Mechanically-adaptive, resveratrol-eluting neural probes for improved intracortical recording performance and stability
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Intracortical microelectrodes are used for recording activity from individual neurons, providing both a valuable neuroscience tool and an enabling medical technology for individuals with motor disabilities. Standard neural probes carrying the microelectrodes are rigid silicon-based structures that can penetrate the brain parenchyma to interface with the targeted neurons. Unfortunately, within weeks after implantation, neural recording quality from microelectrodes degrades, owing largely to a neuroinflammatory response. Key contributors to the neuroinflammatory response include mechanical mismatch at the device-tissue interface and oxidative stress. We developed a mechanically-adaptive, resveratrol-eluting (MARE) neural probe to mitigate both mechanical mismatch and oxidative stress and thereby promote improved neural recording quality and longevity. In this work, we demonstrate that compared to rigid silicon controls, highly-flexible MARE probes exhibit improved recording performance, more stable impedance, and a healing tissue response. With further optimization, MARE probes can serve as long-term, robust neural probes for brain-machine interface applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Neuroscience and Neural Engineering · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Jorfi, M., Skousen, J. L., Weder, C. & Capadona, J. R. Progress towards biocompatible intracortical microelectrodes for neural interfacing applications. J. Neural Eng. 12, 011001 (2015).10.1088/1741-2560/12/1/011001 ↗
2. Nicolelis, M. A. Brain-machine interfaces to restore motor function and probe neural circuits. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4, 417–422 (2003).10.1038/nrn1105 ↗
3. Hochberg, L. R. et al. Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm. Nature 485, 372–375 (2012).10.1038/nature11076 ↗
4. Ajiboye, A. B. et al. Restoration of reaching and grasping movements through brain-controlled muscle stimulation in a person with tetraplegia: a proof-of-concept demonstration. Lancet 389, 1821–1830 (2017).10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30601-3 ↗
5. Burns, A., Adeli, H. & Buford, J. A. Brain–computer interface after nervous system injury. Neuroscientist 20, 639–651 (2014).10.1177/1073858414549015 ↗
6. Collinger, J. L. et al. Functional priorities, assistive technology, and brain-computer interfaces after spinal cord injury. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 50, 145–160 (2013).10.1682/JRRD.2011.11.0213 ↗
7. Eapen, B. C., Murphy, D. P. & Cifu, D. X. Neuroprosthetics in amputee and brain injury rehabilitation. Exp. Neurol. 287, 479–485 (2017).10.1016/j.expneurol.2016.08.004 ↗
8. Tayebi, H. et al. Applications of brain-computer interfaces in neurodegenerative diseases. Neurosurg. Rev. 46, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-02038-9 (2023).10.1007/s10143-023-02038-9 ↗
9. Bronte-Stewart, H. M. et al. Perspective: Evolution of control variables and policies for closed-loop deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease using bidirectional deep-brain-computer interfaces. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 14, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00353 (2020).10.3389/fnhum.2020.00353 ↗
10. Usoro, J. O., Sturgill, B. S., Musselman, K. C., Capadona, J. R. & Pancrazio, J. J. Intracortical microelectrode array unit yield under chronic conditions: a comparative evaluation. Micromachines 12, 972 (2021).10.3390/mi12080972 ↗
11. Ward, M. P., Rajdev, P., Ellison, C. & Irazoqui, P. P. Toward a comparison of microelectrodes for acute and chronic recordings. Brain Res. 1282, 183–200 (2009).10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.052 ↗
12. Barrese, J. C. et al. Failure mode analysis of silicon-based intracortical microelectrode arrays in non-human primates. J. Neural Eng. 10, 066014 (2013).10.1088/1741-2560/10/6/066014 ↗
13. Rousche, P. J. & Normann, R. A. Chronic recording capability of the Utah Intracortical Electrode Array in cat sensory cortex. J. Neurosci. Methods 82, 1–15 (1998).10.1016/S0165-0270(98)00031-4 ↗
14. Suner, S., Fellows, M. R., Vargas-Irwin, C., Nakata, G. K. & Donoghue, J. P. Reliability of signals from a chronically implanted, silicon-based electrode array in non-human primate primary motor cortex. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 13, 524–541 (2005).10.1109/TNSRE.2005.857687 ↗
15. Liu, X., McCreery, D. B., Bullara, L. A. & Agnew, W. F. Evaluation of the stability of intracortical microelectrode arrays. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 14, 91–100 (2006).10.1109/TNSRE.2006.870495 ↗
16. Liu, X. et al. Stability of the interface between neural tissue and chronically implanted intracortical microelectrodes. IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 7, 315–326 (1999).10.1109/86.788468 ↗
17. Polikov, V., Tresco, P. & Reichert, W. Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes. J. Neurosci. Methods 148, 1–18 (2005).10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.08.015 ↗
18. Nicolelis, M. A. et al. Chronic, multisite, multielectrode recordings in macaque monkeys. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 11041–11046 (2003).10.1073/pnas.1934665100 ↗
19. Williams, J. C., Rennaker, R. L. & Kipke, D. R. Long-term neural recording characteristics of wire microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex. Brain Res. 4, 303–313 (1999).
