Long-term stability strategies of deep brain flexible neural interface
Source abstract
Abstract
Flexible deep brain neural interfaces, as an important research direction in the field of neural engineering, have broad application prospects in areas such as neural signal detection, treatment of neurological diseases, and intelligent control systems. However, chronic inflammatory responses caused by long-term implantation and the resulting electrode failure seriously hinder the clinical development of this technology. This review systematically explores the long-term stability issues of flexible deep brain neural interfaces, with a focus on analyzing the synergistic optimization of electrode geometric morphology and implantation strategies in regulating inflammatory responses. Additionally, this paper delves into innovative strategies, such as passive enhancement of biocompatibility through electrode surface functionalization and active inhibition of inflammation through drug-controlled release systems, offering new technical paths to extend electrode lifespan. By integrating and reviewing existing innovative methods for deep brain flexible electrodes, this study provides an important theoretical foundation and technical guidance for the development of high-stability neural interface devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Neuroscience and Neural Engineering · Photoreceptor and optogenetics research · Neural dynamics and brain function
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhao, Z. et al. Ultraflexible electrode arrays for months-long high-density electrophysiological mapping of thousands of neurons in rodents. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 7, 520–532 (2022).10.1038/s41551-022-00941-y ↗
2. Oganesian, L. L. & Shanechi, M. M. Brain–computer interfaces for neuropsychiatric disorders. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 2, 653–670 (2024).10.1038/s44222-024-00177-2 ↗
3. Tang, X., Shen, H., Zhao, S., Li, N. & Liu, J. Flexible brain–computer interfaces. Nat. Electron 6, 109–118 (2023).10.1038/s41928-022-00913-9 ↗
4. Wang, J. et al. Flexible electrodes for brain–computer interface system. Adv. Mater. 35, 2211012 (2023).10.1002/adma.202211012 ↗
5. Rivnay, J., Wang, H., Fenno, L., Deisseroth, K. & Malliaras, G. G. Next-generation probes, particles, and proteins for neural interfacing. Sci. Adv. 3, e1601649 (2017).10.1126/sciadv.1601649 ↗
6. Salatino, J. W., Ludwig, K. A., Kozai, T. D. Y. & Purcell, E. K. Glial responses to implanted electrodes in the brain. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 1, 862–877 (2017).10.1038/s41551-017-0154-1 ↗
7. Skaper, S. D., Facci, L., Zusso, M. & Giusti, P. An inflammation-centric view of neurological disease: beyond the neuron. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 12, 72 (2018).10.3389/fncel.2018.00072 ↗
8. Wu, N. et al. Electrode materials for brain–machine interface: a review. InfoMat 3, 1174–1194 (2021).10.1002/inf2.12234 ↗
9. Shen, K., Chen, O., Edmunds, J. L., Piech, D. K. & Maharbiz, M. M. Translational opportunities and challenges of invasive electrodes for neural interfaces. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 7, 424–442 (2023).10.1038/s41551-023-01021-5 ↗
10. Wang, Y., Yang, X., Zhang, X., Wang, Y. & Pei, W. Implantable intracortical microelectrodes: reviewing the present with a focus on the future. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 9, 7 (2023).10.1038/s41378-022-00451-6 ↗
11. Lyu, J. et al. Microglial responses to brain injury and disease: functional diversity and new opportunities. Transl. Stroke Res. 12, 474–495 (2021).10.1007/s12975-020-00857-2 ↗
12. Oakes, R. S., Polei, M. D., Skousen, J. L. & Tresco, P. A. An astrocyte derived extracellular matrix coating reduces astrogliosis surrounding chronically implanted microelectrode arrays in rat cortex. Biomaterials 154, 1–11 (2018).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.10.001 ↗
13. He, Y., Liu, X. & Chen, Z. Glial scar—a promising target for improving outcomes after CNS injury. J. Mol. Neurosci. 70, 340–352 (2020).10.1007/s12031-019-01417-6 ↗
14. Song, E., Li, J., Won, S. M., Bai, W. & Rogers, J. A. Materials for flexible bioelectronic systems as chronic neural interfaces. Nat. Mater. 19, 590–603 (2020).10.1038/s41563-020-0679-7 ↗
