Inertia-driven, self-powered electrotherapy for enhanced wound regeneration
Source abstract
Abstract
Skin serves as the primary barrier against hazardous substances, and timely wound closure is an essential initial step in wound regeneration. However, intrinsic skin regenerative capacity is severely limited in critical-size acute wounds due to insufficient cell migration and tissue regeneration. Electrical stimulation restores endogenous wound electric fields and promotes cell migration and proliferation, thereby accelerating wound regeneration. Repetitive stimulation with identical electrical waveforms may attenuate electrophysiological responsiveness. Here, we present a miniaturized, lightweight, inertia-driven triboelectric nanogenerator–based electroceutical platform (2 cm3, 4.9 g) that enables self-powered operation with bioresorbable electrodes. In vitro studies demonstrate that electric fields and charges enhance cell migration and exosome secretion. In vivo animal studies confirm that motion-modulated, electrical waveforms delivered to the wound bed promote angiogenesis and epidermal maturation and stabilize the wound-associated microbiome. Collectively, these findings establish an electroceutical strategy for effective wound management in aging and impaired healing environments.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation · Microbial Inactivation Methods · Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (67)
Show source-provided references
1. Singh, S., Young, A. & McNaught, C.-E. The physiology of wound healing. Surgery 35, 473–477 (2017).
2. Guo, S. & DiPietro, L. A. Factors affecting wound healing. J. Dent. Res. 89, 219–229 (2010).10.1177/0022034509359125 ↗
3. Bonifant, H. & Holloway, S. A review of the effects of ageing on skin integrity and wound healing. Br. J. Community Nurs. 24, S28–S33 (2019).10.12968/bjcn.2019.24.Sup3.S28 ↗
4. Boateng, J. & Catanzano, O. Advanced therapeutic dressings for effective wound healing—A review. J. Pharm. Sci. 104, 3653–3680 (2015).10.1002/jps.24610 ↗
5. Freedman, B. R. et al. Breakthrough treatments for accelerated wound healing. Sci. Adv. 9, eade7007 (2023).10.1126/sciadv.ade7007 ↗
6. Martin-Granados, C. & McCaig, C. D. Harnessing the electric spark of life to cure skin wounds. Adv. Wound Care 3, 127–138 (2014).10.1089/wound.2013.0451 ↗
7. Kawai, E., Kumazawa, N., Ozawa, K. & Denda, M. Skin surface electrical potential as an indicator of skin condition: observation of surfactant-induced dry skin and middle-aged skin. Exp. Dermatol. 20, 757–759 (2011).10.1111/j.1600-0625.2011.01298.x ↗
8. Zhao, M. et al. Electrical signals control wound healing through phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase-γ and PTEN. Nature 442, 457–460 (2006).10.1038/nature04925 ↗
9. Conta, G., Libanori, A., Tat, T., Chen, G. & Chen, J. Triboelectric nanogenerators for therapeutic electrical stimulation. Adv. Mater. 33, e2007502 (2021).10.1002/adma.202007502 ↗
10. Tai, G., Tai, M. & Zhao, M. Electrically stimulated cell migration and its contribution to wound healing. Burns Trauma 6, 20 (2018).10.1186/s41038-018-0123-2 ↗
11. Yi, J. et al. Enhanced chondrogenic differentiation of electrically primed human mesenchymal stem cells for the regeneration of osteochondral defects. Biomater. Res. 28, 0109 (2024).10.34133/bmr.0109 ↗
12. Ud-Din, S. & Bayat, A. Electrical stimulation and cutaneous wound healing: a review of clinical evidence. Healthcare 2, 445–467 (2014).10.3390/healthcare2040445 ↗
13. Roy Barman, S. & Jhunjhunwala, S. Electrical stimulation for immunomodulation. ACS Omega 9, 52–66 (2024).10.1021/acsomega.3c06696 ↗
14. Wang, Z. L., Chen, J. & Lin, L. Progress in triboelectric nanogenerators as a new energy technology and self-powered sensors. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 2250–2282 (2015).10.1039/C5EE01532D ↗