20. Bjornsson, C. S. et al. Effects of insertion conditions on tissue strain and vascular damage during neuroprosthetic device insertion. J. Neural Eng. 3, 196–207 (2006).10.1088/1741-2560/3/3/002 ↗
21. Pollock, A. L. Early Brain Tissue Reaction Surrounding the Michigan-style Microelectrode Arrays Indicates that Extensive Remodeling of Glial and Neuronal Populations Occurs during the Foreign Body Response (Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, 2007).
22. Aihara, N., Tanno, H., Hall, J. J., Pitts, L. H. & Noble, L. J. Immunocytochemical localization of immunoglobulins in the rat brain: relationship to the blood-brain barrier. J. Comp. Neurol. 342, 481–496 (1994).10.1002/cne.903420402 ↗
23. Saxena, T. et al. The impact of chronic blood-brain barrier breach on intracortical electrode function. Biomaterials 34, 4703–4713 (2013).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.007 ↗
24. Chen, R., Canales, A. & Anikeeva, P. Neural recording and modulation technologies. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 16093 (2017).10.1038/natrevmats.2016.93 ↗
25. Ferguson, M., Sharma, D., Ross, D. & Zhao, F. A critical review of microelectrode arrays and strategies for improving neural interfaces. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 8, 1900558 (2019).10.1002/adhm.201900558 ↗
26. Fernández, E. & Botella, P. Biotolerability of intracortical microelectrodes. Adv. Biosyst. 2, 1700115 (2017).10.1002/adbi.201700115 ↗
27. Harris, J. P. et al. In vivo deployment of mechanically adaptive nanocomposites for intracortical microelectrodes. J. Neural Eng. 8, 046010 (2011).10.1088/1741-2560/8/4/046010 ↗
28. He, W. & Bellamkonda, R. V. in Indwelling Neural Implants: Strategies for Contending with the In Vivo Environment Frontiers in Neuroengineering (ed. Reichert, W. M.) Ch. 6 (CRC Press, 2008).
