Advances in flexible piezoelectrics for wearable and implantable medical devices
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Flexible piezoelectric materials have garnered increasing attention due to their potential applications in wearable and implantable medical devices. While wearable technologies provide continuous health monitoring, their reliance on batteries limits long-term usability. In contrast, implantable medical devices (IMDs) offer both monitoring and therapeutic functions, but they face challenges such as power supply limitations, biocompatibility issues and long-term stability concerns. This review focuses on the role of flexible piezoelectric nanogenerators (PENGs) in overcoming these challenges by enabling self-powered operation, high-sensitivity biosensing and therapeutic applications. We discuss how material properties, including piezoelectric performance, mechanical flexibility and biocompatibility, influence device functionality. Additionally, key challenges, including material degradation, encapsulation strategies and integration with existing medical technologies, are examined. By highlighting recent advances in PENG-based IMDs for energy harvesting, physiological monitoring and medical therapies, this review provides insights into the future development of self-sustaining and multifunctional biomedical devices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies · Advanced Materials and Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Deng, W. et al. Piezoelectric nanogenerators for personalized healthcare. Chem. Soc. Rev. 51, 3380–3435 (2022).10.1039/D1CS00858G ↗
2. Libanori, A. et al. Smart textiles for personalized healthcare. Nat. Electron. 5, 142–156 (2022).10.1038/s41928-022-00723-z ↗
3. Kvedar, J. C. et al. Digital medicine’s march on chronic disease. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 239–246 (2016).10.1038/nbt.3495 ↗
4. Steinhubl, S. R., Muse, E. D. & Topol, E. J. The emerging field of mobile health. Sci. Transl. Med. 7, 283rv3–283rv3 (2015). p.10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa3487 ↗
5. Walker, A. L. & Muhlestein, J. B. Smartphone electrocardiogram monitoring: current perspectives. Adv. Health Care Technol. 4, 15–24 (2018).10.2147/AHCT.S138445 ↗
6. Klonoff, D. C., Ahn, D. & Drincic, A. Continuous glucose monitoring: a review of the technology and clinical use. Diab. Res. Clin. Pract. 133, 178–192 (2017).10.1016/j.diabres.2017.08.005 ↗
7. Fu, Y. & Liu, J. System design for wearable blood oxygen saturation and pulse measurement device. Procedia Manuf. 3, 1187–1194 (2015).10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.197 ↗
8. Khan, Y. et al. Monitoring of vital signs with flexible and wearable medical devices. Adv. Mater. 28, 4373–4395 (2016).10.1002/adma.201504366 ↗
9. Iqbal, S. M. A. et al. Advances in healthcare wearable devices. npj Flex. Electron. 5, 9 (2021).10.1038/s41528-021-00107-x ↗
10. Seneviratne, S. et al. A survey of wearable devices and challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 19, 2573–2620 (2017).10.1109/COMST.2017.2731979 ↗
11. Cingolani, E., Goldhaber, J. I. & Marbán, E. Next-generation pacemakers: from small devices to biological pacemakers. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 15, 139–150 (2018).10.1038/nrcardio.2017.165 ↗
12. Singh, R. et al. A review of bioresorbable implantable medical devices: materials, fabrication, and implementation. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 9, 2000790 (2020).10.1002/adhm.202000790 ↗
13. Wang, R., Sui, J. & Wang, X. Natural piezoelectric biomaterials: a biocompatible and sustainable building block for biomedical devices. ACS Nano 16, 17708–17728 (2022).10.1021/acsnano.2c08164 ↗
14. Tang, L. & Eaton, J. W. Inflammatory responses to biomaterials. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 103, 466–471 (1995).10.1093/ajcp/103.4.466 ↗
15. Yoon, H.-J. & Kim, S.-W. Nanogenerators to power implantable medical systems. Joule 4, 1398–1407 (2020).10.1016/j.joule.2020.05.003 ↗
16. Dong, L. et al. Cardiac energy harvesting and sensing based on piezoelectric and triboelectric designs. Nano Energy 76, 105076 (2020).10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105076 ↗
