Large-area magnetic skin for multi-point and multi-scale tactile sensing with super-resolution
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The advancements in tactile sensor technology have found wide-ranging applications in robotic fields, resulting in remarkable achievements in object manipulation and overall human-machine interactions. However, the widespread availability of high-resolution tactile skins remains limited, due to the challenges of incorporating large-sized, robust sensing units and increased wiring complexity. One approach to achieve high-resolution and robust tactile skins is to integrate a limited number of sensor units (taxels) into a flexible surface material and leverage signal processing techniques to achieve super-resolution sensing. Here, we present a magnetic skin consisting of multi-direction magnetized flexible films and a contactless Hall sensor array. The key features of the proposed sensor include the specific magnetization arrangement, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) clustering algorithm and convolutional neural network (CNN) model for signal processing. Using only an array of 4*4 taxels, our magnetic skin is capable of achieving super-resolution perception over an area of 48400 mm 2 , with an average localization error of 1.2 mm. By employing neural network algorithms to decouple the multi-dimensional signals, the skin can achieve multi-point and multi-scale perception. We also demonstrate the promising potentials of the proposed sensor in intelligent control, by simultaneously controlling two vehicles with trajectory mapping on the magnetic skin.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tactile and Sensory Interactions · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Interactive and Immersive Displays
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Lei, Z. et al. A Biomimetic Tactile Palm for Robotic Object Manipulation. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 7, 11500–11507 (2022).10.1109/LRA.2022.3202653 ↗
2. Dingley, G., Cox, M. & Soleimani, M. EM-skin: an artificial robotic skin using magnetic inductance EM-skin: an artificial robotic skin using magnetic inductance tomography tomography. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 72, 1–9 (2023).10.1109/TIM.2023.3268481 ↗
3. Mary Catherine, V. G., Paul, B. & Vinoj, P. G. Wearable Fabric Tactile Sensors for Robotic Elderly Assistance. Proc. - 2nd Int. Conf. Smart Technol. Commun. Robot. 2022, STCR 2022 1–5 (2022).10.1109/STCR55312.2022.10009305 ↗
4. Kwon, S. Y. et al. On-skin and tele-haptic application of mechanically decoupled taxel array on dynamically moving and soft surfaces. npj Flex. Electron. 6, 1–9 (2022).10.1038/s41528-022-00233-0 ↗
5. Liu, W. et al. Touchless interactive teaching of soft robots through flexible bimodal sensory interfaces. Nat. Commun. 13, 1–14 (2022).
6. Li, S. et al. Bioinspired robot skin with mechanically gated electron channels for sliding tactile perception. Sci. Adv. 8, 1–13 (2022).10.1126/sciadv.ade0720 ↗
7. Li, G., Liu, S., Wang, L. & Zhu, R. Skin-inspired quadruple tactile sensors integrated on a robot hand enable object recognition. Sci. Robot. 5, 1–12 (2020).10.1126/scirobotics.abc8134 ↗
8. Liu, F. et al. Printed synaptic transistor-based electronic skin for robots to feel and learn. Sci. Robot. 7, (2022).10.1126/scirobotics.abl7286 ↗
9. Liu, F. et al. Neuro-inspired electronic skin for robots. Sci. Robot. 7, 1–16 (2022).10.1126/scirobotics.abl7344 ↗
10. Seo, B., Cha, Y., Choi, Y., Kim, S. & Choi, W. Rationally designed micropixelation-free tactile sensors via contour profile of triboelectric field propagation. Nano Energy 109, 108255 (2023).10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108255 ↗
11. Mu, Y. et al. All-printed flexible capacitive array tactile force sensors with tunable sensitivity and low crosstalk for micro motion detection. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 356, 114337 (2023).10.1016/j.sna.2023.114337 ↗
12. Yin, A. et al. High performance waterproof-breathable fully flexible tactile sensor based on piezotronics coupled OFET. Nano Energy 106, 108034 (2023).10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.108034 ↗
13. Yang, Y. et al. Human skin based triboelectric nanogenerators for harvesting biomechanical energy and as self-powered active tactile sensor system. ACS Nano 7, 9213–9222 (2013).10.1021/nn403838y ↗
14. Zhao, Z. et al. Large-Scale Integrated Flexible Tactile Sensor Array for Sensitive Smart Robotic Touch. ACS Nano 16, 16784–16795 (2022).10.1021/acsnano.2c06432 ↗
15. Samaddar, N., Wani, M. I., Maharshi, V., Sonkusale, S. & Malik, S. A Resistance Change Detection Circuitry for Thread Based Resistive Sensors. APSCON 2023 - IEEE Appl. Sens. Conf. Symp. Proc. 1, 3 (2023).