15. Gulino, M., Kim, D., Pané, S., Santos, S. D. & Pêgo, A. P. Tissue response to neural implants: the use of model systems toward new design solutions of implantable microelectrodes. Front. Neurosci. 13, 689 (2019).10.3389/fnins.2019.00689 ↗
16. Chen, Y. et al. How is flexible electronics advancing neuroscience research? Biomaterials 268, 120559 (2021).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120559 ↗
17. Servais, B., Mahmoudi, N., Gautam, V. & Tong, W. Engineering brain-on-a-chip platforms. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 2, 691–709 (2024).10.1038/s44222-024-00184-3 ↗
18. Lecomte, A., Descamps, E. & Bergaud, C. A review on mechanical considerations for chronically-implanted neural probes. J. Neural Eng. 15, 031001 (2018).10.1088/1741-2552/aa8b4f ↗
19. Seo, K. J. et al. A soft, high-density neuroelectronic array. npj Flex. Electron 7, 40 (2023).10.1038/s41528-023-00271-2 ↗
20. Hong, G. & Lieber, C. M. Novel electrode technologies for neural recordings. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 330–345 (2019).10.1038/s41583-019-0140-6 ↗
21. Huang, Y. et al. Flexible electronic-photonic 3D integration from ultrathin polymer chiplets. npj Flex. Electron 8, 61 (2024).10.1038/s41528-024-00344-w ↗
22. Hong, G., Yang, X., Zhou, T. & Lieber, C. M. Mesh electronics: a new paradigm for tissue-like brain probes. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 50, 33–41 (2018).10.1016/j.conb.2017.11.007 ↗
23. Mo, F. et al. Single-neuron detection of place cells remapping in short-term memory using motion microelectrode arrays. Biosens. Bioelectron. 217, 114726 (2022).10.1016/j.bios.2022.114726 ↗
24. Yang, X. et al. Bioinspired neuron-like electronics. Nat. Mater. 18, 510–517 (2019).10.1038/s41563-019-0292-9 ↗
25. Du, Z. J. et al. Ultrasoft microwire neural electrodes improve chronic tissue integration. Acta Biomater. 53, 46–58 (2017).10.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.010 ↗
26. Tian, Y. et al. An ultraflexible electrode array for large‐scale chronic recording in the nonhuman primate brain. Adv. Sci. 10, 2302333 (2023).10.1002/advs.202302333 ↗
27. Lee, K. et al. Flexible, scalable, high channel count stereo-electrode for recording in the human brain. Nat. Commun. 15, 218 (2024).10.1038/s41467-023-43727-9 ↗
28. Kim, J. H. et al. Flexible deep brain neural probe for localized stimulation and detection with metal guide. Biosens. Bioelectron. 117, 436–443 (2018).10.1016/j.bios.2018.06.035 ↗
29. Ferro, M. D. et al. NeuroRoots, a bio-inspired, seamless Brain Machine Interface device for long-term recording. AIP Adv. 14, 085109 (2024).10.1063/5.0216979 ↗
30. Wang, Y. et al. Flexible multichannel electrodes for acute recording in nonhuman primates. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 9, 93 (2023).10.1038/s41378-023-00550-y ↗
31. Fu, T.-M. et al. Stable long-term chronic brain mapping at the single-neuron level. Nat. Methods 13, 875–882 (2016).10.1038/nmeth.3969 ↗
32. Du Roure, O. et al. Force mapping in epithelial cell migration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 2390–2395 (2005).10.1073/pnas.0408482102 ↗
33. Luan, L. et al. Ultraflexible nanoelectronic probes form reliable, glial scar–free neural integration. Sci. Adv. 3, e1601966 (2017).10.1126/sciadv.1601966 ↗
34. Wei, X. et al. Nanofabricated ultraflexible electrode arrays for high‐density intracortical recording. Adv. Sci. 5, 1700625 (2018).10.1002/advs.201700625 ↗
35. Wei, C. et al. Distributed implantation of a flexible microelectrode array for neural recording. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 8, 50 (2022).10.1038/s41378-022-00366-2 ↗
36. Musk, E. & Neuralink. An integrated brain-machine interface platform with thousands of channels. J. Med. Internet Res. 21, e16194 (2019).10.2196/16194 ↗
37. Lee, J. M. et al. Scalable three-dimensional recording electrodes for probing biological tissues. Nano Lett. 22, 4552–4559 (2022).10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c01444 ↗
38. Lee, J. M. The ultra-thin, minimally invasive surface electrode array NeuroWeb for probing neural activity. Nature Communications (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-42860-9 ↗
