic electrochemical transistors with tunable electronic properties. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 6, 1211–1222 (2024).10.1021/acsaelm.3c01592 ↗
47. Han, M. et al. Tissue‐like optoelectronic neural interface enabled by PEDOT: PSS hydrogel for cardiac and neural stimulation. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 11, 2102160 (2022).10.1002/adhm.202102160 ↗
48. Wang, Y.-F. et al. Fully printed PEDOT: PSS-based temperature sensor with high humidity stability for wireless healthcare monitoring. Sci. Rep. 10, 2467 (2020).10.1038/s41598-020-59432-2 ↗
49. Yang, Z. et al. High‐performing acid‐free PEDOT: PSS‐based organic photodiodes for cardiovascular disease diagnosis. Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2309271 (2024).10.1002/adfm.202309271 ↗
50. Boehler, C., Aqrawe, Z. & Asplund, M. Applications of PEDOT in bioelectronic medicine. Bioelectron. Med. 2, 89–99 (2019).10.2217/bem-2019-0014 ↗
51. Hung, J.-N. et al. PEDOT: PSS in solution form exhibits strong potential in inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 infection of the host cells by targeting viruses and also the host cells. Biomacromolecules 23, 3535–3548 (2022).10.1021/acs.biomac.2c00271 ↗
52. Yang, G. et al. Developmental toxicity of PEDOT: PSS in Zebrafish: effects on morphology, cardiac function, and intestinal health. Toxics 12, 150 (2024).10.3390/toxics12020150 ↗
53. Zhu, J., Omura, T. & Wakisaka, M. Biological response of protists Haematococcus lacustris and Euglena gracilis to conductive polymer poly (3, 4‐ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 72, 619–625 (2021).10.1111/lam.13459 ↗
54. John, D. A. et al. Silk nanofibers based soft and degradable capacitive pressure sensor arrays. IEEE Sens. Lett. 7, 1–4 (2023).10.1109/LSENS.2023.3270665 ↗
55. Parameswaran, C., Shakthivel, D., & Dahiya, R. Fabrication of silk nanofibers with in-situ crystallization for large-area tactile sensing. In: Proc. IEEE Applied Sensing Conference (APSCON), 1–3 (2023).10.1109/APSCON56343.2023.10101140 ↗
56. Karagiorgis, X. et al. Fully degradable, transparent, and flexible photodetectors using ZnO nanowires and PEDOT: PSS based nanofibres. npj Flex. Electron. 9, 22 (2025).10.1038/s41528-025-00385-9 ↗
57. Karagiorgis, X. et al. Highly conductive PEDOT: PSS: Ag nanowire-based nanofibers for transparent flexible electronics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 16, 19551–19562 (2024).10.1021/acsami.4c00682 ↗
58. Sui, Y. et al. Controlled biodegradation of an additively fabricated capacitive soil moisture sensor. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 9, 2486–2495 (2021).10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c07615 ↗
59. Konwar, G., Rahi, S. & Tiwari, S. P. Decomposable flexible organic transistors with a cellulose-based gate dielectric and substrate for biodegradable electronics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15, 35261–35271 (2023).10.1021/acsami.3c06199 ↗
60. Dahiya, A. S. et al. High‐performance n‐channel printed transistors on biodegradable substrate for transient electronics. Adv. Electron. Mater. 8, 2200098 (2022).10.1002/aelm.202200098 ↗