16. Hong, W. et al. Self-adaptive cardiac optogenetics device based on negative stretching-resistive strain sensor. Sci. Adv. 7, (2021).10.1126/sciadv.abj4273 ↗
17. Gong, S. et al. Hierarchically resistive skins as specific and multimetric on-throat wearable biosensors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 889–897 (2023).10.1038/s41565-023-01383-6 ↗
18. Zhang, X. et al. Silver Nanowire/Silver/Poly(dimethylsiloxane) as Strain Sensors for Motion Monitoring. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 5, 15797–15807 (2022).10.1021/acsanm.2c03901 ↗
19. Zhao, S. et al. Strain-driven and ultrasensitive resistive sensor/switch based on conductive alginate/nitrogen-doped carbon-nanotube-supported Ag hybrid aerogels with pyramid design. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 22823–22829 (2014).10.1021/am5069936 ↗
20. Okamoto, Y. et al. Highly sensitive low-frequency-detectable acoustic sensor using a piezoresistive cantilever for health monitoring applications. Sci. Rep. 13, 6503 (2023).10.1038/s41598-023-33568-3 ↗
21. Zhang, W., Guo, Q., Duan, Y., Xing, C. & Peng, Z. A Textile Proximity/Pressure Dual-Mode Sensor Based on Magneto-Straining and Piezoresistive Effects. IEEE Sens. J. 22, 10420–10427 (2022).10.1109/JSEN.2022.3168068 ↗
22. Cheng, Y. et al. Bioinspired Microspines for a High-Performance Spray Ti3C2Tx MXene-Based Piezoresistive Sensor. ACS Nano 14, 2145–2155 (2020).10.1021/acsnano.9b08952 ↗
23. Yu, R. et al. Highly Sensitive Flexible Piezoresistive Sensor with 3D Conductive Network. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 35291–35299 (2020).10.1021/acsami.0c09552 ↗
24. Sun, F. Y. et al. Vascular smooth muscle-inspired architecture enables soft yet tough self-healing materials for durable capacitive strain-sensor. Nat. Commun. 14, 1–12 (2023).
25. Sachdeva, S. et al. Polymer-Metal Organic Framework Composite Films as Affinity Layer for Capacitive Sensor Devices. ACS Sens. 1, 1188–1192 (2016).10.1021/acssensors.6b00295 ↗
26. Chen, L. et al. Textile-Based Capacitive Sensor for Physical Rehabilitation via Surface Topological Modification. ACS Nano 14, 8191–8201 (2020).10.1021/acsnano.0c01643 ↗
27. Qin, R. et al. A new strategy for the fabrication of a flexible and highly sensitive capacitive pressure sensor. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 7, 1–12 (2021).10.1038/s41378-021-00327-1 ↗
28. Liu, Q. et al. Wireless Single-Electrode Self-Powered Piezoelectric Sensor for Monitoring. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 8288–8295 (2020).10.1021/acsami.9b21392 ↗
29. Rajala, S. et al. Cellulose Nanofibril Film as a Piezoelectric Sensor Material. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 15607–15614 (2016).10.1021/acsami.6b03597 ↗
30. Wang, H. S. et al. Biomimetic and flexible piezoelectric mobile acoustic sensors with multiresonant ultrathin structures for machine learning biometrics. Sci. Adv. 7, 1–9 (2021).
31. Qu, X. et al. Artificial tactile perception smart finger for material identification based on triboelectric sensing. Sci. Adv. 8, 1–12 (2022).10.1126/sciadv.abq2521 ↗
32. Zhang, S. et al. Nondestructive Dimension Sorting by Soft Robotic Grippers Integrated with Triboelectric Sensor. ACS Nano 16, 3008–3016 (2022).10.1021/acsnano.1c10396 ↗
33. Park, K. et al. A biomimetic elastomeric robot skin using electrical impedance and acoustic tomography for tactile sensing. 7187, 1–12 (2022).10.1126/scirobotics.abm7187 ↗
34. Sun, H. & Martius, G. Guiding the design of superresolution tactile skins with taxel value isolines theory. Sci. Robot. 7, (2022).10.1126/scirobotics.abm0608 ↗
35. Hu, K., Arcadia, C. E. & Rosenstein, J. K. Super-Resolution Electrochemical Impedance Imaging with a 100 × 100 CMOS Sensor Array. BioCAS 2021 - IEEE Biomed. Circuits Syst. Conf. Proc. 1–4 (2021).10.1109/BioCAS49922.2021.9644965 ↗
36. Yeh, S. K. & Fang, W. Integration of Stainless-Steel Tactile Bump with Inductive Tactile Sensor Array for 3D Micro Joystick Button Application. 2019 20th Int. Conf. Solid-State Sensors, Actuators Microsystems Eurosensors XXXIII, TRANSDUCERS 2019 EUROSENSORS XXXIII 1882–1885 (2019).10.1109/TRANSDUCERS.2019.8808306 ↗
37. Lam, C. et al. Human finger inspired grasping structure using tactile sensing array with single type optoelectronic sensor. Proc. IEEE Sens. 2017, 1–3 (2017).