15. Niu, S. et al. Theoretical study of contact-mode triboelectric nanogenerators as an effective power source. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 3576 (2013).10.1039/c3ee42571a ↗
16. Sibatov, R. T. & Uchaikin, V. V. Fractional kinetics of charge carriers in supercapacitors. in Applications in Engineering, Life and Social Sciences, Part B, 87–118 (De Gruyter, 2019).10.1515/9783110571929-004 ↗
17. Ryu, H. et al. Self-rechargeable cardiac pacemaker system with triboelectric nanogenerators. Nat. Commun. 12, 4374 (2021).10.1038/s41467-021-24417-w ↗
18. Bo, Y. et al. Exosomes from human induced pluripotent stem cells-derived keratinocytes accelerate burn wound healing through miR-762 mediated promotion of keratinocytes and endothelial cells migration. J. Nanobiotechnol. 20, 291 (2022).10.1186/s12951-022-01504-8 ↗
19. Wang, A. et al. Piezoelectric nanofibrous scaffolds as in vivo energy harvesters for modifying fibroblast alignment and proliferation in wound healing. Nano Energy 43, 63–71 (2018).10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.11.023 ↗
20. Wu, Y. et al. MXene-coated piezoelectric poly-L-lactic acid membrane accelerates wound healing by biomimicking low-voltage electrical pulses. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 278, 134971 (2024).10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.134971 ↗
21. Wu, Y. et al. Construction of piezoelectric, conductive and injectable hydrogels to promote wound healing through electrical stimulation. Acta Biomater. 191, 205–215 (2025).10.1016/j.actbio.2024.11.028 ↗
22. Bhang, S. H. et al. Zinc oxide nanorod-based piezoelectric dermal patch for wound healing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1603497 (2017).10.1002/adfm.201603497 ↗
23. Lv, X. et al. Self-adhesive ultrasound-mediated triboelectric nanogenerator device for subcutaneous antibacterial treatment and accelerated wound healing. Sci. China Mater. 68, 261–269 (2025).10.1007/s40843-024-3120-x ↗
24. Meng, X. et al. Self-contracting, battery-free triboelectric wound healing strip with strong wet adhesion. Nat. Commun. 16, 7220 (2025).10.1038/s41467-025-62312-w ↗
25. Meng, X. et al. An ultrasound-driven bioadhesive triboelectric nanogenerator for instant wound sealing and electrically accelerated healing in emergencies. Adv. Mater. 35, e2209054 (2023).10.1002/adma.202209054 ↗
26. Hinchet, R. et al. Transcutaneous ultrasound energy harvesting using capacitive triboelectric technology. Science 365, 491–494 (2019).10.1126/science.aan3997 ↗
27. Jeong, S.-H. et al. Accelerated wound healing with an ionic patch assisted by a triboelectric nanogenerator. Nano Energy 79, 105463 (2021).10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105463 ↗
28. Long, Y. et al. Effective wound healing enabled by discrete alternative electric fields from wearable nanogenerators. ACS Nano 12, 12533–12540 (2018).10.1021/acsnano.8b07038 ↗
29. Tang, Q. et al. Flexible, breathable, and self-powered patch assembled of electrospun polymer triboelectric layers and polypyrrole-coated electrode for infected chronic wound healing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15, 17641–17652 (2023).10.1021/acsami.3c00500 ↗
30. Venkatraman, S., Long, J. D., Pister, K. S. J. & Carmena, J. M. Wireless inertial sensors for monitoring animal behavior. in Proc. 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 378–381 (IEEE, 2007).10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4352303 ↗
31. Venkatraman, S., Jin, X., Costa, R. M. & Carmena, J. M. Investigating neural correlates of behavior in freely behaving rodents using inertial sensors. J. Neurophysiol. 104, 569–575 (2010).10.1152/jn.00121.2010 ↗
