journal article·2025-12-28Open access

Tunable magnetic field architecture for bioinspired magnetic pressure sensors featuring low detection limits and wide sensing range

Huiyun Xiao, Feng Xu, Changxiao Wang, Zhiyi Gao, Zidong He, Yuanzhao Wu, Cheng Liu, Jinyun Liu, Dongyang Zhuang, Linqian Liu, Lei Sheng, Wen-Tong Chen, Yiwei Liu, Run-Wei Li

npj Flexible Electronics· Volume 10· Issue 1

Abstract

Magnetic pressure sensors that employ magneto-elastomers to convert pressure stimuli into detectable magnetic signals are widely regarded as promising components for smart wearables. However, achieving both an ultralow detection limit and a broad sensing range within a single device remains a persistent challenge. Here, we present a magnetic amorphous-wire pressure sensor (MAWPS) that simultaneously attains these properties through a multilayer architecture designed to generate a tunable magnetic-field configuration. The device comprises a force-to-magnetic conversion unit (FMCU) and a magnetic sensing unit (MSU). The FMCU incorporates a composite magneto-elastomer formed by integrating cilia-type and film-type structures with opposite magnetization orientations. The magnetic cilia, characterized by low modulus, allows to detect subtle pressure, while the higher-modulus magnetic films modulate the intensity and direction of the magnetic field under larger pressure. This cooperative mechanism ensures that the magnetic field detected by magnetic amorphous wire of MSU remains within the sensitive range. As a result, the MAWPS exhibits a detection limit of 2.4 Pa, a sensing range exceeding 300 kPa, rapid response, and excellent stability. Furthermore, asymmetric wire placement enables shear-direction sensing ability. We further demonstrate the applicability in smart wearable scenarios, including respiratory monitoring, object grasping, morphology recognition, and stress direction sensing.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Advanced Materials and Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. Sun, T. et al. Artificial intelligence meets flexible sensors: emerging smart flexible sensing systems driven by machine learning and artificial synapses. Nano Micro Lett. 16, 14 (2024).10.1007/s40820-023-01235-x ↗
2. Luo, Y. et al. Technology roadmap for flexible sensors. ACS Nano 17, 5211–5295 (2023).10.1021/acsnano.2c12606 ↗
3. Lee, J.-H., Cho, K. & Kim, J.-K. Age of flexible electronics: emerging trends in soft multifunctional sensors. Adv. Mater. 36, 2310505 (2024).10.1002/adma.202310505 ↗
4. Wu, H. et al. Additively manufactured flexible liquid metal–coated self-powered magnetoelectric sensors with high design freedom. Adv. Mater. 36, 2307546 (2024).10.1002/adma.202307546 ↗
5. Zhang, Z. et al. Ultrasensitive flexible pressure sensors with broad linear detection range enabled by magnetically induced self-assembled parallel circuit. Adv. Mater. Technol. 9, 2301646 (2024).10.1002/admt.202301646 ↗
6. Zhou, Y. et al. Giant magnetoelastic effect in soft systems for bioelectronics. Nat. Mater. 20, 1670–1676 (2021).10.1038/s41563-021-01093-1 ↗
7. Ai, J. et al. Graphene/electrospun carbon nanofiber sponge composites induced by magnetic particles for mutil-functional pressure sensor. Carbon 205, 454–462 (2023).10.1016/j.carbon.2023.01.033 ↗
8. Dai, H. et al. Split-type magnetic soft tactile sensor with 3D force decoupling. Adv. Mater. 36, 2310145 (2023).10.1002/adma.202310145 ↗
9. Becker, C. et al. A new dimension for magnetosensitive e-skins: active matrix integrated micro-origami sensor arrays. Nat. Commun. 13, 2121 (2022).10.1038/s41467-022-29802-7 ↗
10. Man, J., Chen, G. & Chen, J. Recent progress of biomimetic tactile sensing technology based on magnetic sensors. Biosensors 12, 1054 (2022).10.3390/bios12111054 ↗
11. Yang, H. et al. Advances in flexible magnetosensitive materials and devices for wearable electronics. Adv. Mater. 36, 2311996 (2024).10.1002/adma.202311996 ↗