17. Shawon, S. M. A. Z. et al. Piezo-tribo dual effect hybrid nanogenerators for health monitoring. Nano Energy 82, 105691 (2021).10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105691 ↗
18. Dagdeviren, C., Li, Z. & Wang, Z. L. Energy harvesting from the animal/human body for self-powered electronics. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 19, 85–108 (2017).10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071516-044517 ↗
19. Howells, C. A. Piezoelectric energy harvesting. Energy Convers. Manag. 50, 1847–1850 (2009).10.1016/j.enconman.2009.02.020 ↗
20. Kim, J.-H. et al. Conformable piezoelectric devices and systems for advanced wearable and implantable biomedical applications. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 27, 255–282 (2025).10.1146/annurev-bioeng-020524-121438 ↗
21. Yoon, H. et al. Decoding tissue biomechanics using conformable electronic devices. Nat. Rev. Mater. 10, 4–27 (2025).10.1038/s41578-024-00729-3 ↗
22. Jin, F. et al. A bright future for self-sustainable bioelectronics. Nat. Rev. Electr. Eng. 2, 338–349 (2025).10.1038/s44287-025-00164-8 ↗
23. Tan, P. et al. An artificial intelligence-enhanced blood pressure monitor wristband based on piezoelectric nanogenerator. Biosensors 12, 234 (2022).10.3390/bios12040234 ↗
24. Sun, Y. et al. Intelligent cardiovascular disease diagnosis system combined piezoelectric nanogenerator based on 2D Bi2O2Se with deep learning technique. Nano Energy 128, 109878 (2024).10.1016/j.nanoen.2024.109878 ↗
25. Guan, X., Xu, B. & Gong, J. Hierarchically architected polydopamine modified BaTiO3@P(VDF-TrFE) nanocomposite fiber mats for flexible piezoelectric nanogenerators and self-powered sensors. Nano Energy 70, 104516 (2020).10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104516 ↗
26. Chen, Z. et al. A self-powered controllable microneedle drug delivery system for rapid blood pressure reduction. Nano Energy 123, 109344 (2024).10.1016/j.nanoen.2024.109344 ↗
27. Wu, P. et al. Ultrasound-driven in vivo electrical stimulation based on biodegradable piezoelectric nanogenerators for enhancing and monitoring the nerve tissue repair. Nano Energy 102, 107707 (2022).10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107707 ↗
28. Das, K. K. et al. Piezoelectric nanogenerators for self-powered wearable and implantable bioelectronic devices. Acta Biomater. 171, 85–113 (2023).10.1016/j.actbio.2023.08.057 ↗
29. Xu, Q., Wen, J. & Qin, Y. Development and outlook of high output piezoelectric nanogenerators. Nano Energy 86, 106080 (2021).10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106080 ↗
30. Wang, Z. L. & Song, J. Piezoelectric nanogenerators based on zinc oxide nanowire arrays. Science 312, 242–246 (2006).10.1126/science.1124005 ↗
31. Wang, Z. L. et al. Semiconducting and piezoelectric oxide nanostructures induced by polar surfaces. Adv. Funct. Mater. 14, 943–956 (2004).10.1002/adfm.200400180 ↗
32. Cui, X. et al. Implantable self-powered systems for electrical stimulation medical devices. Adv. Sci. 12, 2412044 (2024).10.1002/advs.202412044 ↗
33. Hu, D. et al. Strategies to achieve high performance piezoelectric nanogenerators. Nano Energy 55, 288–304 (2019).10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.053 ↗
34. Vijayakanth, T. et al. Recent advances in organic and organic–inorganic hybrid materials for piezoelectric mechanical energy harvesting. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2109492 (2022).10.1002/adfm.202109492 ↗
35. Chen, W. & Lynch, C. A micro-electro-mechanical model for polarization switching of ferroelectric materials. Acta Mater. 46, 5303–5311 (1998).10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00207-9 ↗
36. Lefki, K. & Dormans, G. Measurement of piezoelectric coefficients of ferroelectric thin films. J. Appl. Phys. 76, 1764–1767 (1994).10.1063/1.357693 ↗
37. Panda, P. K. & Sahoo, B. PZT to lead free piezo ceramics: a review. Ferroelectrics 474, 128–143 (2015).10.1080/00150193.2015.997146 ↗
38. El-Khouri, R. J., Thomas, C. G. & Gaddy, S. A. The Role of Microbubbles in Ultrasound-Triggered Drug Delivery, Recent Patents on Topical and Cosmetic Science. 2, 40–51 (2019).