29. Lee, H., Bellamkonda, R. V., Sun, W. & Levenston, M. E. Biomechanical analysis of silicon microelectrode-induced strain in the brain. J. Neural Eng. 2, 81–89 (2005).10.1088/1741-2560/2/4/003 ↗
30. Tresco, P. A. & Winslow, B. D. The challenge of integrating devices into the central nervous system. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 39, 29–44 (2011).10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v39.i1.30 ↗
31. Skousen, J. L. et al. Reducing surface area while maintaining implant penetrating profile lowers the brain foreign body response to chronically implanted planar silicon microelectrode arrays. Prog. Brain Res. 194, 167–180 (2011).10.1016/B978-0-444-53815-4.00009-1 ↗
32. Winslow, B. D., Christensen, M. B., Yang, W. K., Solzbacher, F. & Tresco, P. A. A comparison of the tissue response to chronically implanted Parylene-C-coated and uncoated planar silicon microelectrode arrays in rat cortex. Biomaterials 31, 9163–9172 (2010).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.050 ↗
33. Nilsson, B., Ekdahl, K. N., Mollnes, T. E. & Lambris, J. D. The role of complement in biomaterial-induced inflammation. Mol. Immunol. 44, 82–94 (2007).10.1016/j.molimm.2006.06.020 ↗
34. Block, M. L., Zecca, L. & Hong, J. S. Microglia-mediated neurotoxicity: uncovering the molecular mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 57–69 (2007).10.1038/nrn2038 ↗
35. Chao, C. C., Hu, S. & Peterson, P. K. Glia, cytokines, and neurotoxicity. Crit. Rev. Neurobiol. 9, 189–205 (1995).
36. Chao, C. C., Hu, S., Ehrlich, L. & Peterson, P. K. Interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha synergistically mediate neurotoxicity: involvement of nitric oxide and of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. Brain Behav. Immun. 9, 355–365 (1995).10.1006/brbi.1995.1033 ↗
37. Bennett, C. et al. Neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption in acute Utah electrode array implants and the effect of deferoxamine as an iron chelator on acute foreign body response. Biomaterials 188, 144–159 (2019).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.040 ↗
38. Prasad, A. et al. Comprehensive characterization and failure modes of tungsten microwire arrays in chronic neural implants. J. Neural Eng. 9, 056015 (2012).10.1088/1741-2560/9/5/056015 ↗
39. Merrill, D. R. The electrochemistry of charge injection at the electrode/tissue interface. Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, 85–138 (2010).10.1007/978-0-387-98120-8_4 ↗
40. Potter, K. A. et al. Curcumin-releasing mechanically adaptive intracortical implants improve the proximal neuronal density and blood-brain barrier stability. Acta Biomater. 10, 2209–2222 (2014).10.1016/j.actbio.2014.01.018 ↗
41. Potter, K. A. et al. The effect of resveratrol on neurodegeneration and blood brain barrier stability surrounding intracortical microelectrodes. Biomaterials 34, 7001–7015 (2013).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.05.035 ↗
42. Schmitt, G. et al. Passivation and corrosion of microelectrode arrays. Electrochim. Acta 44, 3865–3883 (1999).10.1016/S0013-4686(99)00094-8 ↗
43. Ereifej, E. S. et al. Implantation of neural probes in the brain elicits oxidative stress. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 6, 9 (2018).10.3389/fbioe.2018.00009 ↗
44. Williams, J. C., Hippensteel, J. A., Dilgen, J., Shain, W. & Kipke, D. R. Complex impedance spectroscopy for monitoring tissue responses to inserted neural implants. J. Neural Eng. 4, 410–423 (2007).10.1088/1741-2560/4/4/007 ↗
45. Kim, Y. T., Bridge, M. J. & Tresco, P. A. The influence of the foreign body response evoked by fibroblast transplantation on soluble factor diffusion in surrounding brain tissue. J. Control Release 118, 340–347 (2007).10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.01.002 ↗