12. Marshall, K. & Patapoutian, A. Getting a grip on touch receptors. Science 368, 1311 (2020).10.1126/science.abc7610 ↗
13. Liu, L. et al. Bioinspired, omnidirectional, and hypersensitive flexible strain sensors. Adv. Mater. 34, 2200823 (2022).10.1002/adma.202200823 ↗
14. Pan, L. et al. Flexible sensor based on Hair-like microstructured ionic hydrogel with high sensitivity for pulse wave detection. Chem. Eng. J. 450, 137929 (2022).10.1016/j.cej.2022.137929 ↗
15. Bai, N. et al. Graded interlocks for iontronic pressure sensors with high sensitivity and high linearity over a broad range. ACS Nano 16, 4338–4347 (2022).10.1021/acsnano.1c10535 ↗
16. Kim, T. et al. Ultra-stable and tough bioinspired crack-based tactile sensor for small legged robots. Npj Flex. Electron. 7, 22 (2023).10.1038/s41528-023-00255-2 ↗
17. Shi, Z. et al. Morphological engineering of sensing materials for flexible pressure sensors and artificial intelligence applications. Nano-Micro Lett. 14, 141 (2022).10.1007/s40820-022-00874-w ↗
18. Bi, P. et al. Ultra-sensitive and wide applicable strain sensor enabled by carbon nanofibers with dual alignment for human machine interfaces. Nano Res. 16, 4093–4099 (2023).10.1007/s12274-022-5162-0 ↗
19. Feng, B. et al. A programmable, gradient-composition strategy producing synergistic and ultrahigh sensitivity amplification for flexible pressure sensing. Nano Energy 74, 104847 (2020).10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104847 ↗
20. Cao, K. et al. Beyond skin pressure sensing: 3D printed laminated graphene pressure sensing material combines extremely low detection limits with wide detection range. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2202360 (2022).10.1002/adfm.202202360 ↗
21. Jing, H. et al. A phase-change gel based pressure sensor with tunable sensitivity for artificial tactile feedback systems. J. Mater. Chem. A. 9, 19914 (2021).10.1039/D1TA02791C ↗
22. Wang, J. et al. Stretchable stiffness-tuning of liquid metal elastomer triggered by homocrystal seeds. Appl. Phys. Rev. 11, 021406 (2024).10.1063/5.0185725 ↗
23. Nam, S. et al. Needle-like multifunctional biphasic microfiber for minimally invasive implantable bioelectronics. Adv. Mater. 36, 2404101 (2024).10.1002/adma.202404101 ↗
24. Mao, L. et al. Reconfigurable, stretchable strain sensor with the localized controlling of substrate modulus by two-phase liquid metal cells. Nanomaterials 12, 882 (2022).10.3390/nano12050882 ↗
25. Lee, S. et al. Beyond human touch perception: an adaptive robotic skin based on gallium microgranules for pressure sensory augmentation. Adv. Mater. 34, 2204805 (2022).10.1002/adma.202204805 ↗
26. Hu, H. et al. Wireless flexible magnetic tactile sensor with super-resolution in large-areas. ACS Nano 16, 19271–19280 (2022).10.1021/acsnano.2c08664 ↗
27. Zhao, X. et al. A soft magnetoelastic generator for wind-energy harvesting. Adv. Mater. 34, 2204238 (2022).10.1002/adma.202204238 ↗
28. Chen, G. et al. Wearable ultrahigh current power source based on giant magnetoelastic effect in soft elastomer system. ACS Nano 15, 20582–20589 (2021).10.1021/acsnano.1c09274 ↗
29. Man, J. et al. A tactile and airflow motion sensor based on flexible double-layer magnetic cilia. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 9, 12 (2023).10.1038/s41378-022-00478-9 ↗
30. Wu, Z. et al. Flexible out-of-plane wind sensors with a self-powered feature inspired by fine hairs of the spider. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 44865–44873 (2019).10.1021/acsami.9b15382 ↗
31. Zhang, J. et al. Biomimic hairy skin tactile sensor based on ferromagnetic microwires. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 33848–33855 (2016).10.1021/acsami.6b14236 ↗
32. Ge, J. et al. A bimodal soft electronic skin for tactile and touchless interaction in real time. Nat. Commun. 10, 4405 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-12303-5 ↗