39. Chik, G. K. K. et al. Flexible multichannel neural probe developed by electropolymerization for localized stimulation and sensing. Adv. Mater. Technol. 7, 2200143 (2022).10.1002/admt.202200143 ↗
40. Zhao, S. et al. Tracking neural activity from the same cells during the entire adult life of mice. Nat. Neurosci. 26, 696–710 (2023).10.1038/s41593-023-01267-x ↗
41. Hong, G. et al. Tissue-like neural probes for understanding and modulating the brain. Biochemistry 57, 3995–4004 (2018).10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00122 ↗
42. Hong, G. et al. Syringe injectable electronics: precise targeted delivery with quantitative input/output connectivity. Nano Lett. 15, 6979–6984 (2015).10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02987 ↗
43. Lee, J. M. et al. Nanoenabled direct contact interfacing of syringe-injectable mesh electronics. Nano Lett. 19, 5818–5826 (2019).10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03019 ↗
44. Lee, J. M. et al. Stitching flexible electronics into the brain. Adv. Sci. 10, 2300220 (2023).10.1002/advs.202300220 ↗
45. Xiang, Z., Liu, J. & Lee, C. A flexible three-dimensional electrode mesh: An enabling technology for wireless brain–computer interface prostheses. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2, 16012 (2016).10.1038/micronano.2016.12 ↗
46. Lee, S. H. et al. Scalable thousand channel penetrating microneedle arrays on flex for multimodal and large area coverage brainmachine interfaces. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2112045 (2022).10.1002/adfm.202112045 ↗
47. Kang, Y. N., Chou, N., Jang, J.-W., Choe, H. K. & Kim, S. A 3D flexible neural interface based on a microfluidic interconnection cable capable of chemical delivery. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 7, 66 (2021).10.1038/s41378-021-00295-6 ↗
48. Merken, L., Schelles, M., Ceyssens, F., Kraft, M. & Janssen, P. Thin flexible arrays for long-term multi-electrode recordings in macaque primary visual cortex. J. Neural Eng. 19, 066039 (2022).10.1088/1741-2552/ac98e2 ↗
49. Lee, J. Y. et al. Foldable three dimensional neural electrode arrays for simultaneous brain interfacing of cortical surface and intracortical multilayers. npj Flex. Electron 6, 86 (2022).10.1038/s41528-022-00219-y ↗
50. Yang, Y. et al. Ultraflexible neural probes for multidirectional neuronal activity recordings over large spatial and temporal scales. Nano Lett. 23, 8568–8575 (2023).10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c02348 ↗
51. Opie, N. L. et al. Focal stimulation of the sheep motor cortex with a chronically implanted minimally invasive electrode array mounted on an endovascular stent. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2, 907–914 (2018).10.1038/s41551-018-0321-z ↗
52. Oxley, T. J. et al. Minimally invasive endovascular stent-electrode array for high-fidelity, chronic recordings of cortical neural activity. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 320–327 (2016).10.1038/nbt.3428 ↗
53. Pancaldi, L. et al. Flow driven robotic navigation of microengineered endovascular probes. Nat. Commun. 11, 6356 (2020).10.1038/s41467-020-20195-z ↗
54. Zhang, A. et al. Ultraflexible endovascular probes for brain recording through micrometer-scale vasculature. Science 381, 306–312 (2023).10.1126/science.adh3916 ↗
55. Li, H., Wang, J. & Fang, Y. Bioinspired flexible electronics for seamless neural interfacing and chronic recording. Nanoscale Adv. 2, 3095–3102 (2020).10.1039/D0NA00323A ↗
56. Lv, S. et al. Tentacle microelectrode arrays uncover soft boundary neurons in hippocampal CA1. Adv. Sci 2401670 (2024).10.1002/advs.202401670 ↗
57. Fan, P. et al. Flexible microelectrode array probe for simultaneous detection of neural discharge and dopamine in striatum of mice aversion system. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 390, 133990 (2023).10.1016/j.snb.2023.133990 ↗
58. Pas, J. et al. A bilayered PVA/PLGA-bioresorbable shuttle to improve the implantation of flexible neural probes. J. Neural Eng. 15, 065001 (2018).10.1088/1741-2552/aadc1d ↗
59. Zhou, Y. et al. A silk-based self-adaptive flexible opto-electro neural probe. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 8, 118 (2022).10.1038/s41378-022-00461-4 ↗