46. Burns, B. D., Stean, J. P. & Webb, A. C. Recording for several days from single cortical neurons in completely unrestrained cats. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 36, 314–318 (1974).10.1016/0013-4694(74)90175-8 ↗
47. Moshayedi, P. et al. The relationship between glial cell mechanosensitivity and foreign body reactions in the central nervous system. Biomaterials 35, 3919–3925 (2014).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.038 ↗
48. Csicsvari, J. et al. Massively parallel recording of unit and local field potentials with silicon-based electrodes. J. Neurophysiol. 90, 1314–1323 (2003).10.1152/jn.00116.2003 ↗
49. Fekete, Z. & Pongrácz, A. Multifunctional soft implants to monitor and control neural activity in the central and peripheral nervous system: a review. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 243, 1214–1223 (2017).10.1016/j.snb.2016.12.096 ↗
50. Woods, G. A., Rommelfanger, N. J. & Hong, G. Bioinspired materials for bioelectronic neural interfaces. Matter 3, 1087–1113 (2020).10.1016/j.matt.2020.08.002 ↗
51. Lacour, S. P., Courtine, G. & Guck, J. Materials and technologies for soft implantable neuroprostheses. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16063 (2016).10.1038/natrevmats.2016.63 ↗
52. Ware, T. et al. Fabrication of responsive, softening neural interfaces. Adv. Funct. Mater. 22, 3470–3479 (2012).10.1002/adfm.201200200 ↗
53. Sagdic, K., Fernández-Lavado, E., Mariello, M., Akouissi, O. & Lacour, S. P. Hydrogels and conductive hydrogels for implantable bioelectronics. MRS Bull. https://doi.org/10.1557/s43577-023-00536-1 (2023).10.1557/s43577-023-00536-1 ↗
54. Wellman, S. M. et al. A materials roadmap to functional neural interface design. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1701269 (2018).10.1002/adfm.201701269 ↗
55. Sohal, H. S., Vassilevski, K., Jackson, A., Baker, S. N. & O’Neill, A. Design and microfabrication considerations for reliable flexible intracortical implants. Front. Mech. Eng. 2 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2016.00005 (2016).10.3389/fmech.2016.00005 ↗
56. Sharafkhani, N., Long, J. M., Adams, S. D. & Kouzani, A. Z. A self-stiffening compliant intracortical microprobe. Biomed. Microdevices 26, 17 (2024).10.1007/s10544-024-00700-7 ↗
57. Wang, Y. et al. Flexible multichannel electrodes for acute recording in nonhuman primates. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 9, 93 (2023).10.1038/s41378-023-00550-y ↗
58. Rousche, P. J. et al. Flexible polyimide-based intracortical electrode arrays with bioactive capability. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 48, 361–371 (2001).10.1109/10.914800 ↗
59. Takeuchi, S., Ziegler, D., Yoshida, Y., Mabuchi, K. & Suzuki, T. Parylene flexible neural probes integrated with microfluidic channels. Lab Chip 5, 519–523 (2005).10.1039/b417497f ↗
60. Ware, T. et al. Three-dimensional flexible electronics enabled by shape memory polymer substrates for responsive neural interfaces. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 297, 1193–1202 (2012).10.1002/mame.201200241 ↗
61. Ware, T. et al. Thiol-ene/acrylate substrates for softening intracortical electrodes. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 102, 1–11 (2014).10.1002/jbmb.32946 ↗
62. Ware, T., Simon, D., Rennaker, R. L. & Voit, W. Smart polymers for neural interfaces. Polym. Rev. 53, 108–129 (2013).10.1080/15583724.2012.751924 ↗
63. Capadona, J. R., Shanmuganathan, K., Tyler, D. J., Rowan, S. J. & Weder, C. Stimuli-responsive polymer nanocomposites inspired by the sea cucumber dermis. Science 319, 1370–1374 (2008).10.1126/science.1153307 ↗
64. Shanmuganathan, K., Capadona, J. R., Rowan, S. J. & Weder, C. Stimuli-responsive mechanically adaptive polymer nanocomposites. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2, 165–174 (2010).10.1021/am9006337 ↗
