Author Correction: Giant elasto-optic response of gallium selenide on flexible mica

In the original version of the article in Figs. 2, 3 and 4 and corresponding text, the value of the strain is estimated for different bending radii, r, of the mica, i.e. the strain is calculated as t/2r, where t = 0.03 mm is the thickness of the mica. For example, for r = 4 cm, t/2r = 0.04%. However, as shown in Fig. 1, the mica is bent to a radius of approximately r = 4 mm, not r = 4 cm. Thus, the actual strain is a factor of 10 higher (0.4%) than that reported in the original manuscript and in the original Figs. 2, 3 and 4.