journal article·2025-11-18Open access

Simultaneous decoding of static, dynamic, and thermal tactile stimuli by using pulsed spike signals in ion-electronic skin

Hyeongseok Choi, Jungeun Lee, Seungmoon Choi, Taeyeong Kim, Unyong Jeong

npj Flexible Electronics· Volume 9· Issue 1

Abstract

Concurrent perception of static and dynamic tactile stimuli is essential for natural haptic feedback and precise manipulation. However, most artificial tactile sensors remain limited to either static, dynamic, or temperature sensing due to reliance on specific mechanisms for each modality. Integrating these capabilities in a single artificial receptor is still challenging, particularly when spike-based signals are used as the primary encoding strategies. Here, we present an artificial sensory receptor that decodes spike patterns to perceive static, dynamic, and thermal stimuli simultaneously. By applying a pulsed DC bias across a mixed ion–electron conductor, the device continuously produces encoded spike patterns without additional signal conversion circuitry. Furthermore, the engineered combination of stretchable electrodes and the mixed conductor allows decoupling of mechanical and thermal responses, eliminating signal interference. This simple structure enables reliable, real-time recognition of multiple tactile inputs, including pressure, strain, temperature, and vibration, through a single channel.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Tactile and Sensory Interactions · Dielectric materials and actuators