65. Sridharan, A., Nguyen, J. K., Capadona, J. R. & Muthuswamy, J. Compliant intracortical implants reduce strains and strain rates in brain tissue in vivo. J. Neural Eng. 12, 036002 (2015).10.1088/1741-2560/12/3/036002 ↗
66. Nguyen, J. K. et al. Mechanically-compliant intracortical implants reduce the neuroinflammatory response. J. Neural Eng. 11, 056014 (2014).10.1088/1741-2560/11/5/056014 ↗
67. Harris, J. et al. Mechanically adaptive intracortical implants improve the proximity of neuronal cell bodies. J. Neural Eng. 8, 066011 (2011).10.1088/1741-2560/8/6/066011 ↗
68. Nguyen, J. K. et al. Influence of resveratrol release on the tissue response to mechanically adaptive cortical implants. Acta Biomater. 29, 81–93 (2016).10.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.001 ↗
69. Ziemba, A. M. et al. Development of a slow-degrading polymerized curcumin coating for intracortical microelectrodes. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 6, 806–818 (2023).10.1021/acsabm.2c00969 ↗
70. Haley, R. M. et al. Resveratrol delivery from implanted cyclodextrin polymers provides sustained antioxidant effect on implanted neural probes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 3579 (2020).10.3390/ijms21103579 ↗
71. Potter-Baker, K. A. et al. Implications of chronic daily anti-oxidant administration on the inflammatory response to intracortical microelectrodes. J. Neural Eng. 12, 046002 (2015).10.1088/1741-2560/12/4/046002 ↗
72. Leonard, S. S. et al. Resveratrol scavenges reactive oxygen species and effects radical-induced cellular responses. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 309, 1017–1026 (2003).10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.08.105 ↗
73. Holthoff, J. H. et al. Resveratrol, a dietary polyphenolic phytoalexin, is a functional scavenger of peroxynitrite. Biochem. Pharmacol. 80, 1260–1265 (2010).10.1016/j.bcp.2010.06.027 ↗
74. Jardim, F. R. et al. Resveratrol and brain mitochondria: a review. Mol. Neurobiol. 55, 2085–2101 (2018).10.1007/s12035-017-0448-z ↗
75. Bartra Cabré, C. et al. Resveratrol activates antioxidant protective mechanisms in cellular models of Alzheimer’s disease inflammation. Antioxidants 13, 177 (2024).10.3390/antiox13020177 ↗
76. Potter, K. A., Buck, A. C., Self, W. K. & Capadona, J. R. Stab injury and device implantation within the brain results in inversely multiphasic neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative responses. J. Neural Eng. 9, 046020 (2012).10.1088/1741-2560/9/4/046020 ↗
77. Nolta, N. F., Christensen, M. B., Crane, P. D., Skousen, J. L. & Tresco, P. A. BBB leakage, astrogliosis, and tissue loss correlate with silicon microelectrode array recording performance. Biomaterials 53, 753–762 (2015).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.081 ↗
78. Kim, Y. et al. In vivo validation of a mechanically adaptive microfluidic intracortical device as a platform for sustained local drug delivery. Front. Biomater. Sci. 2, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbiom.2023.1279367 (2023).10.3389/fbiom.2023.1279367 ↗
79. Mueller, N. N. et al. Effects of micromachining on anti-oxidant elution from a mechanically-adaptive polymer. J. Micromech. Microeng. 34, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6439/ad27f7 (2024).10.1088/1361-6439/ad27f7 ↗
80. Hess-Dunning, A. & Tyler, D. J. A mechanically-adaptive polymer nanocomposite-based intracortical probe and package for chronic neural recording. Micromachines 9, 583 (2018).10.3390/mi9110583 ↗
81. Hess, A. E. et al. Development of a stimuli-responsive polymer nanocomposite toward biologically optimized, MEMS-based neural probes. J. Micromech. Microeng. 21, 54009–54017 (2011).10.1088/0960-1317/21/5/054009 ↗
82. Hoeferlin, G. F. et al. Antioxidant dimethyl fumarate temporarily but not chronically improves intracortical microelectrode performance. Micromachines 14, 1902 (2023).10.3390/mi14101902 ↗