39. Liu, S. et al. A flexible and lead-free BCZT thin film nanogenerator for biocompatible energy harvesting. Mater. Chem. Front. 5, 4682–4689 (2021).10.1039/D1QM00145K ↗
40. Jiang, L. et al. Ultrahigh piezoelectric coefficients of Li-doped (K,Na)NbO3 nanorod arrays with manipulated O-T phase boundary: towards energy harvesting and self-powered human movement monitoring. Nano Energy 86, 106072 (2021).10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106072 ↗
41. Xue, H. et al. Multilevel structure engineered lead-free piezoceramics enabling breakthrough in energy harvesting performance for bioelectronics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33, 2212110 (2023).10.1002/adfm.202212110 ↗
42. Chen, J. et al. Biocompatible and sustainable power supply for self-powered wearable and implantable electronics using III-nitride thin-film-based flexible piezoelectric generator. Nano Energy 57, 670–679 (2019).10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.12.080 ↗
43. Wang, X. et al. Electricity generation based on one-dimensional group-III nitride nanomaterials. Adv. Mater. 22, 2155–2158 (2010).10.1002/adma.200903442 ↗
44. Shin, D.-M., Hong, S. W. & Hwang, Y.-H. Recent advances in organic piezoelectric biomaterials for energy and biomedical applications. Nanomaterials 10, 123 (2020).10.3390/nano10010123 ↗
45. Cheng, X. et al. Implantable and self-powered blood pressure monitoring based on a piezoelectric thinfilm: simulated, in vitro and in vivo studies. Nano Energy 22, 453–460 (2016).10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.02.037 ↗
46. Lv, F. et al. In-situ electrostatic field regulating the recrystallization behavior of P(VDF-TrFE) films with high β-phase content and enhanced piezoelectric properties towards flexible wireless biosensing device applications. Nano Energy 100, 107507 (2022).10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107507 ↗
47. Liu, Z. et al. Human motion driven self-powered photodynamic system for long-term autonomous cancer therapy. ACS Nano 14, 8074–8083 (2020).10.1021/acsnano.0c00675 ↗
48. Lu, L. et al. Flexible PVDF based piezoelectric nanogenerators. Nano Energy 78, 105251 (2020).10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105251 ↗
49. Ali, M. et al. Biodegradable piezoelectric polymers: recent advancements in materials and applications. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 12, 2300318 (2023).10.1002/adhm.202300318 ↗
50. Kim, D. et al. Biomolecular piezoelectric materials: from amino acids to living tissues. Adv. Mater. 32, 1906989 (2020).10.1002/adma.201906989 ↗
51. Banerjee, S., Ali, S. W. & Naik, S. N. Chitin and chitosan—Foremost hybrid piezoelectric materials for energy harvesting applications. in Hybrid Materials for Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting and Conversion, 301–319 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2024).10.1002/9781394150373.ch12 ↗
52. da Rosa, R. R. et al. Cellulose and chitin twisted structures: from nature to applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2304286 (2024).10.1002/adfm.202304286 ↗
53. Silva, C. C. et al. Collagen–hydroxyapatite films: piezoelectric properties. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 86, 210–218 (2001).10.1016/S0921-5107(01)00674-2 ↗
54. Harrington, D. J. Bacterial collagenases and collagen-degrading enzymes and their potential role in human disease. Infect. Immun. 64, 1885–1891 (1996).10.1128/iai.64.6.1885-1891.1996 ↗
55. Niu, Q. et al. Biodegradable silk fibroin-based bio-piezoelectric/triboelectric nanogenerators as self-powered electronic devices. Nano Energy 96, 107101 (2022).10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107101 ↗
56. Liu, Y. et al. Construction of adhesive and bioactive silk fibroin hydrogel for treatment of spinal cord injury. Acta Biomater. 158, 178–189 (2023).10.1016/j.actbio.2022.12.048 ↗
57. Zhao, P. et al. Gold@ Halloysite nanotubes-chitin composite hydrogel with antibacterial and hemostatic activity for wound healing. Bioact. Mater. 20, 355–367 (2023).