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Vallbo, A. B. & Johansson, R. S. Properties of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the human hand related to touch sensation. Hum. Neurobiol. 3, 3–14 (1984).
2. Granovsky, Y. et al. Thermoreceptive innervation of human glabrous and hairy skin: A contact heat evoked potential analysis. Pain 115, 238–248 (2005).10.1016/j.pain.2005.02.017 ↗
3. Tuthill, J. C. & Wilson, R. I. Parallel transformation of tactile signals in central circuits of Drosophila. Cell 164, 1046–1059 (2016).10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.014 ↗
4. Luo, Y. et al. Technology roadmap for flexible sensors. ACS Nano 17, 5211–5295 (2023).10.1021/acsnano.2c12606 ↗
5. Boahen, E. K. et al. Bio-inspired neuromorphic sensory systems from intelligent perception to nervetronics. Adv. Sci. 12, 2409568 (2025).10.1002/advs.202409568 ↗
6. Tee, B. C.-K. et al. A skin-inspired organic digital mechanoreceptor. Sci 350, 313–316 (2015).10.1126/science.aaa9306 ↗
7. Parvizi-Fard, A. et al. A functional spiking neuronal network for tactile sensing pathway to process edge orientation. Sci. Rep. 11, 1320 (2021).10.1038/s41598-020-80132-4 ↗
8. Tan, H. et al. Tactile sensory coding and learning with bio-inspired optoelectronic spiking afferent nerves. Nat. Commun. 11, 1369 (2020).10.1038/s41467-020-15105-2 ↗
9. Chen, L. et al. Spike timing–based coding in neuromimetic tactile system enables dynamic object. Sci 384, 660–665 (2024).10.1126/science.adf3708 ↗
10. Zhang, X. et al. An artificial spiking afferent nerve based on Mott memristors for neurorobotics. Nat. Commun. 11, 51 (2020).10.1038/s41467-019-13827-6 ↗
11. Jiang, C. et al. A flexible artificial sensory nerve enabled by nanoparticle-assembled synaptic devices for neuromorphic tactile recognition. Adv. Sci. 9, 2106124 (2022).10.1002/advs.202106124 ↗
12. Han, J.-K. et al. Self-powered artificial mechanoreceptor based on triboelectrification for a neuromorphic tactile system. Adv. Sci. 9, 2270058 (2022).10.1002/advs.202270058 ↗
13. Yuan, R. et al. A neuromorphic physiological signal processing system based on VO₂ memristor for next-generation human-machine interface. Nat. Commun. 14, 3695 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-39430-4 ↗
14. Gong, S. et al. Materials-driven soft wearable bioelectronics for connected healthcare. Chem. Rev. 124, 455–553 (2024).10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00502 ↗
15. Wu, Y. et al. A skin-inspired tactile sensor for smart prosthetics. Sci. Robot. 3, eaat0429 (2018).10.1126/scirobotics.aat0429 ↗
16. Sankar, S. et al. A natural biomimetic prosthetic hand with neuromorphic tactile sensing for precise and compliant grasping. Sci. Adv. 11, eadr9300 (2025).10.1126/sciadv.adr9300 ↗
17. Tan, H. et al. Bioinspired multisensory neural network with crossmodal integration and recognition. Nat. Commun. 12, 1120 (2021).10.1038/s41467-021-21404-z ↗
18. Zhu, J. et al. A heterogeneously integrated spiking neuron array for multimode-fused perception and object classification. Adv. Mater. 34, 2200481 (2022).10.1002/adma.202200481 ↗
19. You, I. et al. Artificial multimodal receptors based on ion relaxation dynamics. Sci 370, 961–965 (2020).10.1126/science.aba5132 ↗
20. Li, F. et al. Printable and stretchable temperature-strain dual-sensing nanocomposite with high sensitivity and perfect stimulus discriminability. Nano Lett. 20, 6176–6184 (2020).10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c02519 ↗
21. Rao, J. et al. Tactile electronic skin to simultaneously detect and distinguish between temperature and pressure based on a triboelectric nanogenerator. Nano Energy 75, 105073 (2020).10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105073 ↗
22. Zhang, H. et al. Bioinspired chromotropic ionic skin with in-plane strain/temperature/pressure multimodal sensing and ultrahigh stimuli discriminability. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2208362 (2022).10.1002/adfm.202208362 ↗
23. Kim, Y. et al. A bioinspired flexible organic artificial afferent nerve. Science 360, 998–1003 (2018).10.1126/science.aao0098 ↗
24. Bang, J. et al. Bioinspired electronics for intelligent soft robots. Nat. Rev. Electr. Eng. 1, 597–613 (2024).10.1038/s44287-024-00081-2 ↗
25. Lv, J., Thangavel, G. & Lee, P. S. Reliability of printed stretchable electronics based on nano/micro materials for practical applications. Nanoscale 15, 434–449 (2023).10.1039/D2NR04464A ↗
26. Kim, T. et al. Dynamic tactility by position-encoded spike spectrum. Sci. Robot. 7, eabl5761 (2022).10.1126/scirobotics.abl5761 ↗
27. Shin, Y.-E. et al. Ultrasensitive multimodal tactile sensors with skin-inspired microstructures through localized ferroelectric polarization. Adv. Sci. 9, 2105423 (2022).10.1002/advs.202105423 ↗
28. Ghosh, S. K. et al. A fully biodegradable ferroelectric skin sensor from edible porcine skin gelatine. Adv. Sci. 8, 2005010 (2021).10.1002/advs.202005010 ↗
29. Kim, T. Y., Suh, W. & Jeong, U. Approaches to deformable physical sensors: Electronic versus iontronic. Mater. Sci. Eng.: R. 146, 100640 (2021).10.1016/j.mser.2021.100640 ↗