60. Guan, S. et al. Elastocapillary self-assembled neurotassels for stable neural activity recordings. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav2842 (2019).10.1126/sciadv.aav2842 ↗
61. Cointe, C. et al. Scalable batch fabrication of ultrathin flexible neural probes using a bioresorbable silk layer. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 8, 21 (2022).10.1038/s41378-022-00353-7 ↗
62. Lecomte, A. et al. Silk and PEG as means to stiffen a parylene probe for insertion in the brain: toward a double time-scale tool for local drug delivery. J. Micromech. Microeng. 25, 125003 (2015).10.1088/0960-1317/25/12/125003 ↗
63. Wen, D.-L. et al. Recent progress in silk fibroin-based flexible electronics. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 7, 35 (2021).10.1038/s41378-021-00261-2 ↗
64. Rauhala, O. J. et al. Chitosan‐based, biocompatible, solution processable films for in vivo localization of neural interface devices. Adv. Mater. Technol. 5, 1900663 (2020).10.1002/admt.201900663 ↗
65. Ojeda-Hernández, D. D., Canales-Aguirre, A. A., Matias-Guiu, J., Gomez-Pinedo, U. & Mateos-Díaz, J. C. Potential of chitosan and its derivatives for biomedical applications in the central nervous system. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 389 (2020).10.3389/fbioe.2020.00389 ↗
66. Xie, C. et al. Three-dimensional macroporous nanoelectronic networks as minimally invasive brain probes. Nat. Mater. 14, 1286–1292 (2015).10.1038/nmat4427 ↗
67. Wen, X. et al. Flexible, multifunctional neural probe with liquid metal enabled, ultra-large tunable stiffness for deep-brain chemical sensing and agent delivery. Biosens. Bioelectron. 131, 37–45 (2019).10.1016/j.bios.2019.01.060 ↗
68. Villa, J., Cury, J., Kessler, L., Tan, X. & Richter, C.-P. Enhancing biocompatibility of the brain-machine interface: a review. Bioact. Mater. 42, 531–549 (2024).
69. Sayyad, P. W., Park, S.-J. & Ha, T.-J. Bioinspired nanoplatforms for human-machine interfaces: recent progress in materials and device applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 70, 108297 (2024).10.1016/j.biotechadv.2023.108297 ↗
70. Kämmerling, L. et al. Mitigating the foreign body response through ‘immune-instructive’ biomaterials. J. Immunol. Regenerative Med. 12, 100040 (2021).10.1016/j.regen.2021.100040 ↗
71. Song, I. & Dityatev, A. Crosstalk between glia, extracellular matrix and neurons. Brain Res. Bull. 136, 101–108 (2018).10.1016/j.brainresbull.2017.03.003 ↗
72. Chelyshev, Y. A., Kabdesh, I. M. & Mukhamedshina, Y. O. Extracellular matrix in neural plasticity and regeneration. Cell Mol. Neurobiol. 42, 647–664 (2022).10.1007/s10571-020-00986-0 ↗
73. Amini, S., Salehi, H., Setayeshmehr, M. & Ghorbani, M. Natural and synthetic polymeric scaffolds used in peripheral nerve tissue engineering: Advantages and disadvantages. Polym. Adv. Technol. 32, 2267–2289 (2021).10.1002/pat.5263 ↗
74. Vitale, F. et al. Biomimetic extracellular matrix coatings improve the chronic biocompatibility of microfabricated subdural microelectrode arrays. PLoS ONE 13, e0206137 (2018).10.1371/journal.pone.0206137 ↗
75. Lee, C. D. et al. Matrigel coatings for Parylene sheath neural probes. J. Biomed. Mater. Res 104, 357–368 (2016).10.1002/jbm.b.33390 ↗
76. Qi, Y., Kang, S.-K., Fang, H. & Editors, Guest Advanced materials for implantable neuroelectronics. MRS Bull. 48, 475–483 (2023).10.1557/s43577-023-00540-5 ↗
77. He, W., McConnell, G. C. & Bellamkonda, R. V. Nanoscale laminin coating modulates cortical scarring response around implanted silicon microelectrode arrays. J. Neural Eng. 3, 316–326 (2006).10.1088/1741-2560/3/4/009 ↗
78. Ghane-Motlagh, B. et al. Physicochemical properties of peptide-coated microelectrode arrays and their in vitro effects on neuroblast cells. Mat. Sci. Eng. C 68, 642–650 (2016).10.1016/j.msec.2016.06.045 ↗
79. Tarus, D. et al. Design of hyaluronic acid hydrogels to promote neurite outgrowth in three dimensions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 25051–25059 (2016).10.1021/acsami.6b06446 ↗