58. Kervran, M. et al. Thermal degradation of polylactic acid (PLA)/polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) blends: a systematic review. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 201, 109995 (2022).10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2022.109995 ↗
59. Xu, M. et al. Flexible piezoelectric generator based on PLLA/ZnO oriented fibers for wearable self-powered sensing. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 169, 107518 (2023).10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107518 ↗
60. Tajitsu, Y. Fundamental study on improvement of piezoelectricity of poly(ι-lactic acid) and its application to film actuators. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 60, 1625–1629 (2013).10.1109/TUFFC.2013.2744 ↗
61. Zhao, C. et al. A poly(l-Lactic Acid) polymer-based thermally stable cantilever for vibration energy harvesting applications. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 1, 1700068 (2017). p.10.1002/adsu.201700068 ↗
62. Wang, H., Zhang, J. & Tashiro, K. Phase transition mechanism of poly(l-lactic acid) among the α, δ, and β forms on the basis of the reinvestigated crystal structure of the β form. Macromolecules 50, 3285–3300 (2017).10.1021/acs.macromol.7b00272 ↗
63. Bonartsev, A. P. et al. Hydrolytic degradation of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate), polylactide and their derivatives: kinetics, crystallinity, and surface morphology. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 556, 288–300 (2012).10.1080/15421406.2012.635982 ↗
64. Kunioka, M. & Doi, Y. Thermal degradation of microbial copolyesters: poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) and poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate). Macromolecules 23, 1933–1936 (1990).10.1021/ma00209a009 ↗
65. Banerjee, S. & Ali, S. W. Leveraging the influence of amino acid in tuning the crystal phase of nylon 11: a novel soft material for piezoelectric energy harvesting. Appl. Mater. Today 38, 102258 (2024).10.1016/j.apmt.2024.102258 ↗
66. Guerin, S. et al. Control of piezoelectricity in amino acids by supramolecular packing. Nat. Mater. 17, 180–186 (2018).10.1038/nmat5045 ↗
67. Yu, Q. et al. Interface-induced high piezoelectric γ-glycine-based flexible biodegradable films. Nano Energy 121, 109196 (2024).10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.109196 ↗
68. Xue, H. et al. Flexible, biodegradable ultrasonic wireless electrotherapy device based on highly self-aligned piezoelectric biofilms. Sci. Adv. 10, eadn0260 (2024).10.1126/sciadv.adn0260 ↗
69. Zhang, W. et al. Bio-inspired dopamine functionalization of polypyrrole for improved adhesion and conductivity. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 35, 350–354 (2014).10.1002/marc.201300761 ↗
70. Tang, P. et al. Mussel-inspired electroactive and antioxidative scaffolds with incorporation of polydopamine-reduced graphene oxide for enhancing skin wound healing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 7703–7714 (2019).10.1021/acsami.8b18931 ↗
71. Pan, X. et al. Mechanical energy harvesting based on the piezoelectric materials: recent advances and future perspectives. Chem. Eng. J. 497, 154249 (2024).10.1016/j.cej.2024.154249 ↗
72. Shin, K.-Y., Lee, J. S. & Jang, J. Highly sensitive, wearable and wireless pressure sensor using free-standing ZnO nanoneedle/PVDF hybrid thin film for heart rate monitoring. Nano Energy 22, 95–104 (2016).10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.02.012 ↗
73. Xu, Z. et al. Implantable cardiac Kirigami-inspired lead-based energy harvester fabricated by enhanced piezoelectric composite film. Adv. Health. Mater. 10, e2002100 (2021).10.1002/adhm.202002100 ↗
74. Chen, P. et al. Ultrasound-driven electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves based on implantable piezoelectric thin film nanogenerators. Nano Energy 86, 106123 (2021).10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106123 ↗
75. Azimi, S. et al. Self-powered cardiac pacemaker by piezoelectric polymer nanogenerator implant. Nano Energy 83, 105781 (2021).10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.105781 ↗
76. Dudem, B. et al. Highly-flexible piezoelectric nanogenerators with silver nanowires and barium titanate embedded composite films for mechanical energy harvesting. Appl. Energy 230, 865–874 (2018).10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.009 ↗
77. Gu, L. et al. Enhancing the current density of a piezoelectric nanogenerator using a three-dimensional intercalation electrode. Nat. Commun. 11, 1030 (2020).10.1038/s41467-020-14846-4 ↗
78. Jiang, L. et al. Flexible piezoelectric ultrasonic energy harvester array for bio-implantable wireless generator. Nano Energy 56, 216–224 (2019).10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.11.052 ↗
79. Yu, J. et al. Recent advances on pulsed laser deposition of large-scale thin films. Small Methods 8, 2301282 (2024).10.1002/smtd.202301282 ↗
80. Li, L. et al. Recent progress in piezoelectric thin film fabrication via the solvothermal process. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 16046–16067 (2019).10.1039/C9TA04863D ↗
81. Kim, M. et al. Recent advances in free-standing single crystalline wide band-gap semiconductors and their applications: GaN, SiC, ZnO, β-Ga2O3, and diamond. J. Mater. Chem. C 5, 8338–8354 (2017).10.1039/C7TC02221B ↗