32. Farber, P. L., Isoldi, F. C. & Ferreira, L. M. Electric factors in wound healing. Adv. Wound Care 10, 461–476 (2021).10.1089/wound.2019.1114 ↗
33. Leal, J., Shaner, S., Jedrusik, N., Savelyeva, A. & Asplund, M. Electrotaxis evokes directional separation of co-cultured keratinocytes and fibroblasts. Sci. Rep. 13, 11444 (2023).10.1038/s41598-023-38664-y ↗
34. Cunha, F., Rajnicek, A. M. & McCaig, C. D. Electrical stimulation directs migration, enhances and orients cell division and upregulates the chemokine receptors CXCR4 and CXCR2 in endothelial cells. J. Vasc. Res. 56, 39–53 (2019).10.1159/000495311 ↗
35. CHOI, Y. K. et al. Desalinated lava seawater promotes wound healing by MMP9 through activating ERK pathways in HaCaT cells. In Vivo 39, 2035–2049 (2025).10.21873/invivo.13999 ↗
36. Wang, F., Chen, S., Liu, H. B., Parent, C. A. & Coulombe, P. A. Keratin 6 regulates collective keratinocyte migration by altering cell–cell and cell–matrix adhesion. J. Cell Biol. 217, 4314–4330 (2018).10.1083/jcb.201712130 ↗
37. Taivanbat, B. et al. Transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 promotes cutaneous wound healing by regulating keratinocytes and fibroblasts migration and collagen production in fibroblasts in a mouse model. J. Dermatol. Sci. 112, 54–62 (2023).10.1016/j.jdermsci.2023.10.002 ↗
38. Dasu, M. R. K., Barrow, R. E., Spies, M. & Herndon, D. N. Matrix metalloproteinase expression in cytokine stimulated human dermal fibroblasts. Burns 29, 527–531 (2003).10.1016/S0305-4179(03)00154-2 ↗
39. Chen, L. et al. Positional differences in the wound transcriptome of skin and oral mucosa. BMC Genom. 11, 471 (2010).10.1186/1471-2164-11-471 ↗
40. Xie, J. et al. Effects of basic fibroblast growth factor on the expression of extracellular matrix and matrix metalloproteinase-1 in wound healing. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 33, 176–182 (2008).10.1111/j.1365-2230.2007.02573.x ↗
41. Song, Y. H. et al. Distribution of fibroblast growth factors and their roles in skin fibroblast cell migration. Mol. Med. Rep. 14, 3336–3342 (2016).10.3892/mmr.2016.5646 ↗
42. Park, H. J., Rouabhia, M., Lavertu, D. & Zhang, Z. Electrical stimulation modulates the expression of multiple wound healing genes in primary human dermal fibroblasts. Tissue Eng. Part A 21, 1982–1990 (2015).10.1089/ten.tea.2014.0687 ↗
43. Théry, C. Exosomes: secreted vesicles and intercellular communications. F1000 Biol. Rep. 3, 15 (2011).10.3410/B3-15 ↗
44. Shin, D. et al. Exosomes secreted during myogenic differentiation of human fetal cartilage-derived progenitor cells promote skeletal muscle regeneration through miR-145-5p. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 21, 487–497 (2024).10.1007/s13770-023-00618-w ↗
45. Bhat, S., Kannan, S., Kolkundkar, U. K. & Seetharam, R. N. Exosome therapy: a promising avenue for treating intervertebral disc degeneration. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 22, 895–909 (2025).10.1007/s13770-025-00746-5 ↗
46. Xiu, C. et al. MSCs-derived miR-150-5p-expressing exosomes promote skin wound healing by activating PI3K/AKT pathway through PTEN. Int. J. Stem Cells 15, 359–371 (2022).10.15283/ijsc21135 ↗
47. Zhang, S. et al. Enhanced mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes secretion by electrical stimulation of triboelectric nanogenerator. Nano Energy 139, 110933 (2025).10.1016/j.nanoen.2025.110933 ↗
48. Rouabhia, M., Park, H., Meng, S., Derbali, H. & Zhang, Z. Electrical stimulation promotes wound healing by enhancing dermal fibroblast activity and promoting myofibroblast transdifferentiation. PLoS ONE 8, e71660 (2013).10.1371/journal.pone.0071660 ↗