30. Suh, W. et al. Shear-pressure decoupling and accurate perception of shear directions in ionic sensors by analyzing the frequency-dependent ionic behavior. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15, 51538–51548 (2023).10.1021/acsami.3c12924 ↗
31. Lee, H.-R., Kim, C.-C. & Sun, J.-Y. Stretchable ionics - a promising candidate for upcoming wearable devices. Adv. Mater. 30, 1704403 (2018).10.1002/adma.201704403 ↗
32. Kim, H. W. et al. Water-saturated ion gel for humidity-independent high precision epidermal ionic temperature sensor. Adv. Sci. 9, 2200687 (2022).10.1002/advs.202200687 ↗
33. Faiz, S. et al. High-precision stretchable ionic temperature sensor passivated with a liquid metal/block copolymer multilayer film. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15, 28825–28832 (2023).10.1021/acsami.3c03811 ↗
34. Volkov, A. V. et al. Understanding the capacitance of PEDOT:PSS. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1700329 (2017).10.1002/adfm.201700329 ↗
35. Kim, S. Y. et al. Highly conductive, conformable ionic laser-induced graphene electrodes for flexible iontronic devices. Sci. Rep. 14, 4599 (2024).10.1038/s41598-024-55082-w ↗
36. Zhang, G., Chen, Z., Ahn, C. H. & Suo, Z. Conducting polymer coatings prepared by mixed emulsions are highly conductive and stable in water. Adv. Mater. 36, 2306960 (2024).10.1002/adma.202306960 ↗
37. Choi, H. & Jeong, U. Purposive design of stretchable composite electrodes for strain-negative, strain-neutral, and strain-positive ionic sensors. Adv. Mater. 35, 2306795 (2023).10.1002/adma.202306795 ↗
38. Park, D. et al. Stretchable anisotropic conductive film with position-registered conductive microparticles used for strain-insensitive ionic interfacing in stretchable ionic sensors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2408902 (2024).10.1002/adfm.202408902 ↗
39. Zhao, Y. et al. Soft strain-insensitive bioelectronics featuring brittle materials. Sci 378, 1222–1227 (2022).10.1126/science.abn5142 ↗
40. Mejia-Aguilar, A. & Pallas-Areny, R. Electrical impedance measurement using pulse excitation. Proc. 16th IMEKO TC4 Symp.: Italy, 567−572 (2008).
41. Ehrensberger, M. T. & Gilbert, J. L. A time-based potential step analysis of electrochemical impedance incorporating a constant phase element: A study of commercially pure titanium in phosphate buffered saline. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A 93, 576–584 (2010).10.1002/jbm.a.32550 ↗
42. Tzaneva, B. et al. Electrochemical properties of PEDOT:PSS/graphene conductive layers in artificial sweat. Sensors 24, 39 (2024).10.3390/s24010039 ↗
43. Gong, S., Zhu, Z. H. & Li, Z. Electron tunneling and hopping effects on the temperature coefficient of resistance of carbon nanotube/polymer nanocomposites. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 5113–5120 (2017).10.1039/C6CP08115K ↗
44. Chen, H. et al. Human skin-inspired integrated multidimensional sensors based on highly anisotropic structures. Mater. Horiz. 7, 2378–2389 (2020).10.1039/D0MH00922A ↗
45. Ha, S.-H. et al. Highly sensitive and selective multidimensional resistive strain sensors based on a stiffness-variant stretchable substrate. Nanoscale 10, 5105–5113 (2018).10.1039/C7NR08118A ↗
46. Bae, G. Y. et al. Pressure/temperature sensing bimodal electronic skin with stimulus discriminability and linear sensitivity. Adv. Mater. 30, 1803388 (2018).10.1002/adma.201803388 ↗
47. Wang, P. et al. Printable, flexible, breathable and sweatproof bifunctional sensors based on an all-nanofiber platform for fully decoupled pressure–temperature sensing application. Chem. Eng. J. 452, 139174 (2023).10.1016/j.cej.2022.139174 ↗
48. Wu, J. et al. Highly sensitive temperature–pressure bimodal aerogel with stimulus discriminability for human physiological monitoring. Nano Lett. 22, 4459–4467 (2022).10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c01145 ↗
49. Park, J. et al. Fingertip skin–inspired microstructured ferroelectric skins discriminate static/dynamic pressure and temperature stimuli. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500661 (2015).10.1126/sciadv.1500661 ↗
50. Guo, Y. et al. Haptic artificial muscle skin for extended reality. Sci. Adv. 10, eadr1765 (2024).10.1126/sciadv.adr1765 ↗
51. Lee, Y. et al. Mimicking human and biological skins for multifunctional skin electronics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1904523 (2020).10.1002/adfm.201904523 ↗
52. Yoon, H. et al. Adaptive epidermal bioelectronics by highly breathable and stretchable metal nanowire bioelectrodes on electrospun nanofiber membrane. Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2313504 (2024).10.1002/adfm.202313504 ↗
53. Niu, H. et al. Perception-to-Cognition Tactile Sensing Based on Artificial-Intelligence-Motivated Human Full-Skin Bionic Electronic Skin. Adv. Mater. 34, 2202622 (2022).10.1002/adma.202202622 ↗
54. Niu, H. et al. Micropyramid Array Bimodal Electronic Skin for Intelligent Material and Surface Shape Perception Based on Capacitive Sensing. Adv. Sci. 11, 2305528 (2024).10.1002/advs.202305528 ↗
55. Niu, H. et al. Intelligent Robotic Sensory System with Epidermis-Dermis Bionic Electronic Skin for Autonomous Hardness/Softness-Based Material Perception. Adv. Funct. Mater. 35, 2500511 (2025).10.1002/adfm.202500511 ↗