80. Hu, Y. et al. Resilient and self-healing hyaluronic acid/chitosan hydrogel with ion conductivity, low water loss, and freeze-tolerance for flexible and wearable strain sensor. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10, 837750 (2022).10.3389/fbioe.2022.837750 ↗
81. Swingler, S. et al. Recent advances and applications of bacterial cellulose in biomedicine. Polymers 13, 412 (2021).10.3390/polym13030412 ↗
82. Robbins, M. et al. Biofunctionalised bacterial cellulose scaffold supports the patterning and expansion of human embryonic stem cell-derived dopaminergic progenitor cells. Stem Cell Res Ther. 12, 574 (2021).10.1186/s13287-021-02639-5 ↗
83. Yang, J. et al. Bacterial cellulose as a supersoft neural interfacing substrate. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 33049–33059 (2018).10.1021/acsami.8b12083 ↗
84. Kozai, T. D. Y. et al. Chronic in vivo evaluation of PEDOT/CNT for stable neural recordings. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 63, 111–119 (2016).10.1109/TBME.2015.2445713 ↗
85. Li, X. et al. Flexible electrocorticography electrode array for epileptiform electrical activity recording under glutamate and GABA modulation on the primary somatosensory cortex of rats. Micromachines 11, 732 (2020).10.3390/mi11080732 ↗
86. Li, X. et al. PDMS–parylene hybrid, flexible micro-ECoG electrode array for spatiotemporal mapping of epileptic electrophysiological activity from multicortical brain regions. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 4, 8013–8022 (2021).10.1021/acsabm.1c00923 ↗
87. Lim, J. et al. Hybrid graphene electrode for the diagnosis and treatment of epilepsy in free-moving animal models. NPG Asia Mater. 15, 7 (2023).10.1038/s41427-023-00464-1 ↗
88. Park, S. et al. Adaptive and multifunctional hydrogel hybrid probes for long-term sensing and modulation of neural activity. Nat. Commun. 12, 3435 (2021).10.1038/s41467-021-23802-9 ↗
89. Wang, K. et al. Electrodeposition of alginate with PEDOT/PSS coated MWCNTs to make an interpenetrating conducting hydrogel for neural interface. Compos 26, 27–40 (2019).
90. Rinoldi, C. et al. In vivo chronic brain cortex signal recording based on a soft conductive hydrogel biointerface. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15, 6283–6296 (2023).10.1021/acsami.2c17025 ↗
91. Lee, Y. et al. A lubricated nonimmunogenic neural probe for acute insertion trauma minimization and long‐term signal recording. Adv. Sci. 8, 2100231 (2021).10.1002/advs.202100231 ↗
92. Sung, C. et al. Multimaterial and multifunctional neural interfaces: from surface-type and implantable electrodes to fiber-based devices. J. Mater. Chem. B 8, 6624–6666 (2020).10.1039/D0TB00872A ↗
93. Ziai, Y. et al. Conducting polymer‐based nanostructured materials for brain–machine interfaces. WIRES Nanomed. Nanobi 15, e1895 (2023).10.1002/wnan.1895 ↗
94. Qazi, R. et al. Wireless optofluidic brain probes for chronic neuropharmacology and photostimulation. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 3, 655–669 (2019).10.1038/s41551-019-0432-1 ↗
95. Seyfoddin, A. et al. Electro-responsive macroporous polypyrrole scaffolds for triggered dexamethasone delivery. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 94, 419–426 (2015).10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.06.018 ↗
96. Wadhwa, R., Lagenaur, C. F. & Cui, X. T. Electrochemically controlled release of dexamethasone from conducting polymer polypyrrole coated electrode. J. Control Release 110, 531–541 (2006).10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.10.027 ↗
97. Kim, D., Abidian, M. & Martin, D. C. Conducting polymers grown in hydrogel scaffolds coated on neural prosthetic devices. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 71A, 577–585 (2004).10.1002/jbm.a.30124 ↗
98. Wu, C. et al. Electrochemical deposition of Ppy/Dex/ECM coatings and their regulation on cellular responses through electrical controlled drug release. Colloids Surf. B 222, 113016 (2023).10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.113016 ↗
99. Abidian, M. R., Kim, D. ‐H. & Martin, D. C. Conducting‐polymer nanotubes for controlled drug release. Adv. Mater. 18, 405–409 (2006).10.1002/adma.200501726 ↗
100. Abidian, M. R. & Martin, D. C. Multifunctional nanobiomaterials for neural interfaces. Adv. Funct. Mater. 19, 573–585 (2009).10.1002/adfm.200801473 ↗