49. Bowden, L. G. et al. An ordinary differential equation model for full thickness wounds and the effects of diabetes. J. Theor. Biol. 361, 87–100 (2014).10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.07.001 ↗
50. Pastar, I. et al. Preclinical models for wound-healing studies. in Skin Tissue Models for Regenerative Medicine 223–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-810545-0.00010-3 (Elsevier, 2018).10.1016/B978-0-12-810545-0.00010-3 ↗
51. Yang, Y. et al. The role of the skin microbiome in wound healing. Burns Trauma 12, tkad059 (2024).10.1093/burnst/tkad059 ↗
52. Johnson, T. R. et al. The cutaneous microbiome and wounds: new molecular targets to promote wound healing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 2699 (2018).10.3390/ijms19092699 ↗
53. Xu, Z. & Hsia, H. C. The impact of microbial communities on wound healing. Ann. Plast. Surg. 81, 113–123 (2018).10.1097/SAP.0000000000001450 ↗
54. Plichta, J. K. et al. Cutaneous burn injury promotes shifts in the bacterial microbiome in autologous donor skin. Shock 48, 441–448 (2017).10.1097/SHK.0000000000000874 ↗
55. Wolcott, R. et al. Microbiota is a primary cause of pathogenesis of chronic wounds. J. Wound Care 25, S33–S43 (2016).10.12968/jowc.2016.25.Sup10.S33 ↗
56. del Pozo, J. L. et al. Effect of electrical current on the activities of antimicrobial agents against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53, 35–40 (2009).10.1128/AAC.00237-08 ↗
57. Costerton, J. W., Ellis, B., Lam, K., Johnson, F. & Khoury, A. E. Mechanism of electrical enhancement of efficacy of antibiotics in killing biofilm bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38, 2803–2809 (1994).10.1128/AAC.38.12.2803 ↗
58. Canchy, L., Kerob, D., Demessant, A. & Amici, J. Wound healing and microbiome, an unexpected relationship. J. Eur. Acad. Dermat. Venereol. 37, 7–15 (2023).10.1111/jdv.18854 ↗
59. van Lith, R., Wang, X. & Ameer, G. Biodegradable elastomers with antioxidant and retinoid-like properties. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2, 268–277 (2016).10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00534 ↗
60. Ryu, H. et al. Materials and design approaches for a fully bioresorbable, electrically conductive and mechanically compliant cardiac patch technology. Advanced Science 10, 2370187 (2023).10.1002/advs.202303429 ↗
61. Goedegebuure, M. et al. A biodegradable microgrooved and tissue mechanocompatible citrate-based scaffold improves bladder tissue regeneration. Bioact. Mater. 41, 553–563 (2024).
62. Zollfrank, C., Gutbrod, K., Wechsler, P. & Guggenbichler, J. P. Antimicrobial activity of transition metal acid MoO3 prevents microbial growth on material surfaces. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 32, 47–54 (2012).10.1016/j.msec.2011.09.010 ↗
63. Ottenio, M., Tran, D., Ní Annaidh, A., Gilchrist, M. D. & Bruyère, K. Strain rate and anisotropy effects on the tensile failure characteristics of human skin. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 41, 241–250 (2015).10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.10.006 ↗
64. Kim, D., Xiao, J., Song, J., Huang, Y. & Rogers, J. A. Stretchable, curvilinear electronics based on inorganic materials. Adv. Mater. 22, 2108–2124 (2010).10.1002/adma.200902927 ↗
65. Tong, S. Y. C., Davis, J. S., Eichenberger, E., Holland, T. L. & Fowler, V. G. Staphylococcus aureus infections: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 28, 603–661 (2015).10.1128/CMR.00134-14 ↗
66. Leek, J. T. et al. sva: Surrogate Variable Analysis. R package version 3.58.0, https://doi.org/10.18129/B9.bioc.sva (2025).10.18129/B9.bioc.sva ↗
67. Zhou, Y. et al. Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets. Nat. Commun. 10, 1523 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-09234-6 ↗