33. Zhang, X. et al. Magnetoelectric soft composites with a self-powered tactile sensing capacity. Nano Energy 69, 104391 (2020).10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104391 ↗
34. Zhao, X. et al. Giant magnetoelastic effect enabled stretchable sensor for self-powered biomonitoring. ACS Nano 16, 6013–6022 (2022).10.1021/acsnano.1c11350 ↗
35. Bermúdez, G. S. C. et al. Magnetosensitive e-skins with directional perception for augmented reality. Sci. Adv. 4, eaao2623 (2018).10.1126/sciadv.aao2623 ↗
36. Mata, E. S. O. et al. Printable anisotropic magnetoresistance sensors for highly compliant electronics. Appl. Phys. A. 127, 280 (2021).10.1007/s00339-021-04411-1 ↗
37. Dai, T. et al. Ultrasensitive magnetic sensors enabled by heterogeneous integration of graphene hall elements and silicon processing circuits. ACS Nano 14, 17606–17614 (2020).10.1021/acsnano.0c08435 ↗
38. Ding, L. et al. Stress and magnetic field bimode detection sensors based on flexible CI/CNTs-PDMS sponges. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 30774–30784 (2018).10.1021/acsami.8b11333 ↗
39. Granell, P. N. et al. Highly compliant planar Hall effect sensor with sub 200 nT sensitivity. Npj Flex. Electron. 3, 3 (2019).10.1038/s41528-018-0046-9 ↗
40. Mostufa, S. et al. Flexible magnetic field nanosensors for wearable electronics: a review. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 6, 13732–13765 (2023).10.1021/acsanm.3c01936 ↗
41. Xiao, H. et al. Dual mode strain–temperature sensor with high stimuli discriminability and resolution for smart wearables. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33, 2214907 (2023).10.1002/adfm.202214907 ↗
42. Pei, C. et al. Superlattice-shelled nanocrystalline core structural design for highly sensitive GMI sensors. Acta Mater. 255, 119088 (2023).10.1016/j.actamat.2023.119088 ↗
43. Li, S. et al. Wearable magnetic field sensor with low detection limit and wide operation range for electronic skin applications. Adv. Sci. 11, 2304525 (2024).10.1002/advs.202304525 ↗
44. Ha, M. et al. Reconfigurable magnetic origami actuators with on-board sensing for guided assembly. Adv. Mater. 33, e2008751 (2021).10.1002/adma.202008751 ↗
45. Ding, Q. et al. Stretchable, self-healable, and breathable biomimetic iontronics with superior humidity-sensing performance for wireless respiration monitoring. SmartMat. 4, e1147 (2023).10.1002/smm2.1147 ↗
46. Hu, D. et al. Stretchable e-skin and transformer enable high-resolution morphological reconstruction for soft robots. Nat. Mach. Intell. 5, 261–272 (2023).10.1038/s42256-023-00622-8 ↗
47. Huber, C. et al. Polymer-bonded anisotropic SrFe12O19 filaments for fused filament fabrication. J. Appl. Phys. 127, 063904 (2020).10.1063/1.5139493 ↗
48. Xu, W. et al. 3D printing-enabled nanoparticle alignment: a review of mechanisms and applications. Small 17, 1 (2021).10.1002/smll.202100817 ↗
49. Wu, Y. et al. A skin-inspired tactile sensor for smart prosthetics. Sci. Robot. 3, eaat0429 (2018).10.1126/scirobotics.aat0429 ↗
50. Zhu, Z. et al. A novel induction-type pressure sensor based on magneto-stress impedance and magnetoelastic coupling effect for monitoring hand rehabilitation. Small 20, 2400797 (2024).10.1002/smll.202400797 ↗
51. Gao, J. et al. Flexible, superhydrophobic, and electrically conductive polymer nanofiber composite for multifunctional sensing applications. Chem. Eng. J. 381, 122778 (2020).10.1016/j.cej.2019.122778 ↗
52. Zhao, X. et al. Soft fibers with magnetoelasticity for wearable electronics. Nat. Commun. 12, 6755 (2021).10.1038/s41467-021-27066-1 ↗
53. Vicente, B. A., Sebastião, R. & Sencadas, V. Wearable devices for respiratory monitoring. Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2404348 (2024).10.1002/adfm.202404348 ↗
54. Liu, M. et al. Non-invasive flexible electro-mechanical sensors for human respiratory monitoring and chronic disease management. Adv. Mater. Technol. 9, 2302010 (2024).10.1002/admt.202302010 ↗