83. Hernandez-Reynoso, A. G. et al. The effect of a Mn(III)tetrakis(4-benzoic acid)porphyrin (MnTBAP) coating on the chronic recording performance of planar silicon intracortical microelectrode arrays. Biomaterials 303, 122351 (2023).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.122351 ↗
84. Maynard, E. M., Fernandez, E. & Normann, R. A. A technique to prevent dural adhesions to chronically implanted microelectrode arrays. J. Neurosci. Methods 97, 93–101 (2000).10.1016/S0165-0270(00)00159-X ↗
85. Chen, K., Cambi, F. & Kozai, T. D. Y. Pro-myelinating clemastine administration improves recording performance of chronically implanted microelectrodes and nearby neuronal health. Biomaterials 301, 122210 (2023).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.122210 ↗
86. Senzai, Y., Fernandez-Ruiz, A. & Buzsaki, G. Layer-specific physiological features and interlaminar interactions in the primary visual cortex of the mouse. Neuron 101, 500–513.e505 (2019).10.1016/j.neuron.2018.12.009 ↗
87. Tseng, H. A. & Han, X. Distinct spiking patterns of excitatory and inhibitory neurons and LFP oscillations in prefrontal cortex during sensory discrimination. Front. Physiol. 12, 618307 (2021).10.3389/fphys.2021.618307 ↗
88. Salvesen, G. S. & Walsh, C. M. Functions of caspase 8: the identified and the mysterious. Semin. Immunol. 26, 246–252 (2014).10.1016/j.smim.2014.03.005 ↗
89. Mracsko, E. et al. Leukocyte invasion of the brain after experimental intracerebral hemorrhage in mice. Stroke 45, 2107–2114 (2014).10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005801 ↗
90. Chistiakov, D. A., Killingsworth, M. C., Myasoedova, V. A., Orekhov, A. N. & Bobryshev, Y. V. CD68/macrosialin: not just a histochemical marker. Lab. Investig. 97, 4–13 (2017).10.1038/labinvest.2016.116 ↗
91. Ma, Y. et al. Microglia LILRB4 upregulation reduces brain damage after acute ischemic stroke by limiting CD8+ T cell recruitment. J. Neuroinflammation 21, 214 (2024).10.1186/s12974-024-03206-4 ↗
92. Ghannam, K. et al. Upregulation of immunoproteasome subunits in myositis indicates active inflammation with involvement of antigen presenting cells, CD8 T-cells and IFNγ. PLoS ONE 9, e104048 (2014).10.1371/journal.pone.0104048 ↗
93. Yim, A., Smith, C. & Brown, A. M. Osteopontin/secreted phosphoprotein-1 harnesses glial-, immune-, and neuronal cell ligand-receptor interactions to sense and regulate acute and chronic neuroinflammation. Immunol. Rev. 311, 224–233 (2022).10.1111/imr.13081 ↗
94. Shih, R.-H., Wang, C.-Y. & Yang, C.-M. NF-kappaB signaling pathways in neurological inflammation: a mini review. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 8 https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2015.00077 (2015).10.3389/fnmol.2015.00077 ↗
95. Pekny, M. & Nilsson, M. Astrocyte activation and reactive gliosis. Glia 50, 427–434 (2005).10.1002/glia.20207 ↗
96. Garlanda, C., Bottazzi, B., Magrini, E., Inforzato, A. & Mantovani, A. PTX3, a humoral pattern recognition molecule, in innate immunity, tissue repair, and cancer. Physiol. Rev. 98, 623–639 (2018).10.1152/physrev.00016.2017 ↗
97. Yao, H. et al. Histone Arg modifications and p53 regulate the expression of OKL38, a mediator of apoptosis *. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 20060–20068 (2008).10.1074/jbc.M802940200 ↗
98. Sarkar, C. et al. PLA2G4A/cPLA2-mediated lysosomal membrane damage leads to inhibition of autophagy and neurodegeneration after brain trauma. Autophagy 16, 466–485 (2020).10.1080/15548627.2019.1628538 ↗
99. Liu, X., Xu, C., Xiao, W. & Yan, N. Unravelling the role of NFE2L1 in stress responses and related diseases. Redox Biol. 65, 102819 (2023).10.1016/j.redox.2023.102819 ↗
100. Martins, D., Moreira, J., Gonçalves, N. P. & Saraiva, M. J. MMP-14 overexpression correlates with the neurodegenerative process in familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy. Dis. Model. Mech. 10, 1253–1260 (2017).10.1242/dmm.028571 ↗