82. Lim, C. T. Nanofiber technology: current status and emerging developments. Prog. Polym. Sci. 70, 1–17 (2017).
83. Ghafari, E. & Lu, N. Self-polarized electrospun polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) nanofiber for sensing applications. Compos. Part B Eng. 160, 1–9 (2019).10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.011 ↗
84. Anand, A. & Bhatnagar, M. C. Role of vertically aligned and randomly placed zinc oxide (ZnO) nanorods in PVDF matrix: Used for energy harvesting. Mater. Today Energy 13, 293–301 (2019).10.1016/j.mtener.2019.06.005 ↗
85. Pi, Z. et al. Flexible piezoelectric nanogenerator made of poly(vinylidenefluoride-co-trifluoroethylene) (PVDF-TrFE) thin film. Nano Energy 7, 33–41 (2014).10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.04.016 ↗
86. Pei, H. et al. 3D printing of PVDF-based piezoelectric nanogenerator from programmable metamaterial design: Promising strategy for flexible electronic skin. Nano Energy 109, 108303 (2023).10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108303 ↗
87. Joshi, B. et al. Supersonically sprayed PVDF and ZnO flowers with built-in nanocuboids for wearable piezoelectric nanogenerators. Nano Energy 112, 108447 (2023).10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108447 ↗
88. Hwang, G.-T. et al. Flexible piezoelectric thin-film energy harvesters and nanosensors for biomedical applications. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 4, 646–658 (2015).10.1002/adhm.201400642 ↗
89. Abbasipour, M., Khajavi, R. & Akbarzadeh, A. H. A comprehensive review on piezoelectric polymeric and ceramic nanogenerators. Adv. Eng. Mater. 24, 2101312 (2022).10.1002/adem.202101312 ↗
90. Su, H. et al. Enhanced energy harvesting ability of polydimethylsiloxane-BaTiO3-based flexible piezoelectric nanogenerator for tactile imitation application. Nano Energy 83, 105809 (2021).10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.105809 ↗
91. Li, H. et al. Three-dimensional polymer-nanoparticle-liquid ternary composite for ultrahigh augmentation of piezoelectric nanogenerators. Nano Energy 113, 108576 (2023).10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108576 ↗
92. Wolf, M. P., Salieb-Beugelaar, G. B. & Hunziker, P. PDMS with designer functionalities—Properties, modifications strategies, and applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 83, 97–134 (2018).10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.06.001 ↗
93. Jiao, C. et al. Hydrogel-based soft bioelectronic interfaces and their applications. J. Mater. Chem. C 13, 2620–2645 (2025).10.1039/D4TC04150J ↗
94. Nisticò, R. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) in the packaging industry. Polym. Test. 90, 106707 (2020).10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106707 ↗
95. Jian, G. et al. Excellent high-temperature piezoelectric energy harvesting properties in flexible polyimide/3D PbTiO3 flower composites. Nano Energy 82, 105778 (2021).10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.105778 ↗
96. Rubehn, B. & Stieglitz, T. In vitro evaluation of the long-term stability of polyimide as a material for neural implants. Biomaterials 31, 3449–3458 (2010).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.053 ↗
97. Ali, A., Iqbal, S. & Chen, X. Recent advances in piezoelectric wearable energy harvesting based on human motion: Materials, design, and applications. Energy Strategy Rev. 53, 101422 (2024).10.1016/j.esr.2024.101422 ↗
98. Zhao, Z. et al. Flexible nanogenerators for wearable electronic applications based on piezoelectric materials. Mater. Today Energy 20, 100690 (2021).10.1016/j.mtener.2021.100690 ↗
99. Chen, Z. et al. PVDF/PANi@HNT nanocomposite membranes: pioneering solutions for piezoelectric sensing and energy harvesting efficiency. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 17, 28668–28681 (2025).10.1021/acsami.5c03368 ↗
100. Shin, S.-H. et al. Hemispherically aggregated BaTiO3 nanoparticle composite thin film for high-performance flexible piezoelectric nanogenerator. ACS Nano 8, 2766–2773 (2014).10.1021/nn406481k ↗