38. Weerasinghe, L. & Chathuranga, D. S. Development and characterization of a soft tactile sensor array used for parallel grippers. MERCon 2018 - 4th Int. Multidiscip. Moratuwa Eng. Res. Conf. 102–107 (2018).10.1109/MERCon.2018.8421962 ↗
39. Lee, H., Kwon, D., Cho, H., Park, I. & Kim, J. Soft Nanocomposite Based Multi-point, Multi-directional Strain Mapping Sensor Using Anisotropic Electrical Impedance Tomography. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–10 (2017).10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x ↗
40. Van Den Heever, D. J., Schreve, K. & Scheffer, C. Tactile sensing using force sensing resistors and a super-resolution algorithm. IEEE Sens. J. 9, 29–35 (2009).10.1109/JSEN.2008.2008891 ↗
41. Wu, B., Liu, Q. & Zhang, Q. Tactile Pattern Super Resolution with Taxel-based Sensors. 2022. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robot. Syst. 3644, 3650 (2022).
42. Yan, Y. et al. Soft magnetic skin for super-resolution tactile sensing with force self-decoupling. Sci. Robot. 6, (2021).10.1126/scirobotics.abc8801 ↗
43. Krause, A., Singh, A. & Guestrin, C. Near-optimal sensor placements in Gaussian processes: Theory, efficient algorithms and empirical studies. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 9, 235–284 (2008).
44. Boutry, C. M. et al. A hierarchically patterned, bioinspired e-skin able to detect the direction of applied pressure for robotics. Sci. Robot. 3, 1–10 (2018).10.1126/scirobotics.aau6914 ↗
45. Ge, J. et al. A bimodal soft electronic skin for tactile and touchless interaction in real time. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–10 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-12303-5 ↗
46. Hellebrekers, T. et al. Soft Magnetic Tactile Skin for Continuous Force and Location Estimation Using Neural Networks. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 5, 3892–3898 (2020).10.1109/LRA.2020.2983707 ↗
47. Hu, H. et al. Wireless Flexible Magnetic Tactile Sensor with Super-Resolution in Large-Areas. ACS Nano 16, 19271–19280 (2022).10.1021/acsnano.2c08664 ↗
48. Hellebrekers, T., Kroemer, O. & Majidi, C. Soft Magnetic Skin for Continuous Deformation Sensing. Adv. Intell. Syst. 1, 1900025 (2019).10.1002/aisy.201900025 ↗
49. Dobashi, Y. et al. Piezoionic mechanoreceptors: Force-induced current generation in hydrogels. Sci. (80-.) 376, 502–507 (2022).10.1126/science.aaw1974 ↗
50. Zou, Z. et al. Rehealable, fully recyclable, and malleable electronic skin enabled by dynamic covalent thermoset nanocomposite. Sci. Adv. 4, 1–9 (2018).10.1126/sciadv.aaq0508 ↗
51. Sun, Z., Zhu, M., Shan, X. & Lee, C. Augmented tactile-perception and haptic-feedback rings as human-machine interfaces aiming for immersive interactions. Nat. Commun. 13, (2022).10.1038/s41467-022-32745-8 ↗
52. Xia, Z. et al. Contact Shape and Pose Recognition: Utilizing a Multipole Magnetic Tactile Sensor With a Metalearning Model. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 29, 127–137 (2022).10.1109/MRA.2022.3198372 ↗
53. Qiu, X., Liu, J., Zhou, B. & Zhang, X. Bioinspired Bimodal Mechanosensors with Real-Time, Visualized Information Display for Intelligent Control. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33, 1–10 (2023).10.1002/adfm.202300321 ↗